scholarly journals P003: Emergency department quality assurance sepsis project: why are more people dying in southwestern Ontario?

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S78
Author(s):  
A. Aguanno ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
M. Columbus
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Sepsis Diagnosis ◽  
Mortality Ratio ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Statistics Canada

Introduction: London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) includes two academic, urban hospitals in London, Canada. The hospital-standardized mortality ratio (HSMR) is consistently higher than provincial and national averages. Unpublished data reveals that sepsis contributes the largest number of statistically unexpected deaths to LHSC’s HSMR calculation. Factors contributing to in-hospital sepsis mortality are hypothesized to include demography, emergency department (ED) flow or sepsis treatment. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients aged >=18 years, presenting to an LHSC ED between 01 Nov 2014 and 31 Oct 2015, with >=2 SIRS criteria and/or ED suspicion of infection and/or ED or hospital discharge sepsis diagnosis (ICD-10 diagnostic codes A4xx and R65). Data were abstracted from electronic health records. Regional, provincial and national data was retrieved from CIHI and Statistics Canada. Results: Median age and sex in London and across Canada are similar (48.2 years vs 48.9 years; 48% male vs 49% male). Baseline prevalences of diabetes, hypertension, COPD and mood disorders were similar in the Local Health Integration Network and Ontario (6% vs 7%, 19% vs 19%, 3% vs 4%, and 10% vs 8%). Median “Physician Initial Assessment,” (PIA) times for sepsis patients at LHSC were faster than median Canadian PIA times for CTAS I and II patients (CTAS I: 7 min vs 11 min, CTAS II: 34 min vs 54 min), and slower for CTAS III-V patients (CTAS III: 98 min vs 79 min, CTAS IV: 99 min vs 66 min, CTAS V: 132 min vs 53 min). Median ED length of stay for admitted, high acuity (CTAS I-III) patients was 6 h at LHSC versus 10 h across Canada.Median [IQR] time to intravenous fluid resuscitation was 60.5 min [29.8-101.2] for septic shock patients and 77.0 min [36.0-127.0] for expired patients. Median [IQR] time to antibiotics was 130 min [73.0-229.0] for sepsis patients, 106 min [60.0-189.0] for severe sepsis patients, and 82 min [42.2-142] for septic shock patients. Conclusion: Excess sepsis-related mortality at LHSC is not convincingly related to patient demographics or ED flow. Gains may be made by improving time to antibiotics and IV fluids.

Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Filbin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Lactate Production ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Organ Failures ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Sepsis accounts for approximately one in three hospital deaths, and is associated with very high health care costs due to prolonged lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Sepsis is essentially an immunologic response to infection that is propagated systemically, leading to diffuse cellular and microcirculatory dysfunction, vasodilation, vital organ hypoperfusion, and eventual failure. This review covers the pathophysiology, stabilization/assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition and outcomes of sepsis. Figures show the inflammatory and thrombotic response to infection, the action of nitric oxide on vascular smooth muscle cells, accelerated glycolysis and increased lactate production as a result of the catecholamine surge seen in septic shock, sepsis mortality associated with number of organ failures identified in the emergency department (ED), and protocolized therapy for septic shock. Tables list definitions of sepsis syndromes; frequently cited scoring systems for mortality prediction in emergency department patients with sepsis; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; current recommendations regarding treatment bundles at 3 and 6 hours of resuscitation; antibiotic recommendations based on suspected source; and vasopressors used in septic shock with recommended dosing, mechanism of action, and indications. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 57 references. Keywords: Sepsis; Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, definitions, SEP-1 sepsis quality measure, time-to-antibiotics, volume resuscitation, lactated ringers

