scholarly journals Regional anesthesia in Canadian emergency departments: Emergency physician practices, perspectives, and barriers to use

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wiercigroch ◽  
Maxim Ben-Yakov ◽  
Danielle Porplycia ◽  
Steven Marc Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
General Anesthetic ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Dose Requirement ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Modifiable Factors ◽  
Barriers To Use

ABSTRACTObjectivesRegional anesthesia has many applications in the emergency department (ED). It has been shown to reduce general anesthetic dose, requirement for post-procedural opioids, and recovery time. We sought to characterize the use of regional anesthesia by Canadian emergency physicians, including practices, perspectives and barriers to use in the ED.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), consisting of sixteen multiple choice and numerical response questions. Responses were summarized descriptively as percentages and as the median and inter quartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables.ResultsThe survey was completed by 149/1144 staff emergency physicians, with a response rate of 13%. Respondents used regional anesthesia a median of 2 (IQR 0–4) times in the past ten shifts. The most broadly used applications were soft tissue repair (84.5% of respondents, n = 126), fracture pain management (79.2%, n = 118) and orthopedic reduction (72.5%, n = 108). Respondents agreed that regional anesthesia is safe to use in the ED (98.7%) and were interested in using it more frequently (78.5%). Almost all (98.0%) respondents had point of care ultrasound available, however less than half (49.0%) felt comfortable using it for RA. Respondents indicated that they required more training (76.5%), a departmental protocol (47.0%), and nursing assistance (30.2%) to increase their use of RA.ConclusionCanadian emergency physicians use regional anesthesia infrequently but express an interest in expanding their use. While equipment is available, additional training, protocols, and increased support from nursing staff are modifiable factors that could facilitate uptake.

scholarly journals P005: Regional anesthesia in Canadian emergency departments: Emergency physician practices and impressions

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S66-S66
Author(s):  
D. Wiercigroch ◽  
S. Friedman ◽  
D. Porplycia ◽  
M. Ben-Yakov
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Modifiable Factors ◽  
Barriers To Use

Introduction: The use of regional anesthesia (RA) by emergency physicians (EPs) is expanding in frequency and range of application as expertise in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) grows, but widespread use remains limited. We sought to characterize the use of RA by Canadian EPs, including practices, perspectives and barriers to use in the ED. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian EPs was administered to members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), consisting of sixteen multiple choice and numerical responses. Responses were summarized descriptively as percentages and as the median and inter quartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables. Results: The survey was completed by 149/1144 staff EPs, with a response rate of 13%. EPs used RA a median of 2 (IQR 0-4) times in the past ten shifts. The most broadly used applications were soft tissue repair (84.5% of EPs, n = 126), fracture pain management (79.2%, n = 118) and orthopedic reduction (72.5%, n = 108). EPs agreed that RA is safe to use in the ED (98.7%) and were interested in using it more frequently (78.5%). Almost all (98.0%) respondents had POCUS available, however less than half (49.0%) felt comfortable using it for RA. EPs indicated that they required more training (76.5%), a departmental protocol (47.0%), and nursing assistance (30.2%) to increase their use. Conclusion: Canadian EPs engage in limited use of RA but express an interest in expanding their use. While equipment is available, additional training, protocols, and increased support from nursing staff are modifiable factors that could facilitate uptake of RA in the ED.

scholarly journals MP003: AP or IP? Introduction of a new assessment of performance tool for point of care ultrasound

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
P.R. Atkinson ◽  
D. Lewis ◽  
J. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Entire Body ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Assessment Of Performance ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Assessment Of Practice

Introduction: Organizations including CAEP, CEUS, the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) and the Canadian Association of Radiologists have all called for defined competency assessments for point of care ultrasound (PoCUS). Definitions of core indications vary. The requirement for ongoing assessment of performance and skills maintenance is often overlooked. We describe the introduction an IFEM approved Assessment of Practice (AP) tool across a PoCUS training program and for continued assessment. Methods: We completed a cross sectional survey and cohort study including the entire body of emergency medicine physicians at a tertiary hospital. Over a 3 year period, all practitioners were assessed for CAEP position statement defined core applications at baseline and again after 2 years using a published PoCUS AP tool. We describe the tool, its application and the performance assessment findings. Emergency physicians (EP) underwent AP following formal training including an approved course and a logbook documenting a variable number of scans. Results: 23 EPs completed training and underwent AP initially, with all 23 EPs completing further assessment within 3 years. Assessment of practice was completed for 1. Focused Diagnostic Ultrasound Assessment for AAA, eFAST, cardiac, early pregnancy; and 2. Focused Procedural Ultrasound Guidance for venous catheterization. All EPs demonstrated initial and continuing competency in these PoCUS modalities. Conclusion: The IFEM PoCUS curriculum promotes ongoing local assessment of performance. We successfully implemented this competency based approach and demonstrated feasibility, flexibility and utility in a Canadian emergency medicine program.

