scholarly journals MP08: The frequency of emergency departments visits for patients with end-of-life conditions: a call for action

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S44-S45
Author(s):  
S. Kirkland ◽  
M. Kruhlak ◽  
M. Garrido Clua ◽  
C. Villa-Roel ◽  
S. Couperthwaite ◽  
...  

Introduction: An increasing number of patients with end-stage diseases present to emergency departments (EDs) for physical, spiritual, psychological and social care. The objective of this study was to identify patients with end-stage diseases with palliative care (PC) needs and document their frequency of ED visits. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in two Canadian EDs. Using a modified palliative care screening tool, volunteer ED physicians were asked to identify adult patients with end-stage, chronic conditions including cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF), cirrhosis, dementia and/or progressive central nervous system (PCNS) disease. Demographic data were collected from these tools and data regarding patients’ visits in both the 6 months prior to and 30 days following their index visits were collected from the ED Information System. Bivariate analyses were completed using Student's t and chi-square test. Results: A total of 663 patients with end-stage illness were identified; 338 (51%) were female and the median age was 76 (IQR: 63, 85). Cancer was the most common presentation (41%), followed by dementia (23%), COPD (16%), HF (9%), CKD (9%), PCNS disease (9%) and cirrhosis (7%). These patients made a total of 1277 visits in the 6 months prior to and 288 in the 30 days following the index visit. Patients presenting to the EDs with cancer (p = 0.001), cirrhosis (p = 0.005) and CKD (p = 0.03) were more likely to visit an ED in the 6 months prior to their index visit. In contrast, patients presenting with dementia (p < 0.0001) and PCNS disease (p = 0.02) were significantly less likely to present to an ED in the 6 months prior to their index visit. Patients presenting with cirrhosis or CKD had the highest average number of ED visits in the 6 months prior to their index visit (cirrhosis: 4.59 visits, SD: 3.8, p < 0.0001; CKD: 4.39 visits, SD: 3.8, p = 0.0001). Of these patients, those presenting with end-stage cirrhosis were significantly more likely to make a return visit to an ED within 30 days after their index visit (p = 0.014). Conclusion: Cancer is the most common condition for patients with end-stage, chronic illnesses in these EDs. Those presenting with cirrhosis or CKD are at a significantly higher risk of repeat visits to the EDs. This study has identified potential deficits in care and can serve as a baseline for future intervention studies.

Pneumologia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Ioana Cojocaru ◽  
Livia Luculescu ◽  
Daniela Negoescu ◽  
Irina Strâmbu

Abstract Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic bacterium than can colonise the lower intestine and cause enterocolitis in susceptible patients. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is typically a nosocomial infection, favoured by treatment with antibiotics (especially with broad-spectrum drugs), proton pump inhibitors, but also comorbidities, old age and prolonged hospitalisation. Based on the observation that in the past years, the frequency of nosocomial CDI has increased in the Institute of Pulmonology, Bucharest, this retrospective observational study aimed to analyse the characteristics of admitted patients who develop CDI, in order to identify possible particular features and risk factors. Accordingly, medical files from 80 patients admitted from January 2015 to August 2017 were analysed for demographic data, respiratory diagnosis, comorbidities, blood tests, treatments prescribed, time of CDI onset, evolution and outcome. The number of patients studied was 29 in 2015, 16 in 2016 and 35 in 2017, with slight male predominance. Totally, 54 patients (67.5%) had tuberculosis (pulmonary or pleural), 12 had lung cancer, five had respiratory infections, two had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and seven had other diseases. All patients but nine were receiving antibiotics: tuberculosis drugs, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams. About half of the patients received proton pump inhibitors. Most patients had several comorbidities. Mean time since admittance to onset of diarrhoea was 20 days. CDI was treated with metronidazole or vancomycin. The evolution was favourable in 90% of patients, but eight patients (10%) died This study highlights a high frequency of CDI in patients treated for tuberculosis. Due to insufficient data, no epidemiological consideration could be made. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship among tuberculosis, tuberculosis treatment and CDI.


