scholarly journals MP25: Implementation of pain order sets to decrease the time to analgesics in the emergency department: a quality improvement initiative in progress

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S51
Author(s):  
K. Akilan ◽  
V. Teo ◽  
D. Hefferon ◽  
A. Verma
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Chart Audit ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Order Set

Background: Acute pain is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) and inadequacy in its treatment can lengthen stay. Earlier analgesia use and discharge has been associated with positive patient experiences and improved pain management. Validated ‘fast-track pathways’ to aid physician decision making in analgesic administration is associated with decreased waiting times in renal colic diagnoses. Aim Statement: Our aim was to create an order set, for an approach to patients with acute pain, to reduce median time from point of triage to analgesia. We sought to reduce median time by 15 minutes, for ED patients with renal colic in the three months after implementation as compared to three months before. Measures & Design: We used a literature review and comparison to existing order sets at other EDs to design our draft. We focused our evaluation on patients with renal colic. We underwent multiple revisions based on stakeholder feedback and educated both physician and nursing teams about the order set. The utilization, however, was at physician discretion. We implemented the order set on March 30, 2017. After three months, an electronic retrospective chart review identified patients with a final renal colic diagnosis. For each patient, we captured triage time using electronic records and time to analgesia with the medication cart. Utilization of order sets was confirmed via manual chart audit. Evaluation/Results: A run chart showed worsening times after the intervention. Median time to analgesia in minutes, 3 months prior (n = 90) and post (n = 93) intervention, increased from 228 to 310 minutes, although the range was very large. Chart audits demonstrated a considerably low uptake of the order set with a small gradual increase from 0% to 20% over the 3-month period. Discussion/Impact: There was insufficient uptake of the Acute Pain order set preventing impact on time to analgesia. Changes in occupancy likely contributed to the worsening times. There was an increase in utilization over the 3-month period and could be due to increased awareness. This demonstrates that interventions require more than implementation to be effective. Difficulties in implementation were due to the document not being readily available. We have organized the nursing staff to attach order sets onto charts based on triage assessment and will re-assess with another PDSA cycle after this intervention.

scholarly journals LO93: Implementation of sepsis order sets to decrease the time to antibiotics in the emergency department: a quality improvement initiative

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S41-S42
Author(s):  
K. Akilan ◽  
V. Teo ◽  
D. Hefferon ◽  
A. Verma
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Chart Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Order Set

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome, and delays to appropriate antibiotic therapy increases mortality. Order sets have shown decrease in time to antibiotics in pneumonia, and in sepsis, the implementation of order sets resulted in more intravenous fluids, appropriate initial antibiotics and lower mortality. Aim Statement: The goal was to create an order set for an approach to septic patients, to improve sepsis management. We sought to improve time from triage to first antibiotics, by 15 minutes, for Emergency Department (ED) patients with sepsis in three months after implementation compared to three months before. Measures & Design: We used a literature review, as well as comparison to existing order sets at other EDs to design our initial order set. We underwent multiple revisions based on stakeholder feedback. We educated physician and nursing teams about the order sets, although use was ultimately at physician discretion. We implemented the order set on April 9, 2017. After three months, an electronic retrospective chart review identified patients with a final sepsis diagnosis admitted to the critical care unit. For each patient, we captured triage time using the electronic record, and time to antibiotics from when the antibiotic was taken out of the medication cart. Finally, utilization of order sets was checked via manual chart audit. Evaluation/Results: A run chart did not demonstrate any shifts or trends suggesting a change after implementation. Median time to antibiotics in minutes, 3 months prior (n = 45) and post (n = 55) intervention, increased from 245 to 340 minutes, although the range was very large. Chart audits demonstrated clinicians were not using the order sets. There was 10% usage for 2 of the months and 0% usage the other month, post-intervention. Disucssion/Impact: There was insufficient uptake of the Sepsis Order Set by the Sunnybrook ED to result in any impact on time to antibiotics. Order sets require more than just implementation to be effective. Difficulties in implementation were due to the document not being readily available to physicians. To mediate, we have organized nursing staff to attach the order set onto charts based on triage assessment and will re-assess with another PDSA cycle after this intervention.

scholarly journals Implementing a Protocol to Reduce Opioid Prescriptions in Military Otolaryngology: A Quality Improvement Initiative

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
CindyLee P Neighbors ◽  
Michael W Noller ◽  
Michael P Avillion ◽  
John W Neighbors ◽  
Mark C Spaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
New Order ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Medication Refill ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Patient Pain ◽  
Prescription Rates ◽  
Order Set

