scholarly journals 2467 PRMT5 is a master epigenetic regulator to promote repair of radiation-induced DNA damage

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Jake L. Owens

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: We recently reported that PRMT5 epigenetically activates androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer cells. Because targeting AR signaling through androgen deprivation therapy is clinically used as a radiosensitization approach to treat high-risk prostate cancer, our finding raised an exciting possibility that targeting PRMT5 may improve RT for prostate cancer patients. Contrary to our expectation, targeting PRMT5 sensitized both AR expressing and AR negative (AR−) prostate cancer cell lines to radiation. The goal of our study was therefore to determine the role of PRMT5 in repair of IR-induced DSBs and to translate these findings to improving radiation therapy for cancer patients in general (not just prostate cancer patients). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The majority of experiments were basic science experiments analyzing PRMT5’s role in the DNA damage response in normal and cancer cell lines. For example, to extend our findings and determine if PRMT5’s role in DSB repair is conserved across multiple cell types, we performed similar experiments in AR− prostate cancer cells, luminal breast cancer cells, glioblastoma cells, and human embryonic kidney cells. To determine the clinical significance of our finding, we also analyzed mRNA expression of PRMT5, AR, and both PRMT5 and AR target genes involved in DSB repair across 43 clinical cancer data sets. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: (1) Targeting PRMT5 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to IR in an AR-independent manner, (2) PRMT5 regulates the repair of IR-induced DSBs in an AR-independent manner, (3) RNA-seq analysis reveals that PRMT5 likely regulates genes involved in the DNA damage response, (4) PRMT5 activates expression of several genes in the DDR including those involved in DSB repair, (5) PRMT5 functions as an epigenetic activator of genes involved in DDR, (6) PRMT5 is required for NHEJ, HR, and G2-Arrest upon IR treatment, (7) Upregulation of PRMT5 correlates with formation and repair of IR-induced DSBs, (8) PRMT5’s role in repair of IR-induced DSBs is conserved in several normal and cancer cell types, and (9) PRMT5 expression correlates with expression of DSB repair proteins in clinical cancer samples. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: In summary, we provide evidence that PRMT5 is a master epigenetic regulator of IR-induced DSB repair through epigenetic activation of multiple target genes involved both HR and NHEJ as well as G2 arrest. Interestingly, the majority of genes regulated by PRMT5 are well-characterized, “core repair proteins” involved in HR (RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51D, and RAD51AP1), NHEJ (NHEJ1, Ku80, XRCC4, and DNAPKcs), and G2 arrest (Cdk1, CDC25C, CCNB2, and WEE1), which may explain why PRMT5 is essential to repair IR-induced DSBs in several cell lines. Although AR may also regulate DSB repair via both HR and NHEJ, several pieces of evidence in our study suggest that PRMT5 also regulates DSB repair independent of AR. First, PRMT5 targeting sensitizes both AR+ and AR− prostate cancer cells to IR. Second, exogenous expression of AR only partially rescues the impairment of IR-induced DSB repair by PRMT5 knockdown. Third, PRMT5 knockdown increases IR-induced DSB in AR− DU145 cells and several other cancer cell lines and normal cells. Fourth, PRMT5 expression correlates positively with the expression of its target genes in multiple human cancer tissues. During preparation of this project, Braun et al. reported that PRMT5 post-translationally regulates the splicing out of detained-introns (DI)s of genes to modulate gene expression. However, analysis of their data showed that the majority of DEGs we identified either do not contain DIs or DI splicing was not affected by targeting PRMT5. In addition, Clarke et al. reported that PRMT5 participates in the DSB repair choice process and promotes HR through methylation of RUVBL1. It is therefore likely that PRMT5 regulates repair of IR-induced DSB via multiple mechanisms. As PRMT5 is overexpressed in many human cancers and its overexpression correlates with poor prognosis, our findings suggest that increased DSB repair by PRMT5 overexpression in these human cancers may confer survival advantages particularly following DNA damaging treatment. Because targeting DSB repair has been proven to be a valid therapeutic approach for cancer treatment, our findings here also suggest that PRMT5 targeting may be explored as a monotherapy or in combination therapy with RT or chemotherapy for cancer treatment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangchi Xu ◽  
Yin Meng ◽  
Lihe Wang ◽  
Bo Dong ◽  
Feifei Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is the most common malignant tumor in men. Due to the lack of theoretical research on its pathogenic mechanism, the current cure rate is still low. miRNAs play an important role in the pathogenesis of various cancers. miRNA-214-5p plays an important role in the development of a variety of cancers. This study aims to explore the expression level of miR-214-5p in prostate cancer and make a preliminary study of its molecular mechanism in the development of prostate cancer to provide effective new strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods The target genes of miRNA-214-5p were predicted with bioinformatics technology, and the target relationship between miRNA-214-5p and its target genes was verified with dual luciferase reporter assay. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to detect the expression levels of miRNA-214-5p and target genes in 50 clinical samples and two common prostate continuous cell lines, respectively. The targeting relationship between miRNA-214-5p and its target genes was verified with clinical data. miRNA-214-5p and miRNA-214-5p inhibitor was over-expressed in DU-145 cell lines to verify the effect of miRNA-214-5p on prostate cancer cell proliferation and SOX4 gene expression. And the mechanism of miRNA-214-5p inhibiting the proliferation of prostate cancer cells were analyzed by detecting the expression difference of downstream factors of SOX4 pathway. Bioinformatics analysis showed that miRNA-214-5p combined with SOX4 3′UTR region, and dual luciferase reporter assay further verified the reliability of the predicted results. The low expression of miRNA-214-5p was observed in prostate cancer tissues and cells, while high expression of SOX4 was observed in prostate cancer tissues and cells. Results Overexpression of miRNA-214-5p to prostate cancer cells significantly inhibited the proliferation of cancer cells, and the expression of SOX4 was inhibited in the transfected cell line. After transfection of miRNA-214-5p inhibitor into prostate cancer cells, the cell proliferation rate further increased. Meanwhile, overexpression of miRNA-214-5p effectively inhibited the expression of SOX4 downstream factors, including c-Myc, eIF4E, and CDK4. However, the specific knockdown of SOX4 through SOX4 shRNA significantly reduced the proliferation of prostate cancer cell lines. Conclusions miRNA-214-5 can inhibit the proliferation of prostate cancer cells by specifically targeting S0X4 and inhibiting the expression of growth factors downstream of this pathway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanxiong Ding ◽  
Wei Lu ◽  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
Huihui Zhou ◽  
...  

