scholarly journals CDC Consultations for Outbreaks and Infection Control Breaches Occurring in Dental Settings, 2010–2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s156-s156
Author(s):  
Kiran Perkins ◽  
Ieisha Brown ◽  
Lorena Espinoza ◽  
Joseph Perz ◽  
Michele Neuburger
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Dental Instrument ◽  
Patient Infection

Background: Documented transmission of infectious agents involving dental care is uncommon. However, increasing attention to dental infection control, along with several recent outbreaks, have identified infection control gaps in dental settings. We describe CDC consultations involving outbreaks or infection control lapses occurring in dental settings to identify areas for prevention efforts. Methods: We reviewed internal CDC records from January 1, 2010, through October 1, 2019, to identify consultations involving investigations of potential or confirmed disease transmission and infection control lapses in dental settings. We determined yearly number of consultations, number of patients infected, how disease transmission or infection control breaches were identified, suspected mode of transmission, type of infection control breaches identified, and whether at-risk patients were notified. Results: We identified 41 consultations, among 27 states, involving investigation of possible disease transmission or infection control lapses in dental facilities. The number of consultations increased from 11 to 30 between the first half (2010–2014) and the second half (2015–2019) of the period and involved at least 113 infections confirmed or suspected to be associated with dental procedures. Most investigations (n = 29, 71%) began with identification of infection control breaches absent known patient infections; 8 (20%) investigations were initiated after identification of a single patient infection raised concerns for possible transmission associated with dental care (eg, single case of acute hepatitis B infection absent other risk factors). Moreover, 4 investigations involved >1 patient infection; 3 were outbreaks confirmed to be due to poor infection control practices. The most common infection control breaches were lapses in dental instrument reprocessing (n = 28, 78%), for example, failure to sterilize dental handpieces or failure to use biologic indicators. Of the 23 consultations where patient notification activities were discussed, 17 (74%) resulted in notification; >20,000 patients received information about their potential exposure, usually accompanied by advice on seeking screening tests. Conclusions: Dental-related consultations have increased in recent years, and they highlight the need for improved infection control training of dental healthcare personnel, especially related to dental instrument reprocessing. The CDC Division of Oral Health and the Organization for Safety, Asepsis, and Prevention offers tools, training, and other resources to help dental facilities improve infection control practices. Not all investigations resulted in notifying at-risk patients, but notification should be strongly considered, especially when serious breaches are identified, to promote transparency and help identify disease transmission that could otherwise go undetected.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 948 Feasibility Study of a Drive-Through Influenza Vaccination Clinic for Patients-At-Risk & Their Contacts

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Curtin ◽  
S McCarthy ◽  
C Cooney ◽  
K Spencer ◽  
M Thompson
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Primary Measurement ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Heavy Burden ◽  
Influenza Outbreaks

Abstract Background There are 3-5 million cases of severe influenza-like illness globally each year, and up to 650,000 related deaths. This high prevalence rate proves to be a heavy burden on the healthcare system with >3,000 hospitalisations and >150 ICU admissions annually. Immunisation is gold-standard for the prevention of influenza outbreaks. The HSE Influenza Immunisation Strategy allocates vaccines to be administered in primary care to patients at-risk and their contacts. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this has become a logistical challenge. We aimed to design and test a drive-through influenza vaccine clinic at a large GP practice in Cork. Method We designed and implemented an online booking system for at-risk patients and their contacts. 1-minute drive-through time slots were available to book for up to 6 people per vehicle. The primary measurement was the number of patients vaccinated with a secondary measurement of time spent vaccinating these patients. Results The pilot clinic occurred on 10/10/2020 with over 600 patients-at-risk & their contacts receiving the influenza vaccination over a time period of 10 hours. The capacity of this clinic was limited by the supply of vaccines. We estimate that 1,800 people could be vaccinated over the same time period with adequate vaccine supply. Conclusions A drive-through influenza vaccination clinic can be efficiently run using an online booking system and serves as a safe, efficient, and convenient way for patients-at-risk & their contacts to receive vaccinations. This system can be rolled out efficiently each winter for influenza vaccination and could be expanded to deliver mass vaccination for SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Adrenal Incidentaloma: Picking out the High-Risk Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 178-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Di Dalmazi
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Adrenal Incidentaloma ◽  
Bone Mass Density ◽  
Adrenal Incidentalomas ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Novel Biomarkers

