scholarly journals Potential for the current National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) >3 days after admission definition of laboratory-identified, healthcare-facility–onset, Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) to overestimate rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-468
Author(s):  
Shruti Puri ◽  
Heather Y. Hughes ◽  
Monica D. McCrackin ◽  
Robert Williford ◽  
Mulugeta Gebregziabher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Positive Stool ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractHealthcare-facility–onset C.difficile LabID events are defined as positive stool samples collected >3 days after hospitalization. Using a definition of >72 hours, we found that 84 of 1013 cases (8.3%) identified as C. difficile LabID events were collected between 48 and 72 hours after admission.

scholarly journals Analysis of National Healthcare Safety Network Clostridioides difficile Infection Standardized Infection Ratio by Test Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s87-s89
Author(s):  
Qunna Li ◽  
Andrea Benin ◽  
Alice Guh ◽  
Margaret Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Adjustment ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Directional Pattern ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Test Type ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
The Mean

Background: The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) has used positive laboratory tests for surveillance of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) LabID events since 2009. Typically, CDIs are detected using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), or various test combinations. The NHSN uses a risk-adjusted, standardized infection ratio (SIR) to assess healthcare facility-onset (HO) CDI. Despite including test type in the risk adjustment, some hospital personnel and other stakeholders are concerned that NAAT use is associated with higher SIRs than EIA use. To investigate this issue, we analyzed NHSN data from acute-care hospitals for July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018. Methods: Calendar quarters where CDI test type was reported as NAAT (includes NAAT, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)+NAAT and GDH+EIA followed by NAAT if discrepant) or EIA (includes EIA and GDH+EIA) were selected. HO-CDI SIRs were calculated for facility-wide inpatient locations. We conducted the following 2 analyses: (1) Among hospitals that did not switch their test type, we compared the distribution of HO incident rates and SIRs by those reporting NAAT versus EIA. (2) Among hospitals that switched their test type, we selected quarters with a stable switch pattern of 2 consecutive quarters of each of EIA and NAAT (categorized as EIA-to-NAAT or NAAT-to-EIA). Pooled semiannual SIRs for EIA and NAAT were calculated, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the difference in SIRs by switch pattern. Results: Most hospitals did not switch test types (3,242, 89%), and 2,872 (89%) reported sufficient data to calculate an SIR, with 2,444 (85%) using NAAT. The crude pooled HO CDI incidence rates for hospitals using EIAs clustered at the lower end of the histogram versus rates for NAATs (Fig. 1). The SIR distributions, both NAATs and EIAs, overlapped substantially and covered a similar range of SIR values (Fig. 1). Among hospitals with a switch pattern, hospitals were equally likely to have an increase or decrease in their SIRs (Fig. 2). The mean SIR difference for the 42 hospitals switching from EIA to NAAT was 0.048 (95% CI, −0.189 to 0.284; P = .688). The mean SIR difference for the 26 hospitals switching from NAAT to EIA was 0.162 (95% CI, −0.048 to 0.371; P = .124). Conclusions: The pattern of SIR distribution for both NAAT and EIA substantiate the soundness of the NHSN’s risk adjustment for CDI test types. Switching test type did not produce a consistent directional pattern in SIR that was statistically significant.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 875. Pseudo-outbreak of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile amongst post-operative Oncology Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S475-S475
Author(s):  
Daniel Kagedan ◽  
Roderich Schwarz ◽  
Jillianna Wasiura ◽  
Nikolaos Almyroudis ◽  
Robin Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Research Support ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Allelic Differences ◽  
Inpatient Units

