Determination of the Binding Specificity of the SH2 Domains of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 through the Screening of a Combinatorial Phosphotyrosyl Peptide Library†

Biochemistry ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (43) ◽  
pp. 13251-13260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk D. Beebe ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Gulnur Arabaci ◽  
Dehua Pei
Biochemistry ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (29) ◽  
pp. 9229-9236 ◽  
Author(s):  
David De Souza ◽  
Louis J. Fabri ◽  
Andrew Nash ◽  
Douglas J. Hilton ◽  
Nicos A. Nicola ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 976-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Kimura ◽  
Mirai Tanigawa ◽  
Junko Kawawaki ◽  
Kenji Takagi ◽  
Tsunehiro Mizushima ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Yeast Bro1 and Rim20 belong to a family of proteins which possess a common architecture of Bro1 and V domains. Alix and His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase (HD-PTP), mammalian Bro1 family proteins, bind YP(X) n L ( n = 1 to 3) motifs in their target proteins through their V domains. In Alix, the Phe residue, which is located in the hydrophobic groove of the V domain, is critical for binding to the YP(X) n L motif. Although the overall sequences are not highly conserved between mammalian and yeast V domains, we show that the conserved Phe residue in the yeast Bro1 V domain is important for binding to its YP(X) n L-containing target protein, Rfu1. Furthermore, we show that Rim20 binds to its target protein Rim101 through the interaction between the V domain of Rim20 and the YPIKL motif of Rim101. The mutation of either the critical Phe residue in the Rim20 V domain or the YPIKL motif of Rim101 affected the Rim20-mediated processing of Rim101. These results suggest that the interactions between V domains and YP(X) n L motif-containing proteins are conserved from yeast to mammalian cells. Moreover, the specificities of each V domain to their target protein suggest that unidentified elements determine the binding specificity.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3838-3850 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Timms ◽  
Kristen Carlberg ◽  
Haihua Gu ◽  
Haiyan Chen ◽  
Shubhangi Kamatkar ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 is a critical regulator of macrophage biology, but its detailed mechanism of action remains largely undefined. SHP-1 associates with a 130-kDa tyrosyl-phosphorylated species (P130) in macrophages, suggesting that P130 might be an SHP-1 regulator and/or substrate. Here we show that P130 consists of two transmembrane glycoproteins, which we identify as PIR-B/p91A and the signal-regulatory protein (SIRP) family member BIT. These proteins also form separate complexes with SHP-2. BIT, but not PIR-B, is in a complex with the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), suggesting that BIT may direct SHP-1 to the CSF-1R. BIT and PIR-B bind preferentially to substrate-trapping mutants of SHP-1 and are hyperphosphorylated in macrophages from motheaten viable mice, which express catalytically impaired forms of SHP-1, indicating that these proteins are SHP-1 substrates. However, BIT and PIR-B are hypophosphorylated in motheaten macrophages, which completely lack SHP-1 expression. These data suggest a model in which SHP-1 dephosphorylates specific sites on BIT and PIR-B while protecting other sites from dephosphorylation via its SH2 domains. Finally, BIT and PIR-B associate with two tyrosyl phosphoproteins and a tyrosine kinase activity. Tyrosyl phosphorylation of these proteins and the level of the associated kinase activity are increased in the absence of SHP-1. Our data suggest that BIT and PIR-B recruit multiple signaling molecules to receptor complexes, where they are regulated by SHP-1 and/or SHP-2.


Biochemistry ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (49) ◽  
pp. 13414-13418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Townley ◽  
Shi Hsiang Shen ◽  
Denis Banville ◽  
Chidambaram Ramachandran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document