scholarly journals LO03: Application and usefulness of outpatient cardiac testing among emergency department patients with syncope

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S28
Author(s):  
O. Cook ◽  
M.A. Mukarram ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
K. Arcot ◽  
M. Taljaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Cardiac Testing

Introduction: 2.6% of emergency department (ED) syncope patients will have underlying cardiac serious conditions (e.g. arrhythmia, serious structural heart disease) identified within 30-days of disposition. If those at risk are discharged home, outpatient cardiac testing can detect underlying arrhythmias and structural heart disease, and thereby improve patient safety. We describe the frequency of outpatient referrals for cardiac testing and the proportion of cardiac serious adverse events (SAE) among high risk and non-high (low and medium) risk ED syncope patients, as defined by the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS). Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to enroll adult syncope patients across five large tertiary care EDs. We collected demographics, medical history, disposition, CSRS value, outpatient referrals and testing results (holter, echocardiography), and cardiac SAE. Adjudicated 30-day SAE included death due to unknown cause, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and structural heart disease. We used descriptive analysis. Results: Of 4,064 enrolled patients, a total of 955 patients (23%) received an outpatient referral (mean age 57.7 years, 52.1% female). Of the 299 patients (7%) hospitalized, 154 received outpatient cardiac testing after discharge. Among the 3,765 patients discharged home from the ED, 40% of the non-high risk patients (305/756) and 56% of the high risk patients (25/45) received outpatient cardiac testing. Of all patients who received outpatient cardiac testing, 4 patients (0.8%) had serious cardiac conditions identified and all were arrhythmias. Among those with no cardiac testing, 5 patients (0.9%) suffered cardiac SAE (80% arrhythmias) outside the hospital. Of the 20 (44%) high risk patients who did not receive outpatient cardiac testing, 2 (10%) patients suffered arrhythmias outside the hospital. While among the 451 non-high risk patients, only 0.8% suffered arrhythmia outside the hospital. Conclusion: Outpatient cardiac testing among ED syncope patients is largely underutilized, especially among high risk patients. Better guidelines for outpatient cardiac testing are needed, as current practice is highly variable and mismatched with patient risk.

Application of outpatient cardiac testing among emergency department patients with syncope

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 486-491
Author(s):  
Olivia G Cook ◽  
Muhammad A Mukarram ◽  
Soo-Min Kim ◽  
Kirtana Arcot ◽  
Marie-Joe Nemnom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Medium Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
Cardiac Testing

Objectives2.6% of ED syncope patients will suffer cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30 days of disposition, and outpatient cardiac testing can improve patient safety. The objective is to determine whether outpatient cardiac testing for ED syncope patients is being appropriately ordered after discharge. To this end, we describe the proportion of high-risk and non-high (low and medium)-risk ED syncope patients as per the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) who have a SAE after ED discharge, and the proportion referred for outpatient cardiac testing.MethodsOur multicentre prospective cohort study enrolled adult syncope patients between 2010 and 2014 in five academic EDs. We collected patient characteristics, disposition, CSRS predictors, outpatient referrals and testing results (Holter, echocardiography), and 30-day adjudicated SAE (death due to unknown/cardiac cause, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia and structural heart disease). We used descriptive statistics (mean, SD) to report our results.ResultsOf 3584 enrolled patients (mean age 50.9 years, 57.7% women), 800 patients (22.3%) received an outpatient referral. Of these 800 patients, 40.3% of the non-high-risk patients (305/756) and 54.5% of the high-risk patients (24/44) received outpatient cardiac testing. Of all patients who received cardiac testing, five (1.5%; 95% CI 0.6% to 3.5%) suffered outpatient SAE (60.0% arrhythmias). Of all patients who did not receive cardiac testing, four patients (0.9%; 95% CI 0.3% to 2.2%) suffered SAE (all arrhythmias). Of the 20 (45.5%) high-risk patients who did not receive testing, two patients (10.0%; 95% CI 2.8% to 30.1%) suffered arrhythmias outside the hospital, while among the 451 (59.7%) non-high-risk patients, only two (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.6%) suffered outpatient arrhythmias.ConclusionOutpatient cardiac testing is largely underused, especially among high-risk ED syncope patients. Better guidelines for outpatient cardiac testing are needed, as the practice is highly variable and mismatched with patient risk.

scholarly journals Implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program in routine emergency department care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Blomaard ◽  
Bas de Groot ◽  
Jacinta A. Lucke ◽  
Jelle de Gelder ◽  
Anja M. Booijen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Older Patient ◽  
Hospital Admission Rate ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. Methods We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. Results Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). Conclusion Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles.

