Role of Epichloë Endophytes in Improving Host Grass Resistance Ability and Soil Properties

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (26) ◽  
pp. 6944-6955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Wang ◽  
Wenpeng Hou ◽  
Michael J. Christensen ◽  
Xiuzhang Li ◽  
Chao Xia ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
MINAKSHI SERAWAT ◽  
V K PHOGAT ◽  
ANIL Abdul KAPOOR ◽  
VIJAY KANT SINGH ◽  
ASHA SERAWAT

Soil crust strength influences seedling emergence, penetration and morphology of plant roots, and, consequently, crop yields. A study was carried out to assess the role of different soil properties on crust strength atHisar, Haryana, India. The soil samples from 0-5 and 5-15 cm depths were collected from 21 locations from farmer’s fields, having a wide range of texture.Soil propertieswere evaluated in the laboratory and theirinfluence on the modulus of rupture (MOR), which is the measure of crust strength, was evaluated.The MOR of texturally different soils was significantly correlated with saturated hydraulic conductivity at both the depths. Dispersion ratio was found to decrease with an increase in fineness of the texture of soil and the lowest value was recorded in silty clay loam soil,which decreased with depth. The modulus of rupture was significantly negatively correlative with the dispersion ratio.There was no role of calcium carbonate in influencing the values of MOR of soils. Similarly,the influence of pH, EC and SAR of soil solution on MOR was non-significant.A perusal of thevalues of the correlations between MOR and different soil properties showed that the MOR of soils of Haryana are positively correlated with silt + clay (r = 0.805) followed by water-stable aggregates (r = 0.774), organic carbon (r = 0.738), silt (r = 0.711), mean weight diameter (r = 0.608) and clay (r = 0.593) while negatively correlated with dispersion ratio (r = - 0.872), sand (r = -0.801) and hydraulic conductivity (r = -0.752) of soils.


1996 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 93-114
Author(s):  
Antonio José Teixeira Guerra ◽  
Rosangela Garrido Machado Botelho

This paper regards the role of soil characteristics and properties on pedological surveys and soil erosion investigations. Therefore, the main factors of soil formation are here discussed. Furthermore, the main chemical and physical soil properties are also taken into consideration, in order to approach this subject. Finally, some erosion processes are also carried out, together with the main erosion forms and the environmental impacts caused by these associated processes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mátyás Árvai ◽  
Zoltán Czajlik ◽  
János Mészáros ◽  
Balázs Nagy ◽  
László Pásztor

<p>Cropmarks are a major factor in the effectiveness of traditional aerial archaeology. The positive and negative features shown up by cropmarks are the role of the different cultivated plants and the importance of precipitation and other elements of the physical environment. In co-operation with the experts of the Eötvös Loránd University a new research was initiated to compare the pedological features of cropmark plots (CMP) and non-cropmark plots (nCMP) in order to identify demonstrable differences between them. For this purpose, the spatial soil information on primary soil properties provided by DOSoReMI.hu was employed. To compensate for the inherent vagueness of spatial predictions, together with the fact that the definition of CMPs and nCMPs is somewhat indefinite, the comparisons were carried out using data-driven, statistical approaches. In the first round three pilot areas were investigated, where Chernozem and Meadow type soils proved to be correlated with the formation of cropmarks. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and Random Forest models showed a different relative predominance of pedological variables in each study area. The geomorphological differences between the study areas explain these variations satisfactorily. In the next round, the identified relationships between cropmarking and soil features are planned to be utilized in the spatial inference of soil properties, where crop-marking sites will represent a unique, spatially non-exhaustive auxiliary information.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 363 ◽  
pp. 145-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Hartmann ◽  
Nils Moosdorf ◽  
Ronny Lauerwald ◽  
Matthias Hinderer ◽  
A. Joshua West

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (4) ◽  
pp. 1236-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi M. Lozano ◽  
Cristina Armas ◽  
Sara Hortal ◽  
Fernando Casanoves ◽  
Francisco I. Pugnaire

Prion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alsu Kuznetsova ◽  
Debbie McKenzie ◽  
Pamela Banser ◽  
Tariq Siddique ◽  
Judd M. Aiken

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa D. Peters-Lidard ◽  
David M. Mocko ◽  
Matthew Garcia ◽  
Joseph A. Santanello ◽  
Michael A. Tischler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Arif Anshori ◽  
Agung Iswadi ◽  
Sunarya Sunarya ◽  
Damasus Riyanto

<em>Rice</em><em> </em><em>cultivation</em><em> in the second growing season in dry land at Gunungkidul Special Region of Yogyakarta requires additional irrigation and improvement of physical, chemical and biological soil properties. This study aimed to determine the role of organic fertilizer ameliorant on rice yields during second growing season in dry land. The research was conducted in Sambirejo Watusigar Ngawen Gunungkidul Special Region of Yogyakarta during second growing season from March to July 2019. The study used a Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with 3 treatments in the form of no ameliorant, ameliorant of 2 tons ha<sup>-1</sup> and ameliorant 4 tons ha<sup>-1</sup>, with 5 replications. The results showed that the use of ameliorant 2 tons ha<sup>-1</sup> produced rice 5.64 ton ha<sup>-1</sup> and ameliorant 4 tons ha<sup>-1</sup> produced rice 6.04 ton ha<sup>-1</sup>, which was significantly higher than without ameliorant which only produced 5.29 ton ha<sup>-1</sup> of rice.</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document