scholarly journals Preparation and Evaluation of ZD2 Peptide 64Cu-DOTA Conjugate as a Positron Emission Tomography Probe for Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer

ACS Omega ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1185-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Han ◽  
Olga Sergeeva ◽  
Sarah Roelle ◽  
Han Cheng ◽  
Songqi Gao ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2513-2519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Wachter ◽  
Sandra Tomek ◽  
Amir Kurtaran ◽  
Natascha Wachter-Gerstner ◽  
Bob Djavan ◽  
...  

Purpose To assess the clinical value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image fusion with 11C-acetate (AC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for detection and exact location of clinically occult recurrences. Patients and Methods Fifty prostate cancer patients with elevated/increasing serum prostate-specific antigen levels after radical therapy underwent whole-body AC PET. Uptake was initially interpreted as normal, abnormal, or equivocal. In case of abnormal or equivocal uptake, additional conventional imaging techniques, such as CT, MRI, and bone scans, were performed. To precisely define the anatomic location of abnormal uptake and to improve characterization of equivocal lesions, a software-assisted image fusion (CT-PET, MRI-PET) was performed and evaluated as site-by-site analysis of 51 abnormal (n = 37) or equivocal (n = 14) sites of all 50 patients. In 17 patients, additional histopathologic evaluation was available. Results In five (10%), 13 (26%), and 32 (64%) of the 50 patients, AC PET studies demonstrated AC uptake judged as normal, equivocal, and abnormal, respectively. Image fusion changed characterization of equivocal lesions as normal in five (10%) of 51 sites and abnormal in nine (18%) of 51 sites. It precisely defined the anatomic location of abnormal uptake in 37 (73%) of 51 sites. AC PET findings did influence patient management in 14 (28%) of 50 patients. Conclusion Retrospective fusion of AC PET and CT/MRI is feasible and seems to be essential for final diagnosis. This is particularly true in patients with AC uptake in the prostate region.


2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1337-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars R. Perk ◽  
Otto J. Visser ◽  
M. Stigter-van Walsum ◽  
Maria J. W. D. Vosjan ◽  
Gerard W. M. Visser ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Biscontini ◽  
Cinzia Romagnolo ◽  
Chiara Cottignoli ◽  
Andrea Palucci ◽  
Fabio Massimo Fringuelli ◽  
...  

Background: to explore the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-Fluciclovine positron-emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer (PCa), considering both primary staging prior to radical therapy, biochemical recurrence, and advanced setting. Methods: A systematic web search through Embase and Medline was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies performed from 2011 to 2020 were evaluated. The terms used were “PET” or “positron emission tomography” or “positron emission tomography/computed tomography” or “PET/CT” or “positron emission tomography-computed tomography” or “PET-CT” and “Fluciclovine” or “FACBC” and “prostatic neoplasms” or “prostate cancer” or “prostate carcinoma”. Only studies reporting about true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) findings of 18F-fluciclovine PET were considered eligible. Results: Fifteen out of 283 studies, and 697 patients, were included in the final analysis. The pooled sensitivity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for diagnosis of primary PCa was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80–0.86), the specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.80). The pooled sensitivity for preoperative LN staging was 0.57 (95% CI: 0.39–0.73) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94–1.00). The pooled sensitivity for the overall detection of recurrence in relapsed patients was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63–0.73), and specificity of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60–0.75). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed promising results in term of sensitivity and specificity for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to stage the primary lesion and in the assessment of nodal metastases, and for the detection of PCa locations in the recurrent setting. However, the limited number of studies and the broad heterogeneity in the selected cohorts and in different investigation protocols are limitation affecting the strength of these results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Banati ◽  
Ryan J. Middleton ◽  
Ronald Chan ◽  
Claire R. Hatty ◽  
Winnie Wai-Ying Kam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document