scholarly journals Machine Learning Models of Groundwater Arsenic Spatial Distribution in Bangladesh: Influence of Holocene Sediment Depositional History

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (15) ◽  
pp. 9454-9463
Author(s):  
Zhen Tan ◽  
Qiang Yang ◽  
Yan Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Depositional History ◽  
Holocene Sediment ◽  
Groundwater Arsenic ◽  
Machine Learning Models

scholarly journals Decoding defect statistics from diffractograms via machine learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Kunka ◽  
Apaar Shanker ◽  
Elton Y. Chen ◽  
Surya R. Kalidindi ◽  
Rémi Dingreville
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Atomistic Simulations ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Electron Diffractograms ◽  
Material Information ◽  
Machine Learning Models

AbstractDiffraction techniques can powerfully and nondestructively probe materials while maintaining high resolution in both space and time. Unfortunately, these characterizations have been limited and sometimes even erroneous due to the difficulty of decoding the desired material information from features of the diffractograms. Currently, these features are identified non-comprehensively via human intuition, so the resulting models can only predict a subset of the available structural information. In the present work we show (i) how to compute machine-identified features that fully summarize a diffractogram and (ii) how to employ machine learning to reliably connect these features to an expanded set of structural statistics. To exemplify this framework, we assessed virtual electron diffractograms generated from atomistic simulations of irradiated copper. When based on machine-identified features rather than human-identified features, our machine-learning model not only predicted one-point statistics (i.e. density) but also a two-point statistic (i.e. spatial distribution) of the defect population. Hence, this work demonstrates that machine-learning models that input machine-identified features significantly advance the state of the art for accurately and robustly decoding diffractograms.

scholarly journals Distribution of Groundwater Arsenic in Uruguay Using Hybrid Machine Learning and Expert System Approaches

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 527
Author(s):  
Ruohan Wu ◽  
Elena M. Alvareda ◽  
David A. Polya ◽  
Gonzalo Blanco ◽  
Pablo Gamazo
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Environmental Parameters ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Deep Aquifers ◽  
Crystalline Aquifer ◽  
Groundwater Arsenic ◽  
Hybrid Machine ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Groundwater arsenic in Uruguay is an important environmental hazard, hence, predicting its distribution is important to inform stakeholders. Furthermore, occurrences in Uruguay are known to variably show dependence on depth and geology, arguably reflecting different processes controlling groundwater arsenic concentrations. Here, we present the distribution of groundwater arsenic in Uruguay modelled by a variety of machine learning, basic expert systems, and hybrid approaches. A pure random forest approach, using 26 potential predictor variables, gave rise to a groundwater arsenic distribution model with a very high degree of accuracy (AUC = 0.92), which is consistent with known high groundwater arsenic hazard areas. These areas are mainly in southwest Uruguay, including the Paysandú, Río Negro, Soriano, Colonia, Flores, San José, Florida, Montevideo, and Canelones departments, where the Mercedes, Cuaternario Oeste, Raigón, and Cretácico main aquifers occur. A hybrid approach separating the country into sedimentary and crystalline aquifer domains resulted in slight material improvement in a high arsenic hazard distribution. However, a further hybrid approach separately modelling shallow (<50 m) and deep aquifers (>50 m) resulted in the identification of more high hazard areas in Flores, Durazno, and the northwest corner of Florida departments in shallow aquifers than the pure model. Both hybrid models considering depth (AUC = 0.95) and geology (AUC = 0.97) produced improved accuracy. Hybrid machine learning models with expert selection of important environmental parameters may sometimes be a better choice than pure machine learning models, particularly where there are incomplete datasets, but perhaps, counterintuitively, this is not always the case.

Improving XGBoost with Imagination Sampling

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Eric Holloway
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
General System ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Imagination Sampling is the usage of a person as an oracle for generating or improving machine learning models. Previous work demonstrated a general system for using Imagination Sampling for obtaining multibox models. Here, the possibility of importing such models as the starting point for further automatic enhancement is explored.

Epigenetic Target Prediction with Accurate Machine Learning Models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norberto Sánchez-Cruz ◽  
Jose L. Medina-Franco
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Target Prediction ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Discovery Research ◽  
Drug Discovery Research ◽  
Machine Learning Models

<p>Epigenetic targets are a significant focus for drug discovery research, as demonstrated by the eight approved epigenetic drugs for treatment of cancer and the increasing availability of chemogenomic data related to epigenetics. This data represents a large amount of structure-activity relationships that has not been exploited thus far for the development of predictive models to support medicinal chemistry efforts. Herein, we report the first large-scale study of 26318 compounds with a quantitative measure of biological activity for 55 protein targets with epigenetic activity. Through a systematic comparison of machine learning models trained on molecular fingerprints of different design, we built predictive models with high accuracy for the epigenetic target profiling of small molecules. The models were thoroughly validated showing mean precisions up to 0.952 for the epigenetic target prediction task. Our results indicate that the herein reported models have considerable potential to identify small molecules with epigenetic activity. Therefore, our results were implemented as freely accessible and easy-to-use web application.</p>

Utilizing Blockchain Technology in Social Media Bot Identification

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreya Reddy ◽  
Lisa Ewen ◽  
Pankti Patel ◽  
Prerak Patel ◽  
Ankit Kundal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Current Time ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
Machine Learning Models

<p>As bots become more prevalent and smarter in the modern age of the internet, it becomes ever more important that they be identified and removed. Recent research has dictated that machine learning methods are accurate and the gold standard of bot identification on social media. Unfortunately, machine learning models do not come without their negative aspects such as lengthy training times, difficult feature selection, and overwhelming pre-processing tasks. To overcome these difficulties, we are proposing a blockchain framework for bot identification. At the current time, it is unknown how this method will perform, but it serves to prove the existence of an overwhelming gap of research under this area.<i></i></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document