scholarly journals P126: Utilization and outcomes of children presenting to an emergency department by ambulance

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S110-S110
Author(s):  
Z. Cantor ◽  
M. Aglipay ◽  
A. Plint
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Self Presentation ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Ed Visits

Introduction: Children account for a low proportion of paramedic transports. Evidence suggests that many pediatric transports are of low acuity, but there are few studies comparing these patients to those that self-present to the ED. Our primary objective was to determine if illness severity was associated with presentation by ambulance among pediatric patients. Methods: We undertook a single centre, retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care pediatric centre. All patients presenting to the ED in 2015 by any route other than air ambulance were eligible. Patients were divided into two groups based on the route of presentation – ambulance or self-presentation. The primary outcome was disposition decision; the secondary outcome was CTAS level. To determine whether patient discharge disposition or CTAS was associated with the method of arrival, we conducted generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for correlation within patients with multiple ED visits. Results: Of the 69,092 visits, 69,034 were eligible and analyzed. Of those, 4478 (6.5%) arrived by ambulance, while 64,556 (93.5) self-presented. Those arriving by ambulance had a median age of 10 years [IQR: 2-5 years] vs. 4 years [IQR: 1.75-10 years] in the self-presenting group and were 52.6% male (vs. 52.8%). Two percent of the ambulance cohort were admitted to the ICU (vs. 0.2%), and 16.6% were admitted to the ward (vs. 5%). Patients presenting by ambulance had higher CTAS scores – 5.3% CTAS 1 (vs. 0.3%), 16.4% CTAS 2 (vs. 7.0%), 61.2% CTAS 3 (vs. 45.8%), and 17.1% CTAS 4-5 (vs. 46.9%). The odds of arriving by ambulance were 10.2 x higher for patients admitted to the ICU (OR = 10.2, 95%CI: 7.9 to 13.3) vs. those discharged home. The odds of arriving by ambulance were 64.2 x (OR = 64.2, 95% CI: 48.6 to 84.7) higher for patients CTAS 1 patients vs. CTAS 5 patients. The top 3 complaints among ambulance patients were neurological (22.5%), respiratory (22.7%), and orthopaedic (11.3%). Among self-presenting patients, the top three were general/minor (20.4%), respiratory (16.4%), and gastrointestinal (14.3%). Conclusion: Children presenting to the ED via ambulance are at higher risk for admission to the ward and critical care unit. It is important that paramedics have sufficient training to ensure adequate skills to manage critically ill children. Given the low proportion but higher severity of illness of pediatric transports, further research and consideration must be given to how best to enable paramedics in the management of children.

scholarly journals P016: Utilization and outcomes of children presenting to an emergency department by ambulance

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S68-S69
Author(s):  
Z. Cantor ◽  
M. Aglipay ◽  
A. Plint
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Self Presentation ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Ed Visits

Introduction: Children account for a low proportion of paramedic transports. Evidence suggests that many pediatric transports are of low acuity, but there are few studies comparing these patients to those that self-present to the ED. Our primary objective was to determine if illness severity was associated with presentation by ambulance among pediatric patients. Methods: We undertook a single centre, retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care pediatric centre. All patients presenting to the ED in 2015 by any route other than air ambulance were eligible. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the route of presentation – ambulance or self-presentation. The primary outcome was disposition decision; the secondary outcome was CTAS level. To determine whether patient discharge disposition or CTAS was associated with method of arrival, we conducted generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for correlation within patients with multiple ED visits. Results: Of the 69,092 visits, 69,034 were eligible and analyzed. Of those, 4478 arrived by ambulance, while 64,556 self-presented. Those arriving by ambulance had a median age of 10 years [IQR: 2-5 years] vs. 4 years [IQR: 1.75-10 years] in the self-presenting group, and were 52.6% male (vs. 52.8%). Two percent of the ambulance cohort were admitted to the ICU (vs. 0.2%), and 16.6% were admitted to the ward (vs. 5%). Patients presenting by ambulance had higher CTAS scores – 5.3% CTAS 1 (vs. 0.3%), 16.4% CTAS 2 (vs. 7.0% ), 61.2% CTAS 3 (vs. 45.8%), and 17.1% CTAS 4-5 (vs. 46.9%). The odds of arriving by ambulance were 10.2 x higher for patients admitted to the ICU (OR = 10.2, 95%CI: 7.9 to 13.3) vs. those discharged home. The odds of arriving by ambulance was 64.2 x (OR = 64.2, 95% CI: 48.6 to 84.7) higher for patients CTAS 1 patients vs. CTAS 5 patients. The top 3 complaints among ambulance patients were respiratory (22.7%), orthopedic (14.7%), and general/minor (10.3%). Among self-presenting patients, the top three were general/minor (22.5%), respiratory (18.0%), and gastrointestinal (15.7%). Conclusion: Children presenting to the ED via ambulance are at higher risk for admission to the ward and critical care unit. It is important that EMS staff responsible for transporting children be well trained in managing critically ill children. Given the low proportion of pediatric transports, consideration must be given to how best to train EMS services in managing these children.

