scholarly journals THE NON-AXIOMATIZABILITY OF O-MINIMALITY

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEX RENNET
Keyword(s):  
Function Symbol ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Ordered Fields ◽  
Closed Fields

Abstract Fix a language extending the language of ordered fields by at least one new predicate or function symbol. Call an L-structure R pseudo-o-minimal if it is (elementarily equivalent to) an ultraproduct of o-minimal structures. We show that for any recursive list of L-sentences , there is a real closed field satisfying which is not pseudo-o-minimal. This shows that the theory To−min consisting of those -sentences true in all o-minimal -structures, also called the theory of o-minimality (for L), is not recursively axiomatizable. And, in particular, there are locally o-minimal, definably complete expansions of real closed fields which are not pseudo-o-minimal.

scholarly journals Involutions on finite-dimensional algebras over real closed fields

2004 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. D. Munn
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Zero ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Finite Dimensional Algebra ◽  
Dimensional Algebra ◽  
Algebraically Closed Field ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Finite Dimensional Algebras

AbstractIt is shown that the following conditions on a finite-dimensional algebra A over a real closed field or an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero are equivalent: (i) A admits a special involution, in the sense of Easdown and Munn, (ii) A admits a proper involution, (iii) A is semisimple.

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF CENTRALLY FINITE ALTERNATIVE DIVISION RINGS SATISFYING ALGEBRAIC CLOSURE CONDITIONS

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 1250088
Author(s):  
RICCARDO GHILONI
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Closure ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Division Rings ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Closure Conditions ◽  
The One ◽  
Algebraically Closed Fields

In this paper, we prove that the rings of quaternions and of octonions over an arbitrary real closed field are algebraically closed in the sense of Eilenberg and Niven. As a consequence, we infer that some reasonable algebraic closure conditions, including the one of Eilenberg and Niven, are equivalent on the class of centrally finite alternative division rings. Furthermore, we classify centrally finite alternative division rings satisfying such equivalent algebraic closure conditions: up to isomorphism, they are either the algebraically closed fields or the rings of quaternions over real closed fields or the rings of octonions over real closed fields.

Relative randomness and real closed fields

2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 319-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Raichev
Keyword(s):  
Real Number ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Real Numbers ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Ordered Field ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Master's Thesis ◽  
National University

AbstractWe show that for any real number, the class of real numbers less random than it, in the sense of rK-reducibility, forms a countable real closed subfield of the real ordered field. This generalizes the well-known fact that the computable reals form a real closed field.With the same technique we show that the class of differences of computably enumerable reals (d.c.e. reals) and the class of computably approximable reals (c.a. reals) form real closed fields. The d.c.e. result was also proved nearly simultaneously and independently by Ng (Keng Meng Ng, Master's Thesis, National University of Singapore, in preparation).Lastly, we show that the class of d.c.e. reals is properly contained in the class or reals less random than Ω (the halting probability), which in turn is properly contained in the class of c.a. reals, and that neither the first nor last class is a randomness class (as captured by rK-reducibility).

A note on valuation definable expansions of fields

1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 739-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Haskell ◽  
Dugald Macpherson
Keyword(s):  
Valuation Ring ◽  
Quantifier Elimination ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Ordered Field ◽  
Valued Field ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Binary Predicate ◽  
Algebraically Closed Fields

In this note, we consider models of the theories of valued algebraically closed fields and convexly valued real closed fields, their reducts to the pure field or ordered field language respectively, and expansions of these by predicates which are definable in the valued field. We show that, in terms of definability, there is no structure properly between the pure (ordered) field and the valued field. Our results are analogous to several other definability results for reducts of algebraically closed and real closed fields; see [9], [10], [11] and [12]. Throughout this paper, definable will mean definable with parameters.Theorem A. Let ℱ = (F, +, ×, V) be a valued, algebraically closed field, where V denotes the valuation ring. Let A be a subset ofFndefinable in ℱv. Then either A is definable in ℱ = (F, +, ×) or V is definable in.Theorem B. Let ℛv = (R, <, +, ×, V) be a convexly valued real closed field, where V denotes the valuation ring. Let Abe a subset ofRndefinable in ℛv. Then either A is definable in ℛ = (R, <, +, ×) or V is definable in.The proofs of Theorems A and B are quite similar. Both ℱv and ℛv admit quantifier elimination if we adjoin a definable binary predicate Div (interpreted by Div(x, y) if and only if v(x) ≤ v(y)). This is proved in [14] (extending [13]) in the algebraically closed case, and in [4] in the real closed case. We show by direct combinatorial arguments that if the valuation is not definable then the expanded structure is strongly minimal or o-minimal respectively. Then we call on known results about strongly minimal and o-minimal fields to show that the expansion is not proper.

scholarly journals A VALUATION THEORETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF RECURSIVELY SATURATED REAL CLOSED FIELDS

2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAOLA D’AQUINO ◽  
SALMA KUHLMANN ◽  
KAREN LANGE
Keyword(s):  
Abelian Group ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Theoretic Characterization ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Recursively Saturated

AbstractWe give a valuation theoretic characterization for a real closed field to be recursively saturated. This builds on work in [9], where the authors gave such a characterization for κ-saturation, for a cardinal $\kappa \ge \aleph _0 $. Our result extends the characterization of Harnik and Ressayre [7] for a divisible ordered abelian group to be recursively saturated.