AbstractProstate cancer is still one of the most common malignancies in men all around the world. The mechanism of how prostate cancer initiates and develops is still not clear. Here in this study, we show that tumor suppressor ZBTB38 could suppress the migration and proliferation of prostate cancer cells. We find lower ZBTB38 expression in prostate cancer tissues, which also strongly predicts a poorer prognosis of prostate cancer. ZBTB38 binds DKK1 (Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1) locus and promotes DKK1 expression in prostate cancer cell lines. Consistently, reduction of DKK1 expression significantly restores ZBTB38-mediated suppression of migration and proliferation of prostate cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, we find that ZBTB38 primarily binds the promoters of target genes, and differentially regulates the expression of 1818 genes. We also identify PRKDC (protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic subunit) as a ZBTB38-interacting protein that could repress the function of ZBTB38 in suppressing migration and proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Taken together, our results indicate that ZBTB38 could repress cell migration and proliferation in prostate cancer via promoting DKK1 expression, and also provide evidence supporting ZBTB38 as a potential prognosis marker for prostate cancer.


Author(s):  
Tao Ding ◽  
Yanjun Zhu ◽  
Huimin Jin ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Jianming Guo ◽  
...  

We previously reported the elevated expression of circ_0057558 in prostate cancer tissues and cell lines. Here, we aimed to determine the biological function of circ_0057558 in prostate cancer. In the current study, circ_0057558 knockdown in prostate cancer cells significantly repressed cell proliferation and colony formation, but promoted cell arrest and enhanced the sensitivity to docetaxel. Bioinformatics analysis prediction and RNA-pull down assay identified miR-206 as the potential binding miRNA of circ_0057558. A negative correlation was observed between the expression of miR-206 and circ_0057558 in prostate cancer tissues. miR-206 mimics rescued the function of circ_0057558 overexpression on prostate cancer cells. Further, the bioinformatics analysis and luciferase assay suggested that miR-206 may target ubiquitin-specific peptidase 33 (USP33). USP33 mRNA expression has negative correlation with miR-206 expression and positive correlation with circ_0057558 expression in prostate cancer tissues. USP33 overexpression partially blocked the effects of miR-206 mimics on prostate cell proliferation. USP33 could bind and deubiquitinate c-Myc. Increased c-Myc protein by circ_0057558 overexpression was partially reversed by miR-206 mimics. The proliferation inhibition activity of MYC inhibitor 361 (MYCi361) was more prominent in primary prostate cancer cells and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model with higher level of circ_0057558. Collectively, circ_0057558 gives an impetus to cell proliferation and cell cycle control in prostate cancer cell lines by sponging miR-206 and positively regulating the transcription of the miR-206 target gene USP33.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewelina Szliszka ◽  
Zenon P. Czuba ◽  
Joanna Bronikowska ◽  
Anna Mertas ◽  
Andrzej Paradysz ◽  
...  