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection rates are subject to infection prevention surveillance as a quality measure within the hospital setting. A large spike in Clostridioides difficile infections in post-operative patients, the majority of whom were gastrointestinal surgery (GIS) patients, was noted within a six month period (June through November 2019) at our comprehensive cancer center. These patients had been housed in one of two inpatient units and there was appropriate concern that this represented a C. difficile outbreak possibly related some type of infection control breach. Methods In an effort to query case relatedness, whole genome sequencing was performed using Illumina MiSeq instrumentation and chemistry with Illumina Nextera XT library chemistry. Assembly and core genome multilocus sequence typing analysis were performed with Ridom SeqSphere+ software. Cases were classified as community or hospital acquired based on the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions. Results There were 23 samples submitted for possible whole genome sequencing (WGS). 5 samples were unable to be grown therefore WGS was not completed; 16 were found to be unrelated (51 or more allelic differences); 2 of the 18 isolates were found to be possibly related (7 to 50 allelic differences). There were no isolates found to be definitively related (zero to 6 allelic differences). Conclusion Given the overwhelming unrelatedness of the isolates via whole genome sequencing, this increase of C. difficile cases, identified by routine surveillance within two inpatient units, was determined to be representative of a pseudo-outbreak rather than an outbreak. This study has implications on public health reporting. National Healthcare Safety Network definitions are used to identify healthcare facility-onset C. difficile infections (CDI). The majority of cases in this study met the definition of healthcare facility-onset, and thus were reported as such, despite being genetically unrelated. This raises the concern that a significant percentage of C. difficile infections may be currently misclassified as hospital-associated and this may have negative, unfair consequences for hospitals, such as implications on reimbursement. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)CD Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Contrafect (Grant/Research Support)Curetis (Consultant)GenMark Diagnostics (Consultant)Heraeus Medical (Consultant)Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Next Gen Diagnostics (Consultant)PathoQuest (Consultant)Qvella (Consultant)Samsung (Other Financial or Material Support, Dr. Patel has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued.)Selux Dx (Consultant)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support)Specific Technologies (Consultant)

scholarly journals Analysis of National Healthcare Safety Network Clostridioides difficile Infection Standardized Infection Ratio by Test Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s116-s118
Author(s):  
Qunna Li ◽  
Andrea Benin ◽  
Alice Guh ◽  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Adjustment ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Directional Pattern ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Test Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: The NHSN has used positive laboratory tests for surveillance of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) LabID events since 2009. Typically, CDIs are detected using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), or various test combinations. The NHSN uses a risk-adjusted, standardized infection ratio (SIR) to assess healthcare facility-onset (HO) CDI. Despite including test type in the risk adjustment, some hospital personnel and other stakeholders are concerned that NAAT use is associated with higher SIRs than are EIAs. To investigate this issue, we analyzed NHSN data from acute-care hospitals for July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Methods: Calendar quarters for which CDI test type was reported as NAAT (includes NAAT, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)+NAAT and GDH+EIA followed by NAAT if discrepant) or EIA (includes EIA and GDH+EIA) were selected. HO CDI SIRs were calculated for facility-wide inpatient locations. We conducted the following analyses: (1) Among hospitals that did not switch their test type, we compared the distribution of HO incident rates and SIRs by those reporting NAAT vs EIA. (2) Among hospitals that switched their test type, we selected quarters with a stable switch pattern of 2 consecutive quarters of each of EIA and NAAT (categorized as pattern EIA-to-NAAT or NAAT-to-EIA). Pooled semiannual SIRs for EIA and NAAT were calculated, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the difference of SIRs by switch pattern. Results: Most hospitals did not switch test types (3,242, 89%), and 2,872 (89%) reported sufficient data to calculate SIRs, with 2,444 (85%) using NAAT. The crude pooled HO CDI incidence rates for hospitals using EIA clustered at the lower end of the histogram versus rates for NAAT (Fig. 1). The SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA overlapped substantially and covered a similar range of SIR values (Fig. 1). Among hospitals with a switch pattern, hospitals were equally likely to have an increase or decrease in their SIR (Fig. 2). The mean SIR difference for the 42 hospitals switching from EIA to NAAT was 0.048 (95% CI, −0.189 to 0.284; P = .688). The mean SIR difference for the 26 hospitals switching from NAAT to EIA was 0.162 (95% CI, −0.048 to 0.371; P = .124). Conclusions: The pattern of SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA substantiate the soundness of NHSN risk adjustment for CDI test types. Switching test type did not produce a consistent directional pattern in SIR that was statistically significant.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

scholarly journals 247. Validation of the Use of Oral Vancomycin Following Positive Admission Screening Testing for C. difficile

