Assessing the impact of antibiotic stewardship program elements on antibiotic use across acute-care hospitals: an observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 941-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Langford ◽  
Julie Hui-Chih Wu ◽  
Kevin A. Brown ◽  
Xuesong Wang ◽  
Valerie Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesAntibiotic use varies widely between hospitals, but the influence of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on this variability is not known. We aimed to determine the key structural and strategic aspects of ASPs associated with differences in risk-adjusted antibiotic utilization across facilities.DesignObservational study of acute-care hospitals in Ontario, CanadaMethodsA survey was sent to hospitals asking about both structural (8 elements) and strategic (32 elements) components of their ASP. Antibiotic use from hospital purchasing data was acquired for January 1 to December 31, 2014. Crude and adjusted defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days, accounting for hospital and aggregate patient characteristics, were calculated across facilities. Rate ratios (RR) of defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days were compared for hospitals with and without each antimicrobial stewardship element of interest.ResultsOf 127 eligible hospitals, 73 (57%) participated in the study. There was a 7-fold range in antibiotic use across these facilities (min, 253 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days; max, 1,872 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days). The presence of designated funding or resources for the ASP (RRadjusted, 0·87; 95% CI, 0·75–0·99), prospective audit and feedback (RRadjusted, 0·80; 95% CI, 0·67–0·96), and intravenous-to-oral conversion policies (RRadjusted, 0·79; 95% CI, 0·64–0·99) were associated with lower risk-adjusted antibiotic use.ConclusionsWide variability in antibiotic use across hospitals may be partially explained by both structural and strategic ASP elements. The presence of funding and resources, prospective audit and feedback, and intravenous-to-oral conversion should be considered priority elements of a robust ASP.

scholarly journals Every antibiotic, every day: Maximizing the impact of prospective audit and feedback on total antibiotic use

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e0178434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya J. Campbell ◽  
Melissa Decloe ◽  
Suzanne Gill ◽  
Grace Ho ◽  
Janine McCready ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals 83. Staff Pharmacist-driven Prospective Audit and Feedback at a Community Hospital: Assessing an all Hands on Deck Approach to Antimicrobial Stewardship

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S58-S59
Author(s):  
Casey J Dempsey ◽  
Natasha Weiner ◽  
Michele Riccardi ◽  
Kristin Linder
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Small Community ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Feedback Program

Abstract Background Facilities with robust antimicrobial stewardship programs often have infectious disease (ID) pharmacists with devoted time to complete antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Smaller facilities with limited resources or lacking ID pharmacists, may encounter challenges meeting antimicrobial stewardship regulatory requirements. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective audit and feedback program in a small community hospital. Methods A pre- and post-intervention study was performed to assess the primary outcome of days of therapy per 1,000 patient days (DOT) for targeted antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime). Secondary outcomes were antibiotic expenditures and rates of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results Significant decreases in DOT were observed for piperacillin/tazobactam (29.88 vs. 9.25; p < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (23.22 vs. 9.97; p < 0.001), levofloxacin (11.2 vs. 5.07; p < 0.001) and overall antipseudomonal DOT (62.91 vs. 51.67; p < 0.001). There was no difference in ceftazidime DOT (8.75 vs. 6.47; p= 0.083) and an increase in cefepime DOT (20.47 vs. 34.35; p < 0.001). A trend towards decreased rates of CDI was seen (4.9/10,000 patient days vs. 2.64/10,000 patient days; p= 0.931). There were significant decreases in antibiotic expenditures for piperacillin/tazobactam ($52,498 vs. $10,937; p < 0.001), levofloxacin ($2,168 vs. $672; p < 0.001), ciprofloxacin ($6,700 vs. $1,954; p < 0.001). Lower expenditures for ceftazidime were seen ($9,952 vs. $7,457; p= 0.29). Cefepime expenditures increased ($25,638 vs. $40,097; p= 0.001). An overall decrease in the expenditure for the targeted antibiotics was seen ($95,715 vs. $62,837; p < 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective authorization and feedback program led to a significant decrease in DOT and antibiotic expenditures for several targeted antibiotics and a trend towards decreased rates of CDI. Despite increased DOT and expenditures for cefepime, there was an overall decrease amongst the targeted antibiotics. With proper implementation, staff pharmacists can significantly benefit antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 38. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Adherence to Clostridioides difficile Treatment Guidelines

