scholarly journals SAFE RECURSIVE SET FUNCTIONS

2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 730-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARNOLD BECKMANN ◽  
SAMUEL R. BUSS ◽  
SY-DAVID FRIEDMAN

AbstractWe introduce the safe recursive set functions based on a Bellantoni–Cook style subclass of the primitive recursive set functions. We show that the functions computed by safe recursive set functions under a list encoding of finite strings by hereditarily finite sets are exactly the polynomial growth rate functions computed by alternating exponential time Turing machines with polynomially many alternations. We also show that the functions computed by safe recursive set functions under a more efficient binary tree encoding of finite strings by hereditarily finite sets are exactly the quasipolynomial growth rate functions computed by alternating quasipolynomial time Turing machines with polylogarithmic many alternations.We characterize the safe recursive set functions on arbitrary sets in definability-theoretic terms. In its strongest form, we show that a function on arbitrary sets is safe recursive if and only if it is uniformly definable in some polynomial level of a refinement of Jensen's J-hierarchy, relativized to the transitive closure of the function's arguments.We observe that safe recursive set functions on infinite binary strings are equivalent to functions computed by infinite-time Turing machines in time less than ωω. We also give a machine model for safe recursive set functions which is based on set-indexed parallel processors and the natural bound on running times.

1976 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1205-1209
Author(s):  
Stanley H. Stahl

The class of primitive recursive ordinal functions (PR) has been studied recently by numerous recursion theorists and set theorists (see, for example, Platek [3] and Jensen-Karp [2]). These investigations have been part of an inquiry concerning a larger class of functions; in Platek's case, the class of ordinal recursive functions and in the case of Jensen and Karp, the class of primitive recursive set functions. In [4] I began to study PR in depth and this paper is a report on an attractive analogy between PR and its progenitor, the class of primitive recursive functions on the natural numbers (Prim. Rec).


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 577-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Deolalikar ◽  
Joel David Hamkins ◽  
Ralf Schindler

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 937-953
Author(s):  
ARSENY M. SHUR

We study FAD-languages, which are regular languages defined by finite sets of forbidden factors, together with their “canonical” recognizing automata. We are mainly interested in the possible asymptotic orders of growth for such languages. We analyze certain simplifications of sets of forbidden factors and show that they “almost” preserve the canonical automata. Using this result and structural properties of canonical automata, we describe an algorithm that effectively lists all canonical automata having a sink strong component isomorphic to a given digraph, or reports that no such automata exist. This algorithm can be used, in particular, to prove the existence of a FAD-language over a given alphabet with a given exponential growth rate. On the other hand, we give an example showing that the algorithm cannot prove non-existence of a FAD-language having a given growth rate. Finally, we provide some examples of canonical automata with a nontrivial condensation graph and of FAD-languages with a “complex” order of growth.


2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 1193-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.D. Welch

AbstractWe characterise explicitly the decidable predicates on integers of Infinite Time Turing machines, in terms of admissibility theory and the constructible hierarchy. We do this by pinning down ζ, the least ordinal not the length of any eventual output of an Infinite Time Turing machine (halting or otherwise); using this the Infinite Time Turing Degrees are considered, and it is shown how the jump operator coincides with the production of mastercodes for the constructible hierarchy; further that the natural ordinals associated with the jump operator satisfy a Spector criterion, and correspond to the Lζ-stables. It also implies that the machines devised are “Σ2 Complete” amongst all such other possible machines. It is shown that least upper bounds of an “eventual jump” hierarchy exist on an initial segment.


Author(s):  
Arnold Beckmann ◽  
Sam Buss ◽  
Sy-David Friedman ◽  
Moritz Müller ◽  
Neil Thapen
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 61-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F. Calderón-Soto ◽  
E.J. Herrera-López ◽  
G. Lara-Cisneros ◽  
R. Femat

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1239-1255
Author(s):  
Merlin Carl

Abstract We consider notions of space by Winter [21, 22]. We answer several open questions about these notions, among them whether low space complexity implies low time complexity (it does not) and whether one of the equalities P=PSPACE, P$_{+}=$PSPACE$_{+}$ and P$_{++}=$PSPACE$_{++}$ holds for ITTMs (all three are false). We also show various separation results between space complexity classes for ITTMs. This considerably expands our earlier observations on the topic in Section 7.2.2 of Carl (2019, Ordinal Computability: An Introduction to Infinitary Machines), which appear here as Lemma $6$ up to Corollary $9$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document