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S123-S123
Author(s):  
Preethi Yeturu ◽  
Jorge P Parada ◽  
Maressa Santarossa ◽  
Laurie Labuszewski ◽  
Jenna Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical History ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Infectious Colitis ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Admission Screening ◽  
Positive Stool ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile can cause a severe infectious colitis and is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. C. difficile infection (CDI) is defined as the presence of diarrhea plus a positive stool test, whereas C. difficile colonization is defined as a positive stool test in the absence of diarrhea or the presence of diarrhea attributable to causes other than CDI. Widespread use of stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, especially within the first 3 days of admission, has become common at our institution and has been associated with increased number of positive C. difficile tests results. However, C. difficile colonization rates may be 15% or higher. Oral (PO) vancomycin (vanc) is first line therapy for the treatment of CDI. We sought to evaluate the appropriateness of use of PO vanc in patients who tested positive for C. difficile via stool PCR within 3 days of admission. Methods We reviewed the clinical history, presence of diarrhea, risk factors for diarrhea, treatment and use of an infectious disease (ID) consultation for all patients 18 years of age or older found to test positive for C. difficile by PCR on stool assays during the first 3 days of admission from 07/01/18 to 12/31/18. Results A total of 228 patients met inclusion criteria. 183 (80%) received PO vanc while 45 (20%) did not. 131 (71.6%) of patients who received PO vanc had diarrhea, 39 (21.3%) did not have diarrhea, 13 (7.1%) the presence of diarrhea was unknown. 41 of 143 (28.7%) of patients without ID consults received PO vanc despite not having diarrhea, while 11 of 40 (27.5%) patients seen by ID received PO vanc despite not having diarrhea (p=0.888). Conclusion Most patients who tested positive for C. difficile received PO vanc had documented diarrhea, meeting the definition of CDI. However, over 1 in 5 (21.3%) of patients who received PO vanc did not have diarrhea and may have been colonized rather than have true CDI. ID consultation did not decrease the number of patients without diarrhea who received PO vanc or prevent treatment of colonized patients. This work reveals there may be an opportunity for improvement regarding management of CDI vs. C. difficile colonization which may enhance antibiotic stewardship and the appropriate use of PO vanc. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Bile Acid Profile and its Changes in Response to Cefoperazone Treatment in MR1 Deficient Mice

Metabolites ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinchun Sun ◽  
Zhijun Cao ◽  
Ashley D. Smith ◽  
Paul E. Carlson Jr ◽  
Michael Coryell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Acid ◽  
Intestinal Content ◽  
Knock Out ◽  
Mait Cells ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Infection Resistance ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Cecum Content ◽  
Microbiome Data

Mucosal associated invariant T-cells (MAIT cells) are activated following recognition of bacterial antigens (riboflavin intermediates) presented on major histocompatibility complex class I-related molecule (MR1). Our previous study showed that MR1−/− knock-out (KO) mice (lacking MAIT cells) harbor a unique microbiota that is resistant to antibiotic disruption and Clostridioides difficile colonization. While we have characterized the microbiota of this mouse strain, changes in global metabolic activity in these KO mice have not been assessed. Here, LC/MS-based untargeted metabolomics was applied to investigate the differences in the metabolome, specifically in the bile acid (BA) profile of wild-type (WT) and MR1−/− KO mice, as well as how antibiotics change these profiles. BA changes were evaluated in the intestinal content, cecum content, and stool samples from MR1−/− mice and WT mice treated with cefoperazone (Cef). Fecal pellets were collected daily and both intestinal and cecal contents were harvested at predetermined endpoints on day 0 (D0), day 1 (D1), day 3 (D3), and day 5 (D5). KO mice exhibited no changes in 6-hydroxymethyl-8-D-ribityllumazine (rRL-6-CH2OH; an MR1-restricted riboflavin derivative) in the stool samples at either time point vs. D0, while WT mice showed significant decreases in rRL-6-CH2OH in the stool samples on all treatment days vs. D0. Metabolomics analysis from cecal and stool samples showed that KO mice had more total BA intensity (KO/WT = ~1.7 and ~3.3 fold higher) than that from WT mice prior to Cef treatment, while the fold change difference (KO/WT = ~4.5 and ~4.4 fold) increased after five days of Cef treatment. Both KO and WT mice showed decreases in total BA intensity in response to Cef treatment, however, less dramatic decreases were present in KO vs. WT mice. Increases in taurocholic acid (TCA) intensity and decreases in deoxycholic acid (DCA) intensity in the stool samples from WT mice were associated with the depletion of certain gut bacteria, which was consistent with the previously reported microbiome data. Furthermore, the non-detected TCA and relatively higher DCA intensity in the KO mice might be related to Clostridioides difficile infection resistance, although this needs further investigation.

