scholarly journals Financial and Mortality Modeling as a Tool to Present Infection Prevention Data: What a SIR of 1.2 Means for the Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s64-s65
Author(s):  
Vidya Mony ◽  
Kevin Hultquist ◽  
Supriya Narasimhan
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Excess Mortality ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Excess Cost ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Population Mortality ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Presenting to hospital leadership is an annual requirement of many infection prevention (IP) programs. Most presentations include current statistical data of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and whether the hospital has met its goals according to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria. We presented HAI data in a novel way, with financial and mortality modeling, to show the impact of IP interventions to leadership not attuned to NHSN metrics. Method: We looked at 4 HAIs, their trends, and their effect on our hospital, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC). To estimate the impact of specific HAIs, we used 2 metrics derived from a meta-analysis by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS): excess mortality and excess cost. Excess mortality is defined as the difference between the underlying population mortality and the affected population mortality expressed as deaths per 1,000 population. Excess cost is defined as the additional cost introduced per patient with a specific HAI versus a similarly admitted patient without that HAI. HHS data were multiplied by the number of HAI events at SCVMC to generate estimates. Result: In our presentation, we elucidated a previously unseen cost savings and decreased mortality with 2 HAIs, central-line–associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), which were below NHSN targets due to IP-led interventions. We then showed 2 other HAIs, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and surgical site infections (SSIs), which did not meet our expected NHSN and institutional goals and were estimated to increase costs and potential mortalities in the upcoming year. We argued that proactive monies directed toward expanding our IP program and HAI mitigation efforts would cost a fraction of the impending healthcare expenditures as predicted by the model. Conclusion: By applying financial and mortality modeling, we helped our leadership perceive the concrete effect of IP-led interventions versus presenting abstract NHSN metrics. We also emphasized that without proactive leadership investment, we would continue to overspend healthcare dollars while not meeting our goals. This format of presentation gave us critical leverage to advocate for and successfully expand our IP department. Further SHEA-led cost-analysis modeling and education are needed to help IP departments promote their efforts in an effective manner.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 1154. Impact of Educational Feedback on Reducing Hospital-Onset Catheter-Associated Urinary tract Infections at an Academic Medical Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S412-S412
Author(s):  
Bhagyashri D Navalkele ◽  
Nora Truhett ◽  
Miranda Ward ◽  
Sheila Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Frontline Staff ◽  
Post Intervention Period ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background High regulatory burden on hospital-onset (HO) infections has increased performance pressure on infection prevention programs. Despite the availability of comprehensive prevention guidelines, a major challenge has been communication with frontline staff to integrate appropriate prevention measures into practice. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of educational intervention on HO CAUTI rates and urinary catheter days. Methods At the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Infection prevention (IP) reports unit-based monthly HO infections via email to respective unit managers and ordering physician providers. Starting May 2018, IP assessed compliance to CAUTI prevention strategies per SHEA/IDSA practice recommendations (2014). HO CAUTI cases with noncompliance were labeled as “preventable” infections and educational justification was provided in the email report. No other interventions were introduced during the study period. CAUTI data were collected using ongoing surveillance per NHSN and used to calculate rates per 1,000 catheter days. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare pre- and post-intervention data. Results Prior to intervention (July 2017–March 2018), HO CAUTI rate was 1.43 per 1,000 catheter days. In the post-intervention period (July 2018–March 2019), HO CAUTI rate decreased to 0.62 per 1,000 catheter days. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention rates showed a statistically significant reduction in HO CAUTIs (P = 0.04). The total number of catheter days reduced, but the difference was not statistically significant (8,604 vs. 7,583; P = 0.06). Of the 14 HO CAUTIs in post-intervention period, 64% (8/14) were reported preventable. The preventable causes included inappropriate urine culturing practice in asymptomatic patients (5) or as part of pan-culture without urinalysis (2), and lack of daily catheter assessment for necessity (1). Conclusion At our institute, regular educational feedback by IP to frontline staff resulted in a reduction of HO CAUTIs. Feedback measure improved accountability, awareness and engagement of frontline staff in practicing appropriate CAUTI prevention strategies. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 2085. Bedside Nurses Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Outcomes: Results of a 3.5-Year Study in Three Hospital Telemetry Units

