Comparison between high-resolution selected ion monitoring, selected reaction monitoring, and four-sector tandem mass spectrometry in quantitative analysis of gibberellins in milligram amounts of plant tissue.

1995 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1711-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas. Moritz ◽  
Jorunn E. Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Tandem Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Plant Tissue ◽  
Selected Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Tandem Mass ◽  
Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Selected Ion Monitoring

Assessment of semi-permanent hair dyes in wash water from beauty salons by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-selected reaction monitoring (LC-MS/MS-SRM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (44) ◽  
pp. 5415-5423
Author(s):  
Jefferson Honorio Franco ◽  
Bianca F. da Silva ◽  
Maria V. B. Zanoni
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Tandem Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Wash Water ◽  
Selected Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Tandem Mass ◽  
Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Hair Dyes ◽  
Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass

Herein, we present an approach for the quantification of semi-permanent hair dyes in wash water samples released during washing of dyed hair employing a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-selected reaction monitoring (LC-MS/MS-SRM).

scholarly journals Pitfalls and Prevention Strategies for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the Selected Reaction– Monitoring Mode for Drug Analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1519-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
François-Ludovic Sauvage ◽  
Jean-Michel Gaulier ◽  
Gérard Lachâtre ◽  
Pierre Marquet
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Tandem Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Relative Abundance ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Selected Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Tandem Mass ◽  
Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Positive Results

Abstract Background: We observed cases of false-positive results with the use of liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Different LC-MS/MS techniques that use the selected reaction-monitoring mode, routinely employed for the analysis and quantification of drugs and toxic compounds in biological matrices, were involved in the false-positive and potentially false-positive results obtained. We sought to analyze the causes of and solutions to this problem. Methods: We used a previously reported LC-MS/MS general unknown screening method, as well as manual spectral investigation in 1 case, to perform verification and identification of interfering compounds. Results: We observed that false-positive results involved: a metabolite of zolpidem that might have been mistaken for lysergic acid diethylamide, benzoylecgonine mistaken for atropine, and clomipramine and 3 phenothiazines that share several common ion transitions. Conclusions: To prevent problems such as those we experienced, we recommend the use of stable-isotope internal standards when possible, relative retention times, 2 transitions or more per compound when possible, and acceptable relative abundance ratios between transitions, with an experience-based tolerance of ±15% for transitions with a relative abundance >10% and with an extension to ±25% for transitions <10% when the concentration is at the limit of quantification. A powerful general unknown screening procedure can help to confirm suspected interferences. Our results indicate that the specificity of screening procedures is questionable for LC-MS/MS analyses performed in the selected reaction-monitoring mode and involving a large number of compounds with only 1 transition per compound.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document