scholarly journals 2388 Utilizing a reviewer database to facilitate integration of an investigator-focused translational research and career development program across the state of Indiana

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
R. L. Coffee ◽  
Julie Driscol ◽  
Tammy J. Saydyk ◽  
Anantha Shekhar ◽  
Scott C. Denne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Writing Skills ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
New Faculty ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Career Development Program ◽  
Grant Review ◽  
Internal Funding

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The Indiana CTSI is investigating innovative approaches to integrate resources that will enrich scientific investigators. Our goals are to enhance the availability and communication among CTSI resources, for example internal funding, and to expand existing mentorship. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Developed a reviewer database that serves to streamline reviewer identification, decrease reviewer fatigue, and promote collaboration among disciplines. We started with a pool of NIH-funded investigators from across the Indiana CTSI core institutions and merged this list with previous CTSI reviewers and internal funding awardees. To expand this list, names and expertise from new faculty hires were added. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Though this tool is relatively new, we have already observed an increase in junior faculty awareness and engagement with the CTSI. This database allows for increased opportunities of junior faculty to serve as reviewers and to refine grant writing skills and provides a platform for networking and collaborating across disciplines. It also allows for increased integration of programs with a shared reviewer database and promotes grant review standardization. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our database utilization seeks to decrease the time for junior faculty to obtain their first extramural grant, to enhance promotion and tenure packages, strengthen integration among CTSI programs, increase interactions between clinical and basic science investigators, and promote team science.

scholarly journals 3416 Building Resilience & Wisdom in Clinical and Translational Researchers: A Mixed-Method Study of a Pilot Curricular Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 63-63
Author(s):  
Sandra Burks ◽  
Karen Johnston ◽  
Nicole Chiotta-McCollum ◽  
Natalie May ◽  
John Schorling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Development Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Curricular Intervention ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Career Development Program ◽  
Research Workforce

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The clinical and translational research workforce is in jeopardy due to investigator attrition and competing demands upon researchers. Resilience and wisdom are measurable traits that can be acquired. The aim of this study was to examine a pilot curricular intervention promoting resilience and wisdom formation in early-career translational researchers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a prospective, mixed-methods evaluation of a curricular intervention promoting the development of wisdom and resilience among junior faculty in a career development program. Six 90 minute sessions were delivered between September 2017 and January 2018. Pre- and post- resilience and wisdom were measured using the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale and 3D-Wisdom Scale. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted before and after the intervention RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Five scholars participated. Median resilience and wisdom scores revealed moderate levels of each trait; pre- and post-scores were not significantly different. Four themes emerged from the analysis of interview transcripts: 1. “Success” broadly defined; 2. Adversity threatens success; 3. Community breeds resilience; and 4. Wisdom formation parallels growth towards independence. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: An intervention aimed at developing capacities of resilience and wisdom is feasibly delivered to early career researchers. The relationship between these capacities and the sustainability of a research career warrants additional study.

TRANSCENDS: A Career Development Program for Underrepresented in Medicine Scholars in Academic Neurology

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012058
Author(s):  
Raelle Tagge ◽  
Daniel T. Lackland ◽  
Philip B. Gorelick ◽  
Irene Litvan ◽  
Salvador Cruz-Flores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Development Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
Black African ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Career Development Program ◽  
Advancement Opportunity ◽  
Program Components ◽  
American Academy Of Neurology