Sepsis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Filbin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Lactate Production ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Organ Failures ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Sepsis accounts for approximately one in three hospital deaths, and is associated with very high health care costs due to prolonged lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Sepsis is essentially an immunologic response to infection that is propagated systemically, leading to diffuse cellular and microcirculatory dysfunction, vasodilation, vital organ hypoperfusion, and eventual failure. This review covers the pathophysiology, stabilization/assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition and outcomes of sepsis. Figures show the inflammatory and thrombotic response to infection, the action of nitric oxide on vascular smooth muscle cells, accelerated glycolysis and increased lactate production as a result of the catecholamine surge seen in septic shock, sepsis mortality associated with number of organ failures identified in the emergency department (ED), and protocolized therapy for septic shock. Tables list definitions of sepsis syndromes; frequently cited scoring systems for mortality prediction in emergency department patients with sepsis; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; current recommendations regarding treatment bundles at 3 and 6 hours of resuscitation; antibiotic recommendations based on suspected source; and vasopressors used in septic shock with recommended dosing, mechanism of action, and indications. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 57 references. Keywords: Sepsis; Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, definitions, SEP-1 sepsis quality measure, time-to-antibiotics, volume resuscitation, lactated ringers  

scholarly journals P003: Door-to-antibiotics and mortality for emergency department patients presenting with septic shock

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S64
Author(s):  
A. Aguanno ◽  
K. Van Aarsen ◽  
S. Pearce ◽  
T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Serum Lactate ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Clinical Equipoise ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: We examined our local sepsis patient population, and specifically our most vulnerable patients - those presenting to the emergency department (ED) in septic shock - for variables predictive of survival to hospital discharge. We applied the familiar ED paradigm of, “Door to,” to calculate the impact of time to antibiotics against patient survival to hospital discharge. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients aged > = 18 years, presenting to tertiary care ED between 01 Nov 2014 and 31 Oct 2015. Patients determined to have sepsis if A) > = 2 SIRS criteria and ED suspicion of infection (ED acquisition of blood/urine cultures or antibiotic administration) and/or B) received ED or Hospital discharge diagnosis of sepsis (ICD-10 diagnostic codes A4xx and R65). Patients sub-classified with septic shock if A) triage SBP < = 90mmHg, B) triage MAP < = 65mmHg or C) serum lactate > = 4mmol/L. “Door Time” was defined as the earliest time recorded for the patient encounter, either the time the patient registered in the Emergency Department, or the triage time. A generalized linear model was performed with a binomial distribution using survival to discharge as the response variable. Age, sex, ED arrival method, time to antibiotics, ED serum lactate and ED serum glucose level were the predictor variables. Results: 13506 patient encounters met inclusion criteria (10980 unique patients). Linear regression of time to antibiotics against survival to hospital discharge failed to achieve statistical significance. Linear regression of the secondary outcome variables achieved statistical significance for age and serum lactate level. Per the model, as age increased by 1 year, the odds of dying prior to hospital discharge increased by 3.8% and as serum lactate increased by 1 mmol/L, odds of dying prior to hospital discharge increased by 11.1%. Conclusion: We found no association between time to antibiotic treatment and mortality. Causal relationships require randomized controlled trials, and this analysis contributes to clinical equipoise.

Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Filbin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Lactate Production ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Organ Failures ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Sepsis accounts for approximately one in three hospital deaths, and is associated with very high health care costs due to prolonged lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Sepsis is essentially an immunologic response to infection that is propagated systemically, leading to diffuse cellular and microcirculatory dysfunction, vasodilation, vital organ hypoperfusion, and eventual failure. This review covers the pathophysiology, stabilization/assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition and outcomes of sepsis. Figures show the inflammatory and thrombotic response to infection, the action of nitric oxide on vascular smooth muscle cells, accelerated glycolysis and increased lactate production as a result of the catecholamine surge seen in septic shock, sepsis mortality associated with number of organ failures identified in the emergency department (ED), and protocolized therapy for septic shock. Tables list definitions of sepsis syndromes; frequently cited scoring systems for mortality prediction in emergency department patients with sepsis; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; current recommendations regarding treatment bundles at 3 and 6 hours of resuscitation; antibiotic recommendations based on suspected source; and vasopressors used in septic shock with recommended dosing, mechanism of action, and indications. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 57 references. Keywords: Sepsis; Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, definitions, SEP-1 sepsis quality measure, time-to-antibiotics, volume resuscitation, lactated ringers

scholarly journals LO93: Implementation of sepsis order sets to decrease the time to antibiotics in the emergency department: a quality improvement initiative