Prostate cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer in men. The ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) and its phenolic compounds possess immunomodulatory, chemopreventive and antitumor effects. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/APO2L) is a naturally occurring anticancer agent that preferentially induces apoptosis in cancer cells and is not toxic to normal cells. We examined the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of EEP and phenolic compounds isolated from propolis in combination with TRAIL on two prostate cancer cell lines, hormone-sensitivity LNCaP and hormone-refractory DU145. The cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT and LDH assays. The apoptosis was determined using flow cytometry with annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide. The prostate cancer cell lines were proved to be resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Our study demonstrated that EEP and its components significantly sensitize to TRAIL-induced death in prostate cancer cells. The percentage of the apoptotic cells after cotreatment with 50 μg mL−1EEP and 100 ng mL−1TRAIL increased to 74.9 ± 0.7% for LNCaP and 57.4 ± 0.7% for DU145 cells. The strongest cytotoxic effect on LNCaP cells was exhibited by apigenin, kaempferid, galangin and caffeic acid phenylethyl ester (CAPE) in combination with TRAIL (53.51 ± 0.68–66.06 ± 0.62% death cells). In this work, we showed that EEP markedly augmented TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in prostate cancer cells and suggested the significant role of propolis in chemoprevention of prostate cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianpeng Xue ◽  
Yang Pu ◽  
Jason Smith ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Chun Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractMetastasis is the leading cause of mortalities in cancer patients due to the spreading of cancer cells to various organs. Detecting cancer and identifying its metastatic potential at the early stage is important. This may be achieved based on the quantification of the key biomolecular components within tissues and cells using recent optical spectroscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive label-free optical biopsy technique to retrieve the characteristic molecular information for detecting different metastatic potentials of prostate cancer cells. Herein we report using native fluorescence (NFL) spectroscopy along with machine learning (ML) to differentiate prostate cancer cells with different metastatic abilities. The ML algorithms including principal component analysis (PCA) and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) were used for dimension reduction and feature detection. The characteristic component spectra were used to identify the key biomolecules that are correlated with metastatic potentials. The relative concentrations of the molecular spectral components were retrieved and used to classify the cancer cells with different metastatic potentials. A multi-class classification was performed using support vector machines (SVMs). The NFL spectral data were collected from three prostate cancer cell lines with different levels of metastatic potentials. The key biomolecules in the prostate cancer cells were identified to be tryptophan, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and hypothetically lactate as well. The cancer cells with different metastatic potentials were classified with high accuracy using the relative concentrations of the key molecular components. The results suggest that the changes in the relative concentrations of these key fluorophores retrieved from NFL spectra may present potential criteria for detecting prostate cancer cells of different metastatic abilities.


Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Jasmin Katrin Badawi

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. Despite the development of a variety of therapeutic agents to treat either metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, or nonmetastatic/metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, the progression or spread of the disease often cannot be avoided. Additionally, the development of resistance of prostate cancer cells to available therapeutic agents is a well-known problem. Despite extensive and cost-intensive research over decades, curative therapy for metastatic prostate cancer is still not available. Therefore, additional therapeutic agents are still needed. The animal kingdom offers a valuable source of natural substances used for the treatment of a variety of diseases. Bee venom of the honeybee is a mixture of many components. It contains proteins acting as enzymes such as phospholipase A2, smaller proteins and peptides such as melittin and apamin, phospholipids, and physiologically active amines such as histamine, dopamine, and noradrenaline. Melittin has been shown to induce apoptosis in different cancer cell lines, including prostate cancer cell lines. It also influences cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and necrosis as well as motility, migration, metastasis, and invasion of tumour cells. Hence, it represents an interesting anticancer agent. In this review article, studies about the effect of bee venom components on prostate cancer cells are discussed. An electronic literature research was performed utilising PubMed in February 2021. All scientific publications, which examine this interesting subject, are discussed. Furthermore, the different types of application of these promising substances are outlined. The studies clearly indicate that bee venom or melittin exhibited anticancer effects in various prostate cancer cell lines and in xenografts. In most of the studies, a combination of bee venom or the modified melittin with another molecule was utilised in order to avoid side effects and, additionally, to target selectively the prostate cancer cells or the surrounding tissue. The studies showed that systemic side effects and unwanted damage to healthy tissue and organs could be minimised when the anticancer drug was not activated until binding to the cancer cells or the surrounding tissue. Different targets were used, such as the matrix metalloproteinase 2, hormone receptors expressed by prostate cancer cells, the extracellular domain of PSMA, and the fibroblast activation protein occurring in the stroma of prostate cancer cells. Another approach used loaded phosphate micelles, which were cleaved by the enzyme secretory phospholipase A2 produced by prostate cancer cells. In a totally different approach, targeted nanoparticles containing the melittin gene were used for prostate cancer gene therapy. By the targeted nonviral gene delivery, the gene encoding melittin was delivered to the prostate cancer cells without systemic side effects. This review of the scientific literature reveals totally different approaches using bee venom, melittin, modified melittin, or protoxin as anticancer agents. The toxic agents acted through several different mechanisms to produce their anti-prostate cancer effects. These mechanisms are not fully understood yet and more experimental studies are necessary to reveal the complete mode of action. Nevertheless, the researchers have conducted pioneering work. Based on these results, further experimental and clinical studies about melittin and modifications of this interesting agent deriving from nature are necessary and could possibly lead to a complementary treatment option for prostate cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abrar Samiea ◽  
Jeff S. J. Yoon ◽  
Christopher J. Ong ◽  
Amina Zoubeidi ◽  
Thomas C. Chamberlain ◽  
...  

