Structural Disruptions of the Outer Membranes of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Rationally Designed Amphiphilic Antimicrobial Peptides

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoning Gong ◽  
Xuzhi Hu ◽  
Mingrui Liao ◽  
Ke Fa ◽  
Daniela Ciumac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Outer Membranes

scholarly journals Quinolones Sensitize Gram-Negative Bacteria to Antimicrobial Peptides

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2361-2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Campos ◽  
Pau Morey ◽  
José A. Bengoechea
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Antibacterial Agents ◽  
Divalent Cations ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Outer Membranes ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Subinhibitory Concentrations

ABSTRACT The treatment of infections caused by bacteria resistant to the vast majority of antibiotics is a challenge worldwide. Antimicrobial peptides (APs) make up the front line of defense in those areas exposed to microorganisms, and there is intensive research to explore their use as new antibacterial agents. On the other hand, it is known that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics affect the expression of numerous bacterial traits. In this work we evaluated whether treatment of bacteria with subinhibitory concentrations of quinolones may alter the sensitivity to APs. A 1-h treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae with 0.25× the MIC of ciprofloxacin rendered bacteria more sensitive to polymyxins B and E, human neutrophil defensin 1, and β-defensin 1. Levofloxacin and nalidixic acid at 0.25× the MICs also increased the sensitivity of K. pneumoniae to polymyxin B, whereas gentamicin and ceftazidime at 0.25× the MICs did not have such an effect. Ciprofloxacin also increased the sensitivities of K. pneumoniae ciprofloxacin-resistant strains to polymyxin B. Two other pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae, also became more sensitive to polymyxins B and E after treatment with 0.25× the MIC of ciprofloxacin. Incubation with ciprofloxacin did not alter the expression of the K. pneumoniae loci involved in resistance to APs. A 1-N-phenyl-naphthylamine assay showed that ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin increased the permeabilities of the K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa outer membranes, while divalent cations antagonized this action. Finally, we demonstrated that ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin increased the binding of APs to the outer membrane by using dansylated polymyxin B.

scholarly journals Proteomic response of Escherichia coli to a membrane lytic and iron chelating truncated Amaranthus tricolor defensin

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa B. Moyer ◽  
Ashleigh L. Purvis ◽  
Andrew J. Wommack ◽  
Leslie M. Hicks
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Amaranthus Tricolor ◽  
Core Motif ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Membrane Lysis

Abstract Background Plant defensins are a broadly distributed family of antimicrobial peptides which have been primarily studied for agriculturally relevant antifungal activity. Recent studies have probed defensins against Gram-negative bacteria revealing evidence for multiple mechanisms of action including membrane lysis and ribosomal inhibition. Herein, a truncated synthetic analog containing the γ-core motif of Amaranthus tricolor DEF2 (Atr-DEF2) reveals Gram-negative antibacterial activity and its mechanism of action is probed via proteomics, outer membrane permeability studies, and iron reduction/chelation assays. Results Atr-DEF2(G39-C54) demonstrated activity against two Gram-negative human bacterial pathogens, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Quantitative proteomics revealed changes in the E. coli proteome in response to treatment of sub-lethal concentrations of the truncated defensin, including bacterial outer membrane (OM) and iron acquisition/processing related proteins. Modification of OM charge is a common response of Gram-negative bacteria to membrane lytic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to reduce electrostatic interactions, and this mechanism of action was confirmed for Atr-DEF2(G39-C54) via an N-phenylnaphthalen-1-amine uptake assay. Additionally, in vitro assays confirmed the capacity of Atr-DEF2(G39-C54) to reduce Fe3+ and chelate Fe2+ at cell culture relevant concentrations, thus limiting the availability of essential enzymatic cofactors. Conclusions This study highlights the utility of plant defensin γ-core motif synthetic analogs for characterization of novel defensin activity. Proteomic changes in E. coli after treatment with Atr-DEF2(G39-C54) supported the hypothesis that membrane lysis is an important component of γ-core motif mediated antibacterial activity but also emphasized that other properties, such as metal sequestration, may contribute to a multifaceted mechanism of action.

scholarly journals Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Austin Hanson ◽  
Anna Dostálová ◽  
Camilla Ceroni ◽  
Mickael Poidevin ◽  
Shu Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Fungal Pathogens ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Cationic Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Bacteria And Fungi