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S41-S42
Author(s):  
K. Akilan ◽  
V. Teo ◽  
D. Hefferon ◽  
A. Verma
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Chart Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Sepsis Management ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Order Set

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome, and delays to appropriate antibiotic therapy increases mortality. Order sets have shown decrease in time to antibiotics in pneumonia, and in sepsis, the implementation of order sets resulted in more intravenous fluids, appropriate initial antibiotics and lower mortality. Aim Statement: The goal was to create an order set for an approach to septic patients, to improve sepsis management. We sought to improve time from triage to first antibiotics, by 15 minutes, for Emergency Department (ED) patients with sepsis in three months after implementation compared to three months before. Measures & Design: We used a literature review, as well as comparison to existing order sets at other EDs to design our initial order set. We underwent multiple revisions based on stakeholder feedback. We educated physician and nursing teams about the order sets, although use was ultimately at physician discretion. We implemented the order set on April 9, 2017. After three months, an electronic retrospective chart review identified patients with a final sepsis diagnosis admitted to the critical care unit. For each patient, we captured triage time using the electronic record, and time to antibiotics from when the antibiotic was taken out of the medication cart. Finally, utilization of order sets was checked via manual chart audit. Evaluation/Results: A run chart did not demonstrate any shifts or trends suggesting a change after implementation. Median time to antibiotics in minutes, 3 months prior (n = 45) and post (n = 55) intervention, increased from 245 to 340 minutes, although the range was very large. Chart audits demonstrated clinicians were not using the order sets. There was 10% usage for 2 of the months and 0% usage the other month, post-intervention. Disucssion/Impact: There was insufficient uptake of the Sepsis Order Set by the Sunnybrook ED to result in any impact on time to antibiotics. Order sets require more than just implementation to be effective. Difficulties in implementation were due to the document not being readily available to physicians. To mediate, we have organized nursing staff to attach the order set onto charts based on triage assessment and will re-assess with another PDSA cycle after this intervention.

Association of septic shock definitions and standardized mortality ratio in a contemporary cohort of critically ill patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Kashyap ◽  
Tarun D. Singh ◽  
Hamza Rayes ◽  
John C. O'Horo ◽  
Gregory Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Mortality Ratio

Development of a Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio for Emergency Department Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-524.e26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Berthelot ◽  
Eddy S. Lang ◽  
Hude Quan ◽  
Henry T. Stelfox
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Mortality Ratio

Sepsis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Filbin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Lactate Production ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Organ Failures ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Time To Antibiotics ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Sepsis accounts for approximately one in three hospital deaths, and is associated with very high health care costs due to prolonged lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Sepsis is essentially an immunologic response to infection that is propagated systemically, leading to diffuse cellular and microcirculatory dysfunction, vasodilation, vital organ hypoperfusion, and eventual failure. This review covers the pathophysiology, stabilization/assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition and outcomes of sepsis. Figures show the inflammatory and thrombotic response to infection, the action of nitric oxide on vascular smooth muscle cells, accelerated glycolysis and increased lactate production as a result of the catecholamine surge seen in septic shock, sepsis mortality associated with number of organ failures identified in the emergency department (ED), and protocolized therapy for septic shock. Tables list definitions of sepsis syndromes; frequently cited scoring systems for mortality prediction in emergency department patients with sepsis; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; current recommendations regarding treatment bundles at 3 and 6 hours of resuscitation; antibiotic recommendations based on suspected source; and vasopressors used in septic shock with recommended dosing, mechanism of action, and indications. This review contains 5 figures, 7 tables, and 57 references. Keywords: Sepsis; Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, definitions, SEP-1 sepsis quality measure, time-to-antibiotics, volume resuscitation, lactated ringers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document