DEGREES OF CATEGORICITY AND SPECTRAL DIMENSION

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
NIKOLAY A. BAZHENOV ◽  
ISKANDER SH. KALIMULLIN ◽  
MARS M. YAMALEEV

AbstractA Turing degreedis the degree of categoricity of a computable structure${\cal S}$ifdis the least degree capable of computing isomorphisms among arbitrary computable copies of${\cal S}$. A degreedis the strong degree of categoricity of${\cal S}$ifdis the degree of categoricity of${\cal S}$, and there are computable copies${\cal A}$and${\cal B}$of${\cal S}$such that every isomorphism from${\cal A}$onto${\cal B}$computesd. In this paper, we build a c.e. degreedand a computable rigid structure${\cal M}$such thatdis the degree of categoricity of${\cal M}$, butdis not the strong degree of categoricity of${\cal M}$. This solves the open problem of Fokina, Kalimullin, and Miller [13].For a computable structure${\cal S}$, we introduce the notion of the spectral dimension of${\cal S}$, which gives a quantitative characteristic of the degree of categoricity of${\cal S}$. We prove that for a nonzero natural numberN, there is a computable rigid structure${\cal M}$such that$0\prime$is the degree of categoricity of${\cal M}$, and the spectral dimension of${\cal M}$is equal toN.

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 325-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
BARBARA F. CSIMA ◽  
MATTHEW HARRISON-TRAINOR

AbstractWe investigate the complexity of isomorphisms of computable structures on cones in the Turing degrees. We show that, on a cone, every structure has a strong degree of categoricity, and that degree of categoricity is${\rm{\Delta }}_\alpha ^0 $-complete for someα. To prove this, we extend Montalbán’sη-system framework to deal with limit ordinals in a more general way. We also show that, for any fixed computable structure, there is an ordinalαand a cone in the Turing degrees such that the exact complexity of computing an isomorphism between the given structure and another copy${\cal B}$in the cone is a c.e. degree in${\rm{\Delta }}_\alpha ^0\left( {\cal B} \right)$. In each of our theorems the cone in question is clearly described in the beginning of the proof, so it is easy to see how the theorems can be viewed as general theorems with certain effectiveness conditions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 496-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAMUEL R. BUSS ◽  
LESZEK ALEKSANDER KOŁODZIEJCZYK ◽  
NEIL THAPEN

AbstractWe study the long-standing open problem of giving $\forall {\rm{\Sigma }}_1^b$ separations for fragments of bounded arithmetic in the relativized setting. Rather than considering the usual fragments defined by the amount of induction they allow, we study Jeřábek’s theories for approximate counting and their subtheories. We show that the $\forall {\rm{\Sigma }}_1^b$ Herbrandized ordering principle is unprovable in a fragment of bounded arithmetic that includes the injective weak pigeonhole principle for polynomial time functions, and also in a fragment that includes the surjective weak pigeonhole principle for FPNP functions. We further give new propositional translations, in terms of random resolution refutations, for the consequences of $T_2^1$ augmented with the surjective weak pigeonhole principle for polynomial time functions.


1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-754
Author(s):  
J. S. Hwang

Theorem. Letbe a function holomorphic in the disk, wherep is a natural number andIfthen then f(z) assumes every complex value infinitely often in every sector.The purpose of this note is to prove the above result. To do this, we first observe that from the condition a<∞, we can easily show that the derivative f′(z) satisfying


1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Brunner

Fibonacci groups are the groupswhere r is a natural number. The groups F(2, 8) and F(2, 10) are shown to he infinite, thus leaving F(2, 9) as the only Fibonacci group whose finiteness or infiniteness has not been determined.


