Understanding the Many-Body Basis Set Superposition Error: Beyond Boys and Bernardi

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 2386-2400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Richard ◽  
Brandon W. Bakr ◽  
C. David Sherrill
Keyword(s):  
Basis Set ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Basis Set Superposition Error ◽  
The Many

Basis Set Superposition Errors in the Many-Body Expansion of Molecular Properties

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (20) ◽  
pp. 4500-4511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Peyton ◽  
T. Daniel Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Properties ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Many Body ◽  
The Many

scholarly journals Photoemission Spectra from the Extended Koopman’s Theorem, Revisited

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Di Sabatino ◽  
J. Koskelo ◽  
J. Prodhon ◽  
J. A. Berger ◽  
M. Caffarel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Function ◽  
Secular Equation ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Effective Energy ◽  
Bulk Silicon ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Optimal Basis ◽  
Diagonal Approximation ◽  
Energy Theory ◽  
The Many

The Extended Koopman’s Theorem (EKT) provides a straightforward way to compute charged excitations from any level of theory. In this work we make the link with the many-body effective energy theory (MEET) that we derived to calculate the spectral function, which is directly related to photoemission spectra. In particular, we show that at its lowest level of approximation the MEET removal and addition energies correspond to the so-called diagonal approximation of the EKT. Thanks to this link, the EKT and the MEET can benefit from mutual insight. In particular, one can readily extend the EKT to calculate the full spectral function, and choose a more optimal basis set for the MEET by solving the EKT secular equation. We illustrate these findings with the examples of the Hubbard dimer and bulk silicon.

scholarly journals Comparing many-body approaches against the helium atom exact solution

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
N. D. Drummond ◽  
Peter Schuck ◽  
Valerio Olevano
Keyword(s):  
Exact Solution ◽  
Helium Atom ◽  
Quantum Monte Carlo ◽  
Nuclear Physics ◽  
Density Functional ◽  
Random Phase ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Functional Theory ◽  
The Many

Over time, many different theories and approaches have been developed to tackle the many-body problem in quantum chemistry, condensed-matter physics, and nuclear physics. Here we use the helium atom, a real system rather than a model, and we use the exact solution of its Schrödinger equation as a benchmark for comparison between methods. We present new results beyond the random-phase approximation (RPA) from a renormalized RPA (r-RPA) in the framework of the self-consistent RPA (SCRPA) originally developed in nuclear physics, and compare them with various other approaches like configuration interaction (CI), quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT), and the Bethe-Salpeter equation on top of the \boldsymbol{GW}𝐆𝐖 approximation. Most of the calculations are consistently done on the same footing, e.g. using the same basis set, in an effort for a most faithful comparison between methods.

On the many-body theory of nuclear reactions

1968 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 392-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
K DIETRICH ◽  
K HARA
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Reactions ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Many Body Theory ◽  
The Many ◽  
Body Theory

Divergence of Many-Body Perturbation Theory for Noncovalent Interactions of Large Molecules

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Nguyen ◽  
Guo P Chen ◽  
Matthew M. Agee ◽  
Asbjörn M. Burow ◽  
Matthew Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Perturbation Theory ◽  
System Size ◽  
State Density ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Binding Energies ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Many Body Perturbation Theory ◽  
Relative Errors ◽  
Ground State Density

Prompted by recent reports of large errors in noncovalent interaction (NI) energies obtained from many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), we compare the performance of second-order Møller–Plesset MBPT (MP2), spin-scaled MP2, dispersion-corrected semilocal density functional approximations (DFA), and the post-Kohn–Sham random phase approximation (RPA) for predicting binding energies of supramolecular complexes contained in the S66, L7, and S30L benchmarks. All binding energies are extrapolated to the basis set limit, corrected for basis set superposition errors, and compared to reference results of the domain-based local pair-natural orbital coupled-cluster (DLPNO-CCSD(T)) or better quality. Our results confirm that MP2 severely overestimates binding energies of large complexes, producing relative errors of over 100% for several benchmark compounds. RPA relative errors consistently range between 5-10%, significantly less than reported previously using smaller basis sets, whereas spin-scaled MP2 methods show limitations similar to MP2, albeit less pronounced, and empirically dispersion-corrected DFAs perform almost as well as RPA. Regression analysis reveals a systematic increase of relative MP2 binding energy errors with the system size at a rate of approximately 1‰ per valence electron, whereas the RPA and dispersion-corrected DFA relative errors are virtually independent of the system size. These observations are corroborated by a comparison of computed rotational constants of organic molecules to gas-phase spectroscopy data contained in the ROT34 benchmark. To analyze these results, an asymptotic adiabatic connection symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (AC-SAPT) is developed which uses monomers at full coupling whose ground-state density is constrained to the ground-state density of the complex. Using the fluctuation–dissipation theorem, we obtain a nonperturbative “screened second-order” expression for the dispersion energy in terms of monomer quantities which is exact for non-overlapping subsystems and free of induction terms; a first-order RPA-like approximation to the Hartree, exchange, and correlation kernel recovers the macroscopic Lifshitz limit. The AC-SAPT expansion of the interaction energy is obtained from Taylor expansion of the coupling strength integrand. Explicit expressions for the convergence radius of the AC-SAPT series are derived within RPA and MBPT and numerically evaluated. Whereas the AC-SAPT expansion is always convergent for nondegenerate monomers when RPA is used, it is found to spuriously diverge for second-order MBPT, except for the smallest and least polarizable monomers. The divergence of the AC-SAPT series within MBPT is numerically confirmed within RPA; prior numerical results on the convergence of the SAPT expansion for MBPT methods are revisited and support this conclusion once sufficiently high orders are included. The cause of the failure of MBPT methods for NIs of large systems is missing or incomplete “electrodynamic” screening of the Coulomb interaction due to induced particle–hole pairs between electrons in different monomers, leaving the effective interaction too strong for AC-SAPT to converge. Hence, MBPT cannot be considered reliable for quantitative predictions of NIs, even in moderately polarizable molecules with a few tens of atoms. The failure to accurately account for electrodynamic polarization makes MBPT qualitatively unsuitable for applications such as NIs of nanostructures, macromolecules, and soft materials; more robust non-perturbative approaches such as RPA or coupled cluster methods should be used instead whenever possible.<br>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document