An attempt to detect an Electric Moment in a Light Quantum

1930 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Clark ◽  
W. H. Watson

If a light quantum has an electric moment, we should expect its axis to coincide with the direction of the electric vector, and therefore to be perpendicular to the plane of polarisation. Now an electric doublet of moment μ on entering a uniform electric field E with its doubletaxis parallel or antiparallel to the field will have its energy changed by an amount ∓ μE. For a light quantum this is equivalent to a change in wave-lengthwhen in the field. The method adopted to detect this change was to set up a grating with a strong electric field normal to its surface, and then have a plane polarised parallel beam of light fall on the ruled surface with the electric vector parallel to the direction of the field. The spectra formed near the normal to the grating were then examined both in the presence and absence of the field.

2010 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 286-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
DOV RHODES ◽  
EHUD YARIV

A dielectric drop is suspended within a dielectric liquid and is exposed to a uniform electric field. Due to polarization forces, the drop deforms from its initial spherical shape, becoming prolate in the field direction. At strong electric fields, the drop elongates significantly, becoming long and slender. For moderate ratios of the permittivities of the drop and surrounding liquid, the drop ends remain rounded. The slender limit was originally analysed by Sherwood (J. Phys. A, vol. 24, 1991, p. 4047) using a singularity representation of the electric field. Here, we revisit it using matched asymptotic expansions. The electric field within the drop is continued into a comparable solution in the ‘inner’ region, at the drop cross-sectional scale, which is itself matched into the singularity representation in the ‘outer’ region, at the drop longitudinal scale. The expansion parameter of the problem is the elongated drop slenderness. In contrast to familiar slender-body analysis, this parameter is not provided by the problem formulation, and must be found throughout the course of the solution. The drop aspect-ratio scaling, with the 6/7-power of the electric field, is identical to that found by Sherwood (J. Phys. A, vol. 24, 1991, p. 4047). The predicted drop shape is compared with the boundary-integral solutions of Sherwood (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 188, 1988, p. 133). While the agreement is better than that found by Sherwood (J. Phys. A, vol. 24, 1991, p. 4047), the weak logarithmic decay of the error terms still hinders an accurate calculation. We obtain the leading-order correction to the drop shape, improving the asymptotic approximation.


1972 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sozou

The deformation of a liquid drop immersed in a conducting fluid by the imposition of a uniform electric field is investigated. The flow field set up is due to the surface charge and the tangential electric field stress over the surface of the drop, and the rotationality of the Lorentz force which is set up by the electric current and the associated magnetic field. It is shown that when the fluids are poor conductors and good dielectrics the effects of the Lorentz force are minimal and the flow field is due to the stresses of the electric field tangential to the surface of the drop, in agreement with other authors. When, however, the fluids are highly conducting and poor dielectrics the effects of the Lorentz force may be predominant, especially for larger drops.


Author(s):  
N. Aubry ◽  
P. Singh ◽  
S. Nudurupati ◽  
M. Janjua

We present a technique to concentrate particles on the surface of a drop, separate different types of particles, and remove them from the drop by subjecting the drop to a uniform electric field. The particles are moved under the action of the dielectrophoretic force which arises due to the non-uniformity of the electric field on the surface of the drop. Experiments show that depending on the dielectric constants of the fluids and the particles, particles aggregate either near the poles or near the equator of the drop. When particles aggregate near the poles and the dielectric constant of the drop is greater than that of the ambient fluid, the drop deformation is larger than that of a clean drop. In this case, under a sufficiently strong electric field the drop develops conical ends and particles concentrated at the poles eject out by a tip streaming mechanism, thus leaving the drop free of particles. On the other hand, when particles aggregate near the equator, it is shown that the drop can be broken into three major droplets, with the middle droplet carrying all particles and the two larger sized droplets on the sides being free of particles. The method also allows us to separate particles for which the sign of the Clausius-Mossotti factor is different, making particles of one type aggregate at the poles and of the second type aggregate at the equator. The former are removed from the drop by increasing the electric field strength, leaving only the latter inside the drop.


1997 ◽  
Vol 117 (11) ◽  
pp. 1109-1114
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Suda ◽  
Kenji Mutoh ◽  
Yosuke Sakai ◽  
Kiyotaka Matsuura ◽  
Norio Homma

2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1445-1451
Author(s):  
Takanori Yasuoka ◽  
Tomohiro Kato ◽  
Katsumi Kato ◽  
Hitoshi Okubo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document