scholarly journals 4065 Preferences, Expectancies, and Stigma among Treatment Seeking Combat PTSD Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
John Moring ◽  
Alan Peterson ◽  
Casey Straud ◽  
Jim Mintz ◽  
Paul Nabity ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) is a cognitive behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). CPT is effective in treating combat-related PTSD among Veterans and active duty service members. It is unknown whether improvement in PTSD is related to accommodation of patient preference of the modality of therapy, such as in-office, telehealth, and in-home settings. An equipoise-stratified randomization design allows for complete randomization of participants who are interested and eligible for all three treatment arms. It also allows participants to reject one treatment arm if they are not interested or eligible. Participants who elect to opt out of one arm are randomized to one of the two remaining treatment arms. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate differences in patient satisfaction, treatment stigma beliefs, and credibility beliefs based on patient treatment modality preference. The second aim of this study was to examine if baseline satisfaction, stigma beliefs, and credibility beliefs predicted PTSD treatment outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Active duty service members and veterans with PTSD (N = 123) were randomized to one of three arms using an equipoise stratified randomization. Participants underwent diagnostic interviews for PTSD at baseline and post-treatment and completed self-report measures of satisfaction, stigma, credibility and expectancies of therapy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A series of ANOVAs indicated that there were group differences on patient stigma beliefs regarding mental health, F = 5.61, p = .001, and therapist credibility, F = 5.11, p = .002. Post hoc analyses revealed that participants who did not opt of any treatment arm demonstrated lower levels of stigma beliefs compared to participants who opted-out of in-office, p = .001. Participants who opted out of in-home viewed the therapist as less credible compared to participants who did not opt of any arm, p = .004. Multiple regression analysis found that baseline patient satisfaction, stigma beliefs, and credibility beliefs were not predictive of PTSD treatment outcomes, p > .05. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Combat PTSD patients may opt out of in-office therapy due to mental health stigma beliefs, and visibility in mental health clinics may be a concern. For patients who opted out of in-home therapy, lack of credibility may have decreased participants’ desire for therapists to enter their home. Despite concerns of mental health stigma and the credibility of the therapy in certain treatment arms, patients in each treatment arm significantly improved in PTSD symptomotology. Moreover, patient characteristics, including satisfaction, stigma, and credibility of the therapy, did not significantly predict treatment outcomes, which demonstrates the robustness of Cognitive Processing Therapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn L. Gobin ◽  
Margaret-Anne Mackintosh ◽  
Emy Willis ◽  
Carolyn B. Allard ◽  
Karen Kloezeman ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A285-A285
Author(s):  
Kristi Pruiksma ◽  
Daniel Taylor ◽  
Jennifer Schuster Wachen ◽  
Casey Straud ◽  
Willie Hale ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Sleep disturbances are common in active duty military personnel and play a key role in the development and maintenance of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Research indicates that although insomnia and nightmares improve with successful PTSD treatment, they may remain clinically significant. Few previous PTSD studies have assessed sleep disorder constructs using validated instruments. The objectives of this study were to examine the proportion of active duty military personnel seeking treatment for PTSD who reported clinically significant insomnia, nightmares, sleep duration, and excessive daytime sleepiness and to examine the impact PTSD treatment had on these sleep constructs using validated self-report questionnaires. Methods Sleep was evaluated in 223 active duty service members participating in a randomized clinical trial comparing group and individual Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for PTSD. Sleep constructs were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Trauma-Related Nightmare Survey (TRNS), Self-Assessment of Sleep (SAS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at baseline and 2 weeks posttreatment. Results At baseline, 82% of participants reported clinically significant insomnia and 75% reported at least 1 moderately severe nightmare per week. Participants reported averaging 4.76 hours of sleep per night, and 65% reported excessive daytime sleepiness. Over the course of PTSD treatment, there were statistically significant improvements in insomnia, nightmares, and excessive daytime sleepiness, but scores remained in clinically significant ranges. Minimal increases were seen in sleep duration. Of the participants who no longer met criteria for PTSD at posttreatment, 50% continued to report clinically significant insomnia, 52% continued to report clinically significant nightmares, and 44% continued to report excessive daytime sleepiness. Conclusion Consistent with previous research, sleep problems persisted for a significant number of service members who completed treatment for PTSD. Insomnia, nightmare, and sleep extension interventions are likely an important part of comprehensive PTSD treatment plans. Support (if any) Funding for this work was made possible by the U.S. Department of Defense through the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program awards W81XWH-08-02-109 (Alan Peterson), W81XWH-08-02-0116 (Patricia Resick), W81XWH-10-1-0828 (Daniel Taylor), and W81XWH-08-02-0114 (Brett Litz).


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy Clemans ◽  
Craig Bryan ◽  
Patricia Resick ◽  
Katherine Dondanville ◽  
Jennifer Schuster ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Hale ◽  
Jessica L. Rodriguez ◽  
Theodore P. Wright ◽  
Scott A. Driesenga ◽  
C. Richard Spates

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document