A randomized controlled trial with 4-month follow-up of adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex for depression

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mogg ◽  
G. Pluck ◽  
S. V. Eranti ◽  
S. Landau ◽  
R. Purvis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Sham Group ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Real Group ◽  
The Mean

BackgroundEffectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depression is unclear. The authors performed a randomized controlled trial comparing real and sham adjunctive rTMS with 4-month follow-up.MethodFifty-nine patients with major depression were randomly assigned to a 10-day course of either real (n=29) or sham (n=30) rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Primary outcome measures were the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and proportions of patients meeting criteria for response (⩾50% reduction in HAMD) and remission (HAMD⩽8) after treatment. Secondary outcomes included mood self-ratings on Beck Depression Inventory-II and visual analogue mood scales, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score, and both self-reported and observer-rated cognitive changes. Patients had 6-week and 4-month follow-ups.ResultsOverall, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were modestly reduced in both groups but with no significant group×time interaction (p=0.09) or group main effect (p=0.85); the mean difference in HAMD change scores was −0.3 (95% CI −3.4 to 2.8). At end-of-treatment time-point, 32% of the real group were responders compared with 10% of the sham group (p=0.06); 25% of the real group met the remission criterion compared with 10% of the sham group (p=0.2); the mean difference in HAMD change scores was 2.9 (95% CI −0.7 to 6.5). There were no significant differences between the two groups on any secondary outcome measures. Blinding was difficult to maintain for both patients and raters.ConclusionsAdjunctive rTMS of the left DLPFC could not be shown to be more effective than sham rTMS for treating depression.

scholarly journals Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with visual scanning treatment on cognitive and behavioral symptoms of left hemispatial neglect in right hemispheric stroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Di Gregorio ◽  
Fabio La Porta ◽  
Emanuela Casanova ◽  
Elisabetta Magni ◽  
Roberta Bonora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hemispatial Neglect ◽  
Visual Scanning ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocol ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background Left hemispatial neglect (LHN) is a neuropsychological syndrome often associated with right hemispheric stroke. Patients with LHN have difficulties in attending, responding, and consciously representing the right side of space. Various rehabilitation protocols have been proposed to reduce clinical symptoms related to LHN, using cognitive treatments, or on non-invasive brain stimulation. However, evidence of their benefit is still lacking; in particular, only a few studies focused on the efficacy of combining different approaches in the same patient. Methods In the present study, we present the SMART ATLAS trial (Stimolazione MAgnetica Ripetitiva Transcranica nell’ATtenzione LAteralizzata dopo Stroke), a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with pre-test (baseline), post-test, and 12 weeks follow-up assessments based on a novel rehabilitation protocol based on the combination of brain stimulation and standard cognitive treatment. In particular, we will compare the efficacy of inhibitory repetitive-transcranial magnetic stimulation (r-TMS), applied over the left intact parietal cortex of LHN patients, followed by visual scanning treatment, in comparison with a placebo stimulation (SHAM control) followed by the same visual scanning treatment, on visuospatial symptoms and neurophysiological parameters of LHN in a population of stroke patients. Discussion Our trial results may provide scientific evidence of a new, relatively low-cost rehabilitation protocol for the treatment of LHN. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04080999. Registered on September 2019.

scholarly journals Results Are Similar Two Years After Acute or Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. A Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0017
Author(s):  
Karl Eriksson ◽  
Christoffer von Essen ◽  
Björn Barenius
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Delayed Group ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: Acute ACLR has been avoided since the 1990’s due to reports of postoperative stiffness. But are these risks still valid with modern arthroscopic techniques? The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the impact of the time between injury and reconstruction on the outcome after ACLR. Our hypothesis was that acute ACLR with semitendinosus graft can be performed safely. Methods: The primary endpoint was ROM at three months after surgery. A power calculation revealed the need for 64 patients to detect a ROM difference of 5 degrees between the groups (5% significance level). 70 patients with a high recreational activity level (Tegner ≥6) who presented with an acute ACL injury were randomized to an acute reconstruction within 8 days from the injury or delayed reconstruction (after normalized ROM) 6-10 weeks after the injury. Fixation was with Endobutton in femur and a metallic interference screw in tibia. The rehabilitation was performed at the same physiotherapy center for all patients. Follow up assessment was performed by a physiotherapist not involved with the rehabilitation. The follow up at 24 months included ROM, Lachman, instrumented laxity with Rolimeter, pivot shift, one leg hop index, Biodex, IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm and Tegner Activity level, and a VAS question regarding knee function and the knee function’s effect on activity level. Results: Seventy percent of the patients were males, mean age at the time of surgery was 27 years (18 -41) and the median pre-injury Tegner level was 9 (6-10) with no differences between the groups. 64 (91%) patients were assessed at three months with no difference according to the primary endpoint. Median Tegner level was restored to pre-injury levels in both groups after one year, and did not change between one and two years. 63 (90%) patients were available for the 2-year follow up. There was one graft rupture and one contralateral ACL injury in both groups. There was additional surgery in 15% of the acute patients and in 31% in the delayed (n.s.). The mean instrumented laxity was 1.8 mm in the acute and 2.0 in the delayed group. There were no positive pivot shift in the acute group and 6 patients with grade 1 or not possible to perform in the delayed group (p=0.039). IKDC revealed no significant differences between the groups. Lysholm score was 87 in both groups. KOOS values showed no significant difference between the groups. VAS response to the question “How is your knee working on a scale from 0-100? (100 = best)” was 81 in the acute and 71 in the delayed group (p=0.1) and “How does your knee affect your activity level? (100 = no affection)” the mean score was 75 in the acute and 67 in the delayed group (p=0.3). Functional strength (one leg hop index >90%) was 85% in the acute and 67% in the delayed group (n.s). Conclusion: We found no increased risk of arthrofibrosis after acute ACLR. Good results can be achieved at two years regardless of ROM and swelling in the acute stage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document