scholarly journals Creating opioid dependence in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneel Upadhye
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Clinical Question ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

Clinical questionWhat is the risk of creating opioid dependence from an ED opioid prescription?Article chosenBarnett ML, Olenski AR, Jena AB. Opioid-prescribing patterns of emergency physicians and risk of long-term use. N Engl J Med 2017;376:663-73, doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1610524.ObjectiveThis study examined the risk of creating long-term opioid dependence from a prescription written in an opioid-naive patient in the ED.

scholarly journals P113: Examining emergency physicians’ self-reported opioid prescribing practices for the treatment of acute pain: A Newfoundland perspective

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S105-S106
Author(s):  
P. Doran ◽  
G. Sheppard ◽  
B. Metcalfe
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Introduction: Canadians are the second largest consumers of prescription opioids per capita in the world. Emergency physicians tend to prescribe stronger and larger quantities of opioids, while family physicians write the most opioid prescriptions overall. These practices have been shown to precipitate future dependence, toxicity and the need for hospitalization. Despite this emerging evidence, there is a paucity of research on emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices in Canada. The objectives of this study were to describe our local emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing patterns both in the emergency department and upon discharge, and to explore factors that impact their prescribing decisions. Methods: Emergency physicians from two urban, adult emergency departments in St. John's, Newfoundland were anonymously surveyed using a web-based survey tool. All 42 physicians were invited to participate via email during the six-week study period and reminders were sent at weeks two and four. Results: A total of 21 participants responded to the survey. Over half of respondents (57.14%) reported that they “often” prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department, and an equal number of respondents reported doing so “sometimes” at discharge. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported most commonly prescribing intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department, and over thirty-five percent reported most commonly prescribing oral morphine upon discharge. Patient age and risk of misuse were the most frequently cited factors that influenced respondents’ prescribing decisions. Only 4 of the 22 respondents reported using evidence-based guidelines to tailor their opioid prescribing practices, while an overwhelming majority (80.95%) believe there is a need for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for the treatment of acute pain. Sixty percent of respondents completed additional training in safe opioid prescribing, yet less than half of respondents (42.86%) felt they could help to mitigate the opioid crisis by prescribing fewer opioids in the emergency department. Conclusion: Emergency physicians frequently prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain and new evidence suggests that this practice can lead to significant morbidity. While further research is needed to better understand emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices, our findings support the need for evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute pain to ensure patient safety.

scholarly journals SP7.1.8 Routine use of opioids for post-operative pain in opioid naïve patient can risk long term dependence

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Majeed ◽  
Simon Mcgurk ◽  
Jeremy Wilson ◽  
Conor Magee
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Aims and Objectives Aim of our study was to evaluate the current practices of prescribing opioids for post-operative pain in opioid-naive patients in our region and the risk of prolonged opioid use among them. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed where cohort consisted of patients who had surgery in 2018 with at least one year follow up. Endpoints were the proportion of all patients and opioid naïve patients, discharged on opioid prescription and proportion of opioid naïve patients who developed opioid dependence after one year. Results During 2018, 17524 patients underwent a total of 20526 surgical procedures by pan surgical specialties in our hospitals. 8772 patients (50%) were discharged with opioid prescription. 673 (7.70%) of those required further opiate prescriptions after discharge, of those requiring opiates, 331 had no opiate exposure before surgery (342 had previous opiate exposure). In opioid naïve patients, at 1 year follow up 151 (45%) had no further opiate prescriptions, but 180 (55%) required ongoing opiate prescriptions after one year follow up. The risk of opioid dependence after surgery is significant in opioid naïve patients. Conclusion Results are alarming and evidence-based strategies, national and local guidelines are needed to prevent the opioid crisis in the UK. There is a need for a national campaign to minimize the dependence on opioids and to find, better alternatives to opioids.

scholarly journals Opioid-Prescribing Patterns of Emergency Physicians and Risk of Long-Term Use

2017 ◽  
Vol 376 (7) ◽  
pp. 663-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Barnett ◽  
Andrew R. Olenski ◽  
Anupam B. Jena
Keyword(s):  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

scholarly journals MP35: Targeting the opioid crisis by influencing opioid prescribing in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S55-S55
Author(s):  
D. Shelton ◽  
V. Teo ◽  
K. Ding ◽  
D. Hefferon
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Electronic Prescription ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Crisis ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Discharged Patients