scholarly journals 1496. Bezlotoxumab Administered at the End of a Suppressive Drug Regimen for Patients with Multiply Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S545-S545
Author(s):  
Xing Tan ◽  
Larry H Danziger ◽  
Dale N Gerding
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Public Health Burden ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Positive Stool ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Effective Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a public health burden, affecting as many as 35% of patients with primary CDI. Bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal anti-toxin B antibody, was the first FDA-approved agent indicated for the prevention of recurrent CDI, but real-world experience is limited, particularly in patients with multiple CDI recurrences. Methods We conducted a retrospective case study of patients with multiple CDI recurrences who failed prior treatments with pulsed and tapered vancomycin and fidaxomicin regimens. Six patients in a single CDI specialty outpatient clinic received a single iv infusion of bezlotoxumab at the end of a suppressive vancomycin or fidaxomicin treatment regimen. The suppressive treatment was stopped immediately after the bezlotoxumab infusion and the patients were followed closely for recurrent symptoms and need for additional CDI treatment. Results Four of 6 patients who received bezlotoxumab at the end of a suppressive treatment regimen did not require subsequent CDI treatment and have been followed for 2 weeks to 1.5 years to date. These four patients experienced a single, self-limited episode of diarrhea within 2 weeks of the infusion, and did not require subsequent CDI treatment. Two patients had recurrent symptoms and positive stool C. difficile tests one month after infusion and were re-started on CDI treatment. One of the patients had longstanding underlying irritable bowel syndrome and variable initial response to re-starting vancomycin. The other patient responded to re-starting fidaxomicin. Conclusion Bezlotoxumab at the end of a prolonged suppressive treatment regimen may be an effective therapeutic strategy in preventing recurrent CDI in complicated, multiply recurrent CDI patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Using diagnostic stewardship to reduce rates, healthcare expenditures and accurately identify cases of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Dipesh Solanky ◽  
Derek K. Juang ◽  
Scott T. Johns ◽  
Ian C. Drobish ◽  
Sanjay R. Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infection ◽  
Laxative Use ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Hospital Days

AbstractObjective:Lack of judicious testing can result in the incorrect diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), unnecessary CDI treatment, increased costs and falsely augmented hospital-acquired infection (HAI) rates. We evaluated facility-wide interventions used at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) to reduce healthcare-onset, healthcare-facility–associated CDI (HO-HCFA CDI), including the use of diagnostic stewardship with test ordering criteria.Design:We conducted a retrospective study to assess the effectiveness of measures implemented to reduce the rate of HO-HCFA CDI at the VASDHS from fiscal year (FY)2015 to FY2018.Interventions:Measures executed in a stepwise fashion included a hand hygiene initiative, prompt isolation of CDI patients, enhanced terminal room cleaning, reduction of fluoroquinolone and proton-pump inhibitor use, laboratory rejection of solid stool samples, and lastly diagnostic stewardship with C. difficile toxin B gene nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) criteria instituted in FY2018.Results:From FY2015 to FY2018, 127 cases of HO-HCFA CDI were identified. All rate-reducing initiatives resulted in decreased HO-HCFA cases (from 44 to 13; P ≤ .05). However, the number of HO-HCFA cases (34 to 13; P ≤ .05), potential false-positive testing associated with colonization and laxative use (from 11 to 4), hospital days (from 596 to 332), CDI-related hospitalization costs (from $2,780,681 to $1,534,190) and treatment cost (from $7,158 vs $1,476) decreased substantially following the introduction of diagnostic stewardship with test criteria from FY2017 to FY2018.Conclusions:Initiatives to decrease risk for CDI and diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile stool NAAT significantly reduced HO-HCFA CDI rates, detection of potential false-positives associated with laxative use, and lowered healthcare costs. Diagnostic stewardship itself had the most dramatic impact on outcomes observed and served as an effective tool in reducing HO-HCFA CDI rates.

