Conodont size, trophic level, and the evolution of platform elements

Paleobiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Ginot ◽  
Nicolas Goudemand
Keyword(s):  
Trophic Level ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Developmental Constraints ◽  
Raw Data ◽  
Limited Impact ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Character Matrix

AbstractConodonts are among the first vertebrates to have evolved mineralized tooth-like structures. Among these, the so-called P1 elements are known to have been used to break down food and display a wide variety of morphologies. In particular, the repeated independent evolution of platform-like P1 elements have been suggested to correspond to similar functional constraints linked to diet. To test this hypothesis of convergence, we measured size (as element length) for various conodont taxa and used it as a proxy for trophic level. We then tested the correlation between size and platform presence/absence, both on raw data and in a phylogenetic context. Retaining or excluding the platform traits from the character matrix has limited impact on the resulting phylogeny. Contrary to platform presence/absence, size shows no phylogenetic signal. Using the raw data, size and platform presence appear positively correlated. That correlation, however, is no longer significant if one corrects for the phylogeny. We conclude that platform presence cannot be explained by an enlargement of the conodont element, be it via a trophic-level change or developmental constraints. This suggests that conodonts as a whole, and in particular platform-bearing conodonts, were an ecologically diverse group and that the various known platform types are likely to reflect different, rather than convergent, ecological niches.

scholarly journals Patterns of genome size variation in snapping shrimp

Genome ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 393-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas W. Jeffery ◽  
Kristin Hultgren ◽  
Solomon Tin Chi Chak ◽  
T. Ryan Gregory ◽  
Dustin R. Rubenstein
Keyword(s):  
Genome Size ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Chromosome Size ◽  
Genome Size Variation ◽  
Large Genome ◽  
Large Genome Size ◽  
Single Genus ◽  
Geographic Regions

Although crustaceans vary extensively in genome size, little is known about how genome size may affect the ecology and evolution of species in this diverse group, in part due to the lack of large genome size datasets. Here we investigate interspecific, intraspecific, and intracolony variation in genome size in 39 species of Synalpheus shrimps, representing one of the largest genome size datasets for a single genus within crustaceans. We find that genome size ranges approximately 4-fold across Synalpheus with little phylogenetic signal, and is not related to body size. In a subset of these species, genome size is related to chromosome size, but not to chromosome number, suggesting that despite large genomes, these species are not polyploid. Interestingly, there appears to be 35% intraspecific genome size variation in Synalpheus idios among geographic regions, and up to 30% variation in Synalpheus duffyi genome size within the same colony.

scholarly journals Morphological diversity in tenrecs (Afrosoricida, Tenrecidae): comparing tenrec skull diversity to their closest relatives

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sive Finlay ◽  
Natalie Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Morphological Diversity ◽  
Lateral View ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Geometric Morphometric ◽  
Skull Shape ◽  
Morphometric Analyses ◽  
The Family

Morphological diversity is often studied qualitatively. However, to truly understand the evolution of exceptional diversity, it is important to take a quantitative approach instead of relying on subjective, qualitative assessments. Here, we present a quantitative analysis of morphological diversity in a Family of small mammals, the tenrecs (Afrosoricida, Tenrecidae). Tenrecs are often cited as an example of an exceptionally morphologically diverse group. However, this assumption has not been tested quantitatively. We use geometric morphometric analyses of skull shape to test whether tenrecs are more morphologically diverse than their closest relatives, the golden moles (Afrosoricida, Chrysochloridae). Tenrecs occupy a wider range of ecological niches than golden moles so we predict that they will be more morphologically diverse. Contrary to our expectations, We find that tenrec skulls are only more morphologically diverse than golden moles when measured in lateral view. Furthermore, similarities among the species-rich Microgale tenrec Genus appear to mask higher morphological diversity in the rest of the Family. These results reveal new insights into the morphological diversity of tenrecs and highlight the importance of using quantitative methods to test qualitative assumptions about patterns of morphological diversity.

scholarly journals Developmental constraints on behavioural flexibility

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1618) ◽  
pp. 20120350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay E. Holekamp ◽  
Eli M. Swanson ◽  
Page E. Van Meter
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Analysis ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Maternal Effects ◽  
Aggressive Behaviour ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Behavioural Flexibility ◽  
Developmental Constraints ◽  
Relative Brain Size ◽  
Socioecological Models

