Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial use: A survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1281-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireia Puig-Asensio ◽  
Eli N. Perencevich ◽  
Daniel J. Livorsi
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Important Target ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology ◽  
Current Guidelines

AbstractContinuing surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis after the incision is closed is not recommended in current guidelines. Our survey found that only 30.8% of hospitals had fully adopted these new recommendations. Feedback on prophylaxis duration was infrequently provided. Promoting guideline-concordant surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis discontinuation is an important target for future stewardship interventions.

scholarly journals Impact of a Critical National Shortage of Cefazolin on Antimicrobial Practice at a Tertiary-Care Center in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s256-s256
Author(s):  
Shutaro Murakami ◽  
Junko Hiroi ◽  
Yasuaki Tagashira ◽  
Akane Takamatsu ◽  
Shinya Hasegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Background: Shortages of essential medicines, a long-standing issue in healthcare, apply equally to antimicrobial agents, a group of essential drugs necessary for sustainable healthcare. The WHO categorized essential medicines into the access, watch, and reserve groups. Older antimicrobials, in particular, were categorized into the access group, meaning that these drugs are in theory widely available at an affordable cost. The shortage of essential antimicrobial agents like cefazolin leads to increased consumption of alternative antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum activity, which often has the undesirable consequence of defeating antimicrobial stewardship efforts in inpatient settings and potentially promoting antimicrobial resistance. In Japan, cefazolin has been in critically short supply since March 2019. Cefazolin is a first-line agent against common infectious diseases and in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, and its shortage has substantially impacted inpatient care. The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in antimicrobial practice at a tertiary-care center in Japan following the emergence of the national cefazolin shortage in March 2019. Methods: Data on each antimicrobial use are logged as days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days (PD) for antimicrobial stewardship purposes at the study institution. We extracted weekly data from September 2018 to September 2019 to evaluate the impact of the national cefazolin shortage on antimicrobial use at our tertiary-care center. Changes in weekly antimicrobial use and the weekly incidence of Clostridium difficile infections were analyzed by interrupted time series analysis. We also investigated changes in antimicrobial practice at selected situations. Results: As weekly cefazolin use significantly declined after the emergence of the national shortage, use of third-generation cephalosporin (+18.9 DOT per 1,000 PD for intercept [P < .001] and +0.65 DOT per 1,000 PD per week for trend [P = .037]) and clindamycin (18 DOT per 1,000 PD for intercept [P = .008] and 0.12 DOT per 1,000 PD per week for trend [P = .003]) significantly increased. Significant changes in antimicrobial practice were also observed in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: third-generation cephalosporin use increased from 1.0% (31 of 3,032) to 62.9% (2,237 of 3,554) (P < .001). However, no significant change in the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was observed during the study period: +1.72 per 10,000 PD for intercept (P = .12) and 0.12 per 10,000 PD per week for the trend (P = .09). Conclusions: The national cefazolin shortage had a significantly negative impact on patient care and led to increased use of alternative, broader-spectrum antimicrobials, which are not ideal choices either for prophylaxis or treatment.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Interfacility transfer communication of multidrug-resistant organism colonization or infection status: Practices and barriers in the acute-care setting

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Katherine D. Ellingson ◽  
Brie N. Noble ◽  
Genevieve L. Buser ◽  
Graham M. Snyder ◽  
Jessina C. McGregor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Academic Affiliation ◽  
Healthcare Epidemiology

Abstract Objective: To describe interfacility transfer communication (IFTC) methods for notification of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) status in a diverse sample of acute-care hospitals. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Hospitals within the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN). Methods: SRN members completed an electronic survey on protocols and methods for IFTC. We assessed differences in IFTC frequency, barriers, and perceived benefit by presence of an IFTC protocol. Results: Among 136 hospital representatives who were sent the survey, 54 (40%) responded, of whom 72% reported having an IFTC protocol in place. The presence of a protocol did not differ significantly by hospital size, academic affiliation, or international status. Of those with IFTC protocols, 44% reported consistent notification of MDRO status (>75% of the time) to receiving facilities, as opposed to 13% from those with no IFTC protocol (P = .04). Respondents from hospitals with IFTC protocols reported significantly fewer barriers to communication compared to those without (2.8 vs 4.3; P = .03). Overall, however, most respondents (56%) reported a lack of standardization in communication. Presence of an IFTC protocol did not affect whether respondents perceived IFTC protocols as having a significant impact on infection prevention or antimicrobial stewardship. Conclusions: Most respondents reported having an IFTC protocol, which was associated with reduced communication barriers at transfer. Standardization of protocols and clarity about expectations for sending and receipt of information related to MDRO status may facilitate IFTC and promote appropriate and timely infection prevention practices.

Reducing Broad Spectrum Antimicrobial Use in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Reduce AMMO Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Shah ◽  
Priya Sampathkumar ◽  
Ryan W Stevens ◽  
John K Bohman ◽  
Brian D Lahr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adults is increasing. There are currently no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. We analyzed 7 years of prophylactic antimicrobial use across three time series for patients on ECMO at our institution in the development, improvement, and streamlining of our ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol. Study design and Methods In this quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis, we evaluated the impact of an initial ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, implemented in 2014, on antimicrobial use and NHSN reportable infection rates. Then, following a revision and streamlining of the protocol in November 2018, we re-evaluated the same metrics. Results Our study population included 338 ICU patients who received ECMO between July 2011 and November 2019. After implementation of the first version of the protocol we did not observe significant changes in antimicrobial use or infection rates in these patients; however, following revision and streamlining of the protocol, we demonstrated a significant reduction in broad spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without any evidence of a compensatory increase in infection rates. Conclusion Our final protocol significantly reduces broad spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO. We propose a standard antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen for patients on ECMO based on current evidence and our experience.

scholarly journals Intraoperative Bacterial Contamination and Activity of Different Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Regimens in Primary Knee and Hip Replacement

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Alba Rivera ◽  
Alba Sánchez ◽  
Sonia Luque ◽  
Isabel Mur ◽  
Lluís Puig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Bacterial Contamination ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Almost All

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is important for the prevention of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and must be effective against the microorganisms most likely to contaminate the surgical site. Our aim was to compare different SAP regimens (cefazolin, cefuroxime, or vancomycin, alone or combined with gentamicin) in patients undergoing total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. In this preclinical exploratory analysis, we analyzed the results of intraoperative sample cultures, the ratio of plasma antibiotic levels to the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for bacteria isolated at the surgical wound and ATCC strains, and serum bactericidal titers (SBT) against the same microorganisms. A total of 132 surgical procedures (68 TKA, 64 THA) in 128 patients were included. Cultures were positive in 57 (43.2%) procedures (mostly for coagulase-negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium spp.); the rate was lower in the group of patients receiving combination SAP (adjusted OR 0.475, CI95% 0.229–0.987). The SAP regimens evaluated achieved plasma levels above the MICs in almost all of intraoperative isolates (93/94, 98.9%) and showed bactericidal activity against all of them (SBT range 1:8–1:1024), although SBTs were higher in patients receiving cefazolin and gentamicin-containing regimens. The potential clinical relevance of these findings in the prevention of PJIs remains to be determined.

Quality of local guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Gagliotti ◽  
F Ravaglia ◽  
D Resi ◽  
M.L Moro
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

scholarly journals Optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery: a before-after study

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akane Takamatsu ◽  
Yasuaki Tagashira ◽  
Kaori Ishii ◽  
Yasuhiro Morita ◽  
Yasuharu Tokuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document