ABSTRACT Introduction To compare pain medication refill rates for adult septoplasty and rhinoplasty patients before and after initiating a multimodal analgesic protocol for reducing opioid prescriptions (PROP). Materials and Methods Data from 58 adult patients were retrieved by retrospective chart review (19 septoplasties and 10 rhinoplasties before initiating PROP in September 2018 and 21 septoplasties and 8 rhinoplasties after PROP). We selected consecutive septoplasties and rhinoplasties, at which time a new discharge order set was implemented. The new order set consisted of 10 oxycodone tabs (5 mg), 100 acetaminophen tabs (325 mg), and 28 celecoxib tabs (200 mg). The primary outcome variable was the number of initial opioid prescriptions and refills filled by any provider. Results Among the septoplasties, there was a 46% decrease in total morphine milligram equivalent (MME) prescribed, from a mean of 202.0 mg in the non-PROP group (95% CI, 235.4, 174.6) to 108.6 mg in the PROP group (95% CI, 135.8, 81.4), with no difference in refill rates. Among the rhinoplasties, there was a 51% decrease in total MME prescribed, from a mean of 258.8 mg in the non-PROP group (95% CI, 333.4, 184.1) to 126.6 mg in the PROP group (95% CI, 168.1, 85.0) with no difference in refill rates. Conclusions The outcomes after PROP implementation for septoplasty and rhinoplasty at our institution suggest that opioid prescription rates can be significantly decreased to manage postoperative pain, with no difference in opioid refill rates. The results also warrant further investigation into patient pain, satisfaction, provider efficiency, and healthcare costs.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Opioid Pill Consumption After an ED Visit: How Many Pills Are People Using?

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M McCarthy ◽  
Howard S Kim ◽  
Scott I Hur ◽  
Patrick M Lank ◽  
Christine Arroyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Use Patterns ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Objectives Recent guidelines advise limiting opioid prescriptions for acute pain to a three-day supply; however, scant literature quantifies opioid use patterns after an emergency department (ED) visit. We sought to describe opioid consumption patterns after an ED visit for acute pain. Design Descriptive study with data derived from a larger interventional study promoting safe opioid use after ED discharge. Setting Urban academic emergency department (>88,000 annual visits). Subjects Patients were eligible if age >17 years, not chronically using opioids, and newly prescribed hydrocodone-acetaminophen and were included in the analysis if they returned the completed 10-day medication diary. Methods Patient demographics and opioid consumption are reported. Opioid use is described in daily number of pills and daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) both for the sample overall and by diagnosis. Results Two hundred sixty patients returned completed medication diaries (45 [17%] back pain, 52 [20%] renal colic, 54 [21%] fracture/dislocation, 40 [15%] musculoskeletal injury [nonfracture], and 69 [27%] “other”). The mean age (SD) was 45 (15) years, and 59% of the sample was female. A median of 12 pills were prescribed. Patients with renal colic used the least opioids (total pills: median [interquartile range {IQR}] = 3 [1–7]; total MME: median [IQR] = 20 [10–50]); patients with back pain used the most (total pills: median [IQR] = 12 [7–16]; total MME: median [IQR] = 65 [47.5–100]); 92.5% of patients had leftover pills. Conclusions In this sample, pill consumption varied by illness category; however, overall, patients were consuming low quantities of pills, and the majority had unused pills 10 days after their ED visit.

scholarly journals LO015: A multi-centered regional emergency department study of renal colic management using medical expulsion therapy

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S35-S35
Author(s):  
E. Bristow ◽  
A. Kinnaird ◽  
T. Schuler ◽  
P. Pang ◽  
S. Couperthwaite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Practice Variation ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Medical Chart Review ◽  
Data Collection Process ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Resident Involvement ◽  
Review Study ◽  
Initial Imaging

Introduction: Patients with renal colic present frequently to the emergency department (ED). Existing literature suggests management with medical expulsion therapy (MET) may improve outcomes, especially for those with stones > 5 mm in size. This study evaluates the use of MET in the management of adult patients seen in regional EDs with a diagnosis of renal colic. Methods: A multi-centered medical chart review study was conducted in seven Edmonton-Zone EDs. Approximately 100 cases from each site were randomly selected from administrative data from the 2014 calendar year, no repeat cases were permitted. Using a standardized data collection process and trained research assistance, data were abstracted from medical charts. Medians and inter-quartile ranges (IQR), proportions, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Overall, 656 patient charts were included in the review; median age was 46 years (IQR: 35, 46) and 249 (38%) were female. Few (10%) arrived by ambulance or were on MET therapy at presentation; however, many (51%) reported a previous episode of renal colic. Many (191 {29%}) received no initial ED imaging; CT (236 {36%}) was favoured over ultrasound (39 {6%}) for initial imaging, either alone or with plain radiographs (8%). Plain radiographs were frequently ordered (204 {31%}). Only 198 (31%) of charts contained documentation of the use of MET at discharge and the median duration of therapy was 10 days (IQR: 7, 14). Initiation of MET therapy did not vary based on older age (OR = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.14); sex (OR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.33); resident involvement (OR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.63, 2.0); presentation to an academic centre (OR = 1.4; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.95) or stone size (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.06). Conclusion: Management of renal colic with MET is uncommon in this region and practice variation appears driven by physician preference rather than evidence. Practice guidelines with standardized order sets are urgently needed to improve care.

