scholarly journals Birmingham University Radiocarbon Dates VI

Radiocarbon ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. W. Shotton ◽  
R. E. G. Williams

The following list comprises results obtained during 1971 from both the 1 L and 6 L proportional gas counters at pressures of 1 to 3 atm of methane. Age calculations are based on 95% activity of NBS oxalic acid standard and computed from the Libby half-life of 5570 ± 30 yr. Background samples are synthesized from Welsh anthracite. Errors quoted refer only to the standard deviation (1σ) calculated from a statistical analysis of sample, background, and standard count rates. Recently a Micromass 6 mass spectrometer was installed in the Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory which will enable C13 measurements on future samples. Pretreatment is continued as described previously (R., 1969, v. 11, p. 263) but in cases where sample size was insufficient for full pretreatment, details are described.

Radiocarbon ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. W. Shotton ◽  
R. E. G. Williams

The following list comprises results obtained during 1970 from both the 1 L and 6 L counters. Results are not corrected for C13fractionation. Errors quoted refer only to the standard deviation calculated from a statistical analysis of sample and background count rates and the Libby half-life of 5570 ± 30 yr. Pretreatment has been continued as described previously (R., 1969, v. 11, p. 263). In cases where sample size was insufficient for full pretreatment, details of the necessary deviations accompany the result.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. W. Shotton ◽  
R. E. G. Williams

The following list of dates contains all measurements made during 1972, i.e., since our last list. Counting equipment, operating procedures and sample pretreatment are the same as previously described (R., 1969, v. 11, p. 263). Age calculations are based on 95% activity of the NBS oxalic acid standard computed from the Libby half-life of 5570 ± 30 yr. Background samples are synthesized from Welsh anthracite. Errors quoted refer only to the standard deviation (1σ) calculated from a statistical analysis of sample, background and standard count rates.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-158
Author(s):  
Arvi Liiva ◽  
Ilze Loze

This date list reports dates of archaeological samples of Mesolithic and Neolithic sites of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. We use liquid scintillation counting at the Geochemical and Statistical Laboratory of the Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Academy of Sciences. Our modern standard is benzene enriched in 14C and its activity is checked with an NBS oxalic acid standard sample. Dates are given in conventional 14C years, based on the Libby half-life of 5570 ± 30 yr. AD 1950 is the reference year. Errors are based on one standard deviation calculated from count rates.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 256-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Crane ◽  
James B. Griffin

The following is a list of dates obtained since the time of the compilation of List X in December 1964. The method is essentially the same as that used for the work described in the previous list. Two CO2-CS2Geiger counter systems are used. The equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). The dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and including VII we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statistical errors of counting, in order to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest he double the figures that are given in this list.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 228-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Crane ◽  
James B. Griffin

The following is a list of dates obtained since the time of the compilation of List VII in December 1961. The method is essentially the same as that used for the work described in the previous list. Two CO2-CS2 Geiger counter systems are used. The equipment and counting technique have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961a, 1961b). The dates and the estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conference of 1962, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of a half life of 5568 years, (b) a.d. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In all previous Michigan date lists we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statistical errors of counting, in order to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many other sources of error in the dating process, we suggest he double the figures that are given in this list. The procedures for converting the dates to the more recent half life scale and to a scale having its zero at any time other than 1950 need not be given here as they have been covered in this journal and elsewhere. Where there is no comment, it is because the submitter of the sample had none to make.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuin-Chi Hsu ◽  
Muh-Chen Chou ◽  
Yi-Chuan Hsu ◽  
Song-Yun Lin ◽  
Shih-Chong Lu

The C14 dates given below have been obtained by counting CO2 at 2 atm pressure in a 1 L proportional counter. Details of procedure are given in our previous list (R., 1970, v. 12, p. 187–192). Radiocarbon dates in this list are based on 95% of activity of NBS oxalic acid as the modern standard and were calculated using 5570 yr as the half-life of C14. Errors quoted with the dates are standard deviation originating from the statistical nature of radioactive disintegration process. Results obtained during 1970 and 1971 are described here.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Crane ◽  
James B. Griffin

The following is a list of dates obtained since the time of the compilation of List VIII in December 1962. The method is essentially the same as that used for the work described in the previous list. Two CO2-CS2 Geiger counter systems are used. The equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961a, 1961b). The dates and the estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conference of 1962, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half life, 5570 years, (b) a.d. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and including VII we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statistical errors of counting, in order to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many other sources of error in the dating process, we suggest he double the figures that are given in this list. Where there is no comment, it is because the submitter of the sample had none to make.We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in preparing chemical samples and Roscoe Wilmeth in preparing the descriptions. The descriptions and comments are essentially those of persons submitting the samples.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 498-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Fairhall ◽  
W. R. Schell ◽  
J. A. Young

This date list consists of those measurements made since 1962. The counter is one described previously (Fairhall and Schell, 1963). The results are computed using NBS oxalic acid as the standard and 5568 for the half-life of C14. Standard deviations are computed for each measurement, including the statistical error in the sample count and uncertainties in background and standard. In general, each sample is counted at least twice. The quoted error on the date is the standard deviation. A 2σ criterion is used to establish a lower limit to the age of very old samples with no detectable trace of C14. No correction for isotope fractionation has been made in any of the measurements.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. W. Shotton ◽  
D. J. Blundell ◽  
R. E. G. Williams

Measurements have continued with the 6 L counter which has proved reliable at pressures as high as 2.6 atm and as low as 0.3 atm. It has now been enclosed in a double ring of 27 geiger tubes which has reduced the background count to 10 cpm at 2 atm. So far, we have had no success with the 1.5 L Oeschger-type proportional counter. Failure to obtain steady readings is probably due to continued outgassing from the teflon insulation. All insulating parts have now been remanufactured from the same source of teflon as was used in the 6 L counter, and the Oeschger counter is being reassembled.Results are still given without correction for δC13. Errors quoted refer only to the standard deviation calculated from a statistical analysis of count rates and the Libby half-life of 5570 ± 30 yr.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Crane ◽  
James B. Griffin

The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as described in that list. Two CO2-CS2Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and including VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statistical errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list.We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in preparing chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document