Turpentine Derived Secondary Amines for Sustainable Crop Protection: Synthesis, Activity Evaluation and QSAR Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (42) ◽  
pp. 11829-11838
Author(s):  
Shichao Xu ◽  
Xiaojing Zeng ◽  
Songlin Dai ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Yuxiang Chen ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1079
Author(s):  
Die Cheng ◽  
Deng Ke Liu ◽  
Mo Liu ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Wei Ren Xu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengzhu Xue ◽  
Minghao Xu ◽  
Weiqiang Lu ◽  
Jin Huang ◽  
Honglin Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1210-1217
Author(s):  
Xian-yu Sun ◽  
Chun-yan Zhong ◽  
Qing-qing Qiu ◽  
Zhen-wang Li ◽  
Mei-yu Liu ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (9) ◽  
pp. 1197-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth Hughes ◽  
Fiona J. Burnett

Generically, farm-scale crop protection decision making may be characterized as a process beginning with an initial assessment of disease risk followed by the accumulation of evidence related to current risk factors, leading to a risk prediction. What action is then taken depends on the response of the decision owner, taking into account previous experience, advice from trusted sources, alongside policy or legislative constraints on crop protection practice that are intended to mitigate any impacts that may transcend the farm scale. This process has commonalities with decision-making in the strategy of preventive medicine. This article delves into the clinical literature in order to provide a perspective on some recent discussions of shared decision making presented there, discussions that relate to issues also faced in sustainable crop protection.


2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2117-2125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loghman Firoozpour ◽  
Najmeh Edraki ◽  
Maryam Nakhjiri ◽  
Saeed Emami ◽  
Maliheh Safavi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 032-036
Author(s):  
Rangaswamy Muniappan ◽  
◽  
E.A Heinrichs ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document