Enhancement of CeO2 Silanization by Spontaneous Breakage of Si–O Bonds through Facet Engineering

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 2644-2655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyang Ma ◽  
Hangjuan Ren ◽  
Pramod Koshy ◽  
Charles C. Sorrell ◽  
Judy N. Hart
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Breakage

Spontaneous Breakage and Fragile Site Expression in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariela Fundia ◽  
Isabel Giere ◽  
Irene Larripa ◽  
Irma Slavutsky
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Fragile Site ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Spontaneous Breakage

scholarly journals Spontaneous breakage of malleable penile prosthesis

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
WH Lee ◽  
ZC Xin ◽  
YD Choi ◽  
HK Choi
Keyword(s):  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Spontaneous Breakage

scholarly journals 3121 Spontaneous Breakage and Antegrade Enteral Migration of Jejunal Extension Tubing

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S1678-S1679
Author(s):  
Donald Goens ◽  
Matthew Berger ◽  
Edwin K. McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Breakage

Mechanism and Criterion of Spontaneous Breakage of Tempered Glass

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 401 ◽  
Author(s):  
BAO Yi-Wang ◽  
LIU Zheng-Quan
Keyword(s):  
Tempered Glass ◽  
Spontaneous Breakage

scholarly journals Spontaneous breakage of malleable prosthesis

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lockyer ◽  
Clive Gingell
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Breakage

Spontaneous duplication loss and breakage in Caenorhabditis elegans

Genome ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-606
Author(s):  
Kim S. McKim ◽  
Ann M. Rose
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Fragile Site ◽  
Ring Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Breakage ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Spontaneous Breakage ◽  
Ring Chromosomes ◽  
Ring Structures ◽  
Chromosome I

Duplications in Caenorhabditis elegans spontaneously delete at frequencies ranging from 10−4 to 10−5. We have analyzed the structure and mitotic stability of 33 deleted duplications resulting from spontaneous breakage events. (i) Breakage usually occurred at a variety of sites; that is, there were no hot spots for breakage. An exception was the spontaneous breakage of the X chromosome into which hDp14 was inserted. These breaks were close to or at the site of the chromosome I insertion; therefore, the insertion created a type of fragile site. (ii) Spontaneous duplications often had complex structures. In some cases, their structures were most simply resolved by proposing that the progenitor duplication was a ring chromosome with a superimposed inversion. Most of the proposed ring chromosomes were mitotically unstable, suggesting that ring structures increase the frequency of chromosome loss, (iii) Clusters of spontaneous deletion events were rarely observed, suggesting that the majority of spontaneous breakage events probably occurred during meiosis. (iv) A minority of the spontaneous breakage events were associated with linkage to an autosome. Like free duplications of chromosome I, these linked duplications tended to segregate from the X chromosome in males. (v) Three meiotic mutants, him-3, him-6, and him-8, had no effect on somatic loss of the duplications but did reduce the frequency of breakage events. Given the conclusion that chromosome breakage is a meiotic event, these data are consistent with the function of the three meiotic genes being restricted to meiosis.Key words: chromosome structure, duplication, mitosis, meiosis, Caenorhabditis species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document