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S704-S704
Author(s):  
David Ha ◽  
Mary Bette Forte ◽  
Victoria Broberg ◽  
Rita Olans ◽  
Richard Olans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Bedside Nurse ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Minimal literature exists to demonstrate the quantitative impact of bedside nurses in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). We initiated bedside nurse-driven AMS and infection prevention (AMS/IP) rounds on three inpatient telemetry units of a community regional medical center. Rounds were nurse-driven, involved an infectious diseases (ID) pharmacist and infection preventionist, and were designed to complement traditional ID pharmacist and ID physician AMS rounds. Rounds were focused on use of antibiotics, urinary catheters (UCs), and central venous catheters (CVCs). Recommendations from rounds were communicated by the bedside nurse either directly to providers or to the ID pharmacist and ID physician for intervention. Methods This was an observational, multiple-group, quasi-experimental study conducted over 3.5 years (July 2015 to December 2018) to characterize the impact of bedside nurse-driven AMS/IP rounds on antibiotic, urinary catheter and CVC use, hospital-onset C. difficile infection (CDI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Outcomes were assessed in two cohorts based on time of AMS/IP rounds implementation (Cohort 1 implemented on one telemetry unit in July 2016, Cohort 2 implemented in two telemetry units in January 2018). Results A total of 2,273 patient therapy reviews occurred (Cohort 1: 1,736; Cohort 2: 537). Of these reviews, 1,209 (53%) were antibiotics, 879 (39%) were urinary catheters, and 185 (8%) were CVCs. Pre- vs. post-intervention, significant reductions were observed in both cohorts for mean monthly antibiotic days of therapy per 1,000 patient-days (Cohort 1: 791 vs. 688, P < 0.001; Cohort 2: 615 vs. 492, P < 0.001), UC days per patient day (Cohort 1: 0.25 vs. 0.16, P < 0.001; Cohort 2: 0.19 vs. 0.14, P < 0.001), CVC days per patient day (Cohort 1: 0.15 vs. 0.11, = 0.002; Cohort 2: 0.09 vs. 0.07, p = 0.005), and CDI per 10,000 patient-days (Cohort 1: 17.8 vs. 7.1, p = 0.035; Cohort 2: 19.1 vs. 5.4, p = 0.003). Numerical reductions were observed in CAUTI and CLABSI per 10,000 patient-days. Conclusion Bedside nurses can improve AMS and IP outcomes in a scalable fashion when supported by an interdisciplinary AMS/IP team and are complimentary to traditional AMS and IP practices. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Effect of Removing Contact Precautions for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms on Hospital Infections in a Pediatric Health System

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s199-s200
Author(s):  
Matthew Linam ◽  
Dorian Hoskins ◽  
Preeti Jaggi ◽  
Mark Gonzalez ◽  
Renee Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background: Discontinuation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have failed to show an increase in associated transmission or infections in adult healthcare settings. Pediatric experience is limited. Objective: We evaluated the impact of discontinuing contact precautions for MRSA, VRE, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing gram-negative bacilli (ESBLs) on device-associated healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Methods: In October 2018, contact precautions were discontinued for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs in a large, tertiary-care pediatric healthcare system comprising 2 hospitals and 620 beds. Coincident interventions that potentially reduced HAIs included blood culture diagnostic stewardship (June 2018), a hand hygiene education initiative (July 2018), a handshake antibiotic stewardship program (December 2018) and multidisciplinary infection prevention rounding in the intensive care units (November 2018). Compliance with hand hygiene and HAI prevention bundles were monitored. Device-associated HAIs were identified using standard definitions. Annotated run charts were used to track the impact of interventions on changes in device-associated HAIs over time. Results: Average hand hygiene compliance was 91%. Compliance with HAI prevention bundles was 81% for ventilator-associated pneumonias, 90% for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and 97% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections. Overall, device-associated HAIs decreased from 6.04 per 10,000 patient days to 3.25 per 10,000 patient days after October 2018 (Fig. 1). Prior to October 2018, MRSA, VRE and ESBLs accounted for 10% of device-associated HAIs. This rate decreased to 5% after October 2018. The decrease in HAIs was likely related to interventions such as infection prevention rounds and handshake stewardship. Conclusions: Discontinuation of contact precautions for children with MRSA, VRE, and ESBLs were not associated with increased device-associated HAIs, and such discontinuation is likely safe in the setting of robust infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship programs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