Background:The Training in Research for Academic Neurologists to Sustain Careers and Enhance the Numbers of Diverse Scholars (TRANSCENDS) program is a career advancement opportunity for individuals underrepresented in biomedical research, funded by the National Institute and Neurological Disorders and Stroke; and American Academy of Neurology (AAN).Objective:To report on qualitative and quantitative outcomes in TRANSCENDS.Design:Early career individuals (neurology fellows and junior faculty) from groups underrepresented in medicine were competitively selected from a national pool of applicants (2016-2019). TRANSCENDS activities comprised an online Clinical Research degree program, monthly webinars, AAN meeting activities, and mentoring. Participants were surveyed during and after completion of TRANSCENDS to evaluate program components.Outcomes:Of 23 accepted scholars (comprising four successive cohorts), 56% were women; 61% Hispanic/Latinx, 30% Black/African American, 30% assistant professors. To date, 48% have graduated the TRANSCENDS program and participants have published 180 peer-reviewed articles. Mentees' feedback noted that professional skills development (i.e., manuscript and grant writing), networking opportunities, and mentoring were the most beneficial elements of the program. Stated opportunities for improvement included: incorporating a mentor-the-mentor workshop, providing more transitional support for mentees in the next stage of their careers, and requiring mentees to provide quarterly reports.Conclusions:TRANSCENDS is a feasible program for supporting underrepresented in medicine neurologists towards careers in research and faculty academic appointments attained thus far have been sustained. While longer term outcomes and process enhancements are warranted, programs like this may help increase the numbers of diverse academic neurologists, and further drive neurological innovation.

scholarly journals Participant perspectives on a seminar-based research career development program and its role in career independence

2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2020-001769
Author(s):  
Nicole M Llewellyn ◽  
Jamie J Adachi ◽  
Eric J Nehl ◽  
Stacy S Heilman
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Career Stages ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Group Settings ◽  
Development Programming ◽  
Career Development Program

Health science researchers need training and support to effectively pursue independence in their research careers. Little data exist regarding the specific resources that faculty researchers have found or would find useful. In this study, we aimed to better understand the needs of health science researchers to develop recommendations for effective career development programming. The authors conducted a multi-method evaluation of early-career researcher faculty needs beginning by using post-session satisfaction surveys to assess the value of a long-standing “K-Club” seminar, which educates and supports those pursuing NIH Career Development (K) awards or similar. The authors then collected in-depth views on career development needs through a series of focus groups conducted with health science researchers at three career stages: early career, award-seeking junior faculty; mid-career faculty who have obtained some extramural funding; senior faculty who serve as mentors for early/mid-career faculty. Participants who attended the existing K-Club strongly endorse the program in supporting their career goals. Focus group participants described specific areas for program expansion that would add value across career stages: more flexible training options, conducted in smaller group settings with immediate feedback provided; more formalized training and resources for senior research mentors; in-depth guidance on individualized grantsmanship. The authors propose program development guidelines for helping researchers achieve research independence and success. Findings indicate that a broad-reaching K-Club style educational seminar can serve as a valuable foundation supporting professional development. The addition of tailored programs delivered across diverse platforms are predicted to heighten career development success.

scholarly journals Accomplishing Career Transitions 2019: facilitating success towards the professoriate

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Verónica A. Segarra ◽  
Jim Vigoreaux ◽  
Maria Elena Zavala ◽  
Ashanti Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Cell Biology ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Career Transitions ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Critical Transitions ◽  
Chapel Hill ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
American Society ◽  
Summer Workshop

AbstractThe Minorities Affairs Committee of the American Society for Cell Biology through its Accomplishing Career Transitions (ACT) program aims to ease critical transitions for postdocs and junior faculty from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM or from minority-serving institutions as they work towards promotion and tenure at a wide range of academic institutions. The ACT program is a 2-year cohort-based professional and skills development program that kicks off with a summer workshop and continues with additional online training sessions on selected topics, forging the creation of a permanent mentoring community for the participants. In this BMC Proceedings Supplement, we highlight selected content from the first ACT summer workshop held in 2019 at the Rizzo Center in Chapel Hill, NC. The goal of this BMC Proceedings Supplement is to amplify impact of ACT programming in a way that transcends the ACT Fellow community to benefit an increased number of scientists.

PENGARUH PROGRAM PENGEMBANGAN KARIR TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63
Author(s):  
Rizska Julianita
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Employee Performance ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Development Program ◽  
T Test ◽  
Linear Regression Method ◽  
Performance Variables ◽  
Career Development Program ◽  
The Relationship

