scholarly journals An Update on the Florida State Twin Registry

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette E. Taylor ◽  
Sara A. Hart ◽  
Amy J. Mikolajewski ◽  
Christopher Schatschneider

The Florida State Twin Registry began in 2002 through a pilot study of personality disorders and executive cognitive functioning in adult twins. Since 2006, the registry has grown substantially as part of the Learning Disability Research Center at Florida State University that recently began its second funding cycle through the National Institute of Child Health and Development. An update on the Florida State Twin Registry sample, focus, and measures is provided, as well as future directions.

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-730
Author(s):  
Jeanette Taylor ◽  
Kimberly Martinez ◽  
Sara A. Hart

AbstractThe Florida State Twin Registry has existed for nearly two decades, and it grew primarily over 10 years as part of the Florida Learning Disability Research Center at Florida State University. The registry contains 2753 sets of twins and other multiples in Florida. The mean age of the sample currently is 17.96 years (SD = 2.05). The registry is diverse in terms of race and ethnicity (49% White, 19% African American, 24% Hispanic and 8% mixed or other). The characteristics of the samples and measures in the studies that served to build the registry are outlined.


Author(s):  
ELizabeth Logan ◽  
Lori L. Driscoll-Eagan

A pilot study devised to explore factors contributing to searcher persistence in varying electronic environments was conducted in the usability lab at the School of Information Studies at Florida State University in the summer and fall of 1997. Subjects were students who claimed some knowledge of WWW searching and students who had completed a basic course in traditional electronic searching.


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Mi Hur ◽  
Joong Sik Shin ◽  
Hoe-Uk Jeong ◽  
Jung Yeol Han

AbstractThe South Korean Twin Registry (SKTR), previously called the Seoul Twin Family Study, is a nationwide volunteer registry of South Korean twins and their families. Since 2002, the SKTR has been updated in 4 important ways. First, continued sampling led to an increase in the number of twins. Second, the target area, Seoul, was enlarged to include other cities and rural areas in the country. Third, the target population was extended from school-aged twins to preschool and adult twins. Fourth, the research focus was expanded to include psychiatric and physical disease phenotypes. The present article describes a brief history of the SKTR, goals and current research highlights, recent major accomplishments, and future directions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 761-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A. Hart ◽  
Kim Martinez ◽  
Patrick C. Kennedy ◽  
Colleen M. Ganley ◽  
Jeanette Taylor

AbstractThe National Project on Achievement in Twins (NatPAT) began in 2017 as part of the third funding cycle of the Florida Learning Disabilities Research Center, a program project grant funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development. NatPAT will have a nationally representative sample of elementary school-aged twins in the United States. The overall goal of the project is to uncover salient factors, including genetic and environmental influences, which contribute to the co-development of reading and math performance during the critical developmental period of elementary school. Here we present the specific aims, methods and materials, and future directions of the project.


2019 ◽  
pp. 113-118

Background Suppression is associated with binocular vision conditions such as amblyopia and strabismus. Commercial methods of testing fusion often only measure central fusion or suppression at near. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess a new iPad picture fusion test that assesses foveal and central fusion at near. Methods Participants aged 5 years and older presenting for eye examination at The Ohio State University College of Optometry were enrolled. Results from visual acuity, dry and wet refraction/retinoscopy, stereopsis and cover testing were recorded from the patient chart. The iPad picture fusion test, Worth four-dot, Worth type test with foveal letter targets, and Polarized four-dot were performed by one examiner in a randomized order at 40 cm. Testing was repeated with the anaglyphic filters reversed. Crosstabulation and McNemar chi-square analysis were used to compare the results between fusion testing devices. Results Of the fifty participants (mean age = 17.5), twelve reported suppression and one reported diplopia. Testability was excellent for all tests (98% to 100%). There were no significant differences between tests in reported results (P ≥ 0.22 for all comparisons). No difference in reported fusion or suppression status was observed with change in orientation of the anaglyphic filters. Six participants reported foveal suppression alone at near which was not identified with Worth four-dot at near. Conclusion The iPad picture fusion test provided excellent testability and agreement with commonly used tests of fusion and allowed testing of both central and foveal fusion at near. Nearly half (46%) of participants with suppression reported foveal suppression, supporting the importance of testing for foveal suppression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document