scholarly journals LO044: Stress-testing the resuscitation room: latent threats to patient safety identified during interprofessional in-situ simulation in the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S45-S45
Author(s):  
G. Mastoras ◽  
C. Poulin ◽  
L. Norman ◽  
B. Weitzman ◽  
A. Pozgay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Training Tool

Introduction: Emergency Department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high-stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend upon effective interactions between the healthcare team, the patient, and the environment. To this end, resuscitation teams work in spaces designed to optimize workflows and ensure that necessary treatments and skillsets are available when required. However, systematic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, exposing patients to opportunities for harm. As part of a new interprofessional education initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent threats to patient safety (LST’s) identified during the delivery of in-situ, simulated resuscitations in two Canadian, tertiary care, academic Emergency Departments. Methods: In-situ simulation sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs of each hospital campus, during which a variety of simulated resuscitation scenarios were run with distinct teams of ED healthcare professionals. A research assistant was present throughout each session and documented LST’s identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing. Data were entered into a master table and grouped thematically for analysis. Results: After a pilot run-in, 10 in-situ simulation sessions were delivered, involving 27 cases and reaching 180 ED healthcare professionals (25 attending MD, 37 resident MD, 59 RN, 24 RT). 83 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean 3.1 LSTs per case) of which 52 were determined to be “actionable”. Corrective mechanisms have been initiated in 72% of these cases (e.g., new education campaigns and in-servicing, equipment provisioning, equipment checklists). Conclusion: In-situ simulation, beyond its role as a training tool for developing Non-Technical and Crisis Resource Management skills, can be effectively used to identify systematic deficits and knowledge gaps that could expose critically ill patients to harm. Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care.

scholarly journals A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit’s Experience with Implementing an In-Situ Simulation and Debriefing Patient Safety Program in the Setting of a Quality Improvement Collaborative

Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
Mary Eckels ◽  
Terry Zeilinger ◽  
Henry C. Lee ◽  
Janine Bergin ◽  
Louis P. Halamek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Implementation Phase

Extensive neonatal resuscitation is a high acuity, low-frequency event accounting for approximately 1% of births. Neonatal resuscitation requires an interprofessional healthcare team to communicate and carry out tasks efficiently and effectively in a high adrenaline state. Implementing a neonatal patient safety simulation and debriefing program can help teams improve the behavioral, cognitive, and technical skills necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. In Simulating Success, a 15-month quality improvement (QI) project, the Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE) and California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) provided outreach and training on neonatal simulation and debriefing fundamentals to individual teams, including community hospital settings, and assisted in implementing a sustainable program at each site. The primary Aim was to conduct two simulations a month, with a goal of 80% neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) staff participation in two simulations during the implementation phase. While the primary Aim was not achieved, in-situ simulations led to the identification of latent safety threats and improvement in system processes. This paper describes one unit’s QI collaborative experience implementing an in-situ neonatal simulation and debriefing program.

scholarly journals LO095: Developing and implementing an interprofessional in-situ simulation program in an academic, tertiary-care emergency department: barriers, successes and the Ottawa Hospital experience

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
C. Poulin ◽  
B. Weitzman ◽  
G. Mastoras ◽  
L. Norman ◽  
A. Pozgay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Simulation Program ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Simulation Center ◽  
The Impact

Introduction / Innovation Concept: During Emergency Department (ED) resuscitation of critically ill patients, effective teamwork and communication among various healthcare professionals is essential to ensure favorable patient outcomes and to minimize threats to patient safety. However, numerous individual and system factors create barriers to effective team functioning. Simulation center- based training has been used to improve Crisis Resource Management skills among physician and nursing trainees, but in-situ simulation is a relatively new concept in adult Emergency Medicine in North America. Methods: To enhance patient care and team effectiveness, an ED nursing and physician group was created to develop and implement a novel interprofessional in-situ simulation program in two Canadian, academic tertiary-care emergency departments. Departmental approval and financial support was obtained and sessions commenced in January 2015. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: Monthly high-fidelity simulation sessions are held in the ED resuscitation rooms at both campuses of our hospital. Each session is facilitated and debriefed by simulation-trained Emergency Medicine faculty and senior residents, a nurse educator and a research assistant. Technical support is provided by our simulation center staff. Participants are recruited from the physicians, residents, nurses, respiratory therapists and other support staff working in the ED. To minimize the impact on patient care, two additional nurses are scheduled to cover nursing assignments on “sim days”. Simulations are limited to fifteen minutes, followed by a twenty minute debriefing. Conclusion: We have successfully developed and implemented an interprofessional in-situ simulation program in our ED. Participant feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. Lack of financial support, reluctance of staff to participate, and overwhelmed resources are some of the challenges to running a program like this in a busy ED environment. However, there are clear benefits: empowering team members, culture change, identification of latent safety threats, and a perception of improved teamwork and communication.

