Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a parametric set of bumps

2019 ◽  
Vol 866 ◽  
pp. 503-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Racheet Matai ◽  
Paul Durbin

Turbulent flow over a series of increasingly high, two-dimensional bumps is studied by well-resolved large-eddy simulation. The mean flow and Reynolds stresses for the lowest bump are in good agreement with experimental data. The flow encounters a favourable pressure gradient over the windward side of the bump, but does not relaminarize, as is evident from near-wall fluctuations. A patch of high turbulent kinetic energy forms in the lee of the bump and extends into the wake. It originates near the surface, before flow separation, and has a significant influence on flow development. The highest bumps create a small separation bubble, whereas flow over the lowest bump does not separate. The log law is absent over the entire bump, evidencing strong disequilibrium. This dataset was created for data-driven modelling. An optimization method is used to extract fields of variables that are used in turbulence closure models. From this, it is shown how these models fail to correctly predict the behaviour of these variables near to the surface. The discrepancies extend further away from the wall in the adverse pressure gradient and recovery regions than in the favourable pressure gradient region.

Author(s):  
S. Katiyar ◽  
S. Sarkar

Abstract A large-eddy simulation (LES) is employed here to predict the flow field over the suction surface of a controlled-diffusion (C-D) compressor stator blade following the experiment of Hobson et al. [1]. When compared with the experiment, LES depicts a separation bubble (SB) in the mid-chord region of the suction surface, although discrepancies exist in Cp. Further, the LES resolves the growth of boundary layer over the mid-chord and levels of turbulence intensity with an acceptable limit. What is noteworthy that LES also resolves a tiny SB near the leading-edge at the designed inflow angle of 38.3°. The objective of the present study is to assess how this leading-edge bubble influences the transition and development of boundary layer on the suction surface before the mid-chord. It appears that the separation at leading-edge suddenly enhances the perturbation levels exciting development of boundary layer downstream. The boundary layer becomes pre-transitional followed by a decay of fluctuations up to 30% of chord attributing to the local flow acceleration. Further, the boundary layer appears like laminar after being relaxed from the leading edge excitation near the mid-chord. It separates again because of the adverse pressure gradient, depicting augmentation of turbulence followed by the breakdown at about 70% of chord.


Author(s):  
Federico Brusiani ◽  
Gian Marco Bianchi

Today, Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) simulation approach remains the most widely used method in computational fluid dynamic studies of IC-Engines because it allows a good prediction of the mean flow properties at an affordable computational cost. The main limit of the RANS approach resides in the method used to predict turbulence that fails in the reproduction of anisotropic turbulence conditions. It can result in a lack of accuracy in reproducing the main physical processes, as spray evolution (mixture formation), heat transfer, and combustion, governing the IC-Engine physics. To fix this problem, the large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach can be considered. In LES the governing equations are filtered in space, rather than time-averaged as in RANS. It allows the direct solution of all the turbulent scales up to a cut-off length defined by the filter dimension. Therefore, in LES a more accurate description of the turbulence and of all the physical processes correlated to it has to be expected. However, even if the LES method allows an irrefutable improvement in turbulent flow solution accuracy, today its application to industrial IC-Engine design is still rare because of its high computational cost. During the last few years, significant advances in numerical methods, sub-grid scale models, and hardware performance have supported LES applications in many industrial fields. This paper is intended to work in the same direction by presenting a new LES methodology based on the coupling between LES and an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) procedure. The main goal of this procedure is to guarantee a good resolution of the turbulent flow field adapting the filter size to the local turbulence length scale. The developed procedure allows a significant reduction of the total mesh size and, therefore, of the computational cost. The LES-AMR method was tested on an IC-Engine geometry for which experimental results were available.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Minping Wan ◽  
Zhenhua Xia ◽  
Jianchun Wang ◽  
Xiyun Lu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Yang ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Tang-Wei Kuo ◽  
Venkatesh Gopalakrishnan

A comparative cold flow analysis between Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) cycle-averaged velocity and turbulence predictions is carried out for a single cylinder engine with a transparent combustion chamber (TCC) under motored conditions using high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements as the reference data. Simulations are done using a commercial computationally fluid dynamics (CFD) code CONVERGE with the implementation of standard k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulent models for RANS and a one-equation eddy viscosity model for LES. The following aspects are analyzed in this study: The effects of computational domain geometry (with or without intake and exhaust plenums) on mean flow and turbulence predictions for both LES and RANS simulations. And comparison of LES versus RANS simulations in terms of their capability to predict mean flow and turbulence. Both RANS and LES full and partial geometry simulations are able to capture the overall mean flow trends qualitatively; but the intake jet structure, velocity magnitudes, turbulence magnitudes, and its distribution are more accurately predicted by LES full geometry simulations. The guideline therefore for CFD engineers is that RANS partial geometry simulations (computationally least expensive) with a RNG k-ε turbulent model and one cycle or more are good enough for capturing overall qualitative flow trends for the engineering applications. However, if one is interested in getting reasonably accurate estimates of velocity magnitudes, flow structures, turbulence magnitudes, and its distribution, they must resort to LES simulations. Furthermore, to get the most accurate turbulence distributions, one must consider running LES full geometry simulations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document