First- and second-order forcing expansions in a lattice Boltzmann method reproducing isothermal hydrodynamics in artificial compressibility form

2012 ◽  
Vol 698 ◽  
pp. 282-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goncalo Silva ◽  
Viriato Semiao

AbstractThe isothermal Navier–Stokes equations are determined by the leading three velocity moments of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). Necessary conditions establishing the hydrodynamic consistency of these moments are provided by multiscale asymptotic techniques, such as the second-order Chapman–Enskog expansion. However, for simulating incompressible hydrodynamics the structure of the forcing term in the LBM is still a discordant issue as far as its correct velocity expansion order is concerned. This work uses the traditional second-order Chapman–Enskog expansion analysis to demonstrate that the truncation order of the forcing term may depend on the time regime in this case. This is due to the fact that LBM does not reproduce exactly the incompressibility condition. It rather approximates it through a weakly compressible or an artificial compressible system. The present study shows that for the artificial compressible setup, as the incompressibility flow condition is singularly perturbed by the time variable, such a connection will also affect the LBM forcing formulation. As a result, for time-independent incompressible flows the LBM forcing must be truncated to first order whereas for a time-dependent case it is convenient to include the second-order term. The theoretical findings are confirmed by numerical tests carried out in several distinct benchmark flows driven by space- and/or time-varying body forces and possessing known analytical solutions. These results are verified for the single relaxation time, the multiple relaxation time and the regularized collision models.

Author(s):  
Joris C. G. Verschaeve

By means of the continuity equation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, additional physical arguments for the derivation of a formulation of the no-slip boundary condition for the lattice Boltzmann method for straight walls at rest are obtained. This leads to a boundary condition that is second-order accurate with respect to the grid spacing and conserves mass. In addition, the boundary condition is stable for relaxation frequencies close to two.


2015 ◽  
Vol 799-800 ◽  
pp. 784-787
Author(s):  
Wen Qin Liu ◽  
Yong Li

The main objective of this work is to develop a new approach based on the Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) to simulate the extrudate swell of an Oldroyd B viscoelatic fluid. Two lattice Boltzmann equations are used to solve the Navier-Stokes equations and constitutive equation simultaneously at each time iteration. The single LBM model is used to track the moving interface in this paper. To validate the accuracy and stability of this new scheme, we study the steady 2D Poiseuille flow firstly, finding the numerical results be in good accord with the analytical solution. Then the die-swell phenomenon is solved, we successfully acquire the different swelling state of an Oldroyd B fluid at different time.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Watari

The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is shown to be equivalent to the Navier-Stokes equations by applying the Chapman-Enskog (C-E) expansion, which has been established by pioneer researchers. However, it is still difficult for elementary researchers. There is no clear explanation of the small parameter ε used in the C-E expansion. There are several expressions for the viscosity coefficient; some are unclear on the relationship with ε. There are two expressions on the LBM evolution equation. Elementary researchers are perplexed as to which is correct. The LBM achieves second order accuracy by including the numerical viscosity within the physical viscosity. This is not only difficult for elementary researchers to understand but also sometimes leads senior researchers into making errors. The C-E expansion of the LBM was thoroughly reviewed and is presented as a self-contained form in this paper. It is natural to use the time step Δt as ε. The viscosity coefficient is expressed as μ∝Δxc(τ − 1/2). The viscosity relationship and the second order accuracy were confirmed by numerical simulations. The difference in the two expressions on the LBM evolution is simply one of perspective. They are identical. The difference between the relaxation parameter τD for the discrete Boltzmann equation and τ for the LBM was discussed. While τD is a quantity of time, τ is genuinely nondimensional, which is sometimes overlooked.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document