scholarly journals LO81: The use of in situ simulation to improve emergency department staff comfort with the management of high acuity, low occurrence cases

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S36-S37 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bilic ◽  
K. Hassall ◽  
M. Hastings ◽  
C. Fraser ◽  
G. Rutledge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Simulation Design ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
High Acuity ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Introduction: In the emergency department (ED), high-acuity presentations encountered at low frequencies are associated with reduced staff comfort. Previous studies have shown that simulation can improve provider confidence with practical skills and management of presentations in various fields of medicine. The present study examined the effect of in situ simulation on interprofessional provider comfort with the identification and management of high-acuity low-frequency events in the ED. It further assessed the feasibility of implementing weekly simulation as an interprofessional education initiative in a high-volume ED. Methods: This was a retrospective pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design. Weekly in situ simulation events were facilitated by an interdisciplinary team in a high-volume ED in Hamilton, Ontario that sees an average of 185 patients per day. To date, 34 simulation events were held between January 18, 2019 and November 22, 2019, and included neonatal, paediatric and obstetric emergencies, and adult codes. There was an average of 20 patients presenting to the ED during these events. Events included a debrief, and typically lasted 60 minutes in total. Participants included individuals from various disciplines working on shift at the time of the event. Questionnaires were administered via email following the event, in which participants were asked to rank their comfort with emergency codes before and after the simulation using two 5-point Likert scales. The data from 39 questionnaires was analyzed. T-tests were used to analyze differences in self-reported comfort scores. Results: Questionnaire responders included nurses (41%), respiratory therapists (26%), resident physicians (10%), paramedics (3%), attending physicians (3%), students of various disciplines (10%) and other (7%). 38% of participants reported increases in comfort following simulation when compared to prior. Using the 5-point scale, the average reported score for comfort pre-simulation was 3.59 (95% CI 3.30–3.88), and the average post-simulation score was 3.97 (95% CI 3.76–4.19, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that weekly interprofessional in situ simulation is feasible in a high-volume ED, and significantly improves self-reported provider comfort with the identification and management of high-acuity, low-frequency events. This warrants the implementation of this simulation design to improve staff confidence and has implications for its potential role in improving team dynamics and patient safety.

scholarly journals In situ simulation in a time of pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-98
Author(s):  
Shin Ying Thng ◽  
Bao Yu Geraldine Leong ◽  
Guat Keng Yvonne Goh ◽  
Ching Ching Elaine Tan ◽  
Jimmy Kock Keng Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Risk Environment ◽  
Work Processes ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Resuscitation Room ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Set Up

Introduction: Singapore was one of the earliest countries affected by the COVID-19 outbreak, requiring our emergency department to respond urgently to this surge. A designated Fever Area (FA) with a resuscitation room was rapidly set up to manage patients at risk of COVID-19. Our paper describes measures put into this new area to optimise safety outcomes of these patients. Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles incorporating in-situ simulation in the FA resuscitation room were conducted. Using varied resuscitation scenarios and facilitated debriefing, we identified safety gaps and took immediate steps to rectify them in a collaborative manner involving various respective stakeholders. Results: Following reflective debriefing and studying of work processes, latent safety threats were identified resulting in successful improvements and modifications to protocols, equipment, staffing and processes in the FA resuscitation area. Conclusion: PDSA cycles involving in-situ simulation helped to identify safety threats and refine work processes in a newly set up FA facility. As a result, our healthcare team was more prepared to manage the complexities of COVID-19 patients in a high-risk environment.

scholarly journals Integration of In Situ Simulation Into an Emergency Department Code Orange Exercise in a Tertiary Care Trauma Referral Center

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harrison Carmichael ◽  
George Mastoras ◽  
Caroline Nolan ◽  
Hung Tan ◽  
Jeffrey Tochkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Referral Center

scholarly journals IMPROVING SYSTEM READINESS, STAFF PREPAREDNESS AND PATIENT SAFETY IN A NEW SINGLE FAMILY ROOM NICU THROUGH IN SITU SIMULATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e16-e16
Author(s):  
Ahmed Moussa ◽  
Audrey Larone-Juneau ◽  
Laura Fazilleau ◽  
Marie-Eve Rochon ◽  
Justine Giroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Single Family ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
System Readiness ◽  
Dependent Samples