Implementation of order sets for opioid alternatives in community hospital emergency departments

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (15) ◽  
pp. 1258-1264
Author(s):  
Jared Netley ◽  
William Armstrong ◽  
Sarah Meeks
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Incentive Payment ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Nonopioid Analgesics ◽  
Implementation Progress ◽  
Key Steps ◽  
Hospital Emergency Departments

Abstract Purpose The design and implementation of alternatives to opioids (ALTO) order sets for the treatment of acute pain in a community health system’s emergency departments are described. Summary Healthcare institutions nationwide have incorporated policies and procedures to assist prescribers in the safe and effective management of pain. These adopted approaches may be targeted at mitigating opioid prescribing as well as promoting the optimization of nonopioid analgesics. Institutions that enact innovations and track outcomes may be eligible for reimbursement through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Merit-based Incentive Payment System. Emergency departments may monitor implementation progress and outcomes through participation in the American College of Emergency Physician’s Emergency Quality Network. Clinical pharmacists were tasked with assisting an institution’s emergency departments to create and implement two order sets containing ALTO analgesics and supportive medications for atraumatic headache and general acute pain management. Key steps of order set implementation included collaborative development with emergency department providers, implementation with information services, and the development of provider-focused education by project pharmacists. The implementation of ALTO order sets has set the foundation for expansion of pain control protocols and algorithms within our institution. Furthermore, the approach detailed in this article can be adapted and implemented by other healthcare systems to help reduce opioid prescribing. Conclusion The implementation of ALTO order sets within an electronic health record can encourage decreased prescribing of opioids for the treatment of acute pain, promote and optimize dosing of nonopioid analgesics, and may augment reimbursement for services in the emergency department.

scholarly journals Quantity of opioids consumed following an emergency department visit for acute pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e022649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul Daoust ◽  
Jean Paquet ◽  
Alexis Cournoyer ◽  
Éric Piette ◽  
Judy Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Pain Condition

ObjectivesPrescription opioid diversion is a significant contributor to the opioid misuse epidemic. We examined the quantity of opioids consumed by emergency department (ED) discharged patients after treatment for an acute pain condition (musculoskeletal, fracture, renal colic, abdominal pain and other), and the percentage of unused opioids available for potential misuse.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingTertiary care trauma centre academic hospital.ParticipantsA convenience sample of patients ≥18 years who visited the ED for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks) and were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day paper diary of daily pain medication use. To reduce lost to follow-up, participants also responded to standardised phone interview questions about their previous 14-day pain medication use.OutcomesQuantity of morphine 5 mg tablets (or equivalent) prescribed, consumed and unused during a 14-day follow-up. Quantity of opioids to adequately supply 80% of patients for 2 weeks and 95% of patients for the first 3 days was also calculated.ResultsResults for 627 patients were analysed (mean age ±SD: 51±16 years, 48% women). Patients consumed a median of seven tablets of morphine 5 mg (32% of the total prescribed opioids). The quantity of opioids to adequately supply 80% of patients for 2 weeks was 20 tablets of morphine 5 mg for musculoskeletal pain, 30 for fracture, 15 for renal colic or abdominal pain and 20 for other pain conditions. The quantity to adequately supply 95% of patients for the first 3 days was 15 tablets of morphine 5 mg.ConclusionsPatients discharged from the ED with an acute pain condition consumed a median of fewer than 10 tablets of morphine 5 mg (or equivalent). ED physicians should consider prescribing a smaller quantity of opioids and asking the pharmacist to dispense them in portions to minimise unused opioids.Trial registration numberNCT02799004; Results.

scholarly journals Implementation of disease-based standard order sets in emergency department of tertiary care hospital, Pakistan- a novel approach for enhancing patient care

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Feroza Parveen ◽  
Asif Khaliq ◽  
Nadeem Ullah Khan ◽  
Zainab Mazhar ◽  
Aisha Akram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Order Processing ◽  
Standard Order ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Order Set

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of disease-based standard order sets in reducing time of order entry, order processing and medication dispensation in emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: The pilot study was conducted as part of a retrospective clinical audit using pre- and post-intervention design comprising data from July to September 2013 of the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Data collected related to the reduction in medicine order entry, processing and dispensing time of eight common emergency conditions with standard order set.  Subsequently, standard medication orders for the selected medical conditions were developed together with physicians of emergency and other specialties. Post-intervention data was collected and the two data sets were compared using SPSS version 23.0. Results: Mean medication order entry and processing time from the physician end improved from 67.7±22.7 seconds to 20.5±7.1 seconds.  Mean order processing and medication processing and dispensing time at pharmacist end reduced from 70.0±22.4 to 20.6±8.8 seconds. The difference between pre- and post-intervention values was significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of disease-based standard order set significantly improved efficiency. Key Words: Standard, Order sets, Emergency department, Disease, Time management. Continuous...