A class of connected theories of order

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 534-542
Author(s):  
Alan S. Stern ◽  
Stanisław S. Świerczkowski
Keyword(s):  
Linear Order ◽  
Maximal Element ◽  
Disjoint Union ◽  
General Notion ◽  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Ordered Fields ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Finite Sequences

In 1962 Jan Mycielski proposed a very general notion of interpretability [M1]. This led to the question whether a given theory could be interpreted in the disjoint union of two theories, without being interpretable in any of them. He argued that in such a case it would be presumably simpler to study each of these theories separately, and hence conjectured that this situation can never occur for any of the well-known theories of mathematics. This conjecture has now been verified for the following theories (see [MPS], [P], [S1, 2]): ELO (endless, i.e., without maximal element, linear order), Th(〈ℚ, ≤〉), Th(〈ω, ≤〉) and all sequential theories (those which can code finite sequences of elements of their models). The latter include PA, ZF, GB and Th(〈ω,+,·〉). In view of these confirmations it became ever more plausible that the conjecture is valid also for RCF (real closed fields), i.e., for Th(〈ℝ,≤,+,·,0,1〉). In the present paper we show that Mycielski's conjecture is valid for a class of theories which includes RCF and OF (ordered fields).We consider only theories with equality and without function symbols. Interpretations will be meant local, multidimensional, and with parameters, as defined in [M1], [M2] and surveyed in [MPS] (for a recent definition see also [S2]). We shall write T0 ≪ T1 to say that T0 is interpretable in T1 (or that T1 interprets T0), and this will mean that for every theorem α of T0 there is an interpretation of α in T1.

Algebraic theories with definable Skolem functions

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lou van den Dries
Keyword(s):  
Nonempty Subset ◽  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
First Order ◽  
Definable Subset ◽  
Skolem Functions ◽  
Algebraic Theories ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Definitional Extension

(1.1) A well-known example of a theory with built-in Skolem functions is (first-order) Peano arithmetic (or rather a certain definitional extension of it). See [C-K, pp. 143, 162] for the notion of a theory with built-in Skolem functions, and for a treatment of the example just mentioned. This property of Peano arithmetic obviously comes from the fact that in each nonempty definable subset of a model we can definably choose an element, namely, its least member.(1.2) Consider now a real closed field R and a nonempty subset D of R which is definable (with parameters) in R. Again we can definably choose an element of D, as follows: D is a union of finitely many singletons and intervals (a, b) where – ∞ ≤ a < b ≤ + ∞; if D has a least element we choose that element; if not, D contains an interval (a, b) for which a ∈ R ∪ { − ∞}is minimal; for this a we choose b ∈ R ∪ {∞} maximal such that (a, b) ⊂ D. Four cases have to be distinguished:(i) a = − ∞ and b = + ∞; then we choose 0;(ii) a = − ∞ and b ∈ R; then we choose b − 1;(iii) a ∈ R and b ∈ = + ∞; then we choose a + 1;(iv) a ∈ R and b ∈ R; then we choose the midpoint (a + b)/2.It follows as in the case of Peano arithmetic that the theory RCF of real closed fields has a definitional extension with built-in Skolem functions.

scholarly journals Models of true arithmetic are integer parts of models of real exponentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merlin Carl ◽  
Lothar Sebastian Krapp
Keyword(s):  
Multiplicative Group ◽  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Integer Part ◽  
Real Numbers ◽  
The Real ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Closed Fields ◽  
Schanuel's Conjecture

Exploring further the connection between exponentiation on real closed fields and the existence of an integer part modelling strong fragments of arithmetic, we demonstrate that each model of true arithmetic is an integer part of an exponential real closed field that is elementarily equivalent to the real numbers with exponentiation and that each model of Peano arithmetic is an integer part of a real closed field that admits an isomorphism between its ordered additive and its ordered multiplicative group of positive elements. Under the assumption of Schanuel’s Conjecture, we obtain further strengthenings for the last statement.

Ordered Fields, Real Closed Fields

1998 ◽  
pp. 7-21
Author(s):  
Jacek Bochnak ◽  
Michel Coste ◽  
Marie-Françoise Roy
Keyword(s):  
Real Closed Fields ◽  
Ordered Fields ◽  
Closed Fields

Regulous Functions over Real Closed Fields

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Kucharz ◽  
Krzysztof Kurdyka
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Variety ◽  
Open Subset ◽  
Algebraic Curve ◽  
Algebraic Curves ◽  
Rational Points ◽  
Real Closed Field ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Rational Representation ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Closed Fields

Abstract Let $X$ be a quasi-projective algebraic variety over a real closed field $R$, and let $f \colon U \to R$ be a function defined on an open subset $U$ of the set $X(R)$ of $R$-rational points of $X$. Assume that either the function $f$ is locally semialgebraic or the field $R$ is uncountable. If for every irreducible algebraic curve $C \subset X$ the restriction $f|_{U \cap C}$ is continuous and admits a rational representation, then $f$ is continuous and admits a rational representation. There are also suitable versions of this theorem with algebraic curves replaced by algebraic arcs. Heretofore, results of such a type have been known only for $R={\mathbb{R}}$. The transition from ${\mathbb{R}}$ to $R$ is not automatic at all and requires new methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document