scholarly journals P131: Risk factors for recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S122 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Yan ◽  
K. Gushulak ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
A. Hamelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Protective Factors ◽  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Initial Presentation ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus may present repeatedly to the emergency department (ED) for management and treatment of hyperglycemic episodes, including diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors that predict unplanned recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes within 30 days of initial presentation. Methods: We conducted a one-year health records review of patients ≥18 years presenting to one of four tertiary care EDs with a discharge diagnosis of hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Trained research personnel collected data on patient characteristics and determined if patients had an unplanned recurrent ED visit for hyperglycemia within 30 days of their initial presentation. Multivariate logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations to account for patients with multiple visits determined predictor variables independently associated with recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia within 30 days. Results: There were 833 ED visits for hyperglycemia in the one-year period. 54.6% were male and mean (SD) age was 48.8 (19.5). Of all visitors, 156 (18.7%) had a recurrent ED visit for hyperglycemia within 30 days. Factors independently associated with recurrent hyperglycemia visits included a previous hyperglycemia visit in the past month (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-5.8), age <25 years (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.7), glucose >20 mmol/L (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.7), having a family physician (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.6), and being on insulin (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). Having a systolic blood pressure between 90-150 mmHg (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93) and heart rate >110 bpm (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.72) were protective factors independently associated with not having a recurrent hyperglycemia visit. Conclusion: This unique ED-based study reports five risk factors and two protective factors associated with recurrent ED visits for hyperglycemia within 30 days in patients with diabetes. These risk factors should be considered by clinicians when making management, prognostic, and disposition decisions for diabetic patients who present with hyperglycemia.

scholarly journals Risk factors for recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Yan ◽  
Katherine M. Gushulak ◽  
Melanie P. Columbus ◽  
Kristine van Aarsen ◽  
Alexandra L. Hamelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

scholarly journals Sentinel visits in emergency department patients with diabetes mellitus as a warning sign for hyperglycemic emergencies

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Yan ◽  
Katherine M. Gushulak ◽  
Melanie P. Columbus ◽  
Alexandra L. Hamelin ◽  
George A. Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Warning Sign ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Discharge Instructions ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State

ABSTRACTObjectivesPatients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus may have a sentinel emergency department (ED) visit for a precipitating condition prior to presenting for a hyperglycemic emergency, such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS). This study’s objective was to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with a sentinel ED visit prior to their hyperglycemic emergency visit.MethodsThis was a 1-year health records review of patients≥18 years old presenting to one of four tertiary care EDs with a discharge diagnosis of hyperglycemia, DKA, or HHS. Trained research personnel collected data on patient characteristics, management, disposition, and determined whether patients came to the ED within the 14 days prior to their hyperglycemia visit. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.ResultsOf 833 visits for hyperglycemia, 142 (17.0%; 95% CI: 14.5% to 19.6%) had a sentinel ED presentation within the preceding 14 days. Mean (SD) age was 50.5 (19.0) years and 54.4% were male; 104 (73.2%) were discharged from this initial visit, and 98/104 (94.2%) were discharged either without their glucose checked or with an elevated blood glucose (>11.0 mmol/L). Of the sentinel visits, 93 (65.5%) were for hyperglycemia and 22 (15.5%) for infection. Upon returning to the ED, 61/142 (43.0%) were admitted for severe hyperglycemia, DKA, or HHS.ConclusionIn this unique ED-based study, diabetic patients with a sentinel ED visit often returned and required subsequent admission for hyperglycemia. Clinicians should be vigilant in checking blood glucose and provide clear discharge instructions for follow-up and glucose management to prevent further hyperglycemic emergencies from occurring.

Preoperative Assessment of the Patient with Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean A. Josephs ◽  
Gretchen A. Lemmink
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Key Words Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Key Words Diabetes ◽  
Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.  Nearly 30 million Americans have diabetes, more than 25% of which are undiagnosed. Patients with diabetes have multiple problems that should be addressed prior to surgery. They often have uncontrolled glucose levels that should be treated preoperatively. Current studies suggest that outcomes may be improved if perioperative glycemic control is optimized. Patients with diabetes develop end-organ dysfunction that can complicate perioperative management. Preoperative assessment of cardiac, neurologic, vascular, and renal function is necessary for all patients with diabetes that undergo major surgery. Optimization of cardiac disease in particular can reduce major adverse cardiac events for patients with risk factors such as diabetes. Diabetic patients can occasionally present for major surgery with hyperglycemic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. These conditions require urgent treatment to prevent mortality regardless of the need for surgery. This article reviews the preoperative assessment and management of these issues. This review contains 1 figure, 4 tables, and 37 references. Key Words: diabetes mellitus (DM), end-organ damage, hyperglycemia, polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, perioperative glycemic management, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS), perioperative cardiac risk factors

scholarly journals Patofisiologi dan Diagnosis Penurunan Kesadaran pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus

Medicinus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Huang
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Lactic Acidosis ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Loss Of Consciousness ◽  
History Taking ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State