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S141-S141
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Neuner ◽  
Tamara Krekel ◽  
Michael Durkin ◽  
Erik R Dubberke ◽  
Kevin Hseuh
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Facility-specific treatment guidelines are a priority intervention recommended in the CDC Core Elements of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs). Our ASP sought to improve adherence to the facility C. difficile infection (CDI) treatment guideline by implementing prospective audit and feedback of CDI cases, changing fidaxomicin from being restricted to Infectious Diseases consult use, to only requiring prospective audit and feedback, and allowing fidaxomicin and oral vancomycin orders only through the order set. This study reviews the impact of these interventions. Methods This single-center retrospective quasi-experimental study evaluated inpatient CDI lab events 3 months pre-intervention (10/1/2019-12/31/2019) and post-intervention (10/14/2020-1/14/2021). Patient and treatment data was evaluated via chart review. The primary outcome was adherence to CDI treatment guideline. ASP intervention types were categorized. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-squared or Fischer’s exact, where appropriate. Results Baseline characteristics were well matched between the 58 and 70 patients pre and post intervention respectively (Table 1). ASP interventions resulting from the prospective audit and feedback are described in Table 2 and overall acceptance rates were high (88%). Guideline adherence improved significantly from 71% pre to 90% post-intervention (p=0.005). Reasons for non-adherence included vancomycin dose incorrect for the severity of illness (9 pre vs 2 post), inappropriate duration (4 pre vs 0 post), use of combination therapy in non-fulminant disease (5 pre vs 3 post), and not using fidaxomicin for recurrent disease (3 pre vs 2 post). Clinical outcomes pre and post intervention were not different in this small sample size: colectomy 1 (2%) vs 1 (1%) p=1, 60 day all- cause mortality 15 (26%) vs 14 (20%) p=0.43, and CDI recurrence at day 60 9/43 (21%) vs 5/56 (9%) p=0.131. Conclusion A bundle of ASP interventions including prospective audit and feedback of CDI cases improved adherence to facility-specific CDI treatment guidelines. Disclosures Tamara Krekel, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck (Speaker’s Bureau) Erik R. Dubberke, MD, MSPH, Ferring (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres (Consultant)Summit (Consultant)

scholarly journals Acceptability and effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship implementation strategies on fluoroquinolone prescribing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Katie J. Suda ◽  
Gosia S. Clore ◽  
Charlesnika T. Evans ◽  
Heather Schacht Reisinger ◽  
Ibuola Kale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prior Approval ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Advanced Generation

Abstract Objective: To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of antimicrobial stewardship-focused implementation strategies on inpatient fluoroquinolones. Methods: Stewardship champions at 15 hospitals were surveyed regarding the use and acceptability of strategies to improve fluoroquinolone prescribing. Antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 days present (DP) for sites with and without prospective audit and feedback (PAF) and/or prior approval were compared. Results: Among all of the sites, 60% had PAF or prior approval implemented for fluoroquinolones. Compared to sites using neither strategy (64.2 ± 34.4 DOT/DP), fluoroquinolone prescribing rates were lower for sites that employed PAF and/or prior approval (35.5 ± 9.8; P = .03) and decreased from 2017 to 2018 (P < .001). This decrease occurred without an increase in advanced-generation cephalosporins. Total antibiotic rates were 13% lower for sites with PAF and/or prior approval, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .20). Sites reporting that PAF and/or prior approval were “completely” accepted had lower fluoroquinolone rates than sites where it was “moderately” accepted (34.2 ± 5.7 vs 48.7 ± 4.5; P < .01). Sites reported that clinical pathways and/or local guidelines (93%), prior approval (93%), and order forms (80%) “would” or “may” be effective in improving fluoroquinolone use. Although most sites (73%) indicated that requiring infectious disease consults would or may be effective in improving fluoroquinolones, 87% perceived implementation to be difficult. Conclusions: PAF and prior approval implementation strategies focused on fluoroquinolones were associated with significantly lower fluoroquinolone prescribing rates and nonsignificant decreases in total antibiotic use, suggesting limited evidence for class substitution. The association of acceptability of strategies with lower rates highlights the importance of culture. These results may indicate increased acceptability of implementation strategies and/or sensitivity to FDA warnings.

scholarly journals Targeted Outpatient Fluoroquinolone Intervention utilizing an Integrated Electronic Health Record in the Bureau of Prisons

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s402-s402
Author(s):  
Deborah Long ◽  
Alisha Edmunds ◽  
Tyler Campbell ◽  
Michael Long
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Singular System ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Bureau Of Prisons