Background: Liberal prescribing of opioids is a major contributing factor to the opioid crisis. Patients who take opioids for >5 consecutive days are at greater risk of long-term use. Evidence shows that significantly more opioids are prescribed for emergency department (ED) patients with acute pain compared to amounts consumed. Guidelines recommend prescribing a 3-day supply or 10-15 tablets of opioids for patients with acute pain Aim Statement: By January 2020, >70% of opioid prescriptions from our ED will be for <15 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents. Measures & Design: Emergency physicians were educated on best practice of prescribing opioids for discharged patients. An electronic prescription writer was built for discharged ED patients with a pop-up reminder for quantities >15 tablets (indicating a recommended quantity of 10-15 tablets) and a pop-up reminder for quantities >30 tablets (indicating a maximum quantity of 30 tablets and recommended quantity). A feature was built to auto-populate a prescription for morphine 5 mg po q4h prn x 10 tablets to facilitate adherence to guidelines. Outcome Measure % opioid prescriptions for <15 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents Process Measure Amount of opioids prescribed for discharged ED patients, measured as morphine 5 mg equivalents Number of opioid prescriptions for >30 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents Balancing Measure Number of patients that return to ED within 7 days and receive a repeat opioid prescription. Evaluation/Results: Prior to implementation of the electronic prescription writer a sample audit revealed that 50% of opioid prescriptions were written for <15 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents. For the first three quarters of 2019, 62%, 61% and 69% of opioid prescriptions were written for <15 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents. Only two prescriptions during the study period were for >30 tablets of morphine 5 mg equivalents. An average number of 7 patients per quarter were given a repeat opioid prescription during a return ED visit. Discussion/Impact: We were successful in influencing emergency physicians to prescribe fewer opioids to discharged patients. This has the potential to avoid converting ED patients with acute pain into long-term opioid users and to avoid the diversion of unused opioid tablets.

Opioid crisis in primary care? An audit of high-dose opioid prescribing at Bangholm GP Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711581
Author(s):  
Charlotte Greene ◽  
Alice Pearson
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines

BackgroundOpioids are effective analgesics for acute and palliative pain, but there is no evidence base for long-term pain relief. They also carry considerable risks such as overdose and dependence. Despite this, they are increasingly prescribed for chronic pain. In the UK, opioid prescribing more than doubled between 1998 and 2018.AimAn audit at Bangholm GP Practice to understand the scale of high-strength opioid prescribing. The aim of the audit was to find out if indications, length of prescription, discussion, and documentation at initial consultation and review process were consistent with best-practice guidelines.MethodA search on Scottish Therapeutics Utility for patients prescribed an average daily dose of opioid equivalent ≥50 mg morphine between 1 July 2019 and 1 October 2019, excluding methadone, cancer pain, or palliative prescriptions. The Faculty of Pain Medicine’s best-practice guidelines were used.ResultsDemographics: 60 patients (37 females), average age 62, 28% registered with repeat opioid prescription, 38% comorbid depression. Length of prescription: average 6 years, 57% >5 years, 22% >10 years. Opioid: 52% tramadol, 23% on two opioids. Indications: back pain (42%), osteoarthritis (12%), fibromyalgia (10%). Initial consultation: 7% agreed outcomes, 35% follow-up documented. Review: 56% 4-week, 70% past year.ConclusionOpioid prescribing guidelines are not followed. The significant issues are: long-term prescriptions for chronic pain, especially back pain; new patients registering with repeat prescriptions; and no outcomes of treatment agreed, a crucial message is the goal is pain management rather than relief. Changes have been introduced at the practice: a patient information sheet, compulsory 1-month review for new patients on opioids, and in-surgery pain referrals.

scholarly journals Opioid prescription practices for patients discharged from the emergency department with acute musculoskeletal fractures

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-493
Author(s):  
Garrick Mok ◽  
Hailey Newton ◽  
Lisa Thurgur ◽  
Marie-Joe Nemnom ◽  
Ian G. Stiell
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Prescription Data ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Total Dosage ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Prescription Practices ◽  
Ed Visits

ABSTRACTBackgroundOpioid related mortality rate has increased 200% over the past decade. Studies show variable emergency department (ED) opioid prescription practices and a correlation with increased long-term use. ED physicians may be contributing to this problem. Our objective was to analyze ED opioid prescription practices for patients with acute fractures.MethodsWe conducted a review of ED patients seen at two campuses of a tertiary care hospital. We evaluated a consecutive sample of patients with acute fractures (January 2016–April 2016) seen by ED physicians. Patients admitted or discharged by consultant services were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged with an opioid prescription. Data were collected using screening lists, electronic records, and interobserver agreement. We calculated simple descriptive statistics and a multivariable analysis.ResultsWe enrolled 816 patients, including 441 females (54.0%). Most common fracture was wrist/hand (35.2%). 260 patients (31.8%) were discharged with an opioid; hydromorphone (N = 115, range 1–120 mg) was most common. 35 patients (4.3%) had pain related ED visits <1 month after discharge. Fractures of the lumbar spine (OR 10.78 [95% CI: 3.15–36.90]) and rib(s)/sternum/thoracic spine (OR 5.46 [95% CI: 2.88–10.35)] had a significantly higher likelihood of opioid prescriptions.ConclusionsThe majority of patients presenting to the ED with acute fractures were not discharged with an opioid. Hydromorphone was the most common opioid prescribed, with large variations in total dosage. Overall, there were few return to ED visits. We recommend standardization of ED opioid prescribing, with attention to limiting total dosage.