We suggest that variation in mammalian behavioural flexibility not accounted for by current socioecological models may be explained in part by developmental constraints. From our own work, we provide examples of constraints affecting variation in behavioural flexibility, not only among individuals, but also among species and higher taxonomic units. We first implicate organizational maternal effects of androgens in shaping individual differences in aggressive behaviour emitted by female spotted hyaenas throughout the lifespan. We then compare carnivores and primates with respect to their locomotor and craniofacial adaptations. We inquire whether antagonistic selection pressures on the skull might impose differential functional constraints on evolvability of skulls and brains in these two orders, thus ultimately affecting behavioural flexibility in each group. We suggest that, even when carnivores and primates would theoretically benefit from the same adaptations with respect to behavioural flexibility, carnivores may nevertheless exhibit less behavioural flexibility than primates because of constraints imposed by past adaptations in the morphology of the limbs and skull. Phylogenetic analysis consistent with this idea suggests greater evolutionary lability in relative brain size within families of primates than carnivores. Thus, consideration of developmental constraints may help elucidate variation in mammalian behavioural flexibility.

scholarly journals Brain evolution and development: adaptation, allometry and constraint

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1838) ◽  
pp. 20160433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Montgomery ◽  
Nicholas I. Mundy ◽  
Robert A. Barton
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Natural Selection ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Phenotypic Traits ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Developmental Constraints ◽  
Functional Systems ◽  
Evolution And Development ◽  
Developmental Mechanisms

Phenotypic traits are products of two processes: evolution and development. But how do these processes combine to produce integrated phenotypes? Comparative studies identify consistent patterns of covariation, or allometries, between brain and body size, and between brain components, indicating the presence of significant constraints limiting independent evolution of separate parts. These constraints are poorly understood, but in principle could be either developmental or functional. The developmental constraints hypothesis suggests that individual components (brain and body size, or individual brain components) tend to evolve together because natural selection operates on relatively simple developmental mechanisms that affect the growth of all parts in a concerted manner. The functional constraints hypothesis suggests that correlated change reflects the action of selection on distributed functional systems connecting the different sub-components, predicting more complex patterns of mosaic change at the level of the functional systems and more complex genetic and developmental mechanisms. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive but make different predictions. We review recent genetic and neurodevelopmental evidence, concluding that functional rather than developmental constraints are the main cause of the observed patterns.

scholarly journals Trophic convergence drives morphological convergence in marine tetrapods

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 20140709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil P. Kelley ◽  
Ryosuke Motani
Keyword(s):  
Feeding Ecology ◽  
Convergent Evolution ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Trophic Groups ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Tooth Morphology ◽  
Marine Life ◽  
Morphological Convergence ◽  
Dietary Data

Marine tetrapod clades (e.g. seals, whales) independently adapted to marine life through the Mesozoic and Caenozoic, and provide iconic examples of convergent evolution. Apparent morphological convergence is often explained as the result of adaptation to similar ecological niches. However, quantitative tests of this hypothesis are uncommon. We use dietary data to classify the feeding ecology of extant marine tetrapods and identify patterns in skull and tooth morphology that discriminate trophic groups across clades. Mapping these patterns onto phylogeny reveals coordinated evolutionary shifts in diet and morphology in different marine tetrapod lineages. Similarities in morphology between species with similar diets—even across large phylogenetic distances—are consistent with previous hypotheses that shared functional constraints drive convergent evolution in marine tetrapods.

scholarly journals Morphological diversity in tenrecs (Afrosoricida, Tenrecidae): comparing tenrec skull diversity to their closest relatives

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sive Finlay ◽  
Natalie Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Morphological Diversity ◽  
Lateral View ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Geometric Morphometric ◽  
Skull Shape ◽  
Morphometric Analyses ◽  
The Family

It is important to quantify patterns of morphological diversity to enhance our understanding of variation in ecological and evolutionary traits. Here, we present a quantitative analysis of morphological diversity in a family of small mammals, the tenrecs (Afrosoricida, Tenrecidae). Tenrecs are often cited as an example of an exceptionally morphologically diverse group. However, this assumption has not been tested quantitatively. We use geometric morphometric analyses of skull shape to test whether tenrecs are more morphologically diverse than their closest relatives, the golden moles (Afrosoricida, Chrysochloridae). Tenrecs occupy a wider range of ecological niches than golden moles so we predict that they will be more morphologically diverse. Contrary to our expectations, we find that tenrec skulls are only more morphologically diverse than golden moles when measured in lateral view. Furthermore, similarities among the species-rich Microgale tenrec genus appear to mask higher morphological diversity in the rest of the family. These results reveal new insights into the morphological diversity of tenrecs and highlight the importance of using quantitative methods to test qualitative assumptions about patterns of morphological diversity.

scholarly journals The evolution of fruit scent: phylogenetic and developmental constraints

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Nevo ◽  
Kim Valenta ◽  
Annemarie Kleiner ◽  
Diary Razafimandimby ◽  
Juan Antonio James Jeffrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Biosynthetic Pathways ◽  
Ripe Fruit ◽  
Developmental Constraints ◽  
Selective Pressures ◽  
Phylogenetic Constraints ◽  
Complex Landscape ◽  
Study Sites ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Unripe Fruits

