scholarly journals 4500 Providing a System for Practical Monitoring Training for Clinical Trials within Academic Institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 114-115
Author(s):  
Advaita Chandramohan ◽  
Sukhmani Kaur ◽  
Eunjoo Pacifici
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Academic Institutions ◽  
Educational Module ◽  
Consent Forms ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Clinical Research Coordinators ◽  
Monitoring Visit ◽  
Source Data Verification ◽  
A Site ◽  
Monitoring Report

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal was to understand the effectiveness of a novel clinical trial educational module and a corresponding initiative designed and disseminated by the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC-CTSI) to increase the quality of clinical trials conducted in academia. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The CRCs (Clinical Research Coordinators) for the initiative are asked to complete the online training. Possible study protocols are picked to be monitored by the CRCs. The monitor is instructed to study the protocol extensively and prepare for their monitoring visit. The trained monitor from the initiative then reaches out to the CRC of the study that is to be monitored and carries out the monitoring visit. Afterwards, the monitor sends initiative personnel the monitoring report, which is evaluated to see if the monitor checked everything they should have during the visit. The PI of the study is contacted with highlights from the monitoring report and improvements that they can make. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The first study monitored was a site of a large NIH-sponsored study where the consent forms were signed electronically. It was found that the monitor could not access the consent forms. Therefore, the monitor could not do source data verification. The PI of the study said that they would be raising this issue with the NIH. During the monitoring visit of the second study chosen for the initiative, patient binders were specifically examined for informed consent and source documentation completeness. The charts of patients were also reviewed. The only deviation found was a missing signature in the Investigator Site File. For the last two studies, data will be reported. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Monitors were not only able to monitor efficiently, but also able to point out deficiencies in the monitoring practices of large studies. This model could be expanded to other academic institutions to establish quality management systems to ensure data integrity and subject protection.

scholarly journals Interventions to Ameliorate the Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children—A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Katharina Boldt ◽  
Michaela Coenen ◽  
Ani Movsisyan ◽  
Stephan Voss ◽  
Eva Rehfuess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Psychosocial Effects ◽  
Global Database ◽  
Study Protocols

The aim of this study was to identify interventions targeting children and their caregivers to reduce psychosocial problems in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and comparable outbreaks. The review was performed using systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and COVID-19-specific databases, including the CDC COVID-19 Research Database, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Global Database on COVID-19 Research and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register and the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) up to 25th September 2020. The search yielded 6657 unique citations. After title/abstract and full text screening, 11 study protocols reporting on trials planned in China, the US, Canada, the UK, and Hungary during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Four interventions targeted children ≥10 years directly, seven system-based interventions targeted the parents and caregivers of younger children and adolescents. Outcome measures encompassed mainly anxiety and depressive symptoms, different dimensions of stress or psychosocial well-being, and quality of supportive relationships. In conclusion, this systematic review revealed a paucity of studies on psychosocial interventions for children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research should be encouraged in light of the expected demand for child mental health management.

Shared-Task Worklists Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment Workflow in an Academic Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 293-300
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Naceanceno ◽  
Stacey L. House ◽  
Phillip V. Asaro
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Text Message ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Shared Task ◽  
Clinical Research Coordinators

Abstract Background Clinical trials performed in our emergency department at Barnes-Jewish Hospital utilize a centralized infrastructure for alerting, screening, and enrollment with rule-based alerts sent to clinical research coordinators. Previously, all alerts were delivered as text messages via dedicated cellular phones. As the number of ongoing clinical trials increased, the volume of alerts grew to an unmanageable level. Therefore, we have changed our primary notification delivery method to study-specific, shared-task worklists integrated with our pre-existing web-based screening documentation system. Objective To evaluate the effects on screening and recruitment workflow of replacing text-message delivery of clinical trial alerts with study-specific shared-task worklists in a high-volume academic emergency department supporting multiple concurrent clinical trials. Methods We analyzed retrospective data on alerting, screening, and enrollment for 10 active clinical trials pre- and postimplementation of shared-task worklists. Results Notifications signaling the presence of potentially eligible subjects for clinical trials were more likely to result in a screen (p < 0.001) with the implementation of shared-task worklists compared with notifications delivered as text messages for 8/10 clinical trials. The change in workflow did not alter the likelihood of a notification resulting in an enrollment (p = 0.473). The Director of Research reported a substantial reduction in the amount of time spent redirecting clinical research coordinator screening activities. Conclusion Shared-task worklists, with the functionalities we have described, offer a viable alternative to delivery of clinical trial alerts via text message directly to clinical research coordinators recruiting for multiple concurrent clinical trials in a high-volume academic emergency department.

scholarly journals Use of Research Biopsies in Clinical Trials: Are Risks and Benefits Adequately Discussed?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Janhavi Modak ◽  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Ravi Murthy ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Eligibility Criterion ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Primary Indication ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

