Environmental and Economic Assessment of Electrothermal Swing Adsorption of Air Emissions from Sheet-Foam Production Compared to Conventional Abatement Techniques

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 1465-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Johnsen ◽  
Hamidreza Emamipour ◽  
Jeremy S. Guest ◽  
Mark J. Rood
Keyword(s):  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Air Emissions ◽  
Electrothermal Swing Adsorption ◽  
Foam Production

ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Afonina ◽  
Svetlana Goncharova
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Economic Assessment

Biorefinery implementation for recovery debottlenecking at existing pulp mills- Part II: Techno-economic evaluation

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAKIM GHEZZAZ ◽  
LUC PELLETIER ◽  
PAUL R. STUART
Keyword(s):  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Black Liquor ◽  
Pulp Mill ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Extraction Process ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Precipitation Process

The evaluation and process risk assessment of (a) lignin precipitation from black liquor, and (b) the near-neutral hemicellulose pre-extraction for recovery boiler debottlenecking in an existing pulp mill is presented in Part I of this paper, which was published in the July 2012 issue of TAPPI Journal. In Part II, the economic assessment of the two biorefinery process options is presented and interpreted. A mill process model was developed using WinGEMS software and used for calculating the mass and energy balances. Investment costs, operating costs, and profitability of the two biorefinery options have been calculated using standard cost estimation methods. The results show that the two biorefinery options are profitable for the case study mill and effective at process debottlenecking. The after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of the lignin precipitation process option was estimated to be 95%, while that of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process option was 28%. Sensitivity analysis showed that the after tax-IRR of the lignin precipitation process remains higher than that of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process option, for all changes in the selected sensitivity parameters. If we consider the after-tax IRR, as well as capital cost, as selection criteria, the results show that for the case study mill, the lignin precipitation process is more promising than the near-neutral hemicellulose pre-extraction process. However, the comparison between the two biorefinery options should include long-term evaluation criteria. The potential of high value-added products that could be produced from lignin in the case of the lignin precipitation process, or from ethanol and acetic acid in the case of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process, should also be considered in the selection of the most promising process option.

There Reduction of alkali loss in an ash leaching system

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 383-391
Author(s):  
CARLA CÉLIA ROSA MEDEIROS ◽  
FLÁVIA AZEVEDO SILVA ◽  
SAULO GODOY PIGNATON ◽  
ESTANISLAU VICTOR ZUTAUTAS ◽  
KLEVERSON FIGUEIREDO
Keyword(s):  
Solid Waste ◽  
Air Emissions ◽  
Recovery Cycle ◽  
Chloride Level ◽  
Control Loops ◽  
Kraft Mill ◽  
Recovery Boiler ◽  
Ash Leaching

There are many points in a kraft mill where the alkaline compounds are purged from the process. Several effluents, solid waste, and air emissions contain alkali, which leads to the necessity of chemical makeups to maintain the liquor balance. The main loss of alkali at the Veracel mill is present in the wastewater from the recovery boiler; more precisely, it is from the ash leaching system, which represents 80% of the total losses. To minimize the alkaline losses while keeping the chloride level in the recovery cycle under control, a project was developed at Veracel. Key actions were taken by adjusting the control loops of the ash leaching system, mainly on the slurry density and purge control. These adjustments led to a decrease in alkali losses and to an increase of treated ash, and kept the chloride level of the recovery boiler dust at 2.6%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document