scholarly journals LO32: A two-centre survey of caregiver perspectives on opioid use for children's acute pain management

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S18-S19
Author(s):  
E. Jun ◽  
S. Ali ◽  
M. Yaskina ◽  
K. Dong ◽  
M. Rajagopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Acute Injury ◽  
Willingness To Accept ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
At Home

Introduction: Given the current opioid crisis, caregivers have mounting fears regarding use of opioid medication in their children. Since caregivers are often the gatekeepers to their children's pain management, understanding their perspectives on analgesics is essential. For caregivers of children with acute injury presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED), we aimed to determine caregivers’: a) willingness to accept opioids from emergency care providers, b) reasons for refusing opioids, and c) past experiences with opioids. Methods: A novel 31-item electronic survey was offered, via tablet device, to caregivers of children aged 4-16 years who had a musculoskeletal injury <7 days old and presented to one of two Canadian PEDs between March and November 2017. Primary outcome was caregiver willingness to accept opioids for moderate pain for their children. Results: 517 caregivers completed the survey; mean age was 40.9 +/−7 years with 70.0% (362/517) being mothers. Children included 62.2% (321/516) males with an overall mean age of 10 +/−3.6 years. 49.6% of caregivers (254/512) reported willingness to accept opioids for moderate pain that persisted after non-opioid analgesia, while 37.1% (190/512) were unsure what they would do. Only 33.2% (170/512) of caregivers stated they would accept opioid analgesia upon discharge while 45.5% (233/512) were unsure about at-home use. Caregivers were primarily concerned about side effects, overdose, addiction, and masking of diagnosis. Caregiver fear of addiction (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25) and side effects (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.42) increased the odds of rejecting opioids in the emergency department, while fears of addiction (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32) and overdose (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.27) increased the odds of rejecting opioids for at-home use. Conclusion: Only half of caregivers reported that they would accept opioids for moderate pain, despite ongoing pain following non-opioid analgesics. Caregiver fears of addiction, side effects, overdose, and masking their child's diagnosis influence their behaviours. These findings are a first step in understanding caregiver decision-making and can guide healthcare providers in their conversations about acute pain treatment with families.

scholarly journals A two-centre survey of caregiver perspectives on opioid use for children’s acute pain management

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Esther Jun ◽  
Samina Ali ◽  
Maryna Yaskina ◽  
Kathryn Dong ◽  
Manasi Rajagopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Willingness To Accept ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Medication ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Nonopioid Analgesics ◽  
Ongoing Pain ◽  
Past Experiences ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background Given the current opioid crisis, caregivers have mounting fears regarding the use of opioid medication in their children. We aimed to determine caregivers’ a) willingness to accept, b) reasons for refusing, and c) past experiences with opioids. Methods A novel electronic survey of caregivers of children aged 4 to 16 years who had an acute musculoskeletal injury and presented to two Canadian paediatric emergency departments (ED) (March to November 2017). Primary outcome was caregiver willingness to accept opioids for moderate pain for their children. Results Five hundred and seventeen caregivers participated; mean age was 40.9 (SD 7.1) years with 70.0% (362/517) mothers. Children included 62.2% (321/516) males with a mean age of 10.0 (SD 3.6) years. 49.6% of caregivers (254/512) reported willingness to accept opioids for ongoing moderate pain in the ED, while 37.1% (190/512) were ‘unsure’; 33.2% (170/512) of caregivers would accept opioids for at-home use, but 45.5% (233/512) were ‘unsure’. Caregivers’ primary concerns were side effects, overdose, addiction, and masking of diagnosis. Caregiver fear of addiction (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.25) and side effects (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42) affected willingness to accept opioids in the emergency department; fears of addiction (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32), and overdose (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.27) affected willingness to accept opioids for at-home use. Conclusions Only half of the caregivers would accept opioids for moderate pain, despite ongoing pain following nonopioid analgesics. Caregivers’ fears of addiction, side effects, overdose, and masking diagnosis may have influenced their responses. These findings are a first step in understanding caregiver analgesic decision making.

scholarly journals Management of Pain in the Emergency Department

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Past ◽  
Pain Care ◽  
Patient Presentation

Since pain is a primary impetus for patient presentation to the Emergency Department (ED), its treatment should be a priority for acute care providers. Historically, the ED has been marked by shortcomings in both the evaluation and amelioration of pain. Over the past decade, improvements in the science of pain assessment and management have combined to facilitate care improvements in the ED. The purpose of this review is to address selected topics within the realm of ED pain management. Commencing with general principles and definitions, the review continues with an assessment of areas of controversy and advancing knowledge in acute pain care. Some barriers to optimal pain care are discussed, and potential mechanisms to overcome these barriers are offered. While the review is not intended as a resource for specific pain conditions or drug information, selected agents and approaches are mentioned with respect to evolving evidence and areas for future research.

