scholarly journals Predictors of Hospitalization in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moira K. Kapral ◽  
Ruth Hall ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Frank L. Silver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

AbstractBackground: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke are associated with a substantial risk of subsequent stroke; however, there is uncertainty about whether such patients require admission to hospital for their initial management. We used data from a clinical stroke registry to determine the frequency and predictors of hospitalization for TIA or minor stroke across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods: The Ontario Stroke Registry collects information on a population-based sample of all patients seen in the emergency department with acute stroke or TIA in Ontario. We identified patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA included in the registry between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2011, and used multivariable analyses to evaluate predictors of hospitalization. Results: Our study sample included 8540 patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA, 47.2% of whom were admitted to hospital, with a range of 37.6% to 70.3% across Ontario’s 14 local health integration network regions. Key predictors of admission were preadmission disability, vascular risk factors, presentation with weakness, speech disturbance or prolonged/persistent symptoms, arrival by ambulance, and presentation on a weekend or during periods of emergency department overcrowding. Conclusions: More than one-half of patients with minor stroke or TIA were not admitted to the hospital, and there were wide regional variations in admission patterns. Additional work is needed to provide guidance to health care workers around when to admit such patients and to determine whether discharged patients are receiving appropriate follow-up care.

scholarly journals Early Dabigatran Treatment After Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke Does Not Result in Hemorrhagic Transformation

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-611
Author(s):  
Anas Alrohimi ◽  
Kelvin Ng ◽  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Brian Buck ◽  
Grant Stotts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Ischemic Events

ABSTRACT:Objectives:The optimal timing of anticoagulation after ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is unknown. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of initiating dabigatran therapy within 14 days of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke in AF patients.Patients and Methods:A prospective, multi-center registry (NCT02415855) in patients with AF treated with dabigatran within 14 days of acute ischemic stroke/TIA (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 3) onset. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were assessed for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and graded by using European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria.Results:One hundred and one patients, with a mean age of 72.4 ± 11.5 years, were enrolled. Median infarct volume was 0 ml. Median time from index event onset to dabigatran initiation was 2 days, and median baseline NIHSS was 1. Pre-treatment HT was present in seven patients. No patients developed symptomatic HT. On the day 7 CT scan, HT was present in six patients (one progressing from baseline hemorrhagic infarction type 1). Infarct volume was a predictor of incident HT (odds ratio = 1.063 [1.020–1.107], p < 0.003). All six (100%) patients with new/progressive HT were functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 0–2) at 30 days, which was similar to those without HT (90%, p = 0.422). Recurrent ischemic events occurred within 30 days in four patients, two of which were associated with severe disability and death (mRS 5 and 6, respectively).Conclusion:Early dabigatran treatment did not precipitate symptomatic HT after minor stroke. Asymptomatic HT was associated with larger baseline infarct volumes. Early recurrent ischemic events may be clinically more important.