scholarly journals Opioid Prescribing Patterns for Low Back Pain Among Commercially Insured Children

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tej D Azad ◽  
Michael D Harries ◽  
Daniel Vail ◽  
Yi Jonathan Zhang ◽  
John K Ratliff
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

Abstract INTRODUCTION Low back pain (LBP) may affect up to 20% of the pediatric population. No specific guidelines exist regarding pharmacotherapy for acute LBP in the pediatric population. Given this observation and the lack of data available regarding pharmacotherapy for pediatric LBP, we sought to characterize patterns of opioid prescribing in the pediatric population. METHODS We used a national database to identify pediatric patients (age 5-17) with newly diagnosed with LBP between 2008 and 2015 who did not have a red flag diagnosis, had not received an opioid prescription in the 6 mo prior to diagnosis, and had 12-mo of continuous enrollment after diagnosis. We used logistic regression to model the association between sex, geographic region, categorical age, and our primary outcome, receipt of an opioid prescription in the year following diagnosis. RESULTS Our sample included 268 228 opioid-naïve pediatric patients diagnosed with LBP between 2008 and 2015. We observed that 47 631 (17.8%) patients received physical therapy, 29 903 (11.2%) patients received chiropractic manipulative therapy, 658 (0.25%) patients received epidural steroid injection, and 281 (0.10%) patients received surgery. A total of 35 274 (13.2%) pediatric LBP patients were prescribed opioids within 12 mo from their diagnosis. Opioid prescribing decreased in all age groups over the study period age group 5 to 9 decreased from 4.2% to 2.7%, age group 10 to 14 decreased from 10.3% to 7.7%, and age group 15 to 18 yr decreased from 20.9% to 17.1%. Female pediatric patients were more likely than male patients to receive an opioid prescription (OR, 1.12, P < .0001). Patients ages 10 to 14 (OR, 2.89, P < .0001) and 15 to 18 (OR, 6.98, P < .0001) were significantly more likely to be prescribed opioids compared to patients in the youngest age group. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, we report the first observational cohort study of opioids and LBP in the pediatric population. Our findings indicate that opioids are being used for newly diagnosed LBP and receipt of opioids are associated with patient demographic factors.

scholarly journals MP58: Have opioid prescription by emergency physicians changed significantly over five years?

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
M. Wei ◽  
M. Da Silva ◽  
J. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Undetermined Etiology

Introduction: It is believed by some that emergency physicians prescribe more opioids than required to manage patients’ pain, and this may contribute to opioid misuse. The objective of our study was to assess if there has been a change in opioid prescribing practices by emergency physicians over time for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Methods: A medical record review for adult patients presenting at two urban academic tertiary care emergency departments was conducted for two distinct time periods; the years of 2012 and 2017. The first 500 patients within each time period with a discharge diagnosis of “abdominal pain” or “abdominal pain not yet diagnosed” were included. Data were collected regarding analgesia received in the emergency department and opioid prescriptions written. Opioids were standardized into morphine equivalent doses to compare quantities of opioids prescribed. Analyses included t-test for continuous and chi-square for categorical data. Results: 1,000 patients were included in our study. The mean age was 42.0 years and 69.6% of patients were female. Comparing 2017 to 2012, there was a non-significant decrease in opioid prescriptions written for patients discharged directly by emergency physicians, from 17.8% to 14.4% (p = 0.14). Mean opioid quantities per prescription decreased from 130.4 milligrams of morphine equivalents per prescription to 98.9 milligrams per prescription (p = 0.002). 13.9% of opioid prescriptions in 2017 were for more than 3 days, which is a decrease from 28.1% in 2012. During the emergency department care, there was an increase in foundational analgesia use prior to initiating opioids from 17.6% to 26.8% (p = 0.001). There was also a decrease for within ED opioid analgesia use from 40.0% to 32.8% (p = 0.018). Conclusion: Opioid prescription rates did not change significantly during our study. However, physicians reduced the quantity of opioids per prescription and used less opioid analgesia in the emergency department for abdominal pain of undetermined etiology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document