Abstract Background Fruit scent is increasingly recognized as an evolved signal whose function is to attract animal seed dispersers and facilitate plant reproduction. However, like all traits, fruit scent is likely to evolve in response to conflicting selective pressures and various constraints. Two major constraints are (i) phylogenetic constraints, in which traits are inherited from ancestors rather than adapted to current conditions and (ii) developmental constraints, if phenotypes are limited by the expression of other traits within the individual. We tested whether phylogenetic constraints play a role in fruit scent evolution by calculating the phylogenetic signal in ripe fruits of 98 species from three study sites. We then estimated the importance of developmental constraints by examining whether ripe fruits tend to emit compounds that are chemically similar to, and share biosynthetic pathways with, compounds emitted by conspecific unripe fruits from which they develop. Results We show that closely related taxa are not more similar to each other than to very distinct taxa, thus indicating that fruit scent shows little phylogenetic signal. At the same time, although ripe and unripe fruits of the same species tend to emit different chemicals, they tend to employ chemicals originating from similar biosynthetic pathways, thus indicating that some developmental constraints determine ripe fruit scent. Conclusions Our results highlight the complex landscape in which fruit scent has evolved. On one hand, fruit scent evolution is not limited by common ancestry. On the other hand, the range of chemicals that can be employed in ripe fruits is probably constrained by the needs of unripe fruits.

scholarly journals Testing for phylogenetic signal in claws suggests great influence of ecology on Caribbean intertidal arthropods (Acari, Oribatida)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Kerschbaumer ◽  
Tobias Pfingstl
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Habitat Preferences ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Ecological Aspects ◽  
Perfect Model ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Claw Morphology ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Caribbean Populations

AbstractClaws are common biological attachment devices that can be found in a wide variety of animal groups. Their curvature and size are supposed to be parameters related to ecological aspects. Mites, known as very small arthropods, occupy a wide range of ecological niches and are a perfect model system to investigate correlations of claw morphology with ecology. There is only one study regarding this question in littoral mites but the phylogenetic impact, which plays an important role in the evolution of morphological traits, was not tested. We investigated claw shapes of different Caribbean populations of five species showing different substrate/habitat preferences. We used geometric morphometrics to quantify claw shape and tested for phylogenetic signal within this morphological trait. Even in closely related populations, we found clear claw shapes for hard versus soft substrate, confirming previous findings. Surprisingly, we found no phylogenetic signal within the trait, which demonstrates that ecology (different surfaces and substrates) has acted as one of the primary selective forces in the diversification of claw shapes. Considering that the basic claw design may be the same in the majority of arthropods, our results have important implications for further investigations of claw morphology and its ecological relevance within this phylum.

scholarly journals Diversity of cave Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) from a Colombian cave

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Velazquez ◽  
Adam M M Stuckert ◽  
Rafael Vivero ◽  
Daniel R Matute
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Use ◽  
Latitudinal Gradient ◽  
New Records ◽  
Phylogenetic Signal ◽  
Natural Habitat ◽  
Ecological Niches ◽  
Disease Vectors ◽  
Light Traps ◽  
Vector Species ◽  
Karst Systems

Sandflies are vector species of Leishmania, among many other pathogens, with a global distribution and a variety of ecological niches. Previous samplings have found that karstic formations (i.e., caves and folds formed by the erosion of limestone) serve as a natural habitat to sandfly species. The majority of samplings of cave sandfly diversity have occurred in Brazil and to date none have studied the species composition in a cave in the Northern Andes. We collected sandflies in the Cave-Los Guacharos-, in the state of Antioquia, Colombia. The sampling was carried out during two consecutive nights in September 2019. CDC-type light traps were installed inside the cavern and in other surrounding karst systems (caves and folds). In total, we identified 18 species of sandfly from the cave and surrounding karst systems, including three new records for Colombia (Bichromomyia olmeca nociva, Brumptomyia brumpti, and Warileya leponti), and provide the first karstic reports for four other species (Lutzomyia gomezi, Lutzomyia hartmanni, Pintomyia ovallesi, and Psychodopygus panamensis). We then used the results of our survey and published literature to test two hypotheses. First, that sandfly diversity in Neotropical caves is richest nearer to the equator and second that there is a phylogenetic signal of karstic habitat use in sandflies. Counter to our predictions, we found no evidence that diversity follows a latitudinal gradient. Further, we find no evidence of a phylogenetic signal of karstic habitat use, instead finding that the use of caves likely evolved multiple times across several genera. Our results highlight the importance of a wide sampling to understand the natural habitat of sandflies and other disease vectors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document