scholarly journals Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation After Transient Ischemic Attack Versus Minor Ischemic Stroke in the POINT Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hooman Kamel ◽  
Mary Farrant ◽  
J. Donald Easton ◽  
Luciano A. Sposato ◽  
Jordan J. Elm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Event Type ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Index Event ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) after transient ischemic attack (TIA) has not been well studied. We compared the likelihood of new AF diagnosis after ischemic stroke versus TIA. Methods and Results The POINT (Platelet‐Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke) trial enrolled adults within 12 hours of minor ischemic stroke or high‐risk TIA. Our exposure was index event type (ischemic stroke versus TIA). The primary analysis used the original trial definition of TIA (resolution of symptoms/signs). In secondary analyses, TIA cases with infarction on neuroimaging were reclassified as strokes. Our primary outcome was a new AF diagnosis, ascertained from adverse event and treatment interruption/discontinuation reports. We calculated C‐statistics for variables associated with newly diagnosed AF. We used Kaplan‐Meier survival statistics and Cox models adjusted for demographics and vascular risk factors. Excluding 49 subjects with baseline AF, 2746 patients had index stroke and 2086 patients had index TIA. During the 90‐day follow‐up, 106 patients had newly diagnosed AF. Cumulative risks of AF were 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1%–3.4%) after stroke and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.5%–2.7%) after TIA ( P =0.15). After reclassifying index events by neuroimaging, cumulative AF risk was higher after stroke (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.2%–3.4%) than TIA (1.8%; 95% CI, 1.3%–2.5%) ( P =0.04). Index event type had negligible predictive utility (C‐statistic, 0.54). Conclusions Among patients with cerebral ischemia, the distinction between TIA versus minor stroke did not stratify the risk of subsequent AF diagnosis, implying that patients with TIA should undergo similar heart‐rhythm monitoring strategies as patients with ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals Impact of Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor-1 Genotypes on Long-Term Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Guang Zhang ◽  
Jing-Yu Gu ◽  
Qiang-Qiang Fu ◽  
Shi-Wu Chen ◽  
Jie Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Regression ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) rs12041331 has been reported to affect agonist-stimulated platelet aggregation, but it remains unclear whether this variant plays a role in recurrent stroke. Here we assess the clinical relevance of PEAR1 rs12041331 in acute minor ischemic stroke (AMIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) Chinese patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).Methods: We recruited 273 consecutive minor stroke and TIA patients, and Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model the relationship between PEAR1 rs12041331 and thrombotic and bleeding events.Results: Genotyping for PEAR1 rs12041331 showed 49 (18.0%) AA homozygotes, 129 (47.3%) GA heterozygotes, and 95 (34.7%) GG homozygotes. No association was observed between PEAR1 rs12041331 genotype and stroke or composite clinical vascular event rates (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, or vascular death) or bleeding events regardless if individuals carried one or two copies of the A allele. Our results suggested that rs12041331 genetic polymorphism was not an important contributor to clinical events in AMIS and TIA patients in the setting of secondary prevention.Conclusions: Our data do provide robust evidence that genetic variation in PEAR1 rs12041331 do not contribute to atherothrombotic or bleeding risk in minor stroke and TIA patients treated with DAPT.

Hemostatic Activity in Patients with a Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke with or without Chronic Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 350-356
Author(s):  
Gheorghe A. Pop ◽  
Han J. Meeder ◽  
Wynsen van Oudenaarden ◽  
Jeannette C. van Latum ◽  
Wim Verweij ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hemostatic Activity ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Abstract TP438: Japanese versus Non-Japanese Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke: Five-Year Risk of Stroke and Vascular Events

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Uchiyama ◽  
Takao Hoshino ◽  
Hugo Charles ◽  
Kenji Kamiyama ◽  
Taizen Nakase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: We have reported 5-year risk of stroke and vascular events after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke in patients enrolled into the TIAregistry.org, which was an international multicenter-cooperative, prospective registry (N Engl J Med 2018;378:2182-90). We conducted subanalysis on the 5-year follow-up data of Japanese patients in comparison with non-Japanese patients. Methods: The patients were classified into two groups on ethnicity, Japanese (n=345) and non-Japanese (n=3502), and their 5-year event rates were compared. We also determined predictors of five-year stroke in both groups. Results: Death from vascular cause (0.9% vs 2.7%, HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.89, p=0.031) and death from any cause (7.8% vs 9.9%, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99, p=0.045) were fewer in Japanese patients than in non-Japanese patients, while stroke (13.9% vs 7.2%, HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.31-2.43, p<0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (3.2% vs 0.8%, HR 3.61. 95% CI 1.78-7.30, p<0.001) were more common in Japanese than non-Japanese patients during five-year follow-up period. Caplan-Meyer curves at five-years showed that the rates of stroke was also significantly higher in Japanese than non-Japanese patients (log-rank test, p=0.001). Predictors for stroke recurrence at five years were large artery atherosclerosis (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.31-2.52, p<0.001), cardioembolism (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.18-2.47, p=0.004), multiple acute infarction (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.27-2.45, p<0.001) and ABCD 2 score 6 or 7 (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.38-2.78, p<0.001) in non-Japanese patients, although only large artery atherosclerosis (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.13-9.54, p=0.029) was a predictor for stroke recurrence in Japanese patients. Conclusions: Recurrence of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were more prevalent in Japanese than non-Japanese patients. Large artery atherosclerosis was a predictor for stroke recurrence not only in non-Japanese patients but also in Japanese patients.

