Role of Surface Templating on Ice Nucleation Efficiency on a Silver Iodide Surface

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 (34) ◽  
pp. 18857-18865
Author(s):  
Zhuo Liu ◽  
Chu Li ◽  
Eshani C. Goonetilleke ◽  
Yi Cui ◽  
Xuhui Huang
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
pp. 4486-4491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge R. Espinosa ◽  
Guiomar D. Soria ◽  
Jorge Ramirez ◽  
Chantal Valeriani ◽  
Carlos Vega ◽  
...  

1962 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 749-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R Edwards ◽  
L.F Evans ◽  
V.K La Mer
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 2009-2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fitzner ◽  
Gabriele C. Sosso ◽  
Stephen J. Cox ◽  
Angelos Michaelides

When an ice crystal is born from liquid water, two key changes occur: (i) The molecules order and (ii) the mobility of the molecules drops as they adopt their lattice positions. Most research on ice nucleation (and crystallization in general) has focused on understanding the former with less attention paid to the latter. However, supercooled water exhibits fascinating and complex dynamical behavior, most notably dynamical heterogeneity (DH), a phenomenon where spatially separated domains of relatively mobile and immobile particles coexist. Strikingly, the microscopic connection between the DH of water and the nucleation of ice has yet to be unraveled directly at the molecular level. Here we tackle this issue via computer simulations which reveal that (i) ice nucleation occurs in low-mobility regions of the liquid, (ii) there is a dynamical incubation period in which the mobility of the molecules drops before any ice-like ordering, and (iii) ice-like clusters cause arrested dynamics in surrounding water molecules. With this we establish a clear connection between dynamics and nucleation. We anticipate that our findings will pave the way for the examination of the role of dynamical heterogeneities in heterogeneous and solution-based nucleation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Hsin Liu ◽  
Jen-Ping Chen ◽  
Xiquan Dong ◽  
Yi-Chiu Lin

<p>Arctic stratiform clouds (ASC) often exhibit phase inversion structure (i.e., liquid top and mixed- or ice-phase below) and can persist for a very long time. According to past studies, the phase inversion structure is the result of persistent liquid cloud generation aloft and gravitational ice precipitation; however, observation reveals that the largest cloud reflectivity appears in the middle of the cloud, implying that the gravitational ice precipitation cannot fully explain the mechanism of phase inversion structure. Also, the role of ice nucleation in ASC is not fully addressed before. Ice nucleation processes are affected by temperature, ice nuclei (IN) species and number concentration. As the result, strong inversion or strong vertical gradient of IN number concentration may favor ice nucleation to occur in the lower levels and result in phase inversion.</p><p>This study aims to find out the mechanism of phase inversion and the dominant ice nucleation processes in ASC. Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with detailed ice nucleation mechanisms is applied. The ice nucleation scheme used in the model takes different ice nucleation processes and IN species into account. Dust and soot, taken from MERRA-2, are the two main IN considered in this study and are fitted into lognormal distributions for providing the initial and boundary conditions. The 2008 Mar 04-05 case, chosen from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, is simulated. From observation, ASC and the phase inversion structure persisted for half a day. Temperature decreases with height in cloud, indicating that temperature inversion is not the mechanism of phase inversion in this case. More dust in the lower levels is seen from the model simulation results. In this case, strong vertical gradient of IN number concentration serves as the main mechanism of phase inversion, suggesting that ice nucleation process plays an important role in ASC. The role of soot particles will also be addressed.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document