Interleukin-10 (IL10) is best studied for its inhibitory action on immune cells and ability to suppress an antitumour immune response. But IL10 also exerts direct effects on nonimmune cells such as prostate cancer epithelial cells. Elevated serum levels of IL10 observed in prostate and other cancer patients are associated with poor prognosis. After first-line androgen-deprivation therapy, prostate cancer patients are treated with androgen receptor antagonists such as enzalutamide to inhibit androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell growth. However, development of resistance inevitably occurs and this is associated with tumour differentiation to more aggressive forms such as a neuroendocrine phenotype characterized by expression of neuron specific enolase and synaptophysin. We found that treatment of prostate cancer cell lines in vitro with IL10 or enzalutamide induced markers of neuroendocrine differentiation and inhibited androgen receptor reporter activity. Both also upregulated the levels of PDL1, which could promote tumour survival in vivo through its interaction with the immune cell inhibitory receptor PD1 to suppress antitumour immunity. These findings suggest that IL10’s direct action on prostate cancer cells could contribute to prostate cancer progression independent of IL10’s suppression of host immune cells.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
Sulthan Shajahan ◽  
Arul Amuthan

Thanga parpam is a gold nanoparticle used in Siddha for many chronic and challenging diseases including cancers. Clinically it shows benefit in some cancer types, but not to all types. This study was aimed to compare the in-vitro anticancer activity of Thanga parpam in various cancer cell lines. The particle size and elements were evaluated using Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy. Thanga parpam was added to breast adenocarcinoma cells, Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, Human prostate cancer cells and Human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells for 24 hours. MTT assay was used to evaluate the cell viability. Graph was drawn from the % cell viability and dose required to kill 50 % cells was calculated. The gold particles are irregular disk shaped, but agglomerated to each other and not in uniform size. The particle size varies from 17.8 nm – 448 nm. About 9.3% of gold element was present in oxide and sulfide form. It showed dose dependent killing effect on all cancer cell lines. IC50% value was 0.63, 3.51, 6.65 and 11.01 µg/ml for breast, liver, prostate and lung cancer cells respectively. Thanga parpam is a potent anticancer drug to all the four cancer cells, however higher efficacy was observed in breast, liver and prostate cancer cells.


2002 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. R7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
PL Jeffery ◽  
AC Herington ◽  
LK Chopin

This study has examined the expression of two new facets of the growth hormone axis, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) and its recently identified putative natural ligand ghrelin, in prostate cancer cells. GHS-R 1a and 1b isoforms and ghrelin mRNA expression were detected by RT-PCR in the ALVA-41, LNCaP, DU145 and PC3 prostate cancer cell lines. A normal prostate cDNA library expressed GHS-R1a, but not the 1b isoform or ghrelin. Immunohistochemical staining for the GHS-R 1a isoform and ghrelin was positive in the four cell lines studied. PC3 cells showed increased cell proliferation in vitro in response to ghrelin to levels 33% above untreated controls, implying a potential tumour-promoting role for ghrelin in this tissue. This study is the first to demonstrate the co-expression of the GHS-R and ghrelin in prostate cancer cells. It is also the first study to provide evidence that a previously unrecognised autocrine/paracrine pathway involving ghrelin, that is capable of stimulating growth, exists in prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document