scholarly journals Improving patient waiting times and quality of care by arranging access to notes from a neighbouring trust

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S175-S176
Author(s):  
Georgios Basdanis ◽  
Cormac Fenton
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
North West ◽  
Time Required

AimsWe aim to improve waiting times in the Emergency Department and improve the overall quality of care of out-of-area patients by arranging for the liaison team to have access to the electronic notes system of a neighbouring trust.MethodSt Thomas’ Hospital is located in south London, right opposite the City of Westminster. As a result, approximately 20% of patients we see in mental health liaison are from that locality. Given that they belong to a different trust, we do not have access to their notes, which leads to a delay in trying to establish whether they are known to local mental health services. Often, staff are reluctant to divulge information. When information is shared, it is often late and/or incomplete. We approached the Chief Clinical Information Officer and Head of Information Governance from Central and North West London (CNWL) NHS Foundation Trust. We held weekly meetings which included both IT departments. Our IT had to install the electronic notes application (SystmOne) on our computers and open relevant firewall ports. The information is access through an NHS Smartcard, therefore CNWL had to authorise read-only Smartcard profiles for every member of the liaison team. A quick reference guide was created for all staff that would be using the new application. The system went live on 21 January 2021.ResultWe audited patient outcomes in December 2020 and February 2021 for initial comparison. In December 2020, the median time from referral to discharge was 6 hours 35 minutes. 25% of patients were admitted and 17% discharged with HTT. In February 2021, the median time from referral to discharge was 3 hours 19 minutes. 16% of patients were admitted and 5% discharged with HTT.ConclusionIt is likely that by reducing the time required for collateral information, overall waiting times in the emergency department will be reduced. Clinicians are likely to feel more confident in their discharge planning if they have access to all clinical notes and previous risk assessments, which might in turn reduce referrals to HTT or admission. There should be further attempts by neighbouring NHS trusts, especially in London, to ensure access to their electronic notes system in order to reduce waiting times and improve the quality of patient care. We have already been approached for more information by a trust in North London who are interested in establishing access to a neighbouring trust's notes.

Abstract TP377: Nurse Entered Stroke Order Sets Improve Emergency Department Metrics at a Comprehensive Stroke Center

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tawnae C Griffith ◽  
Atul Gupta ◽  
Stacey Aggabao ◽  
Raeesa Dhanji ◽  
Denise Gaffney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Contrast Ct ◽  
Order Set

Introduction: The Joint Commission has established time sensitive metrics for stroke care in the Emergency Department (ED) including door to initial physician evaluation, door to lab and CT order placement, door to lab resulted and door to CT interpretation. Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to assess if nurse entered protocolized order sets for stroke patients would help to improve these metrics. Methods: A code stroke order set was initiated independently by nursing staff upon symptom recognition in the ED. The order set included CBC, electrolyte panel, BUN, creatinine, glucose, troponin, PT/INR, aPTT, non-contrast CT head, EKG, swallow screen and continuous cardiac monitoring. Data was collected for 3 months pre and post intervention. All ED nurses were trained on order set entry and their skills were validated. Data was analyzed using a T-Test. Results: 60 patient pre and 52 post-implementation were evaluated. Door to initial physician evaluation was faster (7 mins pre vs. 5 mins post; p=0.029). Door to lab order placement was faster (8 mins pre vs. 3 mins post; p=0.038). Door to CT ordered was faster (8 mins pre vs. 6 mins post; p<0.01). Door to labs resulted was faster (32 mins pre vs. 27 mins post; p=0.01). Door to CT interpretation was faster (19 mins pre vs. 18 mins post; p=0.04). Conclusion: Implementation of nurse entered order sets can improve ED metrics for door to initial physician evaluation, door to lab and CT order placement. This subsequently led to faster interpretation of the CT scan and lab results.

scholarly journals Nurse-managed analgesia for renal colicpain in the emergency department

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Maree Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Narcotic Analgesia ◽  
Acute Renal Colic ◽  
Sustained Change

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with acute renal colic for the years 1993 and1997, in order to compare analgesia ordering and administration practices before and afterimplementation of a nurse-managed, titrated intravenous (IV) narcotic policy.The study demonstrated a significant and sustained change in analgesia administration practices awayfrom the intramuscular (IM) route in favour of the IV route. For renal colic, in 1993, 76% of patientsreceived IM narcotic analgesia compared to 3% in 1997. In contrast, IV narcotic (with or withoutadjuvant NSAID) was used in 3% of the patients in 1993 compared to 95% in 1997.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document