Abstract BACKGROUND Transitions to new healthcare environments can negatively impact patient care and threaten patient safety. Immersive in situ simulation conducted in newly constructed single family room (SFR) Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) prior to occupancy, has been shown to be effective in testing new environments and identifying latent safety threats (LSTs). These simulations overlay human factors to identify LSTs as new and existing process and systems are implemented in the new environment OBJECTIVES We aimed to demonstrate that large-scale, immersive, in situ simulation prior to the transition to a new SFR NICU improves: 1) systems readiness, 2) staff preparedness, 3) patient safety, 4) staff comfort with simulation, and 5) staff attitude towards culture change. DESIGN/METHODS Multidisciplinary teams of neonatal healthcare providers (HCP) and parents of former NICU patients participated in large-scale, immersive in-situ simulations conducted in the new NICU prior to occupancy. One eighth of the NICU was outfitted with equipment and mannequins and staff performed in their native roles. Multidisciplinary debriefings, which included parents, were conducted immediately after simulations to identify LSTs. Through an iterative process issues were resolved and additional simulations conducted. Debriefings were documented and debriefing transcripts transcribed and LSTs classified using qualitative methods. To assess systems readiness and staff preparedness for transition into the new NICU, HCPs completed surveys prior to transition, post-simulation and post-transition. Systems readiness and staff preparedness were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Average survey responses were analyzed using dependent samples t-tests and repeated measures ANOVAs. RESULTS One hundred eight HCPs and 24 parents participated in six half-day simulation sessions. A total of 75 LSTs were identified and were categorized into eight themes: 1) work organization, 2) orientation and parent wayfinding, 3) communication devices/systems, 4) nursing and resuscitation equipment, 5) ergonomics, 6) parent comfort; 7) work processes, and 8) interdepartmental interactions. Prior to the transition to the new NICU, 76% of the LSTs were resolved. Survey response rate was 31%, 16%, 7% for baseline, post-simulation and post-move surveys, respectively. System readiness at baseline was 1.3/5,. Post-simulation systems readiness was 3.5/5 (p = 0.0001) and post-transition was 3.9/5 (p = 0.02). Staff preparedness at baseline was 1.4/5. Staff preparedness post-simulation was 3.3/5 (p = 0.006) and post-transition was 3.9/5 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Large-scale, immersive in situ simulation is a feasible and effective methodology for identifying LSTs, improving systems readiness and staff preparedness in a new SFR NICU prior to occupancy. However, to optimize patient safety, identified LSTs must be mitigated prior to occupancy. Coordinating large-scale simulations is worth the time and cost investment necessary to optimize systems and ensure patient safety prior to transition to a new SFR NICU.

scholarly journals Patient safety culture improves during an in situ simulation intervention: a repeated cross-sectional intervention study at two hospital sites

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e001183
Author(s):  
Anders Schram ◽  
Charlotte Paltved ◽  
Karl Bang Christensen ◽  
Gunhild Kjaergaard-Andersen ◽  
Hanne Irene Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
In Situ Simulation ◽  
Culture Dimensions ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Safety Attitude

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate staff’s perceptions of patient safety culture (PSC) in two Danish hospitals before and after an in situ simulation intervention.DesignA repeated cross-sectional intervention study.SettingTwo Danish hospitals. Hospital 1 performs emergency functions, whereas hospital 2 performs elective functions.ParticipantsA total of 967 healthcare professionals were invited to participate in this study. 516 were employed in hospital 1 and 451 in hospital 2. Of these, 39 were trained as simulation instructors.InterventionA 4-day simulation instructor course was applied. Emphasis was put on team training, communication and leadership. After the course, instructors performed simulation in the hospital environment. No systematic simulation was performed prior to the intervention.Main outcome measuresThe Safety Attitude Questionnaire investigating PSC was applied prior to the intervention and again 4 and 8 weeks after intervention. The proportion of participants with a positive attitude and mean scale scores were measured as main outcomes.ResultsThe response rate varied from 63.6% to 72.0% across surveys and hospitals. Baseline scores were generally lower for hospital 1. The proportion of staff with positive attitudes in hospital 1 improved by ≥5% in five of six safety culture dimensions, whereas only two dimensions improved by ≥5% in hospital 2. The mean scale scores improved significantly in five of six safety culture dimensions in hospital 1, while only one dimension improved significantly in hospital 2.ConclusionsSafety attitude outcomes indicate an improvement in PSC from before to after the in situ simulation intervention period. However, it is possible that an effect is more profound in an acute care hospital versus an elective setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document