Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Supporting Community Assessment of Environmental Stressors in a Field-Based Sediment Microcosm Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (24) ◽  
pp. 14469-14479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianghua Yang ◽  
Katherine Jeppe ◽  
Vincent Pettigrove ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Environmental Stressors ◽  
Community Assessment ◽  
Microcosm Study ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding

scholarly journals Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding to Spatiotemporal Finfish Community Assessment in a Temperate Embayment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Gary H. Wikfors ◽  
Julie M. Rose ◽  
Richard S. McBride ◽  
Lisa M. Milke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Community Assessment ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding

scholarly journals Let me see your iD: Impacts of Environmental Stressors on Aquatic Ecosystems Assessed by (e)DNA Metabarcoding

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. e25983
Author(s):  
Romana Salis ◽  
Arne Beermann ◽  
Jan Macher ◽  
Christoph Matthaei ◽  
Jeremy Piggott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Aquatic Ecosystems ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Freshwater Ecosystems ◽  
Environmental Stressors ◽  
Macroinvertebrate Communities ◽  
Ecological Requirements ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
The Impact

Traditionally, taxonomic characterisation of organisms has relied on their morphology; however, molecular methods are increasingly used to monitor and assess biodiversity and ecosystem health. Approaches such as DNA amplicon diversity assessments are a particularly useful tool when morphology-based taxonomy is difficult or taxa are morphologically ambiguous, for example for freshwater bacteria and fungi as well as many freshwater invertebrate species. DNA metabarcoding provides the ability to distinguish cryptic taxa (which can differ markedly in their ecological requirements and tolerances) and in addition it can provide valuable insights into the genetic and ecological diversity of taxa and ecosystems. While DNA metabarcoding has been used mostly on tissue of sampled specimens, recent years have seen an increased use of metabarcoding on environmental DNA samples: DNA extracted not from sampled specimens, but from the surrounding soil or water. However, the ability of metabarcoding of specimens and metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) to assess biodiversity and the impact of anthropogenic stressors on freshwater ecosystems is largely understudied. In this talk, several studies that document the advantages and still open challenges of (e)DNA metabarcoding for assessing impacts of environmental stressors on aquatic ecosystems will be presented. These studies, performed in Europe and New Zealand, integrate impacts across different biotic groups, i.e. look at stressor effects on bacterial, protist, fungal and macroinvertebrate communities. Specifically, we use various case studies from freshwater ecosystems to address the following questions: whether eDNA samples, which can be relatively quickly obtained from the water, can act as reliable proxies for catchment-level stressor impacts by comparing these to DNA obtained from local bulk samples, and whether DNA metabarcoding data can also provide quantitative information rather than only presence-absence data. In view of the case studies presented, a perspective on the urgent next steps that need to be taken in order to include genetic tools in routine biomonitoring will be derived and linked to the vision of the international network DNAqua-Net.

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FISH COLLECTION BY NATIONAL CENSUS ON RIVER ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DNA METABARCODING

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. I_415-I_420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa AKAMATSU ◽  
Takayoshi TSUZUKI ◽  
Ryota YOKOYAMA ◽  
Yayoi FUNAHASHI ◽  
Munehiro OHTA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
Fish Collection

Environmental DNA for functional diversity

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Aurélie Bonin ◽  
Lucie Zinger ◽  
Eric Coissac
Keyword(s):  
Functional Groups ◽  
Functional Diversity ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Soil Organisms ◽  
Meaningful Information ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Target Community

Chapter 10 “Environmental DNA for functional diversity” discusses the potential of environmental DNA to assess functional diversity. It first focuses on DNA metabarcoding and discusses the extent to which this approach can be used and/or optimized to retrieve meaningful information on the functions of the target community. This knowledge usually involves coarsely defined functional groups (e.g., woody, leguminous, graminoid plants; shredders or decomposer soil organisms; pathogenicity or decomposition role of certain microorganisms). Chapter 10 then introduces metagenomics and metatranscriptomics approaches, their advantages, but also the challenges and solutions to appropriately sampling, sequencing these complex DNA/RNA populations. Chapter 10 finally presents several strategies and software to analyze metagenomes/metatranscriptomes, and discusses their pros and cons.

Environmental DNA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Aurélie Bonin ◽  
Lucie Zinger ◽  
Eric Coissac
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Feeding Habits ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Ecological Processes ◽  
Biodiversity Research ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
Standard Information

Environmental DNA (eDNA), i.e. DNA released in the environment by any living form, represents a formidable opportunity to gather high-throughput and standard information on the distribution or feeding habits of species. It has therefore great potential for applications in ecology and biodiversity management. However, this research field is fast-moving, involves different areas of expertise and currently lacks standard approaches, which calls for an up-to-date and comprehensive synthesis. Environmental DNA for biodiversity research and monitoring covers current methods based on eDNA, with a particular focus on “eDNA metabarcoding”. Intended for scientists and managers, it provides the background information to allow the design of sound experiments. It revisits all steps necessary to produce high-quality metabarcoding data such as sampling, metabarcode design, optimization of PCR and sequencing protocols, as well as analysis of large sequencing datasets. All these different steps are presented by discussing the potential and current challenges of eDNA-based approaches to infer parameters on biodiversity or ecological processes. The last chapters of this book review how DNA metabarcoding has been used so far to unravel novel patterns of diversity in space and time, to detect particular species, and to answer new ecological questions in various ecosystems and for various organisms. Environmental DNA for biodiversity research and monitoring constitutes an essential reading for all graduate students, researchers and practitioners who do not have a strong background in molecular genetics and who are willing to use eDNA approaches in ecology and biomonitoring.

Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a useful tool for evaluating terrestrial mammal diversity in tropical forests

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Mena ◽  
Hiromi Yagui ◽  
Vania Tejeda ◽  
Emilio Bonifaz ◽  
Eva Bellemain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Forests ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Terrestrial Mammal ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
Mammal Diversity

scholarly journals Corrigendum to: PEMA: a flexible pipeline for environmental DNA metabarcoding analysis of the 16S/18S ribosomal RNA, ITS, and COI marker genes

GigaScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haris Zafeiropoulos ◽  
Ha Quoc Viet ◽  
Katerina Vasileiadou ◽  
Antonis Potirakis ◽  
Christos Arvanitidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
18S Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document