1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Jones ◽  
Y. V. Matijasevič

The purpose of the present paper is to give a new, simple proof of the theorem of M. Davis, H. Putnam and J. Robinson [1961], which states that every recursively enumerable relation A(a1, …, an) is exponential diophantine, i.e. can be represented in the formwhere a1 …, an, x1, …, xm range over natural numbers and R and S are functions built up from these variables and natural number constants by the operations of addition, A + B, multiplication, AB, and exponentiation, AB. We refer to the variables a1,…,an as parameters and the variables x1 …, xm as unknowns.Historically, the Davis, Putnam and Robinson theorem was one of the important steps in the eventual solution of Hilbert's tenth problem by the second author [1970], who proved that the exponential relation, a = bc, is diophantine, and hence that the right side of (1) can be replaced by a polynomial equation. But this part will not be reproved here. Readers wishing to read about the proof of that are directed to the papers of Y. Matijasevič [1971a], M. Davis [1973], Y. Matijasevič and J. Robinson [1975] or C. Smoryński [1972]. We concern ourselves here for the most part only with exponential diophantine equations until §5 where we mention a few consequences for the class NP of sets computable in nondeterministic polynomial time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUSSELL MILLER ◽  
BJORN POONEN ◽  
HANS SCHOUTENS ◽  
ALEXANDRA SHLAPENTOKH

AbstractFried and Kollár constructed a fully faithful functor from the category of graphs to the category of fields. We give a new construction of such a functor and use it to resolve a longstanding open problem in computable model theory, by showing that for every nontrivial countable structure${\cal S}$, there exists a countable field${\cal F}$of arbitrary characteristic with the same essential computable-model-theoretic properties as${\cal S}$. Along the way, we develop a new “computable category theory”, and prove that our functor and its partially defined inverse (restricted to the categories of countable graphs and countable fields) are computable functors.


1987 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aslam Chaudhry ◽  
J. N. Pandey

AbstractLet D(R) be the Schwartz space of C∞ functions with compact support on R and let H(D) be the space of all C∞ functions defined on R for which every element is the Hilbert transform of an element in D(R), i.e.where the integral is defined in the Cauchy principal-value sense. Introducing an appropriate topology in H(D), Pandey [3] defined the Hilbert transform Hf of f ∈ (D(R))′ as an element of (H(D))′ by the relationand then with an appropriate interpretation he proved that.In this paper we give an intrinsic description of the space H(D) and its topology, thereby providing a solution to an open problem posed by Pandey ([4], p. 90).


Author(s):  
L. N. Vaserstein

Let A be an associative ring with 1. For any natural number n, let GLnA denote the group of invertible n by n matrices over A, and let EnA be the subgroup generated by all elementary matrices ai, j, where aεA and 1 ≤ i ≡ j ≤ n. For any (two-sided) ideal B of A, let GLnB be the kernel of the canonical homomorphism GLnA→GLn(A/B) and Gn(A, B) the inverse image of the centre of GLn(A/B) (when n > 1, the centre consists of scalar matrices over the centre of the ring A/B). Let EnB denote the subgroup of GLnB generated by its elementary matrices, and let En(A, B) be the normal subgroup of EnA generated by EnB (when n > 2, the group GLn(A, B) is generated by matrices of the form ai, jbi, j(−a)i, j with aA, b in B, i ≡ j, see [7]). In particuler,is the centre of GLnA


1993 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
R. C. Baker ◽  
J. Brüdern

Let s be a natural number, s ≥ 2. We seek a positive number λ(s) with the following property:Let ε > 0. Let Q1(x1, …, xs), Q2(x1, …, xs) be real quadratic forms, then for N > C1(s, ε) we havefor some integers n1, …, ns,


1937 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Turing

In the theory of conversion it is important to have a formally defined function which assigns to any positive integer n the least integer not less than n which has a given property. The definition of such a formula is somewhat involved: I propose to give the corresponding formula in λ-K-conversion, which will (naturally) be much simpler. I shall in fact find a formula þ such that if T be a formula for which T(n) is convertible to a formula representing a natural number, whenever n represents a natural number, then þ(T, r) is convertible to the formula q representing the least natural number q, not less than r, for which T(q) conv 0.2 The method depends on finding a formula Θ with the property that Θ conv λu·u(Θ(u)), and consequently if M→Θ(V) then M conv V(M). A formula with this property is,The formula þ will have the required property if þ(T, r) conv r when T(r) conv 0, and þ(T, r) conv þ(T, S(r)) otherwise. These conditions will be satisfied if þ(T, r) conv T(r, λx·þ(T, S(r)), r), i.e. if þ conv {λptr·t(r, λx·p(t, S(r)), r)}(þ). We therefore put,This enables us to define also a formula,such that (T, n) is convertible to the formula representing the nth positive integer q for which T(q) conv 0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document