The impact of a multimodel approach to designing a new orthopedic department

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Elad Keren ◽  
Abraham Borer ◽  
Lior Nesher ◽  
Tali Shafat ◽  
Rivka Yosipovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Orthopedic Department ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted approach effectively influenced antibiotic use in an orthopedics department. Design: Retrospective cohort study comparing the readmission rate and antibiotic use before and after an intervention. Setting: A 1,000-bed, tertiary-care, university hospital. Patients: Adult patients admitted to the orthopedics department between January 2015 and December 2018. Methods: During the preintervention period (2015–2016), 1 general orthopedic department was in operation. In the postintervention period (2017–2018), 2 separate departments were created: one designated for elective “clean” surgeries and another that included a “complicated wound” unit. A multifaceted strategy including infection prevention measures and introducing antibiotic stewardship practices was implemented. Admission rates, hand hygiene practice compliance, surgical site infections, and antibiotic treatment before versus after the intervention were analyzed. Results: The number of admissions and hospitalization days in the 2 periods did not change. Seven-day readmissions per annual quarter decreased significantly from the preintervention period (median, 7 days; interquartile range [IQR], 6–9) to the postintervention period (median, 4 days; IQR, 2–7; P = .038). Hand hygiene compliance increased and surgical site infections decreased in the postintervention period. Although total antibiotic use was not reduced, there was a significant change in the breakdown of the different antibiotic classes used before and after the intervention: increased use of narrow-spectrum β-lactams (P < .001) and decreased use of β-lactamase inhibitors (P < .001), third-generation cephalosporins (P = .044), and clindamycin (P < .001). Conclusions: Restructuring the orthopedics department facilitated better infection prevention measures accompanied by antibiotic stewardship implementation, resulting in a decreased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and a significant reduction in readmission rates.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis and metaregression of risk factors associated with mortality in hip fracture patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Firas J. Raheman ◽  
Djamila M. Rojoa ◽  
Jvalant Nayan Parekh ◽  
Reshid Berber ◽  
Robert Ashford
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Excess Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Fatality Rate ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIncidence of hip fractures has remained unchanged during the pandemic with overlapping vulnerabilities observed in patients with hip fractures and those infected with COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the independent impact of COVID-19 infection on the mortality of these patients. Healthcare databases were systematically searched over 2-weeks from 1st–14th November 2020 to identify eligible studies assessing the impact of COVID-19 on hip fracture patients. Meta-analysis of proportion was performed to obtain pooled values of prevalence, incidence and case fatality rate of hip fracture patients with COVID-19 infection. 30-day mortality, excess mortality and all-cause mortality were analysed using a mixed-effects model. 22 studies reporting 4015 patients were identified out of which 2651 (66%) were assessed during the pandemic. An excess mortality of 10% was seen for hip fractures treated during the pandemic (OR 2.00, p = 0.007), in comparison to the pre-pandemic controls (5%). Estimated mortality of COVID-19 positive hip fracture patients was four-fold (RR 4.59, p < 0.0001) and 30-day mortality was 38.0% (HR 4.73, p < 0.0001). The case fatality rate for COVID-19 positive patients was 34.74%. Between-study heterogeneity for the pooled analysis was minimal (I2 = 0.00) whereas, random effects metaregression identified subgroup heterogeneity for male gender (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), dementia (p = 0.001) and extracapsular fractures (p = 0.01) increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 positive patients.