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are host-encoded antibiotics that combat invading microorganisms. These short, cationic peptides have been implicated in many biological processes, primarily involving innate immunity. In vitro studies have shown AMPs kill bacteria and fungi at physiological concentrations, but little validation has been done in vivo. We utilized CRISPR gene editing to delete most known immune-inducible AMPs of Drosophila, namely: 4 Attacins, 2 Diptericins, Drosocin, Drosomycin, Metchnikowin and Defensin. Using individual and multiple knockouts, including flies lacking these ten AMP genes, we characterize the in vivo function of individual and groups of AMPs against diverse bacterial and fungal pathogens. We found that Drosophila AMPs act primarily against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, contributing either additively or synergistically. We also describe remarkable specificity wherein certain AMPs contribute the bulk of microbicidal activity against specific pathogens, providing functional demonstrations of highly specific AMP-pathogen interactions in an in vivo setting.

scholarly journals SPS-neutralization in tissue samples for efficacy testing of antimicrobial peptides

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Sherella Dijksteel ◽  
Peter H. Nibbering ◽  
Magda M. W. Ulrich ◽  
Esther Middelkoop ◽  
Bouke K. H. L. Boekema
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Residual Activity ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Viable Bacteria

Abstract Background Accurate determination of the efficacy of antimicrobial agents requires neutralization of residual antimicrobial activity in the samples before microbiological assessment of the number of surviving bacteria. Sodium polyanethol sulfonate (SPS) is a known neutralizer for the antimicrobial activity of aminoglycosides and polymyxins. In this study, we evaluated the ability of SPS to neutralize residual antimicrobial activity of antimicrobial peptides [SAAP-148 and pexiganan; 1% (wt/v) in PBS], antibiotics [mupirocin (Bactroban) and fusidic acid (Fucidin) in ointments; 2% (wt/wt))] and disinfectants [2% (wt/wt) silver sulfadiazine cream (SSD) and 0.5% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol]. Methods Homogenates of human skin models that had been exposed to various antimicrobial agents for 1 h were pipetted on top of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on agar plates to determine whether the antimicrobial agents display residual activity. To determine the optimal concentration of SPS for neutralization, antimicrobial agents were mixed with PBS or increasing doses of SPS in PBS (0.05–1% wt/v) and then 105 colony forming units (CFU)/mL MRSA were added. After 30 min incubation, the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Next, the in vitro efficacy of SAAP-148 against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was determined using PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS immediately after 30 min incubation of the mixture. Additionally, ex vivo excision wound models were inoculated with 105 CFU MRSA for 1 h and exposed to SAAP-148, pexiganan, chlorhexidine or PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, samples were homogenized in PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS and the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Results All tested antimicrobials displayed residual activity in tissue samples, resulting in a lower recovery of surviving bacteria on agar. SPS concentrations at ≥0.05% (wt/v) were able to neutralize the antimicrobial activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine, but not of SSD, Bactroban and Fucidin. Finally, SPS-neutralization in in vitro and ex vivo efficacy tests of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria resulted in significantly higher numbers of CFU compared to control samples without SPS-neutralization. Conclusions SPS was successfully used to neutralize residual activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine and this prevented an overestimation of their efficacy.

scholarly journals Cathelicidin Peptides Restrict Bacterial Growth via Membrane Perturbation and Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A. Rowe-Magnus ◽  
Adenine Y. Kao ◽  
Antonio Cembellin Prieto ◽  
Meng Pu ◽  
Cheng Kao
Keyword(s):  
Reactive Oxygen Species ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Reactive Oxygen ◽  
Cellular Damage ◽  
Primary Effect ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Oxygen Species ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative

ABSTRACT All metazoans produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that have both broad antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activity. Cathelicidins are AMPs that preferentially kill Gram-negative bacteria in vitro, purportedly by assembling into higher-order structures that perforate the membrane. We utilized high-resolution, single-cell fluorescence microscopy to examine their mechanism of action in real time. Engineered cathelicidins rapidly bound to Gram-negative and Gram-positive cells and penetrated the cytoplasmic membrane. Rapid failure of the peptidoglycan superstructure in regions of active turnover caused leakage of cytoplasmic contents and the formation of membrane-bound blebs. A mutation anticipated to destabilize interactions between cathelicidin subunits had no effect on bactericidal activity, suggesting that cathelicidins have activities beyond perforating the membrane. Nanomolar concentrations of cathelicidins, although not bactericidal, reduced the growth rate of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The cells exhibited expression changes in multiple essential processes, including protein synthesis, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, respiration, and the detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Time-lapse imaging revealed that ROS accumulation preceded bleb formation, and treatments that reduced cellular ROS levels overcame these bactericidal effects. We propose that that the primary effect of cathelicidins is to induce the production of ROS that damage bacterial molecules, leading to slowed growth or cell death. Given their low circulating levels in vivo, AMPs may serve to slow bacterial population expansion so that cellular immunity systems can respond to and battle the infection. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are an important part of the mammalian innate immune system in the battle against microbial infection. How AMPs function to control bacteria is not clear, as nearly all activity studies use nonphysiological levels of AMPs. We monitored peptide action in live bacterial cells over short time frames with single-cell resolution and found that the primary effect of cathelicidin peptides is to increase the production of oxidative molecules that cause cellular damage in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

scholarly journals Metabolic phospholipid labeling of intact bacteria enables a fluorescence assay that detects compromised outer membranes

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 870-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga Nilsson ◽  
Sheng Y. Lee ◽  
William S. Sawyer ◽  
Christopher M. Baxter Rath ◽  
Guillaume Lapointe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Metabolic Labeling ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Transport Pathways ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Outer Membranes ◽  
Outer Leaflet ◽  
Promising Tool

Gram-negative bacteria possess an asymmetric outer membrane (OM) composed primarily of lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) on the outer leaflet and phospholipids (PLs) on the inner leaflet. The loss of this asymmetry due to mutations in the LPS biosynthesis or transport pathways causes the externalization of PLs to the outer leaflet of the OM and leads to OM permeability defects. Here, we used metabolic labeling to detect a compromised OM in intact bacteria. Phosphatidylcholine synthase expression in Escherichia coli allowed for the incorporation of exogenous propargylcholine into phosphatidyl(propargyl)choline and exogenous 1-azidoethyl-choline (AECho) into phosphatidyl(azidoethyl)choline (AEPC), as confirmed by LC/MS analyses. A fluorescent copper-free click reagent poorly labeled AEPC in intact wild-type cells but readily labeled AEPC from lysed cells. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses confirmed the absence of significant AEPC labeling from intact wild-type E. coli strains and revealed significant AEPC labeling in an E. coli LPS transport mutant (lptD4213) and an LPS biosynthesis mutant (E. coli lpxC101). Our results suggest that metabolic PL labeling with AECho is a promising tool for detecting a compromised bacterial OM, revealing aberrant PL externalization, and identifying or characterizing novel cell-active inhibitors of LPS biosynthesis or transport.­

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Peptides from Rat-Tailed Maggots of the Drone Fly Eristalis tenax Show Potent Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Hirsch ◽  
Jochen Wiesner ◽  
Armin Bauer ◽  
Alexander Marker ◽  
Heiko Vogel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Physiological Conditions ◽  
Manure Storage ◽  
Defense Molecules ◽  
Generation Sequencing

The spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria is an increasing threat to human health, because novel compound classes for the development of antibiotics have not been discovered for decades. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) may provide a much-needed breakthrough because these immunity-related defense molecules protect many eukaryotes against Gram-negative pathogens. Recent concepts in evolutionary immunology predict the presence of potent AMPs in insects that have adapted to survive in habitats with extreme microbial contamination. For example, the saprophagous and coprophagous maggots of the drone fly Eristalis tenax (Diptera) can flourish in polluted aquatic habitats, such as sewage tanks and farmyard liquid manure storage pits. We used next-generation sequencing to screen the E. tenax immunity-related transcriptome for AMPs that are synthesized in response to the injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. We identified 22 AMPs and selected nine for larger-scale synthesis to test their activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Two cecropin-like peptides (EtCec1-a and EtCec2-a) and a diptericin-like peptide (EtDip) displayed strong activity against the pathogens, even under simulated physiological conditions, and also achieved a good therapeutic window. Therefore, these AMPs could be used as leads for the development of novel antibiotics.

scholarly journals Correction to Antimicrobial Peptides with High Proteolytic Resistance for Combating Gram-Negative Bacteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 5921-5921
Author(s):  
Jiajun Wang ◽  
Jing Song ◽  
Zhanyi Yang ◽  
Shiqi He ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Proteolytic Resistance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document