scholarly journals Estimating the Contribution of a Contaminated Wheelchair to Pathogen Spread With an Agent-Based Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s474-s474
Author(s):  
Amanda Wilson ◽  
Curtis Donskey ◽  
Marc Verhougstraete ◽  
Kelly Reynolds

Background: Wheelchairs can contribute to healthcare-associated infection transmission due to direct contact with patients and healthcare workers and due to wide spatial movement in facilities. Objective: We utilized location data of a wheelchair to inform an agent-based model for estimating the contribution of a single contaminated patient ride in a wheelchair to subsequent environmental contamination and to estimate the potential for wheelchair disinfection between patients to disrupt this spread. Methods: The destination and origin of wheelchairs were tracked in several facility locations: specialty care services, long-term care, radiology, acute care, common spaces, domiciliary, and outpatient clinics. An agent-based model was developed in which the probability of the wheelchair traveling directly from one location to another was informed by wheelchair origin and destination data. We assumed that the first patient’s hands were contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). For each patient trip, each simulated patient made contact with the wheelchair arm rests and a surface in the destination location. To evaluate potential exposures of uninfected patients, all patients riding in the wheelchair after the contaminated patient were assumed to be uncontaminated. In total, 50 patient rides were simulated. The concentration and number of contaminated surfaces in each hospital area were compared in addition to the average concentration of MRSA on patient hands over time. The intervention simulation involved a disinfection of wheelchair armrests with 90%, 70%, or 50% efficacy. Results: The 3 areas that had the largest estimated number of contaminated surfaces after 50 wheelchair trips following the first patient assumed to be infected were specialty care services, long-term care, and acute care. This finding was consistent with the paths that were most frequented by the wheelchair. Without cleaning between patients, the fiftieth patient to use the wheelchair had an average MRSA concentration of 41.5 CFU/cm2. With cleaning between patients, assuming a 50% cleaning efficacy, average MRSA concentration on the hands for the fiftieth patient was reduced to 7.4 ×10-14 CFU/cm2. Conclusions: We have demonstrated that cleaning, even with efficacies as low as 50%, may protect patients using contaminated wheelchairs from potential pathogen exposures. This study also demonstrates that tracking portable equipment can be useful not only for exposure modeling but also for predicting where the largest number of surfaces contaminated via portable equipment routes may be found. Future steps include performing a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the influence of spatial assumptions.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S390-S391
Author(s):  
Stephen Kralovic ◽  
Martin Evans ◽  
Loretta Simbartl ◽  
Gary Roselle

Abstract Background CDI remains a significant and serious healthcare-associated infection within hospital and long-term care (LTC) settings. In 2012 VA began a CDI Prevention Initiative in its acute care (AC) facilities, which expanded to include LTC. Data were collected with regard to CDI cases and healthcare-facility associated (HCFA) status. Methods VA used CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Lab-ID Event definitions from CDI/MDRO Module with the exception that HCFA-status was called with a more stringent timeframe at 48 hours after admission. Monthly, VA Medical Centers and LTC Facilities report data to a central repository which includes number of cases meeting NHSN definitions for recurrence, hospital onset HCFA (HO-HCFA), community-onset HCFA (CO-HCFA) and community-onset non HCFA (CO-notHCFA) cases (equivalent of NSHN community-acquired [CA] cases). Data collection began from 2011 forward in AC, and from part of 2012 forward in LTC. Results In AC, the number of all cases reported ranged from 6313 to 6595 with no trend for increase/decrease noted from 2011 to 2016. However, when evaluating proportions of each type of CDI contributing to the overall occurrence, there is significant change over the years (P < 0.0001, Chi-Square analysis of proportions) with HO-HCFA and CO-HCFA contributing to less (24.4% and 25.2%, decreases, respectively) and CO cases (particularly CO-notHCFA) contributing to more (38.1% increase) of the cases, (Fig 1). In LTC, there were overall lesser cases ranging from 980 to 789 from 2013 through 2016 (P = 0.05, linear regression), with no significant changes over the years (P = 0.06, Chi-Square of proportions) (Fig 2). Conclusion Over time, HO-HCFA and CO-HCFA cases have declined within VA AC facilities. However, an increase of CO-notHCFA cases (similar to NHSN CA cases) has occurred, increasing admission prevalence of CDI at VA facilities. As CDI prevalence on admission is a contributor to risk for HCFA disease, this increased pressure indicates the success of the VA CDI Prevention Initiative in decreases of HO-HCFA is even more substantive than raw rates would indicate. However, it also highlights a group of CDI cases which need a different, focused targeting of prevention strategies. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 629-629
Author(s):  
Silke Metzelthin ◽  
Sandra Zwakhalen ◽  
Barbara Resnick

Abstract Functional decline in older adults often lead towards acute or long-term care. In practice, caregivers often focus on completion of care tasks and of prevention of injuries from falls. This task based, safety approach inadvertently results in fewer opportunities for older adults to be actively involved in activities. Further deconditioning and functional decline are common consequences of this inactivity. To prevent or postpone these consequences Function Focused Care (FFC) was developed meaning that caregivers adapt their level of assistance to the capabilities of older adults and stimulate them to do as much as possible by themselves. FFC was first implemented in institutionalized long-term care in the US, but has spread rapidly to other settings (e.g. acute care), target groups (e.g. people with dementia) and countries (e.g. the Netherlands). During this symposium, four presenters from the US and the Netherlands talk about the impact of FFC. The first presentation is about the results of a stepped wedge cluster trial showing a tendency to improve activities of daily living and mobility. The second presentation is about a FFC training program. FFC was feasible to implement in home care and professionals experienced positive changes in knowledge, attitude, skills and support. The next presenter reports about significant improvements regarding time spent in physical activity and a decrease in resistiveness to care in a cluster randomized controlled trial among nursing home residents with dementia. The fourth speaker presents the content and first results of a training program to implement FFC in nursing homes. Nursing Care of Older Adults Interest Group Sponsored Symposium


Author(s):  
Sara Carazo ◽  
Denis Laliberté ◽  
Jasmin Villeneuve ◽  
Richard Martin ◽  
Pierre Deshaies ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: To estimate the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate and the secondary attack rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Quebec, the most affected province of Canada during the first wave; to describe the evolution of work-related exposures and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in infected HCWs; and to compare the exposures and practices between acute care hospitals (ACHs) and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Survey of cases Participants: Quebec HCWs from private and public institutions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 1st March and 14th June 2020. HCWs ≥18 years old, having worked during the exposure period and survived their illness were eligible for the survey. Methods: After obtaining consent, 4542 HCWs completed a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 rates and proportions of exposures and practices were estimated and compared between ACHs and LTCFs. Results: HCWs represented 25% (13,726/54,005) of all reported COVID-19 cases in Quebec and had an 11-times greater rate than non-HCWs. Their secondary household attack rate was 30%. Most affected occupations were healthcare support workers, nurses and nurse assistants, working in LTCFs (45%) and ACHs (30%). Compared to ACHs, HCWs of LTCFs had less training, higher staff mobility between working sites, similar PPE use but better self-reported compliance with at-work physical distancing. Sub-optimal IPC practices declined over time but were still present at the end of the first wave. Conclusion: Quebec HCWs and their families were severely affected during the first wave of COVID-19. Insufficient pandemic preparedness and suboptimal IPC practices likely contributed to high transmission in both LTCFs and ACHs.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
France Portrait ◽  
Maarten Lindeboom ◽  
Dorly Deeg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document