scholarly journals 811. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Volume and Surgical Site Infections (SSI) in a Large Network of Community Hospitals

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S499-S499
Author(s):  
Erin Gettler ◽  
Jessica Seidelman ◽  
Becky A Smith ◽  
Deverick J Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Large Network ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
Outbreak Management ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted hospitalizations and healthcare utilization. Diversion of infection prevention resources toward COVID-19 mitigation limited routine infection prevention activities such as rounding, observations, and education in all areas, including the peri-operative space. There were also changes in surgical care delivery. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on SSI rates has not been well described, especially in community hospitals. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing prospectively collected data on SSIs from 45 community hospitals in the southeastern United States from 1/2018 to 12/2020. We included the 14 most commonly performed operative procedure categories, as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network. Coronary bypass grafting was included a priori due to its clinical significance. Only facilities enrolled in the network for the full three-year period were included. We defined the pre-pandemic time period from 1/1/18 to 2/29/20 and the pandemic period from 3/1/20 to 12/31/20. We compared monthly and quarterly median procedure totals and SSI prevalence rates (PR) between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods using Poisson regression. Results Pre-pandemic median monthly procedure volume was 384 (IQR 192-999) and the pre-pandemic SSI PR per 100 cases was 0.98 (IQR 0.90-1.04). There was a transient decline in surgical cases beginning in March 2020, reaching a nadir of 185 cases in April, followed by a return to pre-pandemic volume by June (figure 1). Overall and procedure-specific SSI PRs were not significantly different in the COVID-19 period relative to the pre-pandemic period (total PR per 100 cases 0.96 and 0.97, respectively, figure 2). However, when stratified by quarter and year, there was a trend toward increased SSI PR in the second quarter of 2020 with a PRR of 1.15 (95% CI 0.96-1.39, table 1). Conclusion The decline in surgical procedures early in the pandemic was short-lived in our community hospital network. Although there was no overall change in the SSI PR during the study period, there was a trend toward increased SSIs in the early phase of the pandemic (figure 3). This trend could be related to deferred elective cases or to a shift in infection prevention efforts to outbreak management. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1039. Forty-eight-hour Antibiotic Time-out: Impact on Antibiotic Duration and Clinical Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S365-S366
Author(s):  
Natasha N Pettit ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Cynthia T Nguyen ◽  
Victoria J L Konold ◽  
Madan Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background A core element of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antimicrobial Stewardship standard for the inpatient setting includes a 48-hour antibiotic time-out (ATO) process to reassess antibiotic indication. We implemented an automated alert in the electronic health record (EHR) that identifies patients that have received >=48hours of antibiotic therapy. The alert requires the clinician (physician or pharmacist) to note an indication for continuation or plan for discontinuation. Within the alert, a dashboard was developed to include relevant patient information (e.g., temperature, white blood cell count, microbiology, etc). We sought to evaluate the impact of the ATO alert on the duration of therapy (DOT) of cefepime (CFP), ceftazidime (CTZ) and vancomycin (VAN), for the treatment of pneumonia (PNA) and urinary tract infections (UTI) for adult and pediatric patients. Methods This quasi-experimental, retrospective analysis included adult and pediatric patients that received ≥48 hours of CFP, CTZ, or VAN for UTI or PNA between April 1, 2017 and July 31, 2017 (pre-48H ATO) and October 1, 2018–December 31, 2018 (post-48H ATO). Fields at order-entry to specify an antibiotic indication were not available prior to our EHR interventions. A randomized subset from the Pre-48Hr ATO group was selected for detailed analysis. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the average DOT of CFP/CTZ combined, VAN alone, and the combination of CFP/CTZ/VAN. We also evaluated length of stay (LOS), all-cause inpatient mortality, and 30-day readmissions. Results A total of 157 antibiotic orders (n = 94 patients) were evaluated in the pre-48h ATO group, and 2093 antibiotic orders (n = 521 patients) post-48H ATO group. Pre-48H ATO, 85 patients received CFP/CTZ and 72 VAN. Post-48H ATO, 322 patients received CFP/CTZ and 198 VAN. PNA was the most common indication pre- and post-48H ATO. DOT significantly decreased pre- vs. post-48H ATO (Figure 1). LOS was 2 days shorter (P = 0.01) in the post-48H ATO group, mortality and 30-day readmissions was similar between groups (Table 1). Conclusion Average antibiotic DOT for CFP/CTZ, and VAN significantly decreased following the implementation of the 48H ATO at our medical center. LOS was reduced by 2 days, while mortality and 30-day readmissions were similar before and after. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: A summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey M. Weiner-Lastinger ◽  
Vaishnavi Pattabiraman ◽  
Rebecca Y. Konnor ◽  
Prachi R. Patel ◽  
Emily Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
State Level ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infection ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives: To determine the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infection (HAI) incidence in US hospitals, national- and state-level standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were calculated for each quarter in 2020 and compared to those from 2019. Methods: Central–line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), ventilator-associated events (VAEs), select surgical site infections, and Clostridioides difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia laboratory-identified events reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network for 2019 and 2020 by acute-care hospitals were analyzed. SIRs were calculated for each HAI and quarter by dividing the number of reported infections by the number of predicted infections, calculated using 2015 national baseline data. Percentage changes between 2019 and 2020 SIRs were calculated. Supporting analyses, such as an assessment of device utilization in 2020 compared to 2019, were also performed. Results: Significant increases in the national SIRs for CLABSI, CAUTI, VAE, and MRSA bacteremia were observed in 2020. Changes in the SIR varied by quarter and state. The largest increase was observed for CLABSI, and significant increases in VAE incidence and ventilator utilization were seen across all 4 quarters of 2020. Conclusions: This report provides a national view of the increases in HAI incidence in 2020. These data highlight the need to return to conventional infection prevention and control practices and build resiliency in these programs to withstand future pandemics.