Author(s):  
Linh My Thi Nguyen

Patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience high symptom burden due to severe dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, disability, and social isolation, resulting in poor quality of life. The caregiving burden for the family is also severe. Despite high symptom burden, because of limited access and difficulty with prognostication, the quality of care for patients with end-stage COPD who receive palliative care compares poorly to the care received by patients with cancer, and the proportion of COPD patients who receive palliative care is much lower than that of cancer patients. Therefore, patients with COPD receive less palliative care and die following more aggressive treatments at the end of life compared to patients with lung cancer, despite having the same preferences for palliative care. This chapter discusses the key issues related to end-stage COPD, including symptom assessment, management, and hospice eligibility.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veerawat Phongtankuel ◽  
Lauren Meador ◽  
Ronald D. Adelman ◽  
Jordan Roberts ◽  
Charles R. Henderson ◽  
...  

Background: Many patients live with serious chronic or terminal illnesses. Multicomponent palliative care interventions have been increasingly utilized in patient care; however, it is unclear what is being implemented and who is delivering these interventions. Objectives: To (1) describe the delivery of multicomponent palliative care interventions, (2) characterize the disciplines delivering care, (3) identify the components being implemented, and (4) analyze whether the number of disciplines or components being implemented are associated with positive outcomes. Design: Systematic review. Study Selection: English-language articles analyzing multicomponent palliative care interventions. Outcomes Measured: Delivery of palliative interventions by discipline, components of palliative care implemented, and number of positive outcomes (eg, pain, quality of life). Results: Our search strategy yielded 71 articles, which detailed 64 unique multicomponent palliative care interventions. Nurses (n = 64, 88%) were most often involved in delivering care, followed by physicians (n = 43, 67%), social workers (n = 33, 52%), and chaplains (n = 19, 30%). The most common palliative care components patients received were symptom management (n = 56, 88%), psychological support/counseling (n = 52, 81%), and disease education (n = 48, 75%). Statistical analysis did not uncover an association between number of disciplines or components and positive outcomes. Conclusions: While there has been growth in multicomponent palliative care interventions over the past 3 decades, important aspects require additional study such as better inclusion of key groups (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, minorities, older adults); incorporating core components of palliative care (eg, interdisciplinary team, integrating caregivers, providing spiritual support); and developing ways to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that can be readily replicated and disseminated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Maric ◽  
Dragana Jovanovic ◽  
Ljudmila Nagorni-Obradovic ◽  
Mihailo Stjepanovic ◽  
Darija Kisic-Tepavcevic ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjective:Under conditions in which palliative care has not yet become part of clinical practice, the differences in palliative care needs between patients with cancer and other life-limiting diseases can yield knowledge that will be very valuable for future planning. The aim of our investigation was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and those with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Belgrade, Serbia. We also evaluated the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors on HRQoL for both patient groups.Method:This cross-sectional study included 100 NSCLC patients (stages IIIb and IV) and 100 patients with stage IV COPD. Measures included the SF-36 questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ–C30, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Associations of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors with QoL were examined using linear regression analyses.Results:The COPD group scored significantly lower compared to NSCLC patients in all SF-36 domains except for bodily pain. Additionally, a significantly higher level of depressive symptoms was observed in COPD patients. A worse physical QoL for COPD patients was independently associated with a longer duration of unemployment, a lack of wage earning, lower Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores, and higher levels of depression. A worse mental QoL for COPD patients was related to a longer duration of disease, poorer KPS scores, and higher BDI scores. The independent variables significantly associated with worse physical and mental QoL of NSCLC patients were lower KPS and higher BDI scores.Significance of Results:A worse QoL, a significantly higher level of depressive symptoms, and adverse socioeconomic status in the COPD group imposes the need for development of more intensive psychosocial and community support for COPD patients during implementation of palliative care.


Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Christos Kyriakopoulos ◽  
Athena Gogali ◽  
Konstantinos Exarchos ◽  
Dimitrios Potonos ◽  
Konstantinos Tatsis ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> During the first COVID-19 wave, a considerable decline in hospital admissions was observed worldwide. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess if there were any changes in the number of patients hospitalized for respiratory diseases in Greece during the first CO­VID-19 wave. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In the present study, we evaluated respiratory disease hospitalization rates across 9 tertiary hospitals in Greece during the study period (March–April 2020) and the corresponding period of the 2 previous years (2018–2019) that served as the control periods. Demographic data and discharge diagnosis were documented for every patient. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1,307 patients who were hospitalized during the study period, 444 (35.5%) were males with a mean (±SD) age of 66.1 ± 16.6 years. There was a 47 and 46% reduction in all-cause respiratory morbidity compared to the corresponding periods of 2018 and 2019, respectively. The mean incidence rate for respiratory diseases during the study period was 21.4 admissions per day, and this rate was significantly lower than the rate during the same period in 2018 (40.8 admissions per day; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.491–0.562; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) or the rate during 2019 (39.9 admissions per day; IRR, 0.537; 95% CI, 0.502–0.574; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The greatest reductions (%) in the number of daily admissions in 2020 were observed for sleep apnoea (87% vs. 2018 and 84% vs. 2019) followed by admissions for asthma (76% vs. 2018 and 79% vs. 2019) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (60% vs. 2018 and 51% vs. 2019), while the lowest reductions were detected in hospitalizations for pulmonary embolism (6% vs. 2018 and 23% vs. 2019) followed by tuberculosis (25% vs. both 2018 and 2019). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The significant reduction in respiratory admissions in 2020 raises the reasonable question of whether some patients may have avoided seeking medical attention during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests an urgent need for transformation of healthcare systems during the pandemic to offer appropriate management of respiratory diseases other than COVID-19.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e025692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corita R Grudzen ◽  
Deborah J Shim ◽  
Abigail M Schmucker ◽  
Jeanne Cho ◽  
Keith S Goldfeld

IntroductionEmergency department (ED)-initiated palliative care has been shown to improve patient-centred outcomes in older adults with serious, life-limiting illnesses. However, the optimal modality for providing such interventions is unknown. This study aims to compare nurse-led telephonic case management to specialty outpatient palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness on: (1) quality of life in patients; (2) healthcare utilisation; (3) loneliness and symptom burden and (4) caregiver strain, caregiver quality of life and bereavement.Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled trial in ED patients comparing two established models of palliative care: nurse-led telephonic case management and specialty, outpatient palliative care. We will enrol 1350 patients aged 50+ years and 675 of their caregivers across nine EDs. Eligible patients: (1) have advanced cancer (metastatic solid tumour) or end-stage organ failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, end-stage renal disease with glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/m2, or global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease stage III, IV or oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); (2) speak English; (3) are scheduled for ED discharge or observation status; (4) reside locally; (5) have a working telephone and (6) are insured. Patients will be excluded if they: (1) have dementia; (2) have received hospice care or two or more palliative care visits in the last 6 months or (3) reside in a long-term care facility. We will use patient-level block randomisation, stratified by ED site and disease. Effectiveness will be compared by measuring the impact of each intervention on the specified outcomes. The primary outcome will measure change in patient quality of life.Ethics and disseminationInstitutional Review Board approval was obtained at all study sites. Trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03325985; Pre-results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giti Nadim ◽  
Christian B. Laursen ◽  
Pia I. Pietersen ◽  
Daniel Wittrock ◽  
Michael K. Sørensen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Crowding of the emergency departments is an increasing problem. Many patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often treated in the emergency departments for a very short period before discharged to their homes. It is possible that this treatment could take place in the patients’ homes with sufficient diagnostics supporting the treatment. In an effort to keep the diagnostics and treatment of some of these patients in their homes and thus to reduce the patient load at the emergency departments, we implemented a prehospital treat-and-release strategy based on ultrasonography and blood testing performed by emergency medical technicians (EMT) or paramedics (PM) in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Method EMTs and PMs were enrolled in a six-hour educational program covering ultrasonography of the lungs and point of care blood tests. During the seasonal peak of COPD exacerbations (October 2018 – May 2019) all patients who were treated by the ambulance crews for respiratory insufficiency were screened in the ambulances. If the patient had uncomplicated COPD not requiring immediate transport to the hospital, ultrasonographic examination of the lungs, measurements of C-reactive protein and venous blood gases analyses were performed. The response to the initial treatment and the results obtained were discussed via telemedical consultation with a prehospital anaesthesiologist who then decided to either release the patient at the scene or to have the patient transported to the hospital. The primary outcome was strategy feasibility. Results We included 100 EMTs and PMs in the study. During the study period, 771 patients with respiratory insufficiency were screened. Uncomplicated COPD was rare as only 41patients were treated according to the treat-and-release strategy. Twenty of these patients (49%) were released at the scene. In further ten patients, technical problems were encountered hindering release at the scene. Conclusion In a few selected patients with suspected acute exacerbations of COPD, it was technically and organisationally feasible for EMTs and PMs to perform prehospital POCT-ultrasound and laboratory testing and release the patients following treatment. None of the patients released at the scene requested a secondary ambulance within the first 48 h following the intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document