scholarly journals P086: Awareness and barriers to access of a Ministry of Health mandated ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ confirmation form: An interim analysis

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S94-S95
Author(s):  
M. Lipkus ◽  
T. Manokara ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Ministry Of Health ◽  
Barriers To Access ◽  
Ease Of Access ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Elderly patients with comorbid illness have poor meaningful recovery after out of hospital cardiac arrest. Many elderly patients decide that if they have a cardiac arrest, they would want not want resuscitation. In Ontario, prehospital personnel must provide resuscitation to all patients regardless of previously stated wishes or legal documentation unless they are presented a Ministry of Health mandated ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ Confirmation Form (MOH-DNRCF). This study aimed to evaluate the awareness of this form as well as any barriers to its completion. Methods: Patients over 70 years of age presenting to the Emergency Department were approached to complete a short survey about their wishes regarding resuscitation, awareness of the MOH-DNRCF, as well as any barriers to completion. Standard demographic variables were also collected. Patients, with critical illness, with severe dementia, a language barrier or from a nursing home were excluded. The primary outcome was awareness of the MOH-DNRCF. Standard descriptive statistics were summarized using median [IQR] and simple proportions. Results: Preliminary data of 96 patients has been collected. The median [IQR] age of patients recruited was 81 [75-88] years and 54% were female. 49/96 (51%) have wishes to not be resuscitated in the event of cardiac arrest and of those 42 (86%) are not aware of the existence of the MOH-DNRCF. Of the 7 patients who were aware of the form only 1 had completed one. Barriers to completion included the patient being unsure where to access the form and difficulty in discussing the topic. Conclusion: The majority of patients with wishes to be DNR are unaware of the MOH-DNRCF. This has severe repercussions as, in the event of an out of hospital cardiac arrest, these patients would be resuscitated by prehospital care providers. Strategies to increase awareness of the form as well as strategies to increase ease of access should be considered to avoid resuscitation that is against patient wishes.

scholarly journals Variation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Management

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Jones ◽  
Joseph A. Tyndall ◽  
Christine M. Van Dillen
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
One Airway ◽  
Time And Energy ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective. To evaluate variation in airway management strategies in one suburban emergency medical services system treating patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Method. Retrospective chart review of all adult OHCA resuscitation during a 13-month period, specifically comparing airway management decisions. Results. Paramedics demonstrated considerable variation in their approaches to airway management. Approximately half of all OHCA patients received more than one airway management attempt (38/77 [49%]), and one-quarter underwent three or more attempts (25/77 [25%]). One-third of patients arrived at the emergency department with a different airway device than initially selected (25/77 [32%]). Conclusion. This study confirmed our hypothesis that paramedics’ selection of ventilation strategies in cardiac arrest varies considerably. This observation raises concern because airway management diverts time and energy from interventions known to improve outcomes in OHCA management, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation. More research is needed to identify more focused airway management strategies for prehospital care providers.

scholarly journals The effect of video-instructed versus audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on patient outcomes following out of hospital cardiac arrest in Seoul

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Soon Lee ◽  
Kicheol You ◽  
Jin Pyeong Jeon ◽  
Chulho Kim ◽  
Sungeun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Video Instruction ◽  
Neurologic Recovery ◽  
Metropolitan City ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractWe aimed to investigate whether video-instructed dispatcher-assisted (DA)-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improved neurologic recovery and survival to discharge compared to audio-instructed DA-CPR in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in a metropolitan city with sufficient experience and facilities. A retrospective cohort study was conducted for adult bystander-witnessed OHCA patients administered DA-CPR due to presumed cardiac etiology between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2019 in Seoul, Korea. The primary and secondary outcomes were the differences in favorable neurologic outcome and survival to discharge rates in adult OHCA patients in the two instruction groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the outcome predictors after DA-CPR. A total of 2109 adult OHCA patients with DA-CPR were enrolled. Numbers of elderly patients in audio instruction and video instruction were 1260 (73.2%) and 214 (55.3%), respectively. Elderly patients and those outside the home or medical facility were more likely to receive video instruction. Favorable neurologic outcome was observed more in patients who received video-instructed DA-CPR (n = 75, 19.4%) than in patients who received audio-instructed DA-CPR (n = 117, 6.8%). The survival to discharge rate was also higher in video-instructed DA-CPR (n = 105, 27.1%) than in audio-instructed DA-CPR (n = 211, 12.3%). Video-instructed DA-CPR was significantly associated with neurologic recovery (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.48–3.01) and survival to discharge (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.33–2.46) compared to audio-instructed DA-CPR in adult OHCA patients after adjusting for age, gender, underlying diseases and CPR location. Video-instructed DA-CPR was associated with favorable outcomes in adult patients with OHCA in a metropolitan city equipped with sufficient experience and facilities.