<p><em>Loss of consciousness (LOC) is a clinical presentation of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in emergency department which is caused by complications of the disease. Diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, lactic acidosis, uremic encephalopathy, and hypoglycemia are the several main causes of LOC in patients with DM.  The comprehension of pathophysiology of LOC in patients with DM will be helpful in making accurate diagnosis. History taking, physical examination, and laboratory tests are essential in diagnosing that particular condition. </em></p><p><strong><em>Key Words:</em></strong><em> loss of consciousness, diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemic crisis, hypoglycemia</em></p>

Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2271-PUB
Author(s):  
ASAKO MIZOGUCHI
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

scholarly journals Emergency Department Visits During Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: A Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S333-S334
Author(s):  
So Lim Kim ◽  
Angela Everett ◽  
Susan J Rehm ◽  
Steven Gordon ◽  
Nabin Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Access Complications

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) carries risk of vascular access complications, antimicrobial adverse effects, and worsening of infection. Both OPAT-related and unrelated events may lead to emergency department (ED) visits. The purpose of this study was to describe adverse events that result in ED visits and risk factors associated with ED visits during OPAT. Methods OPAT courses between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 at Cleveland Clinic were identified from the institution’s OPAT registry. ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation were reviewed. Reasons and potential risk factors for ED visits were sought in the medical record. Results Among 11,440 OPAT courses during the study period, 603 (5%) were associated with 1 or more ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation. Mean patient age was 58 years and 57% were males. 379 ED visits (49%) were OPAT-related; the most common visit reason was vascular access complication, which occurred in 211 (56%) of OPAT-related ED visits. The most common vascular access complications were occlusion and dislodgement, which occurred in 99 and 34 patients (47% and 16% of vascular access complications, respectively). In a multivariable logistic regression model, at least one prior ED visit in the preceding year (prior ED visit) was most strongly associated with one or more ED visits during an OPAT course (OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.38 – 3.71, p-value &lt; 0.001). Other significant factors were younger age (p 0.01), female sex (p 0.01), home county residence (P &lt; 0.001), and having a PICC (p 0.05). 549 ED visits (71%) resulted in discharge from the ED within 24 hours, 18 (2%) left against medical advice, 46 (6%) were observed up to 24 hours, and 150 ED visits (20%) led to hospital admission. Prior ED visit was not associated with hospital admission among patients who visited the ED during OPAT. Conclusion OPAT-related ED visits are most often due to vascular access complications, especially line occlusions. Patients with a prior ED visit in the preceding year have a 3-fold higher odds of at least one ED visit during OPAT compared with patients without a prior ED visit. A strategy of managing occlusions at home and a focus on patients with prior ED visits could potentially prevent a substantial proportion of OPAT-related ED visits. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals When Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus and Severe COVID-19 Converge: The Perfect Storm for Mucormycosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Teny M. John ◽  
Ceena N. Jacob ◽  
Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
The Other ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Epidemiological Factors ◽  
Uncontrolled Diabetes ◽  
Diagnostic Certainty ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Perfect Storm

Mucormycosis (MCR) has been increasingly described in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but the epidemiological factors, presentation, diagnostic certainty, and outcome of such patients are not well described. We review the published COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAMCR) cases (total 41) to identify risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes. CAMCR was typically seen in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (94%) especially the ones with poorly controlled DM (67%) and severe or critical COVID-19 (95%). Its presentation was typical of MCR seen in diabetic patients (mostly rhino-orbital and rhino-orbital-cerebral presentation). In sharp contrast to reported COVID-associated aspergillosis (CAPA) cases, nearly all CAMCR infections were proven (93%). Treating physicians should have a high suspicion for CAMCR in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and severe COVID-19 presenting with rhino-orbital or rhino-cerebral syndromes. CAMR is the convergence of two storms, one of DM and the other of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Lack of association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-2 gene variants and the occurrence of coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes mellitus

2002 ◽  
pp. 545-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Bluher ◽  
T Klemm ◽  
T Gerike ◽  
H Krankenberg ◽  
G Schuler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Haemoglobin A1c ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Reduced Risk

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence indicates that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is expressed at high levels in foam cells of atherosclerotic lesions, that PPARgamma agonists may directly modulate vessel wall function and that mutations in the PPARgamma-2 gene are associated with a reduced risk of coronary artery disease. METHODS: We investigated whether known variants in the PPARgamma-2 gene are associated with the occurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in 365 patients with type 2 diabetes, prospectively characterised for the presence or absence of CHD. The Pro115Gln, Pro12Ala, Pro467Leu, Val290Met mutations and two polymorphisms C478T and C161T of the PPARgamma-2 gene were examined using PCR, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing. RESULTS: The distribution of the Pro12Ala, Ala12Ala, C161T and T161T variants was not significantly different between patients with and without CHD, independent of the gender. The Pro12Ala (P=0.011) and the Ala12Ala (P=0.006) variant were associated with a higher body mass index (BMI) compared with the Pro12Pro genotype. A multiple logistic regression analysis introducing the typical risk factors for CHD (age, sex, hypertension, smoking, BMI >26 kg/m2, elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol and haemoglobin A1c >7%) identified age >60, male gender, hypertension and a higher BMI, but not the PPARgamma-2 variants, as significant risk factors for CHD in our study groups. CONCLUSION: The PPARgamma-2 genotype was not associated with an increased or reduced risk of the occurrence of CHD and can therefore not be regarded as an independent risk factor for CHD in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document