scholarly journals Hepatitis C Virus Screening of High-Risk Patients in a Canadian Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kelsey Ragan ◽  
Anjali Pandya ◽  
Tristan Holotnak ◽  
Katrina Koger ◽  
Neil Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hcv Screening

Background. Approximately 0.7% of the Canadian population is infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and many individuals are unaware of their infection. Our objectives were to utilize an emergency department (ED) based point-of-care (POC) HCV screening test to describe our local population and estimate the proportion of high-risk patients in our population with undiagnosed HCV. Methods. A convenience sample of medically stable patients (≥18 years) presenting to a community ED in Calgary, AB, between April and July 2018 underwent rapid clinical screening for HCV risk factors, including history of injection drug use, healthcare in endemic countries, and other recognized criteria. High-risk patients were offered POC HCV testing. Antibody-positive patients underwent HCV-RNA testing and were linked to hepatology care. The primary outcome was the proportion of new HCV diagnoses in the high-risk population. Results. Of the 999 patients screened by survey, 247 patients (24.7%) were high-risk and eligible for testing. Of these, 123 (49.8%) were from HCV-endemic countries, while 63 (25.5%) and 31 (12.6%) patients endorsed a history of incarceration and intravenous drug use (IVDU), respectively. A total of 144 (58.3%) eligible patients agreed to testing. Of these, 6 patients were POC-positive (4.2%, CI 0.9–7.4%); all 6 had antibodies detected on confirmatory lab testing and 4 had detectable HCV-RNA viral loads in follow-up. Notably, 103 (41.7%) patients declined POC testing. Interpretation. Among 144 high-risk patients who agreed to testing, the rate of undiagnosed HCV infection was 4.2%, and the rate of undiagnosed HCV infection with detectable viral load was 2.8%. Many patients with high-risk clinical criteria refused POC testing. It is unknown if tested and untested groups have the same disease prevalence. This study shows that ED HCV screening is feasible and that a small number of previously undiagnosed patients can be identified and linked to potentially life-changing care.

scholarly journals LO89: A multi-disciplinary quality improvement project to improve adherence to best practice guidelines for emergency department patients with transient ischemic attack

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
A. Verma ◽  
A. Kapoor ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
N. Kujbid ◽  
K. Si ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Canadian Stroke Guidelines recommend that Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) patients at highest risk of stroke recurrence should undergo immediate vascular imaging. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck is recommended over carotid doppler because it allows for enhanced visualization of the intracranial and posterior circulation vasculature. Imaging while patients are in the emergency department (ED) is optimal for high-risk patients because the risk of stroke recurrence is highest in the first 48 hours. Aim Statement: At our hospital, a designated stroke centre, less than 5% of TIA patients meet national recommendations by undergoing CTA in the ED. We sought to increase the rate of CTA in high risk ED TIA patients from less than 5% to at least 80% in 10 months. Measures & Design: We used a multi-faceted approach to improve our adherence to guidelines including: 1) education for staff ED physicians; 2) agreements between ED and radiology to facilitate rapid access to CTA; 3) agreements between ED and neurology for consultations regarding patients with abnormal CTA; and 4) the creation of an electronic decision support tool to guide ED physicians as to which patients require CTA. We measured the rate of CTA in high risk patients biweekly using retrospective chart review of patients referred to the TIA clinic from the ED on a biweekly basis. As a balancing measure, we also measured the rate of CTA in non-high risk patients. Evaluation/Results: Data collection is ongoing. An interim run chart at 19 weeks shows a complete shift above the median after implementation, with CTA rates between 70 and 100%. At the time of submission, we had no downward trends below 80%, showing sustained improvement. The CTA rate in non-high risk patients did also increase. Disucssion/Impact: After 19 weeks of our intervention, 112 (78.9%) of high risk TIA patients had a CTA, compared to 10 (9.8%) in the 19 weeks prior to our intervention. On average, 10-15% of high risk patients will have an identifiable lesion on CTA, leading to immediate change in management (at minimum, an inpatient consultation with neurology). Our multi-faceted approach could be replicated in any ED with the engagement and availability of the same multi-disciplinary team (ED, radiology, and neurology), access to CTA, and electronic orders.

scholarly journals Negative D-dimer testing excludes pulmonary embolism in non-high risk patients in the emergency department

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Harringa ◽  
Rebecca L. Bracken ◽  
Scott K. Nagle ◽  
Mark L. Schiebler ◽  
Michael S. Pulia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
D Dimer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document