scholarly journals The Impact of Differences in Surveillance Definitions of Hospital Acquired Urinary Tract Infections (HAUTI)

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1262
Author(s):  
Yossef Levi ◽  
Debby Ben-David ◽  
Inna Estrin ◽  
Hodaya Saadon ◽  
Maya Krocker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Agreement Rate ◽  
Positive Urine ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
The Impact

Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HAUTI) are common and most cases are related to catheters (CAUTI). HAUTI and CAUTI surveillance is mandatory in many countries as a measure to reduce the incidence of infections and appropriately direct the allocation of preventable resources. The surveillance criteria issued by the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH), differ somewhat from that of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Our study aims were to query and quantify the impact of these differences. In a retrospective cohort study conducted at Shamir Medical Center, for calendar year 2017, the surveillance criteria of both IMOH and CDC were applied on 644 patient-unique adults with “positive” urine cultures (per similar definitions). The incidence of HAUTI per IMOH was significantly higher compared to CDC (1.24/1000 vs. 1.02/1000 patient-days, p = 0.02), with no impact on hospitalization’s outcomes. The agreement rate between methods was high for CAUTI (92%), but much lower for all HAUTI (83%). The major error rate, i.e., patients diagnosed with HAUTI per IMOH but had no UTI per CDC, was 31%. To conclude, in order for surveillance to reflect the relative situation and direct allocation of preventable resources based on scientific literature, the process should be uniform worldwide.

A Multimodal Intervention to Reduce Urinary Catheter Use and Associated Infection at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady L. Miller ◽  
Sarah L. Krein ◽  
Karen E. Fowler ◽  
Karen Belanger ◽  
Debbie Zawol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Quality Improvement Intervention ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improvement Intervention

We assessed the impact of a quality improvement intervention to reduce urinary catheter use and associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) at a single hospital. After implementation, UTIs were reduced by 39% (P = .04). Additionally, we observed a slight decrease in catheter use and the number of catheters without an appropriate indication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document