scholarly journals Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Cameroonian physicians with regards to acute pain management in the emergency department: a multicenter cross-sectional study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Owono Etoundi ◽  
Junette Arlette Metogo Mbengono ◽  
Ferdinand Ndom Ntock ◽  
Joel Noutakdie Tochie ◽  
Dominique Christelle Anaba Ndom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Acute Pain Management ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Attitudes And Practices ◽  
Knowledge Attitudes And Practices

scholarly journals Commonly Used Agent for Acute Pain Management of Sickle Cell Anemia in Saudi Emergency Department: a Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem A. Hejazi ◽  
Nameer A. Mandourah ◽  
Aryaf S. Alsulami ◽  
Hussain T. Bakhsh ◽  
Reem M. Diri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Sickle Cell Anemia ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Acute Pain Management

scholarly journals Needs of patient with advanced stages of cancer in a Thai community

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-351
Author(s):  
Panita Krongyuth ◽  
Pimpan Silpasuwan ◽  
Chukiat Viwatwongkasem ◽  
Cathy Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Open Communication ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Palliative Care Needs ◽  
At Home

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the needs of people with cancer in advanced stages and to analyze factors that influence them. Design/methodology/approach A concurrent mixed-method design was used. Descriptive design was conducted in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Data were collected from a convenience sample of patients with advanced cancer of any tissue or organ. Questionnaires were completed by 110 patients aged 60 years and above (response rate 110/130=84.6 percent). In-depth interviews were conducted with a total of eight patients. Content analysis of semi-structured interviews of a sub-sample was subsequently performed to better understand the real needs of patients with advanced stages of cancer at home setting. Findings The majority (77.5 percent) reported a preference to spend their final days at home. The four most common palliative care needs were more information about disease and medical treatment (98.2 percent), more treatment for pain (97.3 percent), health education for family caregivers (95.5 percent) and health volunteers visit at home (95.5 percent). Content analysis of the qualitative data suggested that patient needs health care providers to deliver open communication, pain management and provide psychosocial supports. Originality/value The result showed that patients-related variables are associated with the palliative care needs in patients with advanced stages of cancer. Communication skills and pain management are the key components to support the need for palliative care at home and to benefit the quality of life in terminally ill patients.

scholarly journals POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERY

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 340-345
Author(s):  
ROBINA FIRDOUS
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Opioid Receptors ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Alternate Route ◽  
Parenteral Route ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain

The severity of post-operative pain and the lack of efforts in relievingit have led to the involvement of Anaesthesiologists in the management of post-operative and acute pain. Parenteralopiates have been utilized for post-operative pain management. The identification of the opioid receptors on substantiagelatinosa has provided an alternate route i.e 1 the epidural route - for administering opiates. Objectives: To evaluateand compare the efficacy and side effects of parenteral Buprenorphine with those of Extradural Buprenorphine.Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, District Headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: The data was collected duringthe last three and a half years. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients of either sex and ages ranging from 35-45years, who underwent lower abdominal surgery, were randomly selected for the study. They were equally divided intotwo groups. Group I patients were administered Buprenorphine 0.3 mg through the epidural catheter in extraduralspace. Group II patients were given Buprenorphine 0.3 mg intramuscularly. Results: Buprenorphine through theepidural route gives better analgesia with fewer side effects as compared with the parenteral route.

Acute pain in the elderly

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wagg ◽  
Shashi Gadgil
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
World Health ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Who Analgesic Ladder ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Pain In The Elderly

Physiological changes that occur with age affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in acute pain management. Elderly patients are often reluctant to complain of pain and seek treatment and may sometimes be unable to express pain due to impaired cognition or language. Evidence suggests the elderly as a group that receive inadequate analgesia and are often in pain. Health care professionals are often reluctant to administer sufficient analgesia due to fear of encouraging addiction or inducing side effects. The approach to pain management in this group should follow the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder with close monitoring for potential side effects and with escalation of treatment till sufficient analgesia is achieved. Choice of drugs and the route of administration should be tailored to the individual patient and should consider the nature of their pain and any disability or co-morbidity that will affect their response to the chosen agent. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used with extreme caution, monitoring for potential gastrointestinal (GI) and renal side effects and long-term use should be avoided if possible. Opioids are effective analgesics and should not be denied to the elderly but their use should be monitored carefully and side effects such as nausea and constipation anticipated and treated.

scholarly journals Acute Pain Assessment Inadequacy in the Emergency Department: Patients’ Perspective

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 237437352110496
Author(s):  
Jenni Hämäläinen ◽  
Tarja Kvist ◽  
Päivi Kankkunen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
Pain At Rest ◽  
Patients Perspective

For many patients, acute pain is a common cause to seek treatment in an Emergency Department (ED). An inadequate assessment could cause inappropriate pain management. The aim of this study was to describe and explain patients’ perceptions of acute pain assessment in the Emergency Department. The data were collected from ED patients (n = 114). Patients reported that nurses were asking about intensity of pain at rest, but only 52% during movement. According to the patients, the most common tools to assess acute pain were the verbal rating scale (VRS; 54% of patients), numerical rating scale (NRS; 28% of patients), and visual analogue scale (VAS; 9.7% of patients). Over twenty per cent of patients stated that ED nurses did not ask about the intensity of pain after analgesic administration. Twenty-four per cent of the patients were not pleased with nursing pain assessment in the ED. The assessment of acute pain is still inadequate in the ED. Therefore, ED nurses need to be more attentive to systematic acute pain management of patients in the ED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document