Purpose Although the incorporation of research biopsies into clinical trials is increasing, limited information is available about how study protocols and informed consents integrate and describe their use. Methods All therapeutic clinical trials in which image-guided research biopsies were performed from January 1, 2005, to October 1, 2010, were identified from an interventional radiology database. Data from study protocols and informed consents were extracted and analyzed. Procedural complications were recorded. Results A total of 57 clinical trials were identified, of which 38 (67%) contained at least one mandatory biopsy. The analysis of the research biopsy tumor tissue was a study end point in 95% of trials. The primary indication for a research biopsy was for integral biomarker analysis in 32% and for correlative science in 68% of trials. A statistical analytic plan for the correlative science research biopsy tumor tissue was mentioned in 26%, described as exploratory in 51%, and not mentioned in 23% of trials. For studies with mandatory biopsies, biopsy was an eligibility criterion in 71% of trials, and a statistical justification for the research biopsy sample size was present in 50% of trials. A total of 745 research biopsies were performed on 576 patients. Overall and major complication rates were 5.2% (39 of 745 biopsies) and 0.8% (six of 745 biopsies), respectively. Complication rates for intrathoracic and abdominal/pelvic solid organ biopsies were 17.1% (36 of 211 biopsies) and 1.6% (three of 189 biopsies), respectively. Site-stratified research biopsy–related risks were discussed in five consents. Conclusion A better representation of the risks and benefits of research biopsies in study protocols and informed consents is needed.

Increasing Health Literacy to Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment

2018 ◽  
pp. 94-108
Author(s):  
Saliha Akhtar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Trial Recruitment ◽  
Negative Perception ◽  
Consent Forms ◽  
Clinical Trial Recruitment ◽  
And Training

Health literacy has been found to be linked to healthcare understanding and decision making. Therefore, it makes sense why individuals who do not understand clinical trials will be less likely to want to enroll in one. In fact, three major barriers found in the literature that prevent potential participants from enrolling in clinical trials include a distrust or negative perception, lack of understanding, and lack of accessible and affordable healthcare. Hence, there is a need to increase potential participants' healthcare understanding so that they can make the best healthcare decisions for themselves. Strategies suggested to help increase potential participants' health literacy include revising informed consent forms, utilizing culturally targeted statements, using a variety of material, and training investigative site personnel. These proposed strategies may help increase health literacy, which in turn could improve clinical trial recruitment. Furthermore, these strategies focus on different elements of health literacy and coupled together may bring the most improvement.

Understanding Verbosity: Funding Source and the Length of Consent Forms for Cancer Clinical Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quyen Duong ◽  
Sumithra J. Mandrekar ◽  
Stacey J. Winham ◽  
Kathryn Cook ◽  
Aminah Jatoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Consent Forms

Assessment of the quality of patient information sheets and informed consent forms for clinical trials at a hospital neurology service

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1825-1831
Author(s):  
A. G. Jaramillo Vélez ◽  
M. Aguas Compaired ◽  
M. Granados Plaza ◽  
E. L. Mariño ◽  
P. Modamio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Consent Forms

scholarly journals The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials

1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 867-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.N. Olver ◽  
L. Buchanan ◽  
C. Laidlaw ◽  
G. Poulton
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Consent Forms

scholarly journals Methodological Characteristics of Clinical Trials: Impact of Mandatory Trial Registration

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
Ashish Kumar Kakkar ◽  
Biswa Mohan Padhy ◽  
Sudhir Chandra Sarangi ◽  
Yogendra Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Allocation Concealment ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Numerous studies across multiple specialties have evaluated the impact of trial registration on quality of study reports and found significant improvements over several domains. However, the impact of mandatory trial registration on the quality of clinical trial protocols remains hitherto unexplored. Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of clinical trial applications submitted to drug regulatory authority of India for initial review with the objective of comparing methodological characteristics of their protocols. Since trial registration was made mandatory in the country in June 2009, we selected two study periods as between January 2007 to May 2009 (Period I) and July 2009 to December 2011 (Period II). Seventy-five protocols were randomly selected using a computer-generated list for each study period, making a total of 150 protocols. Data on twelve key methodological characteristics were collected including clearly defined primary outcomes, randomization, blinding, use of control group, statistical methods, handling of withdrawals amongst others. Results: More than 3/4th of the trial applications in the two study periods were for new chemical entities and nearly 90% were pharmaceutical industry sponsored studies. Comparing the period before and after implementation of mandatory trial registration, description of clearly defined trial outcomes improved from nearly 42% to 80% (p<0.001), sample size justifications increased from 38% to 70% (p<0.001) and use of allocation concealment improved from 24% to 49% (p=0.001). Marked improvement was also noted for blinding, description of statistical methods and handling of withdrawals and dropouts. Remaining characteristics did not change significantly between the two study periods. The mean cumulative scores for the study protocols improved significantly from 7± 0.296 in the first period to 8.93± 0.346 (p<0.001) in the second period. Conclusions: Our study found a significant improvement in the methodological quality characteristics of the protocols particularly in elements related to minimization of bias and statistical methods, which could be attributed to mandatory trial registration. Overall, the significant improvement was limited to global clinical trials, and room for improvement was noted for two quality characteristics – proportion of randomized studies and trials adequately describing the generation of allocation sequence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document