This research is intended to find out how the influence of Career Development on Employee Performance PT Bumi Andalas Permai (BAP) Palembang. In this case the sampling using the Saturated sampling method with the employee population of PT BAP Palembang as many as 78 people. From the results of the questionnaire, processed by using SPSS for Windows version 19 by using simple linear regression method, hypothesis test (t test), and correlation coefficient.Based on the analysis results obtained coefficient (R) of 0.033 which shows the relationship between the two low variables. In the hypothesis test (t test) obtained t count value of -0.285 and t value table 1.991, and significant value 0.777. And when viewed from the probability (sig), career development has a probability value of 0.777. It has also been explained that 0.777> 0.05, then H1 is rejected and H0 is accepted, indicating there is no effect of career development on employee performance. The effect of career development on employee performance can be seen also from the value of regression coefficient (R) 0,001, which shows that the percentage contribution of career development influence to employee performance equal to 0,1%. Can also be interpreted that the variation of career development variables used to explain 0.1% variation of performance variables. The conclusion : career development program does not effect employee performance on PT BAP Palembang.

scholarly journals Challenges and Strategies of Successful Mentoring: The Perspective of LEADS Scholars and Mentors from Minority Serving Institutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6155
Author(s):  
Patricia Y. Talbert ◽  
George Perry ◽  
Luisel Ricks-Santi ◽  
Lourdes E. Soto de Laurido ◽  
Magda Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
Senior Faculty ◽  
Additional Insight ◽  
Professional Goals ◽  
Funding Opportunities ◽  
Faculty And Administrators ◽  
Minority Serving Institutions

Mentoring continues to be a salient conversation in academia among junior and senior faculty and administrators. Mentors provide guidance and structure to junior faculty so that they can meet their academic and professional goals. Mentors also convey skills in balancing life and academic pursuits. Therefore, the purpose of this descriptive study was to provide additional insight from a training program called Leading Emerging and Diverse Scientists to Success (LEADS) regarding successful strategies and challenges of mentoring relating to lessons learned from the scholars and mentees’ perspective. The LEADS program provided multiple training platforms to increase skills and knowledge regarding research to promote expertise in grant writing and submission for funding opportunities among diverse scientists. These findings reinforce the knowledge about the value of a mentor in helping define the research pathway of their mentee and underscoring the importance of mentoring.

scholarly journals How to get and keep your lab funded

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (21) ◽  
pp. 2519-2521
Author(s):  
Jonathan Chernoff
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Decisive Factor ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
Grant Proposals ◽  
Grant Review

Much has been written about the seemingly capricious manner by which grant proposals are ranked and awarded by the National Institutes of Health and similar agencies, yet some scientists are able to maintain stable funding over long periods of time. While raw luck may certainly play a role in this process, particularly when paylines are tight, it is also possible that skill—in the art of grant writing at least—could represent a decisive factor. Here, I submit that, even as we attempt to reform and one day perfect the grant review process, there are actions that applicants can take today to get better results from the system we have.

Career Development Program in Queensland Transport

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Santic
Keyword(s):  
Career Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Development Tools ◽  
Career Development Program ◽  
Individual Perspective

The significant changes in work and workplaces are making organisational career development programs imperative from both an organisational and individual perspective. Queensland Transport has responded to the demand from its employees for career development tools and resources by committing to the development and implementation of a departmental Career Development Program. This paper outlines the Queensland Transport Career Development Program with a particular emphasis on how it came about, what it entails and the challenges faced. Various initiatives have been implemented to date, yet many challenges lie ahead.

Hematology Grants Workshop—2001

Hematology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 2001 (1) ◽  
pp. 507-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Todd ◽  
Donald M. Miller ◽  
Roy L. Silverstein
Keyword(s):  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Young Investigator ◽  
Federal Grants ◽  
Comprehensive Listing ◽  
The Common

Abstract This year the Hematology Grants Workshop, chaired by Dr. Todd, includes a comprehensive listing of available National Institutes of Health, Department of Veterans Affairs, and non-federal grants applicable to fellows and junior faculty as well as to established investigators. In Section II, Dr. Miller discusses the essential principles of successful grant writing with a special emphasis on the young investigator. He highlights the best strategies to take and the common mistakes to avoid. In Section III, Dr. Silverstein outlines the structure of the current NIH Integrated Review Group (IRG) system and the study sections of the most relevance to hematology. He traces the path that a grant takes from review to funding including the way in which grants are reviewed at NIH Study Section Meetings and provides advice in the preparation of revised applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document