scholarly journals LO69: Evaluating the impact of night shifts on emergency medicine resident competence in simulated resuscitations

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S51-S52
Author(s):  
S. Edgerley ◽  
C. McKaigney ◽  
D. Boyne ◽  
D. Dagnone ◽  
A.K. Hall

Introduction: Sleep deprivation negatively affects cognitive and behavioural performance. Emergency Medicine (EM) residents commonly work night shifts and are then expected to perform with competence. This study examines the impact of night shifts on EM resident performance in simulated resuscitation scenarios. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed at a single Canadian academic centre where residents participate in twice-annual simulation-based resuscitation objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). OSCE scores for all EM residents between 2010-2016 were collected, as well as post-graduate year (PGY1-5), gender, and shift schedules. OSCEs were scored using the Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT) evaluating four domains: primary assessment, diagnostic actions, therapeutic actions and communication, and an overall global assessment score (GAS). A night shift was defined as a late evening (beyond 23:00) or overnight shift within the three days before an OSCE. A mixed effects linear regression model was used to model the association between night shifts and OSCE scores while adjusting for gender and PGY. Results: A total of 136 OSCE scores were collected from 56 residents. PGY-5 residents had 37.1% (31.3 to 34.0%; p<0.01) higher OSCE scores than those in PGY-1 with an average increase of 8.8% (7.5 to 10.1%; p<0.01) per year. Working one or more night shifts in the three days before an OSCE reduced the total and communication scores by an average of 3.8% (p=0.04) and 4.5% (p=0.04) respectively. We observed a significant gender difference in the effects of acute shift work (p=0.03). Working a night shift one night prior to an OSCE was not associated with total score among male residents (p=0.33) but was associated with a 6.1% (-11.9 to -0.2; p=0.04) decrease in total score among female residents. This difference was consistent across PGY and was primarily due to an 8.5% (-15.5 to -1.6%; p=0.02) decrease in communication scores and a 6.7% (-13.1 to -0.3%; p=0.04) reduction in GAS. Conclusion: Proximity to night shifts significantly impaired the performance of EM trainees in simulated resuscitation scenarios, particularly in the domain of communication. For female residents, the magnitude of difference in total scores after working such shifts one night prior to a resuscitation OSCE was approximately equal to the difference seen between residents one year apart in training.

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Stern ◽  
Hyungjin Myra Kim ◽  
Kathleen Neacy ◽  
Steven C. Dronen ◽  
Michelle Mertz

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 576-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dowin Boatright ◽  
Java Tunson ◽  
Emily Caruso ◽  
Christy Angerhofer ◽  
Brooke Baker ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Edgerley ◽  
Conor McKaigney ◽  
Devon Boyne ◽  
Darrell Ginsberg ◽  
J. Damon Dagnone ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (03) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Koch Hall ◽  
William Pickett ◽  
Jeffrey Damon Dagnone

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to develop and validate a three-station simulation-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) tool to assess emergency medicine resident competency in resuscitation scenarios. Methods: An expert panel of emergency physicians developed three scenarios for use with high-fidelity mannequins. For each scenario, a corresponding assessment tool was developed with an essential actions (EA) checklist and a global assessment score (GAS). The scenarios were (1) unstable ventricular tachycardia, (2) respiratory failure, and (3) ST elevation myocardial infarction. Emergency medicine residents were videotaped completing the OSCE, and three clinician experts independently evaluated the videotapes using the assessment tool. Results: Twenty-one residents completed the OSCE (nine residents in the College of Family Physicians of Canada– Emergency Medicine [CCFP-EM] program, six junior residents in the Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada–Emergency Medicine [FRCP-EM] program, six senior residents in the FRCP-EM). Interrater reliability for the EA scores was good but varied between scenarios (Spearman rho 5 [1] 0.68, [2] 0.81, [3] 0.41). Interrater reliability for the GAS was also good, with less variability (rho 5 [1] 0.64, [2] 0.56, [3] 0.62). When comparing GAS scores, senior FRCP residents outperformed CCFP-EM residents in all scenarios and junior residents in two of three scenarios (p , 0.001 to 0.01). Based on EA scores, senior FRCP residents outperformed CCFP-EM residents, but junior residents outperformed senior FRCP residents in scenario 1 and CCFPEM residents in all scenarios (p 5 0.006 to 0.04). Conclusions: This study outlines the creation of a high-fidelity simulation assessment tool for trainees in emergency medicine. A single-point GAS demonstrated stronger relational validity and more consistent reliability in comparison with an EA checklist. This preliminary work will provide a foundation for ongoing future development of simulationbased assessment tools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Bennett ◽  
David A. McDonald ◽  
Shelley Hurwitz ◽  
Hui Zheng ◽  
Eric Nadel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document