Effectiveness of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral resection of the prostate in the era of antibiotic resistance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Thana Khawcharoenporn ◽  
Pimjira Kanoktipakorn
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Transurethral Resection ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Urine Culture

Abstract The results of this study demonstrate the lower incidence of posttransurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) urinary tract infection (UTI) among patients receiving appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis (AAP) versus inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis (27% vs 47%; P < .001). Preoperative urine culture procurement and APP are critical for post-TURP UTI prevention in the era of antibiotic resistance.

The Benefits and Harms of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection in Older Adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J Langford ◽  
Kevin A Brown ◽  
Christina Diong ◽  
Alex Marchand-Austin ◽  
Kwaku Adomako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

Abstract Background The role of antibiotics in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) in older adults is unknown. We sought to quantify the benefits and risks of antibiotic prophylaxis among older adults. Methods We conducted a matched cohort study comparing older adults (≥66 years) receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as antibiotic treatment for ≥30 days starting within 30 days of a positive culture, with patients with positive urine cultures who received antibiotic treatment but did not receive prophylaxis. We matched each prophylaxis recipient to 10 nonrecipients based on organism, number of positive cultures, and propensity score. Outcomes included (1) emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for UTI, sepsis, or bloodstream infection within 1 year; (2) acquisition of antibiotic resistance in urinary tract pathogens; and (3) antibiotic-related complications. Results Overall, 4.7% (151/3190) of UTI prophylaxis patients and 3.6% (n = 1092/30 542) of controls required an ED visit or hospitalization for UTI, sepsis, or bloodstream infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.57). Acquisition of antibiotic resistance to any urinary antibiotic (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18–1.44) and to the specific prophylaxis agent (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.80–2.24) was higher in patients receiving prophylaxis. While the overall risk of antibiotic-related complications was similar between groups (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, .94–1.22), the risk of Clostridioides  difficile and general medication adverse events was higher in prophylaxis recipients (HR [95% CI], 1.56 [1.05–2.23] and 1.62 [1.11–2.29], respectively). Conclusions Among older adults with UTI, the harms of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis may outweigh their benefits.

scholarly journals Clinical profile of pediatric patients with urinary tract infection in a tertiary care centre in Kashmir, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1149
Author(s):  
Khalid Kawoosa ◽  
Rahid Rasool Malla ◽  
Sheeraz Ahmad Dar ◽  
Syed Heena Kubravi
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Renal Scarring ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre

Background: The urinary tract is a common site of infection in pediatric patients. Author studied the clinical and microbiological profile along with the antibiotic resistance in children with UTI attending centre.Methods: It was a prospective study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India over a period of one year from August 2017 to August 2018.A total of 250 children aged 1-36 months were included in the study. A proper history and examination were done in each case. A clean catch mid-stream urine sample was obtained from each child. Quantitative microscopy and urine culture were performed. Standard biochemical tests were done to identify the isolates and for determination of antibiotic sensitivity.Results: Out of the 250 children studied , a total of 216 children were diagnosed as UTI by positive urine culture.102 were males and 114 were females. Significant pyuria was detected in 85%patients. Fever with irritability was the most common presenting symptom (71%) followed by vomiting (63%) and abdominal pain (52%).The most common uropathogen detected was E. coli (57%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (20%), proteus (16%), pseudomonas (5%), and candida (2%). Majority of the patients responded to treatment with ceftriaxone followed by cefixime. Antibiotic resistance in vitro was least seen with amikacin (25%) followed by nitrofurantoin (11%). 91.3% of UTI detected was nosocomial. Vesicoureteral reflux was found in 49% of patients while 13% were diagnosed with posterior urethral valve.Conclusions: Urinary tract infection should be considered as one of the most important differential diagnosis in patients with fever attending pediatric OPD. Urine microscopy and culture should be a part of routine diagnostic evaluation in all febrile children. Early treatment of UTI is important to prevent later sequelae including pyelonephritis and renal scarring.

scholarly journals Emerging antibiotic resistance pattern of urinary tract infection (UTI) due to Escherichia Coli (E.Coli).