Fascial treatment versus manual therapy (HVLA) in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Katrin Brück ◽  
Kirsten Jacobi ◽  
Tobias Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Industrialized Nations

BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a common health problem in western industrialized nations. In recent years, the fascial tissue has attracted the attention of therapists, and a treatment of the fasciae promises to be a meaningful approach in the therapy of patients with CNP. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a fascial treatment (FT) compared to manual therapy (MT) and to no intervention (control group, CG) in patients with CNP. METHODS: Sixty participants with CNP were randomized into three groups. Primary outcome parameters were pain intensity as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), and severity of illness as measured by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). Secondary outcome parameter was the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine. RESULTS: Repeated measures t-tests demonstrated significant decreases with medium to large effect sizes for the FT (VAS: dR⁢M= 1.14; NPAD: dR⁢M= 0.51) and for the MT (VAS: dR⁢M= 1.15; NPAD: dR⁢M= 0.72). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed the effectiveness of MT on pain and severity of illness in the treatment of patients suffering from CNP. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the effectiveness and clinical relevance of FT for this population.

scholarly journals Pre-Operative Decitabine in Colon Cancer Patients: Analyses on WNT Target Methylation and Expression

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2357
Author(s):  
Janneke F. Linnekamp ◽  
Raju Kandimalla ◽  
Evelyn Fessler ◽  
Joan H. de Jong ◽  
Hans M. Rodermond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Line1 Methylation ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

DNA hypermethylation is common in colon cancer. Previously, we have shown that methylation of WNT target genes predicts poor prognosis in stage II colon cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether pre-operative treatment with decitabine can decrease methylation and increase the expression of WNT target genes APCDD1, AXIN2 and DKK1 in colon cancer patients. A clinical study was conducted, investigating these potential effects of decitabine in colon cancer patients (DECO). Patients were treated two times with 25 mg/m2 decitabine before surgery. Methylation and expression of LINE1 and WNT target genes (primary outcome) and expression of endogenous retroviral genes (secondary outcome) were analysed in pre- and post-treatment tumour samples using pyrosequencing and rt-PCR. Ten patients were treated with decitabine and eighteen patients were used as controls. Decitabine treatment only marginally decreased LINE1 methylation. More importantly, no differences in methylation or expression of WNT target or endogenous retroviral genes were observed. Due to the lack of an effect on primary and secondary outcomes, the study was prematurely closed. In conclusion, pre-operative treatment with decitabine is safe, but with the current dosing, the primary objective, increased WNT target gene expression, cannot be achieved.

scholarly journals Emergency department use by CTAS Levels IV and V patients

CJEM ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (05) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Field ◽  
Andrea Lantz
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Family Physician ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Patient Survey ◽  
Medical Problem ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Specific Service ◽  
Timely Access ◽  
Emergency Department Triage ◽  
Ed Visits

ABSTRACT Introduction: Many emergency department (ED) visits are non-urgent. Postulated reasons for these visits include lack of access to family physicians, convenience and 24/7 access, perceived need for investigations or treatment not available elsewhere, and as a mechanism for expedited referral to other specialists. We conducted a patient survey to determine why non-urgent patients use our tertiary care ED. Our primary objective was to determine how often the lack of a family physician was associated with non-urgent ED use. Methods: The survey was administered to Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Level IV and V patients who attended the ED of the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, NS, from March 7 to March 13, 2005. Results: Of the 352 eligible patients, 235 completed the survey (response rate, 67%). Fifty-six percent (132/235) had an acute medical problem of less than 48 hours, including 48% (114/235) with a recent injury. Thirty-four percent (82/235) had been referred to the ED, 49% (114/235) believed they required a specific service that was unavailable elsewhere (e.g., radiology, suturing, casting) and 43% (100/235) presented because of self-perceived urgency of their condition. Eighty-four percent (198/235) had a family physician; 23% (55/235) used the ED because of limited access to theirfamily physician and 3% (6/235) used the ED because they did not have a family physician. Conclusions: In this setting, most non-urgent ED visits involved patients who required a specific service offered by the ED, patients who believed their condition was urgent, or patients who were referred from the community to the ED. From a patient perspective, relatively few visits would be considered inappropriate. Lack of a family physician was not associated with non-urgent ED use; however, inability to obtain timely access to the FP was a factor in one-quarter of cases.

scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan Ken Lee ◽  
◽  
Dimitrios Doudesis ◽  
Daniella A. Ross ◽  
Anda Bularga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Throat Swab ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Repeated Testing ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serial Testing

Abstract Background Accurate diagnosis in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential to guide treatment and limit spread of the virus. The combined nasal and throat swab is used widely, but its diagnostic performance is uncertain. Methods In a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the combined nasal and throat swab with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in consecutive patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19. Diagnostic performance of the index and serial tests was evaluated for a primary outcome of confirmed or probable COVID-19, and a secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing. The diagnosis was adjudicated by a panel, who recorded clinical, laboratory and radiological features blinded to the test results. Results We enrolled 1368 consecutive patients (median age 68 [interquartile range, IQR 53–80] years, 47% women) who underwent a total of 3822 tests (median 2 [IQR 1–3] tests per patient). The primary outcome occurred in 36% (496/1368), of whom 65% (323/496) and 35% (173/496) had confirmed and probable COVID-19, respectively. The index test was positive in 255/496 (51%) patients with the primary outcome, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 51.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.8 to 54.1%) and 99.5% (95% CI 99.0 to 99.8%). Sensitivity increased in those undergoing 2, 3 or 4 tests to 60.1% (95% CI 56.7 to 63.4%), 68.3% (95% CI 64.0 to 72.3%) and 77.6% (95% CI 72.7 to 81.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of the index test was 78.9% (95% CI 74.4 to 83.2%) for the secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing. Conclusions In patients admitted to hospital, a single combined nasal and throat swab with RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 has excellent specificity, but limited diagnostic sensitivity for COVID-19. Diagnostic performance is significantly improved by repeated testing.

Impact of an oncology acute care clinic (ACC) in a comprehensive cancer care setting to reduce emergency visits and subsequent hospitalizations: A pilot study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Anamika Chaudhuri ◽  
Andrew J. Wagner ◽  
Craig A. Bunnell ◽  
Anne Gross ◽  
Emma Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Emergency Visits ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Ed Visits

110 Background: Emergency Department (ED) visits and subsequent hospitalizations are a major source of healthcare resource utilization and costs among cancer patients, compromising quality of care and patient satisfaction. Emerging evidence, including OCM and other alternative payment models suggest many of these visits may be preventable and effectively managed in oncology-specific urgent care clinics. Little is known about such care delivery models in the comprehensive cancer care arena. Methods: As part of larger effort to provide better, efficient, timely care to patients, an acute care clinic (ACC), appropriately staffed to provide ancillary services, was set up in an academic hospital outpatient setting with hours of operations 10:30- 8:00 pm to effectively manage patients with cancer-related symptoms. The objective was to change the site of care for patients who would otherwise be seen in the ED and discharged home as well as to potentially decrease the frequency of hospitalization following ED evaluation by providing oncology subspecialized care. A retrospective analysis of 4 months pre- and post-intervention was performed with emergency visits per 1000 visits per month as the primary outcome and subsequent hospitalizations as a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 1593 patients (821 pre-intervention and 772 post-intervention) were included. Preliminary analysis revealed a 7% observed reduction in ED visits (0.25 vs 0.23 visits per month per 1000 visits; p = 0.85) for oncology patients which otherwise would have seen a 12% increase, following the historical trend. Data also suggest more effective avoidance of acute care settings with discharge disposition for patients from ED pre-intervention versus ACC post-intervention being 32% vs 72% home, 67% vs 13% inpatient, 1% vs 6% ED respectively. Conclusions: The creation of an ACC to manage urgent patient visits in an ambulatory setting decreased ED visits and the likelihood of patient admission. Although initial findings suggest improved preliminary outcomes, further analysis is required to make any causal inference on the true impact of ACC intervention for reduction of ED and hospitalizations.

Mobilization Therapy in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Initiative

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair R. L. Colwell ◽  
Cydni N. Williams ◽  
Serena P. Kelly ◽  
Laura M. Ibsen
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Improvement Project

Background Mobilization is safe and associated with improved outcomes in critically ill adults, but little is known about mobilization of critically ill children. Objective To implement a standardized mobilization therapy protocol in a pediatric intensive care unit and improve mobilization of patients. Methods A goal-directed mobilization protocol was instituted as a quality improvement project in a 20-bed cardiac and medical-surgical pediatric intensive care unit within an academic tertiary care center. The mobilization goal was based on age and severity of illness. Data on severity of illness, ordered activity limitations, baseline functioning, mobilization level, complications of mobilization, and mobilization barriers were collected. Goal mobilization was defined as a ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness of 1 or greater. Results In 9 months, 567 patient encounters were analyzed, 294 (52%) of which achieved goal mobilization. The mean ratio of mobilization level to severity of illness improved slightly but nonsignificantly. Encounters that met mobilization goals were in younger (P = .04) and more ill (P < .001) patients and were less likely to have barriers (P < .001) than encounters not meeting the goals. Complication rate was 2.5%, with no difference between groups (P = .18). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions A multidisciplinary, multiprofessional, goal-directed mobilization protocol achieved goal mobilization in more than 50% of patients in this pediatric intensive care unit. Undermobilized patients were older, less ill, and more likely to have mobilization barriers at the patient and provider level.

