Vortex interaction between two tandem flexible propulsors with a paddling-based locomotion

2016 ◽  
Vol 793 ◽  
pp. 612-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Goon Park ◽  
Hyung Jin Sung

Schooling behaviours among self-propelled animals can benefit propulsion. Inspired by the schooling behaviours of swimming jellyfish, flexible bodies that self-propel through a paddling-based motion were modelled in a tandem configuration. This present study explored the hydrodynamic patterns generated by the interactions between two flexible bodies and the surrounding fluid in the framework of the penalty immersed boundary method. The hydrodynamic patterns produced in the wake revealed flow-mediated interactions between two tandem propulsors, including vortex–vortex and vortex–body interactions. Two tandem flexible propulsors paddling with identical amplitude and frequency produced stable configurations as a result of the flow-mediated interactions. Both the upstream and downstream propulsors benefited from the tandem configuration in terms of the locomotion velocity and the cost, compared with an isolated propulsion system. The interactions were examined as a function of the initial gap distance and the phase difference in the paddling frequency. The equilibrium gap distance between two propulsors remained constant, regardless of the initial gap distance, although it did depend on the phase difference in the paddling frequency.

Author(s):  
Toma´sˇ Gedeon ◽  
Jeff J. Heys ◽  
B. C. Knott ◽  
Jonas Mulder-Rosi

Many insects are able to sense their surrounding fluid environment through induced motion of their filiform hairs. The mechanism by which the insect can sense a wide range of input signals using the canopy of filiform hairs of different length and orientation is of great interest. Most of the previous filiform hair models have focused on a single, rigid hair in an idealized air field. We have developed [1] a model for a canopy of filiform hairs that are mechanically coupled to the surrounding air. The model equations are based on the penalty immersed boundary method. The key difference between the penalty immersed boundary method and the traditional immersed boundary method is the addition of forces to account for density differences between the immersed solid (the filiform hairs) and the surrounding fluid (air). In this work we validate the model by comparing the model predictions to experimental results on cricket Acheta domestica cercal system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 729 ◽  
pp. 563-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Uddin ◽  
Wei-Xi Huang ◽  
Hyung Jin Sung

AbstractFish schooling is not merely a social behaviour; it also improves the efficiency of movement within a fluid environment. Inspired by the hydrodynamics of schooling, a group of flexible bodies was modelled as a collection of individuals arranged in a combination of tandem and side-by-side formations. The downstream bodies were found to be strongly influenced by the vortices shed from an upstream body, as revealed in the vortex–vortex and vortex–body interactions. To investigate the interactions between flexible bodies and vortices, the present study examined flexible flags in a viscous flow by using an improved version of the immersed boundary method. Three different flag formations were modelled to cover the basic structures involved in fish schooling: triangular, diamond and conical formations. The drag coefficients of the downstream flags could be decreased below the value for a single flag by adjusting the streamwise and spanwise gap distances and the flag bending coefficient. The drag variations were influenced by the interactions between vortices shed from the upstream flexible flags and those surrounding the downstream flags. The interactions between the flexible flags were investigated as a function of both the gap distance between the flags and the bending coefficients. The maximum drag reduction and the trailing flag position were calculated for different sets of conditions. Single-frequency and multifrequency modes were identified and were found to correspond to constructive and destructive vortex interaction modes, which explained the variations in the drag on the downstream flags.


2021 ◽  
Vol 233 ◽  
pp. 109189
Author(s):  
Bin Yan ◽  
Wei Bai ◽  
Sheng-Chao Jiang ◽  
Peiwen Cong ◽  
Dezhi Ning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document