scholarly journals Correlation of prevention practices with rates of health care-associated Clostridioides difficile infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Jackson S. Musuuza ◽  
Linda McKinley ◽  
Julie A. Keating ◽  
Chidi Obasi ◽  
Mary Jo Knobloch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
Acute Care Facilities

AbstractObjective:We examined Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevention practices and their relationship with hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI rates (CDI rates) in Veterans Affairs (VA) acute-care facilities.Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:From January 2017 to February 2017, we conducted an electronic survey of CDI prevention practices and hospital characteristics in the VA. We linked survey data with CDI rate data for the period January 2015 to December 2016. We stratified facilities according to whether their overall CDI rate per 10,000 bed days of care was above or below the national VA mean CDI rate. We examined whether specific CDI prevention practices were associated with an increased risk of a CDI rate above the national VA mean CDI rate.Results:All 126 facilities responded (100% response rate). Since implementing CDI prevention practices in July 2012, 60 of 123 facilities (49%) reported a decrease in CDI rates; 22 of 123 facilities (18%) reported an increase, and 41 of 123 (33%) reported no change. Facilities reporting an increase in the CDI rate (vs those reporting a decrease) after implementing prevention practices were 2.54 times more likely to have CDI rates that were above the national mean CDI rate. Whether a facility’s CDI rates were above or below the national mean CDI rate was not associated with self-reported cleaning practices, duration of contact precautions, availability of private rooms, or certification of infection preventionists in infection prevention.Conclusions:We found considerable variation in CDI rates. We were unable to identify which particular CDI prevention practices (i.e., bundle components) were associated with lower CDI rates.

scholarly journals 837. Prior Hospitalizations Among Cases of Community-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection—10 US States, 2014–2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S9-S10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly M Hatfield ◽  
James Baggs ◽  
Lisa Gail Winston ◽  
Erin Parker ◽  
Helen Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medicare Beneficiary ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

Abstract Background Despite overall progress in preventing Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI), community-associated (CA) infections have been steadily increasing. Although the incubation period of CDI is thought to be relatively short, gastrointestinal microbial disruption from remote healthcare exposures (e.g., inpatient antibiotic use) may be associated with CA-CDI. To assess this potential association, we linked CA-CDI infections identified through CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP) to Medicare claims data to describe prior healthcare utilization. Methods We defined an EIP CA-CDI case as a positive C. difficile test collected in 2014–2015 from an outpatient or inpatient within 3 days of hospital admission, provided there was no positive test in the prior 8 weeks and no admission to a healthcare facility in the prior 12 weeks. We linked EIP CA-CDI cases aged ≥65 years to a Medicare beneficiary using unique combinations of birthdate, sex, and zip code. Cases were included if they maintained continuous fee-for-service coverage for 1 year prior to the event date. To calculate exposure odds ratios for previous hospitalizations, each case was matched to 5 control beneficiaries on age, sex, and county of residence. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted matched odds ratios (amOR) that controlled for chronic conditions. Results We successfully linked 2,287/3,367 (68%) EIP CA-CDI cases. Of these, 1,236 cases met inclusion criteria; the median age was 77 years and 63% were female. We identified 69 (5.6%) cases with misclassification of prior healthcare exposures, most of whom (48, 70%) were hospitalized in the 12 weeks prior to their event. Among the 1,167 true CA-CDI cases, 33% were hospitalized in the prior 12 weeks to 1 year. The median number of weeks from prior hospitalization to CDI was 27 (IQR 18–38, Figure 1). Cases had a higher risk of hospitalization than matched controls in the prior 3–6 months (amOR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.87, 2.90) and 6–12 months (amOR: 1.43 95% CI: 1.18, 1.74). Conclusion Remote hospitalization in the previous year was a significant risk factor for CA-CDI, especially in the 3–6 months prior to CA-CDI. Long-lasting prevention strategies implemented at hospital discharge and enhanced inpatient antibiotic stewardship may prevent CA-CDI among older adults. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document