Organ and tissue donation from poisoned patients in the emergency department: A Canadian emergency physician survey

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Staple ◽  
Janet MacIntyre ◽  
Nancy G. Murphy ◽  
Stephen Beed ◽  
Constance LeBlanc
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Exposure ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Tissue Donation ◽  
Physician Survey ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Organ And Tissue Donation ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Canadian Association

AbstractObjectivesScreening for organ and tissue donation is an essential skill for emergency physicians. In 2015, 4,631 Canadians were on a waiting list for a transplant, and 262 died while waiting. Canada’s donation rates are less than half of comparable countries, so it is essential to explore strategies to improve the referral of donors. Poisoned patients may be one such underutilized source for donation. This study explores physician practices and perceptions regarding the referral of poisoned patients as donors.MethodsIn this cross-sectional unidirectional survey, 1,471 physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians were invited to participate. Physicians were presented with 20 scenarios and asked whether they would refer the patient as a potential organ or tissue donor. Results were reported descriptively, and associations between demographics and referral patterns were assessed.ResultsPhysicians totalling 208 participated in the organ or tissue donation scenarios (14.1%); 75% of scenarios involving poisoning were referred for organ or tissue donation, compared with 92% in a non-poisoning scenario. Poisons associated with lower referrals included sedatives, acetaminophen, chemical exposure, and organophosphates. A total of 175 physicians completed the demographic survey (11.9%). Characteristics associated with increased referrals included previous referral experience, donation training, donation support, >10 years of service, urban practice, emergency medicine certification, and male gender.ConclusionsScenarios involving poisoning were referred less often when compared with an ideal scenario. Because poisoning is not a contraindication for referral, this represents a potential source of donors. Targeted training and referral support may help improve donation rates in this demographic.

scholarly journals P082: Current state of POCUS usage in canadian emergency departments

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
M.W. Leschyna ◽  
E.M. Hatam ◽  
S.R. Britton ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
S.A. Detombe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Current State ◽  
Patterns Of Use ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Cardiac Assessment ◽  
Level Of Training

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has many applications in Emergency Medicine which are proven to improve patient outcomes. Training programs and guidelines for its use are available but its utilization metrics across Canadian Emergency Departments are unknown. This study aims to provide a comprehensive national assessment of POCUS usage, with a key component comparing training with patterns of use. Methods: A survey was distributed via email to all staff adult emergency physician members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). The survey included questions related to training, attitudes towards POCUS, POCUS utilization, and barriers to POCUS use. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated, and differences in mean POCUS usage between groups were measured using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The survey received 189 responses from emergency physicians from across Canada, 81% of which viewed POCUS as “useful and essential”. Respondents indicated that on average, POCUS was used during 71% (SD 29%) of shifts and on 23% (SD 17%) of patients. POCUS was most commonly used for basic applications, including thoracoabdominal trauma (FAST), cardiac assessment in arrest (trans-abdominal), and assessing for pericardial effusion. The most commonly cited barrier to wider POCUS adoption was a lack of training, with 41% of respondents identifying this as an issue. Correspondingly, formal POCUS training and certification were associated with significantly higher POCUS usage: usage rates ranged from 11.5% (SD 10.5%) of patients for those with formal training but no certification to 39.5% (SD 16.4%) of patients for those with a POCUS fellowship (p <0.001). Conclusion: The presented results from this survey provide an initial overview of the current state of POCUS usage in Canadian Emergency Departments. In summary, a higher level of training was associated with higher POCUS usage, and over a third of the respondents cited lack of training as a barrier to adoption; this suggests that efforts to facilitate POCUS utilization should focus on improving access to formal training and certification. Future work will involve further evaluation of additional barriers preventing POCUS usage in the ED, with the goal of providing information that will encourage changes that support widespread POCUS adoption.

scholarly journals Emergency physicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs in Canadian emergency departments

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Lacroix ◽  
Lisa Thurgur ◽  
Aaron M. Orkin ◽  
Jeffrey J. Perry ◽  
Ian G. Stiell
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
National Public Health

AbstractObjectivesRates of opioid-related deaths have reached the level of national public health crisis in Canada. Community-based opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs distribute naloxone to people at risk, and the emergency department (ED) may be an underutilized setting to deliver naloxone to these people. The goal of this study was to identify Canadian emergency physicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs.MethodsThis was an anonymous Web-based survey of members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Survey questions were developed by the research team and piloted for face validity and clarity. Two reminder emails were sent to non-responders at 2-week intervals. Respondent demographics were collected, and Likert scales were used to assess attitudes and barriers to the prescription of naloxone from the ED.ResultsA total of 459 physicians responded. The majority of respondents were male (64%), worked in urban tertiary centres (58.3%), and lived in Ontario (50.6%). Overall, attitudes to OEND were strongly positive; 86% identified a willingness to prescribe naloxone from the ED. Perceived barriers included support for patient education (57%), access to follow-up (44%), and inadequate time (37%). In addition to people at risk of overdose, 77% of respondents identified that friends and family members may also benefit.ConclusionsCanadian emergency physicians are willing to distribute take-home naloxone, but thoughtful systems are required to facilitate opioid OEND implementation. These data will inform the development of these programs, with emphasis on multidisciplinary training and education.

