scholarly journals Halogen Bond of Halonium Ions: Benchmarking DFT Methods for the Description of NMR Chemical Shifts

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 7690-7701
Author(s):  
Daniel Sethio ◽  
Gerardo Raggi ◽  
Roland Lindh ◽  
Máté Erdélyi
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (45) ◽  
pp. 16453-16463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winn Huynh ◽  
Matthew P. Conley

The origin in deshielding of 29Si NMR chemical shifts in R3Si–X, where X = H, OMe, Cl, OTf, [CH6B11X6], toluene, and OX (OX = surface oxygen), as well as iPr3Si+ and Mes3Si+ were studied using DFT methods.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (47) ◽  
pp. 16694-16694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cerreia Vioglio ◽  
Luca Catalano ◽  
Vera Vasylyeva ◽  
Carlo Nervi ◽  
Michele R. Chierotti ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Gao ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Qian Peng ◽  
Vassiliki-Alexandra Glezakou

Accurate prediction of NMR chemical shifts with affordable computational cost is of great importance for rigorous structural assignments of experimental studies. However, the most popular computational schemes for NMR calculation—based on density functional theory (DFT) and gauge-including atomic orbital (GIAO) methods—still suffer from ambiguities in structural assignments. Using state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) techniques, we have developed a DFT+ML model that is capable of predicting 13C/1H NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules with high accuracy. The input for this generalizable DFT+ML model contains two critical parts: one is a vector providing insights into chemical environments, which can be evaluated without knowing the exact geometry of the molecule; the other one is the DFT-calculated isotropic shielding constant. The DFT+ML model was trained with a dataset containing 476 13C and 270 1H experimental chemical shifts. For the DFT methods used here, the root-mean-square-derivations (RMSDs) for the errors between predicted and experimental 13C/1H chemical shifts are as small as 2.10/0.18 ppm, which is much lower than the typical DFT (5.54/0.25 ppm), or DFT+linear regression (4.77/0.23 ppm) approaches. It also has smaller RMSDs and maximum absolute errors than two previously reported NMR-predicting ML models. We test the robustness of the model on two classes of organic molecules (TIC10 and hyacinthacines), where we unambiguously assigned the correct isomers to the experimental ones. This DFT+ML model is a promising way of predicting NMR chemical shifts and can be easily adapted to calculated shifts for any chemical compound.<br>


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (47) ◽  
pp. 16819-16828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cerreia Vioglio ◽  
Luca Catalano ◽  
Vera Vasylyeva ◽  
Carlo Nervi ◽  
Michele R. Chierotti ◽  
...  

RSC Advances ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (52) ◽  
pp. 27290-27296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Gryff-Keller ◽  
Przemysław Szczeciński

Carbon-13 isotropic shielding constants and C–F spin–spin coupling constants for fluorobenzene, 3- and 4-dimethylaminofluorobenzene as well as for their tricarbonylchromium complexes have been calculated using DFT methods.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Gao ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Qian Peng ◽  
Vassiliki-Alexandra Glezakou

Accurate prediction of NMR chemical shifts with affordable computational cost is of great importance for rigorous structural assignments of experimental studies. However, the most popular computational schemes for NMR calculation—based on density functional theory (DFT) and gauge-including atomic orbital (GIAO) methods—still suffer from ambiguities in structural assignments. Using state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) techniques, we have developed a DFT+ML model that is capable of predicting 13C/1H NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules with high accuracy. The input for this generalizable DFT+ML model contains two critical parts: one is a vector providing insights into chemical environments, which can be evaluated without knowing the exact geometry of the molecule; the other one is the DFT-calculated isotropic shielding constant. The DFT+ML model was trained with a dataset containing 476 13C and 270 1H experimental chemical shifts. For the DFT methods used here, the root-mean-square-derivations (RMSDs) for the errors between predicted and experimental 13C/1H chemical shifts are as small as 2.10/0.18 ppm, which is much lower than the typical DFT (5.54/0.25 ppm), or DFT+linear regression (4.77/0.23 ppm) approaches. It also has smaller RMSDs and maximum absolute errors than two previously reported NMR-predicting ML models. We test the robustness of the model on two classes of organic molecules (TIC10 and hyacinthacines), where we unambiguously assigned the correct isomers to the experimental ones. This DFT+ML model is a promising way of predicting NMR chemical shifts and can be easily adapted to calculated shifts for any chemical compound.<br>


Author(s):  
Abril C. Castro ◽  
David Balcells ◽  
Michal Repisky ◽  
Trygve Helgaker ◽  
Michele Cascella

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document