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1804-1811
Author(s):  
Salman Azhar ◽  
Talha Munir ◽  
Mian Sajjad Ahmed ◽  
Wasif Baig ◽  
Ahmed Nawaz Baber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Resistance Pattern ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance Pattern ◽  
Culture And Sensitivity

Objective: To determine the emerging antibiotic resistance pattern of adult patients of MDR UTI cases caused by E.Coli. Study Design: Retrospective Data. Setting: Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Madinah Teaching Hospital / University Medical and Dental College, Faisalabad. Period: August 2016 to Sep 2018. Material & Methods: This retrospective study included 187 patients meeting the operational definition of multi-drug resistance cases of urinary tract infection caused by E. coli. All cases either male or female of age above 15 years with positive reports of urine culture and sensitivity for E.coli were included in the study. Along with the demographic variables urine WBC’s, results of urine culture and sensitivity were noted. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of all the E.coli resistant UTI cases was analyzed. After identification of the microbe, antimicrobial sensitivity was accessed using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method on the Mueller–Hinton agar. The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed against E. coli strains by using the following antibiotics: Piperacilin, Amoxicilin-Calvulanic, Pipmedic Acid, Cefipime, Ceftrixone, Cefuroxime, Cefoperazone-sulbactam, Ceftazidime, Cephradine, Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, ofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, Amikacin, Tombramycin, Gentamicin, Linezolid, Doxycycline, Sulphamethoxazole, Imipenem, Meropenem, Aztreonam in order to obtain an antibiogram. Results: In our data, 66.8% (n=125) were MDR UTI, and more than half of these cases were 63.2% (n=79) were females. Among the total 187 cases, 97.3% patients were resistant to most of the beta-lactam antibiotics, 95.7% were resistant to most of the quinolones and 68.4% were resistant to most of the aminoglycosides. Conclusion: This increasing antibiotic resistance is very alarming and steps should be taken to reduce the misuse of antibiotics. Studies should be done to control the risk factors leading to E. coli UTI. By following proper pharmacological guidelines, principles to use antibiotics and manage outpatient cases of UTIs, the incidence of MDR UTI can be controlled.

Assessment of Urine Gram Stain and Urine Culture in the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 472-473
Author(s):  
Dr G Sucilathangam Dr G Sucilathangam ◽  
◽  
Dr G Velvizhi Dr G Velvizhi
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Gram Stain

URINARY INFECTION AT DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY OF HUE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL

2018 ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
Dinh Khanh Le ◽  
Dinh Dam Le ◽  
Khoa Hung Nguyen ◽  
Xuan My Nguyen ◽  
Minh Nhat Vo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Positive Urine ◽  
Tract Infections

Objectives: To investigate clinical characteristics, bacterial characteristics, drug resistance status in patients with urinary tract infections treated at Department of Urology, Hue University Hospital. Materials and Method: The study was conducted in 474 patients with urological disease treated at Department of Urology, Hue Universiry Hospital from July 2017 to April 2018. Urine culture was done in the patients with urine > 25 Leu/ul who have symptoms of urinary tract disease or infection symptoms. Patients with positive urine cultures were analyzed for clinical and bacterial characteristics. Results: 187/474 (39.5%) patients had symptoms associated with urinary tract infections. 85/474 (17.9%) patients were diagnosed with urinary tract infection. The positive urine culture rate was 45.5%. Symptoms of UTI were varied, and no prominent symptoms. E. coli accounts for the highest proportion (46.67%), followed by, Staphycoccus aureus (10.67%), Pseudomonas aeruginsa (8,0%), Streptococcus faecali and Proteus (2.67%). ESBL - producing E. coli was 69.23%, ESBL producing Enterobacter spp was 33.33%. Gram-negative bacteria are susceptible to meropenem, imipenem, amikacin while gram positive are vancomycin-sensitive. Conclusions: Clinical manifestations of urinary tract infections varied and its typical symptoms are unclear. E.coli is a common bacterium (46.67%). Isolated bacteria have a high rate of resistance to some common antibiotics especially the third generation cephalosporins and quinolones. Most bacteria are resistant to multiple antibiotics at the same time. Gram (+) bacteria are susceptible to vancomycin, and gram (-) bacteria are susceptible to cefoxitin, amikacin, and carbapenem. Key words: urinary tract infection

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document