AbstractPatients with adrenal incidentalomas and autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) have been recognized as a category at risk of developing cardiovascular and metabolic co-morbidities. Considering the increasing number of patients affected by this condition, it is important to perform an accurate subtyping of the patients, in the light of a tailored treatment. This review aims to identify the phenotypic characteristics of patients with adrenal incidentalomas and ACS who are at risk of developing severe cortisol-related co-morbidities. ACS has been associated with severe alteration of the cardiovascular profile, including hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Moreover, ACS has been identified as a contributing factor to the development of cardiovascular events and related mortality. Patients with ACS are also at risk of incident bone fractures, which occur in half of the patients independently of the bone mass density, and infectious diseases. Severity and persistence of hypercortisolism are among the main contributing factors for cardiovascular diseases and bone fractures. Moreover, progression of hypercortisolism over time and altered circadian cortisol rhythm seem to be important additional factors. The role of potential novel biomarkers is also discussed in this review.

Implementation of a systematic method for the identification, tracking, and treatment of malnutrition in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 184-184
Author(s):  
Jennifer Mangino ◽  
Elizabeth Welin ◽  
Cheri Cole-Jenkins ◽  
Kathy Demmel ◽  
Brian D. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Current System ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

184 Background: It is estimated that the prevalence of malnutrition in children with cancer may be as high as 50%. Optimization of nutritional status is known to be associated with improved tolerance of cancer therapy, decreased infection risk, increased quality of life and increased survival. There are established methods for improving nutrition, but we have observed barriers to the identification of at risk patients, adherence to recommended interventions and continued surveillance. Methods: We identified patients in the intensive phases of therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma. Using improvement science methods, we developed a standardized approach to the identification, treatment and tracking of patients at risk for malnutrition. We utilized quality improvement techniques to identify the problems with the current system and implement change. These changes included standardization of an algorithm for nutritional treatment and follow up, creation of a daily electronic report for identification of at risk patients, and improved communication with providers in regard to patient nutrition. Results: At baseline, nearly 10% of our target patients were impacted by significant weight loss. Utilizing quality improvement techniques, we were able to establish the most common causes of failure in our system (awareness of the problem, identification of at-risk patients, tracking and monitoring at-risk patients and provider/patient adherence to recommended nutritional interventions). Interventions were employed using plan-do-study-act quality improvement methods, including the development of an electronic identification and tracking system designed for these patients. We were able to significantly decrease the number of patients with weight loss using these methods. Conclusions: Malnutrition is associated with poor outcomes in patients with cancer. Use of quality improvement methods allowed us to identify key drivers and test/implement specific interventions to combat this problem. In this proof of principle cohort, this has resulted in a significant improvement in the nutritional status of our patients.

scholarly journals Prevalence and associated factors for needlestick and sharp injuries (NSIs) among dental assistants in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lama AlDakhil ◽  
Nagarajkumar Yenugadhati ◽  
Ohoud Al-Seraihi ◽  
Mustafa Al-Zoughool
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Dental Clinics ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Control Procedures ◽  
Control Protocols ◽  
Dental Assistants

Abstract Background Dental personnel are subject to exposure to a number of occupational factors including needlestick and sharp injuries (NSIs). Our study aims to address knowledge gaps on prevalence and associated factors for needlestick and sharp injuries (NSIs) for the first time in Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 450 dental assistants recruited from 40 randomly selected private clinics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data on demographic characteristics, history of NSIs, nature of work, compliance with infection control protocols, and knowledge of infection control procedures and disease transmission were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with NSIs; unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Results About three in ten dental assistants experienced at least one NSI (29.8%, 95% CI 25.6–34.2%) in private dental clinics. Lack of adequate knowledge of infection control procedures and disease transmission, non-compliance with infection control protocol of vaccination against hepatitis B virus, and attending 12 or less number of patients daily were significantly associated with increased risk of NSIs (p ≤ 0.05); adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) were 1.87 (1.18–2.97), 1.89 (1.05–3.41), and 1.63 (1.03–2.56), respectively. In addition, dental assistants working in 45.8% of dental clinics that had no infection control unit were positively associated with higher NSI risk (aOR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.45–3.57). Conclusion Our study reported the prevalent nature of NSIs among dental assistants in Saudi Arabia and identified key factors that could be targeted to mitigate this preventable condition. Dental assistants would benefit from proper training on infection control protocols and procedures.

Exploring the Validity and Operational Impact of Using Allied Health Assistants to Conduct Dysphagia Screening for Low-Risk Patients Within the Acute Hospital Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
False Negatives ◽  
Exact Agreement ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Impact Phase ◽  
Operational Impact

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document