scholarly journals REFLECTION OF STATIONARY SETS AND THE TREE PROPERTY AT THE SUCCESSOR OF A SINGULAR CARDINAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 272-291
Author(s):  
LAURA FONTANELLA ◽  
MENACHEM MAGIDOR
Keyword(s):  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Stationary Reflection ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals

AbstractWe show that from infinitely many supercompact cardinals one can force a model of ZFC where both the tree property and the stationary reflection hold at אω2+1.

scholarly journals The tree property and the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at ℵω2

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 934-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Sinapova
Keyword(s):  
Generic Extension ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Singular Cardinal Hypothesis

AbstractWe show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which the tree property holds at ℵω2+ 1 and the SCH fails at ℵω2.

scholarly journals Guessing models and the approachability ideal

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150003
Author(s):  
Rahman Mohammadpour ◽  
Boban Veličković
Keyword(s):  
Generic Extension ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Ideal Formula ◽  
Singular Cardinal Hypothesis ◽  
Nonstationary Ideal ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Weak Square

Starting with two supercompact cardinals we produce a generic extension of the universe in which a principle that we call [Formula: see text] holds. This principle implies [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and hence the tree property at [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis, and the failure of the weak square principle [Formula: see text], for all regular [Formula: see text]. In addition, it implies that the restriction of the approachability ideal [Formula: see text] to the set of ordinals of cofinality [Formula: see text] is the nonstationary ideal on this set. The consistency of this last statement was previously shown by W. Mitchell.

scholarly journals Contributions to the Theory of Large Cardinals through the Method of Forcing

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-222
Author(s):  
Alejandro Poveda
Keyword(s):  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Supercompact Cardinal ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Strong Limit ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Prikry Forcing ◽  
Regular Cardinals ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Vopěnka’S Principle

AbstractThe dissertation under comment is a contribution to the area of Set Theory concerned with the interactions between the method of Forcing and the so-called Large Cardinal axioms.The dissertation is divided into two thematic blocks. In Block I we analyze the large-cardinal hierarchy between the first supercompact cardinal and Vopěnka’s Principle (Part I). In turn, Block II is devoted to the investigation of some problems arising from Singular Cardinal Combinatorics (Part II and Part III).We commence Part I by investigating the Identity Crisis phenomenon in the region comprised between the first supercompact cardinal and Vopěnka’s Principle. As a result, we generalize Magidor’s classical theorems [2] to this higher region of the large-cardinal hierarchy. Also, our analysis allows to settle all the questions that were left open in [1]. Finally, we conclude Part I by presenting a general theory of preservation of $C^{(n)}$ -extendible cardinals under class forcing iterations. From this analysis we derive several applications. For instance, our arguments are used to show that an extendible cardinal is consistent with “ $(\lambda ^{+\omega })^{\mathrm {HOD}}<\lambda ^+$ , for every regular cardinal $\lambda $ .” In particular, if Woodin’s HOD Conjecture holds, and therefore it is provable in ZFC + “There exists an extendible cardinal” that above the first extendible cardinal every singular cardinal $\lambda $ is singular in HOD and $(\lambda ^+)^{\textrm {{HOD}}}=\lambda ^+$ , there may still be no agreement at all between V and HOD about successors of regular cardinals.In Part II and Part III we analyse the relationship between the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis (SCH) with other relevant combinatorial principles at the level of successors of singular cardinals. Two of these are the Tree Property and the Reflection of Stationary sets, which are central in Infinite Combinatorics.Specifically, Part II is devoted to prove the consistency of the Tree Property at both $\kappa ^+$ and $\kappa ^{++}$ , whenever $\kappa $ is a strong limit singular cardinal witnessing an arbitrary failure of the SCH. This generalizes the main result of [3] in two senses: it allows arbitrary cofinalities for $\kappa $ and arbitrary failures for the SCH.In the last part of the dissertation (Part III) we introduce the notion of $\Sigma $ -Prikry forcing. This new concept allows an abstract and uniform approach to the theory of Prikry-type forcings and encompasses several classical examples of Prikry-type forcing notions, such as the classical Prikry forcing, the Gitik-Sharon poset, or the Extender Based Prikry forcing, among many others.Our motivation in this part of the dissertation is to prove an iteration theorem at the level of the successor of a singular cardinal. Specifically, we aim for a theorem asserting that every $\kappa ^{++}$ -length iteration with support of size $\leq \kappa $ has the $\kappa ^{++}$ -cc, provided the iterates belong to a relevant class of $\kappa ^{++}$ -cc forcings. While there are a myriad of works on this vein for regular cardinals, this contrasts with the dearth of investigations in the parallel context of singular cardinals. Our main contribution is the proof that such a result is available whenever the class of forcings under consideration is the family of $\Sigma $ -Prikry forcings. Finally, and as an application, we prove that it is consistent—modulo large cardinals—the existence of a strong limit cardinal $\kappa $ with countable cofinality such that $\mathrm {SCH}_\kappa $ fails and every finite family of stationary subsets of $\kappa ^+$ reflects simultaneously.