Background: Fluoroquinolones are the perfect target for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) due to their broad-spectrum nature, poor safety profile, and frequent misuse. In April 2019, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) created a national antimicrobial stewardship clinical pharmacist consultant program. One of the program’s main initiatives was to screen active fluoroquinolone prescriptions for appropriateness and work with providers to tailor therapy as needed. Since July 2019, pharmacist consultants have utilized a singular system-wide electronic health record (EHR) to conduct fluoroquinolone prospective audit and feedback targeting all BOP sites across the country. The objective was to assess the national impact of prospective audit and feedback on outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions utilizing pharmacist consultants and an integrated EHR. Method: Reviews were conducted in a federal correctional setting including 122 BOP sites with an average daily population of 167,308 inmates. The ASP consisted of 7 pharmacists, each assigned a region across the country. Consultant pharmacists were in charge of conducting daily fluoroquinolone reviews within 72 hours of the prescription being written, utilizing a singular system-wide EHR to gain remote access to newly prescribed prescriptions along with all other pertinent information (ie, clinical notes, patient profiles, laboratory, and radiology). Interventions were sent via e-mail. Total fluoroquinolone prescriptions per 1,000 inmates during the preintervention period (July 1, 2018, to September 30, 2018) were compared to the postintervention period (July 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019), after the development of the clinical consultant program. Data were also collected during the 3-month postintervention period to include total fluoroquinolone prescriptions reviewed, total recommendations sent, percentage of recommendations accepted, and intervention types. Results: In total, 833 fluoroquinolone prescriptions of 1, 264 total prescriptions written (66%)were reviewed over the 3-month postintervention period. In total,192 interventions were recommended (23%). Of the interventions recommended, 65 (34%) were accepted. The most common intervention was to stop therapy (41%), followed by changing antibiotic (37%), and shorten therapy duration (8%). Total outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions decreased by 1.5 prescriptions per 1,000 patients after the intervention. Conclusions: Pharmacist-driven prospective audit and feedback on a national scale utilizing a singular system-wide EHR resulted in an overall decrease in outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions over short period of time.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals The Impact of a Massachusetts State-Sponsored Educational Program on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Acute Care Hospitals

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Weston ◽  
Lauren Epstein ◽  
Lisa E. Davidson ◽  
Alfred DeMaria ◽  
Shira Doron
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Business Models ◽  
National Level ◽  
State Level ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
The State ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
The Impact

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are critically important for combating the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Despite this, there are no regulatory requirements at a national level, which makes initiatives at the state level critical. The objectives of this study were to identify existing antimicrobial stewardship practices, characterize barriers to antimicrobial stewardship implementation in acute care hospitals throughout Massachusetts, and evaluate the impact on these hospitals of a state-sponsored educational conference on antimicrobial stewardship.In September 2011, a state-sponsored educational program entitled “Building Stewardship: A Team Approach Enhancing Antibiotic Stewardship in Acute Care Hospitals” was offered to interested practitioners from throughout the state. The program consisted of 2 audio conferences, reading materials, and a 1-day conference consisting of lectures focusing on the importance of ASPs, strategies for implementation, improvement strategies for existing programs, and panel discussions highlighting successful practices. Smaller breakout sessions focused on operational issues, including understanding of pharmacodynamics, business models, and electronic surveillance.

scholarly journals 228. Impact of Early Alert to Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions with the Prospective Audit and Feedback Strategy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S98
Author(s):  
Sarah Si Lin Tang ◽  
Lun Yi Tan ◽  
Daphne Yah Chieh Yii ◽  
Andrea L Kwa ◽  
Piotr Chlebicki
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Feedback Strategy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Early Alert

scholarly journals Clostridium DifficileInfection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene K. Louh ◽  
William G. Greendyke ◽  
Emilia A. Hermann ◽  
Karina W. Davidson ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Chlorhexidine Bathing ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEPrevention ofClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) in acute-care hospitals is a priority for hospitals and clinicians. We performed a qualitative systematic review to update the evidence on interventions to prevent CDI published since 2009.DESIGNWe searched Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and grey literature databases from January 1, 2009 to August 1, 2015.SETTINGWe included studies performed in acute-care hospitals.PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTSWe included studies conducted on hospitalized patients that investigated the impact of specific interventions on CDI rates.INTERVENTIONSWe used the QI-Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) to assess the quality of included studies. Interventions were grouped thematically: environmental disinfection, antimicrobial stewardship, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing, probiotics, bundled approaches, and others. A meta-analysis was performed when possible.RESULTSOf 3,236 articles screened, 261 met the criteria for full-text review and 46 studies were ultimately included. The average quality rating was 82% according to the QI-MQCS. The most effective interventions, resulting in a 45% to 85% reduction in CDI, included daily to twice daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces (including bed rails) and terminal cleaning of patient rooms with chlorine-based products. Bundled interventions and antimicrobial stewardship showed promise for reducing CDI rates. Chlorhexidine bathing and intensified hand-hygiene practices were not effective for reducing CDI rates.CONCLUSIONSDaily and terminal cleaning of patient rooms using chlorine-based products were most effective in reducing CDI rates in hospitals. Further studies are needed to identify the components of bundled interventions that reduce CDI rates.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:476–482

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document