scholarly journals The Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Detecting Small Bowel Obstruction in Emergency Department

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pourmand ◽  
U. Dimbil ◽  
A. Drake ◽  
H. Shokoohi
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Intestinal Peristalsis

Radiological imaging plays an essential role in the evaluation of a patient with suspected small bowel obstruction (SBO). In a few studies, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been utilized as a primary imaging modality in patients with suspected SBO. POCUS has been shown to be an accurate tool in the diagnosis of SBO with multiple research studies noting a consistent high sensitivity with a range of 94–100% and specificity of 81–100%. Specific sonographic findings that increase the likelihood of SBO include dilatation of small bowel loops > 25 mm, altered intestinal peristalsis, increased thickness of the bowel wall, and intraperitoneal fluid accumulation. Studies also reported that emergency physicians could apply this technique with limited and short-term ultrasound training. In this article, we aim to review the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound examinations performed by emergency physicians in patients with suspected SBO.

scholarly journals Building and strengthening relationships between academic departments/divisions of emergency medicine and rural and regional emergency departments

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Johnston ◽  
Kylie Booth ◽  
Jim Christenson ◽  
David Fu ◽  
Shirley Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Academic Departments ◽  
List Type ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Common Value ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Rural Physicians ◽  
Training Opportunities

ABSTRACTObjectivesMake recommendations on approaches to building and strengthening relationships between academic departments or divisions of Emergency Medicine and rural and regional emergency departments.MethodsA panel of leaders from both rural and urban/academic practice environments met over 8 months. Draft recommendations were developed from panel expertise as well as survey data and presented at the 2018 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium. Symposium feedback was incorporated into final recommendations.ResultsSeven recommendations emerged and are summarized below: 1)CAEP should ensure engagement with other rural stakeholder organizations such as the College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada.2)Engagement efforts require adequate financial and manpower resources.3)Training opportunities should be promoted.4)The current operational interface between the academic department of Emergency Medicine and the emergency departments in the catchment area must be examined and gaps addressed as part of building and strengthening relationships.5)Initial engagement efforts should be around projects with common value.6)Academic Departments should partner with and support rural scholars.7)Academic departments seeking to build or strengthen relationships should consider successful examples from elsewhere in the country as well as considering local culture and challenges.ConclusionThese recommendations serve as guidance for building and strengthening mutually beneficial relationships between academic departments or divisions of Emergency Medicine and rural and regional emergency departments.

scholarly journals P072: Exploring definitions of “unnecessary care” in emergency medicine: a qualitative analysis of physician survey responses

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S102-S103
Author(s):  
L. Krebs ◽  
L. Gaudet ◽  
L.B. Chartier ◽  
B.R. Holroyd ◽  
S. Dowling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
System Level ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
System Failures ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Urgent Patient ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Evidenced Based ◽  
Survey Responses

Introduction: Recently, campaigns placing considerable emphasis on improving emergency department (ED) care by reducing unnecessary tests, treatments, and/or procedures have been initiated. This study explored how Canadian emergency physicians (EPs) conceptualize unnecessary care in the ED. Methods: An online 60-question survey was distributed to EP-members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) with valid emails. The survey explored respondents awareness/support for initiatives to improve ED care (i.e., reduce unnecessary tests, treatments and/or procedures) and asked respondents to define “unnecessary care” in the ED. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed on these responses to identify key themes and sub-themes and explore variation among EPs definitions of unnecessary care. Results: A total of 324 surveys were completed (response rate: 18%); 300 provided free-text definitions of unnecessary care. Most commonly, unnecessary ED care was defined as: 1) performing tests, treatments, procedures, and/or consults that were not indicated or potentially harmful (n=169) and/or 2) care that should have been provided within a non-emergent context for a non-urgent patient (n=143). Emergency physicians highlighted the role of system-level factors and system failures that result in ED presentations as definitions of unnecessary care (n=69). They also noted a distinction between providing necessary care for a non-urgent patient and performing inappropriate/non-evidenced based care. Finally, a tension emerged in their description of frustration with patient expectations (n=17) and/or non-ED referrals (n=24) for specific tests, treatments, and/or procedures. These frustrations were juxtaposed by participants who asserted that “in a patient-centred care environment, no care is unnecessary” (Participant 50; n=12). Conclusion: Variation in the definition of unnecessary ED care is evident among EPs and illustrates that EPs’ conceptualization of unnecessary care is more nuanced than current campaigns addressing ED care improvements represent. This may contribute to a perceived lack of uptake or support for these initiatives. Further exploring EPs perceptions of these campaigns has the potential to improve EP engagement and influence the language utilized by these programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document