scholarly journals THE STRONG TREE PROPERTY AT SUCCESSORS OF SINGULAR CARDINALS

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 193-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURA FONTANELLA
Keyword(s):  
Singular Limit ◽  
Inaccessible Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Strongly Compact Cardinals

Abstract An inaccessible cardinal is strongly compact if, and only if, it satisfies the strong tree property. We prove that if there is a model of ZFC with infinitely many supercompact cardinals, then there is a model of ZFC where ${\aleph _{\omega + 1}}$ has the strong tree property. Moreover, we prove that every successor of a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals has the strong tree property.

THE TREE PROPERTY UP TO אω+1

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
ITAY NEEMAN
Keyword(s):  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals

AbstractAssuming ω supercompact cardinals we force to obtain a model where the tree property holds both at אω+1, and at אn for all 2 ≤ n < ω. A model with the former was obtained by Magidor–Shelah from a large cardinal assumption above a huge cardinal, and recently by Sinapova from ω supercompact cardinals. A model with the latter was obtained by Cummings–Foreman from ω supercompact cardinals. Our model, where the two hold simultaneously, is another step toward the goal of obtaining the tree property on increasingly large intervals of successor cardinals.

THE TREE PROPERTY AT THE TWO IMMEDIATE SUCCESSORS OF A SINGULAR CARDINAL

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
JAMES CUMMINGS ◽  
YAIR HAYUT ◽  
MENACHEM MAGIDOR ◽  
ITAY NEEMAN ◽  
DIMA SINAPOVA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Tree Property

The tree property at ℵω+1

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Sinapova
Keyword(s):  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Previous Hypothesis ◽  
Aronszajn Trees

AbstractWe show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at ℵω+1· This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor–Shelah [7].

scholarly journals ARONSZAJN TREES AND FAILURE OF THE SINGULAR CARDINAL HYPOTHESIS

2009 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 139-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
ITAY NEEMAN
Keyword(s):  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Strong Limit ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Singular Cardinal Hypothesis ◽  
Aronszajn Trees ◽  
Strongly Compact Cardinals

The tree property at κ+ states that there are no Aronszajn trees on κ+, or, equivalently, that every κ+ tree has a cofinal branch. For singular strong limit cardinals κ, there is tension between the tree property at κ+ and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at κ; the former is typically the result of the presence of strongly compact cardinals in the background, and the latter is impossible above strongly compacts. In this paper, we reconcile the two. We prove from large cardinals that the tree property at κ+ is consistent with failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at κ.

scholarly journals The special Aronszajn tree property

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Golshani ◽  
Yair Hayut
Keyword(s):  
Regular Cardinal ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
Tree Property ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Aronszajn Tree ◽  
Aronszajn Trees

Assuming the existence of a proper class of supercompact cardinals, we force a generic extension in which, for every regular cardinal [Formula: see text], there are [Formula: see text]-Aronszajn trees, and all such trees are special.

Forcing Axioms, Supercompact Cardinals, Singular Cardinal Combinatorics

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-113
Author(s):  
Matteo Viale
Keyword(s):  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Strongly Compact Cardinal ◽  
Compact Cardinal ◽  
Forcing Axioms ◽  
Supercompact Cardinals ◽  
Saturation Properties ◽  
Proper Forcing Axiom ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Proper Forcing

The purpose of this communication is to present some recent advances on the consequences that forcing axioms and large cardinals have on the combinatorics of singular cardinals. I will introduce a few examples of problems in singular cardinal combinatorics which can be fruitfully attacked using ideas and techniques coming from the theory of forcing axioms and then translate the results so obtained in suitable large cardinals properties.The first example I will treat is the proof that the proper forcing axiom PFA implies the singular cardinal hypothesis SCH, this will easily lead to a new proof of Solovay's theorem that SCH holds above a strongly compact cardinal. I will also outline how some of the ideas involved in these proofs can be used as means to evaluate the “saturation” properties of models of strong forcing axioms like MM or PFA.The second example aims to show that the transfer principle (ℵω+1, ℵω) ↠ (ℵ2, ℵ1) fails assuming Martin's Maximum MM. Also in this case the result can be translated in a large cardinal property, however this requires a familiarity with a rather large fragment of Shelah's pcf-theory.Only sketchy arguments will be given, the reader is referred to the forthcoming [25] and [38] for a thorough analysis of these problems and for detailed proofs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document