scholarly journals Evaluation of signs of inflammation that can kill score in predicting mortality in an urban tertiary care centre for children in South India

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1204
Author(s):  
N. Rajeshwari ◽  
Savitha A.
Keyword(s):  
South India ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Prediction Of Mortality ◽  
Background Mortality ◽  
Clinical Scoring ◽  
One Year

Background: Mortality in critically ill children is maximum in the first 24 hours. Need of the hour is a rapid clinical scoring system that predicts mortality on admission. This study aims at using the Signs of Inflammation that Can Kill (SICK) score in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in India, to evaluate its usefulness in predicting mortality on admission.Methods: The study design is a hospital based prospective study for evaluation of diagnostic test for a duration of one year.  The assessment using SICK score was done on arrival prior to initiation of treatment for children admitted through the emergency room and paediatric ward. The variables of SICK score - temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic BP, oxygen saturation, CRT, sensorium by AVPU scale were measured using standard guidelines.Results: The study includes a population of 369 children. Children between 1 month to 12 years were included in the study. Out of 369 children studied 24 died. The mortality in the study is 6.5%. The area under the ROC curve is 0.94, which indicates the scores based on regression could predict mortality in 94% subjects correctly. Further a score of 2.5 showed maximum discrimination with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 87.2%.Conclusions: The assessment of SICK score in the population will provide objective measure of severity of illness on admission, prediction of mortality, early triage of patients, effective allocation of resources and personnel, enables early intervention, which helps in reducing mortality.

scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan Ken Lee ◽  
Dimitrios Doudesis ◽  
Daniella A. Ross ◽  
Anda Bularga ◽  
Claire L. MacKintosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Throat Swab ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Repeated Testing ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serial Testing

AbstractBackgroundAccurate diagnosis in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential to guide treatment and limit spread of the virus. The combined nasal and throat swab is used widely, but its diagnostic performance is uncertain.MethodsIn a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the combined nasal and throat swab with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in consecutive patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19. Diagnostic performance of the index and serial tests was evaluated for a primary outcome of confirmed or probable COVID-19, and a secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing. The diagnosis was adjudicated by a panel, who recorded clinical, laboratory and radiological features blinded to the test results.ResultsWe enrolled 1,369 consecutive patients (68 [53-80] years, 47% women) who underwent a total of 3,822 tests (median 2 [1-3] tests per patient). The primary outcome occurred in 36% (496/1,369), of whom 65% (323/496) and 35% (173/496) had confirmed and probable COVID-19, respectively. The index test was positive in 255/496 (51%) patients with the primary outcome, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 51.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.8 to 54.1%) and 99.5% (95% CI 99.0 to 99.8%). Sensitivity increased in those undergoing 2, 3 or 4 tests to 60.1% (95% CI 56.7 to 63.4%), 68.3% (95% CI 64.0 to 72.3%) and 77.6% (95% CI 72.7 to 81.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of the index test was 78.9% (95% CI 74.4 to 83.2%) for the secondary outcome of confirmed COVID-19 on serial testing.ConclusionsIn patients admitted to hospital, a single combined nasal and throat swab with RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 has excellent specificity, but limited diagnostic sensitivity for COVID-19. Diagnostic performance is significantly improved by repeated testing.

Fractures in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Are We Considering Abuse?

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1161-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay R. Lavin ◽  
Cody H. Penrod ◽  
Cristina M. Estrada ◽  
Donald H. Arnold ◽  
Benjamin R. Saville ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Predictor Variables ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Primary Outcome Variable

Approximately one fourths of infant fractures are due to abuse. Recognition of abuse is important to avoid further morbidity/mortality. There is limited knowledge regarding how frequently pediatric emergency department clinicians consider abuse in infants with fractures. Our primary objective was to estimate the percentage of infants with fractures for whom abuse was considered, and to examine characteristics associated with abuse consideration. We performed a retrospective review of infants <1 year of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Our primary outcome variable was consideration of abuse. Our secondary outcome measures were identification of predictor variables associated with consideration of abuse. We identified 509 infants meeting study criteria. Pediatric emergency physicians considered abuse in approximately two thirds of infants with fractures. Consideration was more likely to occur in younger infants, in the presence of no history or unwitnessed injury mechanism, when evaluated by male physicians, and emergency department encounters from 12 am to 6 am.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document