Control of Charge Transfer in Donor/Acceptor Metal–Organic Frameworks

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Miyasaka
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (40) ◽  
pp. 25772-25779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel M. Usov ◽  
Chanel F. Leong ◽  
Bun Chan ◽  
Mikihiro Hayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Kitagawa ◽  
...  

Donor–Acceptor Metal–Organic Frameworks display redox and pressure dependent charge transfer properties.


2020 ◽  
Vol 528 ◽  
pp. 147053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siqi Wang ◽  
Fanqi Meng ◽  
Xuejiao Sun ◽  
Mingjun Bao ◽  
Jiawen Ren ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 117 (39) ◽  
pp. 19991-20001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Wack ◽  
Renée Siegel ◽  
Tim Ahnfeldt ◽  
Norbert Stock ◽  
Luís Mafra ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 427 ◽  
pp. 132037
Author(s):  
Fanxi Sun ◽  
Xiaoyu Xiong ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Yongli Duan ◽  
Lijun Mao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 3282-3289 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yamamoto ◽  
J. Pirillo ◽  
Y. Hijikata ◽  
Z. Zhang ◽  
K. Awaga

Using the “crystal sponge” approach, weak organic electron donor molecules were impregnated and evenly distributed in a crystal of a metal–organic framework (MOF), with the self-assembly of the donor–acceptor pairs with electron acceptor ligands. The nanopores of the MOF confined them and induced a charge transfer phenomenon, which would not occur between donor and acceptor molecules in a bulk scale.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (46) ◽  
pp. 29142-29151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Adams ◽  
Nicolò Baroni ◽  
Michael Oldenburg ◽  
Felix Kraffert ◽  
Jan Behrends ◽  
...  

Upon prolonged illumination photoproducts are created in porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks that limit the triplet exciton lifetime by charge-transfer quenching.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-615
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Zhao ◽  
Jian-Ping Ma ◽  
Jianzhong Fan ◽  
Yan Geng ◽  
Yu-Bin Dong

The tridentate organic ligand 4,4′,4′′-(4,4,8,8,12,12-hexamethyl-8,12-dihydro-4H-benzo[9,1]quinolizino[3,4,5,6,7-defg]acridine-2,6,10-triyl)tribenzoic acid (H3L) has been synthesized (as the methanol 1.25-solvate, C48H39NO6·1.25CH3OH). As a donor–acceptor motif molecule, H3L possess strong intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) fluorescence. Through hydrogen bonds, H3L molecules construct a two-dimensional (2D) network, which pack together into three-dimensional (3D) networks with an ABC stacking pattern in the crystalline state. Based on H3L and M(NO3)2 salts (M = Cd and Zn) under solvothermal conditions, two metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), namely, catena-poly[[triaquacadmium(II)]-μ-10-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4′-(4,4,8,8,12,12-hexamethyl-8,12-dihydro-4H-benzo[9,1]quinolizino[3,4,5,6,7-defg]acridine-2,6-diyl)dibenzoato], [Cd(C48H37NO6)(H2O)3] n , I, and poly[[μ3-4,4′,4′′-(4,4,8,8,12,12-hexamethyl-8,12-dihydro-4H-benzo[9,1]quinolizino[3,4,5,6,7-defg]acridine-2,6,10-triyl)tribenzoato](μ3-hydroxido)zinc(II)], [Zn2(C48H36NO6)(OH)] n , II, were synthesized. Single-crystal analysis revealed that both MOFs adopt a 3D structure. In I, partly deprotonated HL 2− behaves as a bidentate ligand to link a CdII ion to form a one-dimensional chain. In the solid state of I, the existence of weak interactions, such as O—H...O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions, plays an essential role in aligning 2D nets and 3D networks with AB packing patterns for I. The deprotonated ligand L 3− in II is utilized as a tridentate building block to bind ZnII ions to construct 3D networks, where unusual Zn4O14 clusters act as connection nodes. As a donor–acceptor molecule, H3L exhibits fluorescence with a photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 70% in the solid state. In comparison, the PL of both MOFs is red-shifted with even higher PLQYs of 79 and 85% for I and II, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document