Clinical Effects of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy after Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, a Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Condello ◽  
Gaetano Liccardo ◽  
Giuseppe Ferrante
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Evidence about the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is emerging. The aim of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis about the risks and benefits of DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in this setting. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov databases, main international conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA not eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy presenting in the first 24 hours after the acute event. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemic stroke recurrence, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause death. Results: A total of 4 studies enrolling 21,459 patients were included. DAPT with clopidogrel was used in 3 studies, DAPT with ticagrelor in one study. DAPT duration was 21 days in one study, 1 month in one study, and 3 months in the remaining studies. DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (relative risk [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82, P<0.001, number needed to treat 50 [95% CI 40-72], while it was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.49-4.53, P=0.001, number needed to harm 330 [95% CI 149-1111]), of intracranial hemorrhage (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.41-6.66, P=0.005), with a trend towards higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.83-4.05, P=0.14), and a slight tendency towards higher risk of all-cause death (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89-1.89, P=0.16). Conclusions: Among patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or TIA, DAPT, as compared with aspirin monotherapy, might offer better effectiveness in terms of ischemic stroke recurrence at the expense of a higher risk of major bleeding. The trade-off between ischemic benefits and bleeding risks should be assessed in tailoring the therapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 949-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Boulanger ◽  
MP Lindsay ◽  
G Gubitz ◽  
EE Smith ◽  
G Stotts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Management ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Ischemic Attack

The 2018 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management, 6th edition, is a comprehensive summary of current evidence-based recommendations, appropriate for use by healthcare providers and system planners caring for persons with very recent symptoms of acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. The recommendations are intended for use by a interdisciplinary team of clinicians across a wide range of settings and highlight key elements involved in prehospital and Emergency Department care, acute treatments for ischemic stroke, and acute inpatient care. The most notable changes included in this 6th edition are the renaming of the module and its integration of the formerly separate modules on prehospital and emergency care and acute inpatient stroke care. The new module, Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care is now a single, comprehensive module addressing the most important aspects of acute stroke care delivery. Other notable changes include the removal of two sections related to the emergency management of intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. These topics are covered in a new, dedicated module, to be released later this year. The most significant recommendation updates are for neuroimaging; the extension of the time window for endovascular thrombectomy treatment out to 24 h; considerations for treating a highly selected group of people with stroke of unknown time of onset; and recommendations for dual antiplatelet therapy for a limited duration after acute minor ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. This module also emphasizes the need for increased public and healthcare provider’s recognition of the signs of stroke and immediate actions to take; the important expanding role of paramedics and all emergency medical services personnel; arriving at a stroke-enabled Emergency Department without delay; and launching local healthcare institution code stroke protocols. Revisions have also been made to the recommendations for the triage and assessment of risk of recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack/minor stroke and suggested urgency levels for investigations and initiation of management strategies. The goal of this updated guideline is to optimize stroke care across Canada, by reducing practice variations and reducing the gap between current knowledge and clinical practice.

scholarly journals Association of Level and Increase in D‐Dimer With All‐Cause Death and Poor Functional Outcome After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiqing Hou ◽  
Xianglong Xiang ◽  
Yuesong Pan ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Xia Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Poor Functional Outcome ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
High Level ◽  
D Dimer

Background D‐dimer is involved in poor outcomes of stroke as a coagulation biomarker. We aimed to investigate the associations of the level and increase in D‐dimer between baseline and 90 days with all‐cause death or poor functional outcome in patients after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Methods and Results We collected data from the CNSRIII (Third China National Stroke Registry) study. The present substudy included 10 518 patients within 7 days (baseline) of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and 6268 patients at 90 days. Poor functional outcome at 1 year was assessed on the basis of the modified Rankin Scale (≥3). Multivariable Cox regression or logistic regression was used to assess the association of D‐dimer levels with all‐cause death or poor functional outcome. D‐dimer levels at 90 days were lower than those at baseline (1.4 µg/mL versus 1.7 µg/mL; P <0.001). Higher baseline D‐dimer level was associated with all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.25–2.52; P =0.001) and poor functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23–1.80; P <0.001) during 1‐year follow‐up. Higher D‐dimer level at 90 days was also associated with poor outcomes independently. Furthermore, an increase in D‐dimer levels between baseline and 90 days was associated with all‐cause death (since 90 days to 1 year after index event) (adjusted HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.12–3.53; P =0.019) but not with poor functional outcome (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.82–1.41). Conclusions Our study shows that high level and an increase in D‐dimer between baseline and 90 days are associated with poor outcomes in patients after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document