Sex-specific differences and outcome in elderly patients after survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni Pätz ◽  
Katharina Stelzig ◽  
Rüdiger Pfeifer ◽  
Holger Thiele ◽  
Hans-Jörg Busch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract 309: Prediction Chart for Neurological Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and the Corresponding Time to Termination of Resuscitation: Evidence from a Japanese Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Funada ◽  
Yoshikazu Goto ◽  
Masayuki Takamura
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Neurological outcomes and the appropriate duration from call receipt to termination of resuscitation (TOR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) could differ according to patient characteristics. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a prediction chart comprising prehospital variables, including age, could be useful for predicting neurological outcomes and determining the time to TOR in the field or at the emergency department. Methods: We evaluated 19,829 elderly patients with OHCA (age ≥65 years) of cardiac origin who achieved prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Data were obtained from the prospectively recorded All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2011 and 2016. Patients with OHCA witnessed by emergency medical service providers were excluded. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically intact survival, defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1-2. Patients with OHCA were divided into 12 groups according to shockable rhythm (YES/NO), witness status (YES/NO), and age (65-74, 75-89, or ≥90 years). The time from call receipt to ROSC was calculated and categorized by 5-min intervals. The time from call receipt to ROSC at which the probability of 1-month CPC 1-2 decreased to <1% was defined as the call to TOR duration. Results: The overall 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was 18.9% (n = 3,756). When stratified by patient characteristics, the 1-month CPC 1-2 rates ranged from 52.3% in patients aged 65-74 years with shockable rhythm and witnessed OHCA (best-case scenario) to 1.6% in patients aged ≥90 years with non-shockable rhythm and un-witnessed OHCA (worst-case scenario). The corresponding call to TOR duration ranged from 35 to 10 min (Table). Conclusions: Neurological outcomes and the appropriate call to TOR duration differed according to patient characteristics, including age. Our prediction chart for elderly patients with OHCA could be useful for determining TOR in the field or at the emergency department.

The CAHP (cardiac arrest hospital prognosis) score: A tool for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in elderly patients

Resuscitation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 200-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Sauneuf ◽  
Julien Dupeyrat ◽  
Xavier Souloy ◽  
Maxime Leclerc ◽  
Benoit Courteille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Prognosis Score

scholarly journals Incidence and Outcomes of Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Singapore and Victoria: A Collaborative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shir Lynn Lim ◽  
Karen Smith ◽  
Kylie Dyson ◽  
Siew Pang Chan ◽  
Arul Earnest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
World Health ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Incidence and outcomes of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary between communities. We aimed to examine differences in patient characteristics, prehospital care, and outcomes in Singapore and Victoria. Methods and Results Using the prospective Singapore Pan‐Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study and Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry, we identified 11 061 and 32 003 emergency medical services‐attended adult OHCAs between 2011 and 2016 respectively. Incidence and survival rates were directly age adjusted using the World Health Organization population. Survival was analyzed with logistic regression, with model selection via backward elimination. Of the 11 061 and 14 834 emergency medical services‐treated OHCAs (overall mean age±SD 65.5±17.2; 67.4% males) in Singapore and Victoria respectively, 11 054 (99.9%) and 5595 (37.7%) were transported, and 440 (4.0%) and 2009 (13.6%) survived. Compared with Victoria, people with OHCA in Singapore were older (66.7±16.5 versus 64.6±17.7), had less shockable rhythms (17.7% versus 30.3%), and received less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (45.7% versus 58.5%) and defibrillation (1.3% versus 2.5%) (all P <0.001). Age‐adjusted OHCA incidence and survival rates increased in Singapore between 2011 and 2016 ( P <0.01 for trend), but remained stable, though higher, in Victoria. Likelihood of survival increased significantly ( P <0.001) with arrest in public locations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.81), witnessed arrest (aOR 2.14), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (aOR 1.72), initial shockable rhythm (aOR 9.82), and bystander defibrillation (aOR 2.04) but decreased with increasing age (aOR 0.98) and emergency medical services response time (aOR 0.91). Conclusions Singapore reported increasing OHCA incidence and survival rates between 2011 and 2016, compared with stable, albeit higher, rates in Victoria. Survival differences might be related to different emergency medical services practices including patient selection for resuscitation and transport.

Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Cook ◽  
Steven A. Meador ◽  
Barry D. Buckingham ◽  
Lee V. Groff
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Time Management ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Seat Belt ◽  
Cardiac Arrest Patient ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Seat Belts ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
The Mean

AbstractPurpose:Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance?Methods:The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report.Results:The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41%. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82% of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63%, for “shortness of breath” 38%, and for trauma patients 41%. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72%. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18% of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained.Conclusion:Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document